What level of false flagging is this

what level of false flagging is this
there's no way the first brits were actually 'black', is there

Other urls found in this thread:

nypost.com/2018/02/13/6000-year-old-baby-found-cradled-in-mothers-arm/
youtu.be/tRKn4sLgEFI
telegraph.co.uk/science/2017/05/22/europe-birthplace-mankind-not-africa-scientists-find/
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kennewick_Man
en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gene_redundancy
sciencemag.org/news/2017/10/new-gene-variants-reveal-evolution-human-skin-color
webmd.com/food-recipes/guide/calcium-vitamin-d-foods
youtube.com/watch?v=gMtODpAQ6tY
the-scientist.com/?articles.view/articleNo/32799/title/Half-Life-of-DNA-Revealed/
nytimes.com/2018/02/07/world/europe/uk-cheddar-man-skeleton-skin.html
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

I knew it. Turks colonized Britain before a*glo-sax*ns

Someone dig some dirt up on these guys who are making all these nigger heads and saying it's what Europeans looked like.

Ancient brits were black and circumsized also they were all females and LBGT, PAY REPARATIONS!

>Blacks looks like prehistoric cavemen
I'm okay with this. The Science is settled, after all.

Everybody was black at first you fucking idiots. Humans spread from Africa, and their skin color got lighter the further away from the equator they lived.

This is basic evolution for fucks sake.

So, you're saying niggers arent evolved?

We wuz abbos

No, they stayed in Africa so their skin color didn't change.

Also, you know this, you nazi fuck.

plenty of niggers that aren't in africa anymore their skin isn't getting any lighter

...

We own Africa. WHeres our rent money niggers?

6,000-year-old baby found cradled in mother’s arm

nypost.com/2018/02/13/6000-year-old-baby-found-cradled-in-mothers-arm/

>Primitive man looked like a nigger

NO
FUCKING
SHIT

If all primitive men looked like niggers, couldn't we just say that niggers look like primitive men? THERE'S A CONNECTION HERE.

>implying evolution is a ladder.

No form of life is 'more' evolved than any other, the same amount of natural selection is accounted to all generations if each species.

Genes that help you survive, get passed along
Genes that hinder you don't.
Genes that don't do anything, stay.
Hence the different skin colour.

...

nigga we were all black at some point

man/women that is out in the sun 24/7 look like a brown person
people are fucking retard dude

>Thinking 400 years (roughly 8-12 generations) is enough time to change an allele enough to affect the gene pool.

>he thinks different circumstances don't make animals adapt differently. Coincidentally only skin color.

We were all microbes too, irrelevant.

There's some evidence suggesting homo sapiens developed independent outside of Africa (not conclusive by any means) but the ancestor thereof came from that region, sure.

>We were all dust in Gods asshole too, irrelevant.

depends on the selective coefficient

but why would it? African-american gene frequency change from African populations is dominated by ADMIXTURE from northwest europeans, not selection

Chimps aren't black.

so tell me mr. know it all
how long does it take?
and please provide proof

>Muh kike on a stick

Chedder dude doesnt have an African skull.
They just figured by DNA he was Swarthy.
This is Israel trying to lie about Anthropology again.
No they were not black.

What happens when Aliens drop in every couple thousand years to genetically modify your race ?

Brits have always been niggers.

Why do you know what order skin color and skull shape mutated in better than geneticists?

dude, just look at the history of this shit. it's all just propaganda. it really doesn't make any difference at all.

for the longest time you all believed the out of africa. then some other science fag said no, here's my evidence. then these science fags say yep, look at this cheese man evidence.

who fucking cares.

bullshit out of africa has been btfo ten times over now with older remains discovered in europe and the discovery of a group of people native americans wiped out and replaced

youtu.be/tRKn4sLgEFI

Social3state did some digging on one of thems twatter. Its exactly what you would expect.

>Бpитaнцы
>Heгpы
Я нe yдивлeн.

Dude. I've never even heard of you. I just had to google Seychelles to know what area of the world you are.

Blacks don't have faces and hair structured like this. From what I've read the skin color was left for the artist to interpret, so obviously he had to pay homage to blacked.com somehow. This scultpure looks somewhat like a neanderthal, perhaps mixed with homo sapiens, and it's known that neanderthals and whatever they mixed with wasn't nigger.
telegraph.co.uk/science/2017/05/22/europe-birthplace-mankind-not-africa-scientists-find/

Yes it's a false flag.

The author of the paper came out and called bullshit. Also, after 10kyrs, there's but a fraction of DNA remaining to be analyzed.

Dude. I've never even heard of you. I just had to google Seychelles to know what area of the world you are.

Out of Africa theory is 100x stronger than this

look up "dna half life", then how old the Cheddar Man body is.

Ask yourself if DNA sequencing would be possible after so many years.

I always knew that all the British - it's Negroes.

>I don't know anything about biology but I will talk about it anyways

WE WUZ WALLACE

...

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kennewick_Man


We Wuz White

Does the gene provide either life saving or life threatening changes to the individual who possess it?

If not, it stays. Much like our appendix (yeah I know bad example), the muscles around our ears, and our tail bone, if the gene neither helps nor hinders an individual, it simply remains in the gene pool. Skin colour may have been a deciding factor back when Mankind did not have readily available shelter and was nomadic.

With the invention of shelter, we have largely suppressed the need to have darker skin.

Except for 4th world people.

Much like our appendix, we don't really need any particular skin colour these days (in the first world at least)

en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gene_redundancy
sciencemag.org/news/2017/10/new-gene-variants-reveal-evolution-human-skin-color

Black people literally invented white people
But I'm surprised Sup Forumstards didn't sperg harder over this honestly

So, you didn't look it up?

>being able to tell a genetic code from a facial structure.

They fuck your mother :)

See

what do?

who's white?

Dark skin creates an active hindrance to ANYONE living in cloudy, overcast, low-sun areas like England.

Namely because you need vitamin D to live, and dark skin with low light conditions means you won't make any vitamin D.

You realise that means DNA lasts for something like 6 million years right?

WE

It's stronger for good little goyim like you who don't mind believing that their DNA is literally the diary of some bored nigger that just one day decided to leave Africa. I'd like to remind you that modern African niggers are legally retarded and can't create anything of value, so the ones in the past must've been even less experienced and less intelligent. Many modern researches debunk your shitty Jewish lie that so many fuckwits are so keen on repeating and show more and more actual evidence that Eurasian and African human populations evolved independently for a very long time and that the first Europeans had more in common with Asians than by Africans.

Explain how I'm wrong then.
Explain how you can get skin color from less than 0.00006% of a someone's DNA.

Bear in mind that unlike eye color, which is the result of a single gene, skin color is controlled by over 100 known genes. It's likely closer to 500, but nobody really knows because very little research has been done to identify the specific sequence of genes involved in skin pigmentation.

But please, tell me how I'm wrong.

>The author of the paper came out and called bullshit.
Source. This'll shut fags in my social group up.

that's not surprising considering you're an amerimutt though is it

>evolution
Things that never happened

See

>Explain how you can get skin color from less than 0.00006% of a someone's DNA.
That's literally less than 1 gene. Are you sure you have any idea what you're talking about?

Ironically correct. That's mutation. Dude's an idiot.

Unless you meant evolution in general never happened, which would be a stupid thing to suggest.

Looking forward to their kid?

Or, you know just eat food
Like normal people.

webmd.com/food-recipes/guide/calcium-vitamin-d-foods

>56% white
>most of the whites are pic related

OH I DONT BLOODY KNOW OP ITS QUITE EASY TO SEE WITH SOME GOOGLY GOOGLING

That's police reports, not the census, at least troll properly.

>less than 0.00006%
Apparently your entire skin, the largest organ in your body is only a couple atoms thick.

I'll just leave it here. Searching relics of WW2 Frozen arms but warm hearts: youtube.com/watch?v=gMtODpAQ6tY

A pyccкиe мoнгoлы, дa.

the-scientist.com/?articles.view/articleNo/32799/title/Half-Life-of-DNA-Revealed/

Half life of Bone/tooth DNA in optimal conditions: 521 years

nytimes.com/2018/02/07/world/europe/uk-cheddar-man-skeleton-skin.html

Cheddar man is "aboout 10,000 years old"

This means that, at minimum, the base pairs in his DNA would have disintegrated by 50% 19 times.

So, it's actually 0.00019073486328125%
If you consider Cheddar Gorge to be "optimal conditions" for preserving a corpse.

The smug look kinda betrays that the artist had a chip on his shoulder in the first place, everything about this is too convenient to be accurate

Heт, pyccкиe - пoтoмки дpeвних Apиeв.

>jews are more educated the the average wh*te
Imagine my shock

>american
Yea, no shit

I'm sure the ancient black brittons with their advanced understanding of nutrition did just that.

OR, more likely, those with dark skin died off at a MUCH higher rate, naturally causing them to not pass on their genes and be replaced with lighter skin humans who COULD produce vitamin D without eating 2 dozen eggs a week.

Please, tell me how Cheddar Man's skin survived 10,000 years of rot in open air at Cheddar Gorge.

I'm fascinated to see how you spin this.

>People have thin skin

Sounds about right.

It's pretty hilarious that their symbol of an ancient black man is a crying effeminate figure that can only distinguished from a woman by the fact that it has a barely noticable beard.

Why is "no DNA link was found highlighted". It's saying there was no link with the earlier remains not that there was no link between him and us.

You can get reliable DNA from bone that's 10,000 years old. It degrades too quickly, one of the scientists involved in this is a Jew. Go look at the original reconstruction of Cheddar Man.

Now google : Boxgrove Man.

Yeah.

can't*

The human body has about 3 billion base pairs of DNA in their body.

After 10,000 years of optimal storage, a piece of bone might contain 5,722 base pairs that haven't disintegrated.

Bear in mind about 50% of our genetic information is shared with a banana, or rather, that it's old useless junk data that is common to all life on earth.

As far as I see it there are only 2 ways about all this. Either white skin is evolution, making white people the progression in evolution, or whites were first. It's a no win for niggers.

It has been confirmed that it was highly likely a black slave who gained freedom and mingled whit the brittish gals.

This.

>hurr let's make some orc faces and claim britons looked like this without evidence
fuck these kikes

Point to Fort Wayne, Indiana on a map without looking it up.

It is more populated and relevant than the nigger-poo islands.

If humans came out of Africa obviously we all used to be black. I don't see how what we were 10,000 years ago makes any difference to current afairs

>Bear in mind about 50% of our genetic information is shared with a banana, or rather, that it's old useless junk data that is common to all life on earth.

t. learned about DNA in 1980

Mutation is a part of evolution.

I've noticed a significant increase in honest Schlomos in recent months. Is this a reward for being good goyim in Syria?

nothing evolves without mutation

That's why I'm confused by him making the distinction.

Probably just proxies

>I don't see how what we were 10,000 years ago makes any difference to current afairs

That's because you're an ignorant bigot. Blacks have more right to this land because black people lived here first. This is so obvious it's painful.

Who gives a fuck? If you're not a nigger, you're not a nigger. Be happy that you're not and pay no mind to kike propaganda.

imagine being this much of a turbocuck