The Second Amendment guaranteed us the right to own one of these

Thus, we should not only own Salt Riffles, but a full well regulated battleship with missile defense, Cruise missiles, and so on.
Discuss.

Other urls found in this thread:

raptoraviation.com/aircraft spec pages/Mig29.html
yachtworld.com/boats/1943/Coast-Guard-Cutter---Ex,-Steel-Hull-2871948/Anacortes/WA/United-States#.WodsG-aIbO8
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

Course you can by them, good luck getting the money. The rich people who could afford them don't want them

There is literally nothing stopping from owning a battleship you other than your own poverty.

BB-7 USS Illinois was handed over to the new York militia in the 20's so its happened before

it does, go buy one faggot, oh wait you're poor

Buy one no one is stopping you

>be a liberal
>be a member of the "you cant own a battleship" party

loser

Would you be able to buy a fully-armed F35 if you had the money? Theoretically?

not an f 35 unless you convince a government to buy one for you but you can buy a mig 29 here

raptoraviation.com/aircraft spec pages/Mig29.html

Thumbnail and first few words of post made me think you were talking about slaves

Pretty neat! How is the law regarding the weaponry? I assume the cannon is fully automatic and therefor illegal?

How about guided missiles?

if you can afford it and maintain it and pay for the licensing then yes. Same with nukes. You have to pay the dues, and be able to store it in accordance with the law, but you could own a nuclear bomb.

Gun control limitations are based on the interstate commerce clause.

those DK books were litty

>The First Amendment guaranteed us the right to own one of these.

>Thus, we should not only own wooden screw printing presses, but a fully operational national news organization with Internet presence, paid pundits, and so on.

>Discuss.

INB4
>DURRRR IT MENTIONS ARMS IN THE WRITING

Well dummy, it's 1) not specifying any weapon and, more importantly, 2) it's a figure of speech known as metonymy, meant to represent the right to be armed. It's the same with the mentioning of "the press" since that signifies not only acts of journalism but the literal operation of the mechanism itself.

Thanks for trying!

if you had the money for the licensees paperwork and weaponry then yes

Why don't billionaires have private air forces? I would have.

36 gun broadside into a school

the price for the equipment and upkeep of it is VERY expensive and if you needed protection you could request military escort for a fraction of the cost of owning a private air force

what's to discuss?
I agree, we should.

>go buy one faggot, oh wait you're poor
That's a pretty steep standard you're applying.
>can't afford a trillion dollar ship?
>lolpoorfag

>tfw can't own a battleship

Kind of a bargain too. I mean, I'm barely mid lower class on a good day, but 5m is not impossible for say the ceo of a mid size organization. Trump could literally fund an air wing.

All expense and no profit.

Especially when you can never use it without being called a war criminal.

You're argument has already been squashed by the Supreme Court. Either start talking about a change to the constitution or STFU already. Get real, the gun nuts won the argument because people like us were too busy arguing over who was offended more by words to be bothered about gun control in-between mass shootings.

Is there such a thing as a private air contractor? Like an Air Blackwater?

Yes you can own one But cost is a factor. as up keep of a warship is costly. That is why Merchants had armed ships A. because they wanted security and B because they could afford them.

Their is many armed small vessels owned by people in USA

Well regulated militia does not mean standing military...

Hey I remember this book from my elementary school library

There were many private citizens who not only owned full sail ships but also cannons and mortars. Look up Privateers they were commissioned pirates given the right to conduct war on behalf of their nations. Those vessels had to be armed and ready before they could get their letter of marque.

Maritime law still allows privately owned ships to be armed and carry arms.

You can regularly find coast guard cutters for sale on the gsa auctions

actually yes there is Starfighters inc deals in government and private contract work simulating enemy aircraft in mock air battles and testing missile defense systems

That illustration looks so contrived. Holy fuck.

IS the American police-force Badge supposed to resemble the arc of Noah?

The second amendment gives you the right to call i a foreign army and use it to further your goals.
Viva la Mexico.

I unironically believe I should be allowed to set up SAM sites in my back yard.

Flying
Power
Armor
you know that's all we need

There is a Coast Guard cutter for sale here in my town. Anybody want it?

How much?

Your right to own one isn't being infringed. The U.S pays just as much for these things and they're willing to sell them at a discount, but a discount on a multi million dollar piece of hardware is still a steep price

Only $250K. We'd have to paint it Pepe green desu.
yachtworld.com/boats/1943/Coast-Guard-Cutter---Ex,-Steel-Hull-2871948/Anacortes/WA/United-States#.WodsG-aIbO8

Look, I'm just saying that I don't want to be labeled a "poorfag", just because I can't afford a multi-billion dollar fucking ship.
That's unfair.

i want a rocket launcher on the front of mah truck for people that won't get out of the passing lane

Professional OPFOR pilot sounds like a nice job.

that is a very large ship for the price

...

2nd amendment allows any private person to own even intercontinental ballistic missiles...

it's just that since technology advanced you are ruled by people who don't want you to have even a fucking handgun

So are the fuel and maintenance costs. I haven't been down to look but it's been there awhile so I'm sure the bottom is covered with barnacles, would need haulout and new bottom paint right off the bat. Otherwise it's make a great Sup Forums floating clubhouse kek.