Hand them up

Hand them up

Other urls found in this thread:

truthrevolt.org/commentary/2nd-amendment-it-muskets-only
foreignpolicy.com/2012/02/06/why-does-ruth-bader-ginsburg-like-the-south-african-constitution-so-much/
politifact.com/georgia/statements/2012/feb/28/rick-santorum/santorum-supreme-court-justice-prefers-south-afric/
thehill.com/blogs/floor-action/senate/198343-sanders-offers-constitutional-amendment-to-strip-corporations-of-first-amendment-rights
youtube.com/watch?v=GPC7KiYDshw
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

But technology at the time had progressed past single-shot muskets.

Didn’t they allow some autist to arm his boat with cannons (basically nukes at the time)

>I don't like it, so you don't need it
Get shot fucking waste of flesh and bones

SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED

just drop your little toys at the next PD sweetheart, let's be civilized for once

Just like your toy just dropped out of your ass?

What parts of » shall not be infringed« do you libtards don't understand?
It amazes me every fucking time.

It's still legal to own cannons. They just have to have been made before 1865

dont worry, musket wounds are totally harmless, they wont rip your flesh off your bones

>muh logical fallacy
get shrekt

You're replying to shoddy bait

Once again: the left can't meme.

The founding fathers let citizens have cannons & fully automatic guns. These libs don't know what they're talking about, I genuinely wish they would try to take our guns just so we have an excuse to overthrow the government

why are you hillbillies so attached to an old piece of paper written by dead white men?

muskets are really harmless

They had rapid fire rifles back then, they bought them for Lewis and clark

Why didn't the Founding Fathers add a clause that said "and if the guns fire too fast, then the populace shall give up their weapons and allow the government to hold all firearms?" Oh yeah, because that negates the entire point of the 2nd Amendment...

Do NOT let liberals erase the reasoning behind the 2nd Amendment!

the left can't meme for shit holy fuck

SHALL

not only does the 2nd amendment grant us the right to own firearms and bear them, it also grants us the right to form militias, aka our own armies

funny how people forget that part too

This is a good bait image now since kinder eggs are no longer banned.

a 2cm big steel ball on 300m/s is very harmless

y are u changing the topic

Actually it was referring to state-maintained militias, as directly precedent and referenced within the same document.
You can still make your own militias, but it's protected under the 1st amendment rather than the 2nd. Your error is a common one and should be pointed out.

Take constitutional law.

You can edit any amendment you want. By passing a new amendment which requires a national vote.

Of course that's not what you want, you want to change the law to take away the people's right to self defense and capacity for armed rebellion against the state without the consent of the people.

You'd think if you went to the trouble of drawing a cartoon about the constitution you would have at least a passing familiarity with it.

Apparently not.

Still waiting for the edit..

>Shoot socialist's on sight.

I saw kinder eggs at kwik trip so it must be the child's lack of trigger discipline that's banned

After we're done with the ban the guns meme where are we having the butt sex and lipstick party?

On a side note, you could legally own a ship with dozens of cannons capable of bombarding a city from miles away when the constitution was written.

Not a single anti-gun retard today could argue that the Founding Fathers would be fine with allowing the government to have more and/or better weapons than the American people.

Bullets are made of lead.

Afghanistan and Vietnam have also proved how effective that is at defending a nation from the most powerful military in earth.

It’s also one of the reasons the nazis didn’t invade Switzerland in WW2.

So what are you getting at?

Better to get hit by a 5.56 projectile that will fragment inside the human body than to get struck down by a ball that is half an inch in diameter?

>Shall not be infringed

George Washington put it best in his summary of the Second Amendment - a free people are morally obligated to secure sufficient arms, ammunition, and achieve sufficient proficiency with both to be able to defend themselves and their country from any threat - even their own government.

>shell fragment
>musket ball
pick 1

Whatever
Say goodbye to the Feds legal authority to exist then

No they're made of wood

Liberals crow on and on about the constitution is a living document except in the case of the 2nd amendment

lol, its okay, on a musket hit me
6rpm shrapnel thrower is totally harmless

That's from a shell. No way a musket ball can make that big of a wound.

truthrevolt.org/commentary/2nd-amendment-it-muskets-only

Eat some fucking shit, you fucking stupid bitch.

fucking this


my fucking hero

>overthrow the government blah blah blah
Implying this could ever successfully occur is delusional

living document just means it says whatever we feel it should say to suit our agenda
This is perfectly inline with their views on the second amendment

As a Bong who is neither pro nor anti-gun, the 2nd amendment is a tad outdated, for the mere fact that back in the 18th century, if you had a musket you were on an equal playing field with an enemy soldier. Nowadays, whilst you are wanking off with your Glock, the government will have some fat fuck sat in Nevada piloting a drone heading to your house.
Legalise tanks now.

>m-muh memes!

Drump supports can't stop being immature incels even when we're dealing with children being slaughtered.Sad!

Nice job not even addressing his point, shill.

Even a minor uprising would cause cause the economy and the government's tax base to collapse
This is exactly why they are so obsessed with disarming the public

This is what honestly pisses me off the most about liberals.
They never attempt to change laws.

All they do is whinge and bitch and moan and argue semantics and fight in courtrooms to get their way.
While on occasion getting someone into a position of executive power who simply just does as they please.

This thing existed at the time of constitution write up.

Explain

I like it
what do you have against American industry?

naaah, the outer form is made of lead because its easier to bring molten lead into a round form
this is the iron core (pic related), and this would then also explain because the lead get ripped of the ball and all what is left is pic related, and this shit travels with a few 100m/s through your body, smashing bones and tears flesh appart

>being this retarded
tanks and bombs and aircraft are totally useless against a domestic insurgency since they are weapons of destruction.

If assholes want to rule a nation with an iron fist, they can't just destroy everything.
My grandfather, a general, had nightmares of people revolting over shit.

You're a faggot who is full of shit.

Yeah those drones and regular army units are totally what gave us complete victory in Afganistan and Iraq. Guess I might as well throw all my rifles and armor in the trash.

Who the fuck would be fighting for the government? The largely right-wing, gun-owning military? Do you honestly believe the US military would kill its own people for wanting to overthrow a corrupt government?

I mean it did in 1776.

Are you implying motivated guerillas are powerless against a modern military?

You might want to talk to the Vietnamese or the Afghans about that one.

I love how they think the founding fathers who after rebelling against their government were in any way concerned about the safety of firearms.
Gun duels were still a fucking thing, if two parties consented it was perfectly fine to murder a man, but oh clearly they wouldn't want the American people to have scary black guns! Someone might die!

It is legal to own a tank, though.

weapons, guns, blah, blah, blah 17 students

and yet no mention of 25+ million illegals wandering around our country killing thousands of Americans

I am just stunned that people are this dense

this, they had guns that could fire 100 rounds per minute at the time of the signing

Yeah and freedom of speech only applies to words that existed in 1776.
Obviously the Founding Father's didn't forsee the internet.

The whole idea of the American constitution is that you can't trust anyone to wisely do anything, because people are self interested, or plain retarded, but mostly both.

bad choice
that's a knock gun
it's still only one shot before you reload it
it's like a shotgun but more accurate at longer range

>“I would not look to the U.S. Constitution, if I were drafting a Constitution in the year 2012. I might look at the Constitution of South Africa,” says Ginsburg, whom President Clinton nominated to the court in 1993. “That was a deliberate attempt to have a fundamental instrument of government that embraced basic human rights, had an independent judiciary. … It really is, I think, a great piece of work that was done. Much more recent than the U.S. Constitution.”

foreignpolicy.com/2012/02/06/why-does-ruth-bader-ginsburg-like-the-south-african-constitution-so-much/

And here is where polti"""""""""""""""""""""""fact""""""""""""""""""""""" says she never said that

politifact.com/georgia/statements/2012/feb/28/rick-santorum/santorum-supreme-court-justice-prefers-south-afric/

>Hand them up
invalid argument.

>"We could not foresee technology advancing!"

You need an ATF stamp for explosive shells

And ammunition*
It's legal to own and drive a tank on the streets here in the UK as well. All you need to do is cough up £20k for an era T-34

here they come, selectively revising history

snakes and vipers

That is the first time I hear about steel core musket balls, and I've been into antique firearms for quite some time.

GIVE UP YOUR WEAPONS YOU FUCKING WORKING CLASS PEASANTS!
Fuck off bougie fag

Because "dead white men" are the ones that literally fought and worked hard so they could create civilization and allow you to live comfortably and safe sweetie

They shut down boston looking for 2 retards with pressure cookers
People will not work, consume, and live in major cities if they are a war zone

Dear god this comic hurts my head. I can just see leftists going, "Yeah, yeah, huehuehue, dumb redneck conservitards."

Thanks user. I posted the photo of the gun, and will happily add this to my collection! Have a slightly newer handgun meme in return.

Civil War When?
i
v
i
l

W
a
r

W
h
e
n
?

I wish I had one of those
I'd open carry it when I'm wearing my tux

>and if people call faggots homos and hurt their feelings, do we trust congress to change the wording of the first amendment
Piss weak argument, especially given what was available in Europe at the time.

>sweetheart

larping worm detected, stop replying to it's utterances

Since the Libs are shit at arguing I'll play devil's advocate.
Only 3 Puckle guns are known to be produced and were only used on board a voyage to St Vincent. News of the weapon probably didn't even reach the Yanks.

I would be surprised if the country is still around in 30 years

>"hurr durr the founding fathers couldn't possibly have foreseen technological advances such as tv, radio, the internet, they only knew the printing press, hence the 1st amendment should be scrapped since these mediums weren't invented at the time"

How many people owned cannons with grapeshot?

...

Notice it has only one lock, still making it a one-shot weapon.

>Only 3 Puckle guns are known to be produced
The production of said firearm is irrelevant. The technology existed and was known through patents.

Kinder eggs were banned by competing chocolate manufacturers through lobying. The "protect the children" shtick was just a diversion for the public.

Now who else is trying to use "childrens safety" in an attempt to ban something...?

you can tell a filthy liberal gave her that gun, cos they clearly haven't taught her any trigger discipline. future negligent discharge created by commie filth like you, good hob

the founding fathers personally owned cannons

They would if the could

>Sanders proposes amendment to the Constitution that would limit free speech

thehill.com/blogs/floor-action/senate/198343-sanders-offers-constitutional-amendment-to-strip-corporations-of-first-amendment-rights

Another similar concept meme

...

why does every leftist comic look like it was drawn by a 4 year old with a fat pencil

>What is a false equivalency

Do you even know what a proper argument is?

This. They were the first lawmakers, They would have taken into consideration other weapons or else they would have said it only applied to muskets or rifles. Other anons have posted that it was perfectly legal to own cannons and other weapons.

The mentality at the time was that the founding fathers wanted Civilians to be as well armed as the military. Obviously we can't have civilians own Nuclear weapons, but a line was drawn somewhere along Small arms ownership.

The Institute of Military Technology has one
Here Gun Jesus talks about one.
youtube.com/watch?v=GPC7KiYDshw

>>What is a false equivalency
a reddit meme
you can call anything a false equivalency

Never heard of people casting their bullets with bits of iron inside. Pretty sure pure lead will do the same thing though.

This isn't a false equivalency at all. The argument is that technology has changed so our laws must change.

>The mentality at the time was that the founding fathers wanted Civilians to be as well armed as the military.
Civilians are to be armed because they are the government. In order to limit the government from being tyrannical, it is imperative that we remain so. It is a natural right, and it is not given by the government.