A world with free immigration could be $78 trillion richer

A world with free immigration could be $78 trillion richer

economist.com/news/world-if/21724907-yes-it-would-be-disruptive-potential-gains-are-so-vast-objectors-could-be-bribed
It's proven that
>Workers become more productive when they move from a poor country to a richer one with more efficient firms and better capital.
>It is more difficult to transfer better institutions into countries than it is to transfer people from those countries into ones with better institutions.
>Not all people from poor countries necessarily want to immigrate. Only about 13% of workers from a given country want to emigrate to the US/UK/EU given the chance.
>Open borders can actually lead to less overcrowding overall since immigrants from countries where large families are common tend to have smaller families when they immigrate, even if those families are still bigger than those of the native population
>Uses example of the US to show benefits of cultural enrichment brought by waves of immigration from around the world.
>There are solutions to prevent migrants from being a strain on resources or to prevent them from enacting huge political and cultural changes, such as preventing them from voting until x years in the country (after which they will be likely to have assimilated) and preventing them from receiving welfare benefits.

What do you think? The world would be a better place if anyone from any country was free to work in any country of their choice. Even low-skilled immigration can bring a multitude of benefits to an economy. Globalism is the future, nationalism is hindering progress.

Other urls found in this thread:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Metropolis_Project
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_grenade_attacks_in_Sweden
sorosdictatorship.com/news/world-if/21724907-yes-depopulation-asia-be-disruptive-potential-gains-are-so-vast-objectors-could-be-bribed
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

>It is more difficult to transfer better institutions into countries than it is to transfer people from those countries into ones with better institutions.
And why is it like that? A country is essentially the sum of its people. If Mexico is a country without good institutions, and the kike that wrote that article claims that it's "difficult to transfer better institutions" into it, it's because of the people themselves (or is the land that makes up Mexico cursed?). So if you move all the Mexicans into America, America will then become just as hostile to these institutions as Mexico is now.
tl;dr: This article is kikery, and everyone who pushes or believes it is retarded and should be killed.

Haha I doubled my wealth by moving my furniture around!

Richer for who? The 100 families that own like half the world already?

/thread

Do trillions matter when your nation is burning to the ground?

Late 1990s:
>Whites were a 90%+ majority until the 2000s and Canada was conservative, no LGBTQ+ bullshit
>All of a sudden, start seeing Africans, Muslims, Pakis, Chinks, etc everywhere
>Multiculturalism expands to hyper levels, every school/university/work place/govt agency starts ramming diversity down our throats
>House prices start accelerating
>Wages start decreasing
Fast Forward 2017
>Toronto 30% white
>Vancouver Syrian Refugees 24/7 on TV/news
>White people can't find work, it's all non-whites getting jobs
>Average house price is $1M+ while salaries are 50K-60K max
>Refugees driving BMW and Mercedes
>Most Universities have non-white majorities
>White down to 65-68%
>Whites will be Nobody really knows why this is happening so fast, govt always touts (((250-300k))) "reasonable" immigration a year
>But nobody has ever heard of a white person immigrating in the last 20 years
Now
>Turns out Canada is letting in 750K on permanent residency a year via various immigration schemes not publicized
>Canada lets in 1.2M a year on "temporary immigration" that's 10 year work/live visas that lead to citizenship that aren't even counted in public statistics
>Turns out secret GBA+ (Gender Based Analysis Plus) program is forced down every govt decision maker including immigration officers to discriminate against straight whites
>Turns out 97% of immigrants are poor non-whites
>Turns out there is a secret organization called the Metropolis Project that holds an annual conference of 1,000+ govt bureaucrats with the sole objective of letting in as many poor non-white migrants a year
>Turns out this organization started in 1996, around the time of the change
>Turns out Soros started and funded the Metropolis Project through his Open Societies Foundation
>govt passed M-103 anti-Islamophobia motion, setting road to criminalize any criticism of migration policy
You are here.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Metropolis_Project

I mean, it isn't insurance fraud if arson is committed by your 'friend', right?

Avg price of house in 1998 before white-genocide and open-borders went full swing
>$180k in NYC (boros)
>$170k in SF
>$150k in LA
>$120k in DC
>$140k in Sydney
>$120k in Melbourne
>$140k in Toronto
>$130k in Vancouver
>£50k in London


Avg price of house in 2004 after massive open-borders
>$800k in NYC (boros)
>$1m in SF
>$600k in LA
>$500k in DC
>$900k in Sydney
>$700k in Melbourne
>$600k in Toronto
>$1m in Vancouver
>£1m in London
-----------------------------------------
before free trade:
>domestic production of goods
>goods were affordable and of high quality
>lowest cost of living
>affordable housing (house costs only 2 times the annual salary)
>90% white

after free trade:
>homeless/opiod/suicide epidemic
>unemployment
>highest cost of living
>unaffordable housing (10-20 times the annual salary)
>plummeting life expectance
>shit quality products that kill you
>millions of illegal shitskin locusts invading and killing whites

>benefits
...And it's gone.

Will that 78 trillion be worth the paper its printed on when society collapses or hyperinflation kicks in?

I agree, but it will be much more criminal as well.

>vote for more globalism goy, our profits arent rising fast enough

>What do you think?
OP is a faggot.

>A world with free immigration would make billionaire kikes $78 trillion richer
FTFY

it becomes richer for the top 1% and poorer for everyone else in the world

1% need to be gassed

>muh shekels goyim
>open your borders so my family will be secure for life in our gated communities and bunker retreats while all of yours are ruined

>What do you think? The world would be a better place

Global elites would make more money if they could undercut all workforce by making everyone compete for scraps yes.

The rise of wages has stagnated since the 1970s, adjusted for inflation, cost of living is up. Wealth disparity is increasing, the absolute richest get monumentally richer, you can't afford a house on two salaries when your grandad did on one.

Yet they also say efficiency is up thanks to technology.

Rich cunts are advocating for no borders. Do you seriously think this benefits you? They're going against the will of their own countries. Do you seriously think they are looking out for you? The results of their policies drive a bigger wedge between them, and you, every year. You think suddenly it's going to "trickle down"?

The left and right should be united here for different reasons. Only the brainwashed spout globalist talking points.

What a shocker
Fucking infuriating that people don't get this

We should just let them implement this and then watch it fail spectacularly and then the whole world will know we were right

The world wouldn't be $78 trillion richer. The rich would be $78 trillion richer.

yea, that's a nice theory. Let me tell you how it works in the real world though--people go to where ever the can get the most free shit, and all of those principles like "family values" and "hard work" go out the window.

>preventing them from receiving welfare benefits.
but they still get a free education and school lunches (Plyler v. Doe). they still move into crime-ridden ghettos, which cost money to police.

This. They aren't even hiding it anymore

>A world with free immigration could male jews $78 trillion richer

ftfy

you'll be 78 trillion richer goy! Open borders goy!
The same six or seven families that own the world will be richer. And they'll be able to move the mindless, spiritually bankrupt drones that remain around the world.
A grey, hollow existence where oligarchs bleed us dry and nowhere is home.
I'll pass thanks, this is why materialism is a disease

Fucking toothpaste

>The low IQ scum from syria is going to make you rich
Yea, cause there is a real shortage of janitors in the world.

This. Only kikes and morons argue that displacement level migration is a good thing or would have any net benefit to the existing population. Jews believe it will benefit the 1% (half of which are jews) and are willing to gamble the rest of society on it. That's why they were expelled over a hundred times in history and must be expelled again if western societies have any will to live.

>tfw when it's the 1% that gets 78trillions richer

just stop

This.

Would benefit the oligarchs and immigrants, at the expense of native born people in wealthier countries who now have to deal with lower wages, increased crime, etc.

No thanks.

shitskins end up destroying the company and the company goes out of business. There's over 500 companies that were taken over by shitskins and ALL of them went out of business

and most jobs aren't even required anymore, industry is largely automated and most office workers do nothing but pointless presentations and phonecalls
So your job is unfullfilling compared to the future where you plowed a field and reaped the rewards of your work
Also most jobs are bullshit part time shit created by politicians so they can say 'HEY LOOK WE BROUGHT UNEMPLOYEMENT DOWN TEE HEE'

Google hires are like 80% shitskin retards 10% Really Smart White People 10% Autistic Spergs.

The indians and chinese are for the most part really retarded. They just hangout amongst themselves and are mediocre at their jobs. The indians are usually less qualified and really irritating to work with because all indians have this horrible hubris. The chinese tend to be qualified but unimaginative and don't solve the problems unless its very straight forward.

its not about quality or productivity its about race replacement
the same politics behind open borders, refugees, migrants...
the raped customer/native still foots the bill no matter

We are not talking about trade. We are talking about immigration. They are related, but not interchangeable.

>78 trillion richer
yea for who?
>workers move from third world to first world
>a fucking suit is cutting the fence
sorta makes me think

sage and kys

free trade is code word for open borders

>hyperinflation
78 trillion is what it will cost to buy a house with the flooding of locust shitskins they plan

see

No shit Sherlock. It's all part of labor arbitrage.

The world was a good place before all this "open borders" shit.

Move to africa or kill yourself

>Not all people from poor countries necessarily want to immigrate.
and the 1965 Immigration Act will not change the demographics of a 90% White nation and turn it to a shitskin brazil of 56%, right?

>>It is more difficult to transfer better institutions
WRONG. US transferred their institutions/industry/factories to China rather than transfer the chinks to the US. US did the same thing with USSR 100 years ago to create a monster.

also carbon footprint costs from all the pollution caused by billions of shitskins outweighs any of your fake statistics


the entire article is straight out of soros's ass. no proofs just more deception, globalist lies, and propaganda

>A world with free immigration could be $78 trillion richer
just the business owners, or the workers?

Lets be honest user
you don't care about or understand economics
you created this thread for one of two reasons
1, you wanted to troll pol
2, you have an egaliterian unthinking unchanging beleif in the necessity of "equality" and open borders due to kosher liberal indoctrination.
Though you probably wont read this ( or if you do understand this) here is why open borders is fundmentally a terrible thing for western countries.
Firstly Immigration creates infaltion in the housing market. As more and more people attempt to buy homes houses become worth more and more. As the demand goes up the suply is worth more.
Meanwhile as you have a greater suply of potential workers there becomes less demand for them and thusly wages remain stagnent and you get more unemployed.
The only people who really benifit from mass immigration are larg corperations who get cheeper labour and real estate invetors (including banks) whos main investment becomes more and more valuable.
The final nail the coffin of this "economic theory" is its assumption that western countries with an "open border" policy will attract "workers." As almost all western countries now have a wellfair system they are much more likely to attract non working well fair users who will do nothing but put a strain on our well fair and law enforcment departments. Those "workers" who do come here will also be extremely untrained and merely add to the never ending sea of unskillel labour that make up the majority of working class people especially in the US.
As your article itself admits the push for open borders is not based on economic need but on proceived moral duty.
A moral duty which has no basis in the will or the interest of the poeple i might add.

Not all business owners and arguably none, only large corperations and banks could possibly benefit

well, who could object to reducing wages for workers and giving all the extra to the jews?

>Muh shekels
KYS OP.

Free immigration also creates ethnic genocide of not only whites but all races involved. This is paying you to sell your soul (race).

>raises hand

why the fuck would i care about "duh world" getting richer? where is that money being centralized, fuckhead? certainly not in MY bank account.

I'm not even gonna read and I already know what it is.
>If we do this thing, then muh le markets are better, stocks, errrrm a few other bullshit margins are moved by a bullshit amount to benefit some bullshit bullshit
>All this reflects so good on the middle classes you guys, it will trickle down (((we))) promise
>We should totally do it

>economists aren't just paid propagandists
if the economist is for it, i'm automatically against it

The economy doesn't matter when you have 10 billion shitskin locusts.

the world will be richer if asian/african/mexican total population is reduced to 50 million. this frees up vast amounts of resources, wealth, and alleviates the burden caused by overpopulation thus exponentially increasing efficiency.

depopulation of shitskins is the greatest economic miracle awaiting asia/africa/mexico

abandon rent control in manhattan guise, market is totally going to provide affordable housing. abandon rent control in west la, the market is totally going to create affordable housing.

>The economy doesn't matter when you have 10 billion shitskin locusts
Sure does when you're a filthy rich cunt in an ivory tower. Sure does.

TRANSLATION
>corporations will become richer from importing cheap labour that smashes local labour costs
>except this has been proven to be bullshit (Pajeets being terrible IT employees for example) since shitskins make terrible employees
>So there must be some (((ulterior motive))) behind this sort of BS.

The only good globalist is a dead globalist

It's a boomer rag, they aren't speaking to you. The "Economy" is a boomer dog whistle term that really means "my retirement fund".

fuck off schlomo

A world with free anything would be substantially richer. Pick anything that costs money. This is lazy propaganda.

I'm with the leaf on this one

>What do you think?
I think you should kys Muhammad.

>If borders were open, how many people would up sticks? Gallup, a pollster, estimated in 2013 that 630m people—about 13% of the world’s population—would migrate permanently if they could

(((pollsters)))

>If lots of people migrated from war-torn Syria, gangster-plagued Guatemala or chaotic Congo, would they bring mayhem with them? It is an understandable fear (and one that anti-immigrant politicians play on), but there is little besides conjecture and anecdotal evidence to support it.

>As of 2015, Malmö had the fourth-highest proportion of foreign-born residents of any municipality in Sweden.
>en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_grenade_attacks_in_Sweden

>A world with free immigration could be $78 trillion richer
Yeah, for the jews.

There we go.

"Those who enter the country illegally and those who employ them disrespect the rule of law and they are showing disregard for those who are following the law. We simply cannot allow people to pour into the United States undetected, undocumented, unchecked and circumventing the line of people who are waiting patiently, diligently, and lawfully to become immigrants into this country." - Barrack Obama

"People who enter the United States without our permission are illegal aliens and illegal aliens should not be treated the same as someone who entered the country legally. When we use phrases like undocumented workers we convey a message to the American people that the government is not serious about combating illegal immigration, which the American people overwhelmingly oppose." - Chuck Schumer, Democratic Senate Minority Leader

Fukn rekt. That didn't take long.

Studies like this completely ignore the potential cost of social disruption and, more importantly, the economic cost of changing government policies if/when immigrants gain the right to vote.

As an extreme example, Venezuelans are starving because the people of Venezuela voted for politicians promising policies which destroyed production. Those people do not suddenly change their mindset upon arriving in new lands.

>$78 trillion
Litteraly nothing on the world scale.
Also arguable source and methodology.

>If lots of people migrated from war-torn Syria, gangster-plagued Guatemala or chaotic Congo, would they bring mayhem with them? It is an understandable fear (and one that anti-immigrant politicians play on), but there is little besides conjecture and anecdotal evidence to support it.

This is an outright fucking lie. Somali gangs are now a huge fucking problem in Melbourne.

FPBP

you're so fucking delusional if you actually believe this, we have so many fucking problems with the immigrants we have already hur dur dur they pay taxes, they really dont you have to have a legal ssn to pay actual taxes illegals and other gibs me dat takers also get free university that costs us thousands and thousands to enroll along with classes. All free for illegals and migrants we would be trillions poorer, and europe you know your burning aswell.

Somali gangs are a huge fucking problem everywhere they go. There's a reason they're seen as the literal worst of all immigrant groups, even by other immigrants

It's so infuriating. And the worst part is that there will always be an army of useful idiots who will promote and push these "arguments" and agendas.
Can't we just kill these cocksuckers already?

A world free from Asian/African/Mexican overpopulation could be $8000 Octillion richer

sorosdictatorship.com/news/world-if/21724907-yes-depopulation-asia-be-disruptive-potential-gains-are-so-vast-objectors-could-be-bribed

It's proven that
>Society becomes infinitely more affluent and efficient when you eliminate overpopulation and free up resouces and wealth.
>It is more difficult to manage the burden of overpopulation than it is to exterminate overpopulating shitskins.
>People from overpopulated countries are a burden on the entire planet and block the progress of science, technology, and humanity by hoarding all resources to support the tumor in the form of Asia/Africa/Mexico.
>Only about 1% of humanity is against culling and/or quarantining Asia/Africa/Mexico.
>Culling shitskins will result in less overcrowding overall since shitskins comprise 90% of the entire global population of 10billion
>The surviving shitskin females can then be culturally enriched with white sperm from around the world.
>There are solutions to prevent them from escaping and getting refuge and welfare benefits.

What do you think? The world would be a better place if Asia/Africa/Mexico is culled. Depopulation of overpopulating locusts is the future, globalism is hindering progress.

>A world with free immigration could be $78 trillion richer

Someone would be richer but it would be neither of us fellow goy

>A world with free immigration could be $78 trillion richer

Who would get the money? The top 1%?

As if the world would last long enough to enjoy the 'possible gains'. You think it's bad now, what with mudslides blowing up people in Europe, and niggers butchering people in S Africa, you haven't seen NOTHING yet schlomo. Take your globalism and shove it up your cousin's ass at his bar mitzvah. This is the kind of stupidity that comes from believing everyone is the same.

this is true
with the hyperinflated costs brought by locust invasion ()
9000 homes in vancouver = $9 trillion
90,000 homes in vancouver = $90 trillion

thats like even a drop in the pacific ocean

fuck I didn't notice that. Freudian slip maybe?

>The world would be richer goy *rubs hands*

Capitalist and Jews are different sides of the same sheckle.

You'd be stealing the money from Wakanda. Do you hate Free People of Color?

>sacrifice everything for money goy
>money is the only thing that matters
>give up social cohesion, meaning, happiness and safety for some shekels goy

>how to put even more money in the pockets of megacorps by allowing them to pay shit wages to literal retards
Since when did the left become the party of big busine...

>A world with free immigration could be $78 trillion richer

...

>how to trigger a black person

"Hey you know wakanda doesn't exist right?"

"MUHFUGGIN BOI GEET YO WHYTE AZZ OUGHTA MAH FASE NIGGUH I BOUTTA BEAT MY DICK MUHFUGGIN REEEEEEEEEEE"

>And why is it like that?
Obviously, it's America's fault for being racist and taking the land north of the Rio Grande.