You can't have white nationalism

You can't have white nationalism in America, just like you couldn't have it in South Africa. The only place you can secure for your identity is EUROPE. Otherwise, you seem like hypocritical fools.

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=tIeEotdOVew
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

lets get this to page 10

Antartica is ripe for the taking

True, but this is if you ascribe to humanism, although most people on this board pick and choose when they like to be humanist and not.

You're not wrong.

What the fuck is white nationalism? Sounds pretty american.

Stop grouping all europeans into one group. There is a reason why we have been in constant war with eachother for the whole history.

South Africa was largely uninhabited, similarly to Argentina and Australia.

No humans are indigenous to North America. The first people to arrive were actually early europeans on the east coast 25,000 years ago, between 10-15,000 years before the Asiatic tribes migrated over.

The US was 90% white until 1965, and that didn't stop because of some war or invasion, the government chose to change immigration policies (and Europe was doing it at the same time). Conceivably it's perfectly possible to maintain an overwhelmingly white nation in North America, it was done for centuries.

It is concievable but it is illegitimate imperialism.

It's still part of Africa. Imposing segregation was unjust.

Genetically, they're grouped quite closely together compared to non-Europeans (though there are pockets around southern europe closely related to north africa/the middle east

Japanese, Korean, and Chinese people have always fought, but if I showed you ten people and asked, "which one is East Asian", I don't think you'd have much difficulty with it.

Not for that reason. Real reason is that Amerimutts are 56%-mulattos-in-denial

>La Cretura

White Racist segregation was also wrong in South Africa.

Imperialism is ruling over other peoples, having an overwhelmingly white state ouwide of Europe doesn't necesitate that.

Ethnicity is more than skin color. And yes, I can tell a difference between pureblooded europeans, we all look distinct. There is a reason why almost all of us have our own languages, vastly different from each other, our cultures, mannerism etc.

It does. It means oppressing the non-White population you nutcase.

>It's still part of Africa

Europe and Asia are the same continent

The blacks in South Africa are more related to other blacks then they are to Dutch imperialists.

we need to IP ban all burgers, They can't go 10minutes without posting retarded shit.

You're a Chinese Finn. Get off your high horse.

the Dutch settled a completely uninhabited area of Africa and negroids moved in afterwards, not even close to the same situation of the Americas retard

Not necessarily. Most of North America was unpopulated or close to it before heavy European settlement. And you don't need to have non-white people included within the boundaries of your nation.

Tf? You think stealing other races land is okay? What happened to the concept of Blood and Soil?

Both situations are unjust.

Segregation is oppression. That's what they did in the South. Segregation.

(you)

Mongrelization is a result of imperialism. Although I assure you, I don't have any black or Asian in me.

>Turks can't have Turkish nationalism unless they move back to the Central Asian Steppe
And yet they still continue to be nationalists anyway. There's nothing saying that one piece of land belongs to any group of people indefinitely. Ownership of anything is enforced, not inherent.

What year is your cutoff for migrations of peoples where the land they end up in can be considered their legitimate territory?

Turkic peopes originate in the Asian steppe; they are not in anyway native to Anatolia. Does this mean Turkey is an illegitimate nation?

The bantu are not native to most of Africa, they swept across the continent in a stunningly bloody conquest.

>let me tell you about muh ancestry report!!

Imperialism stopped being acceptable when America was doing it.

And taking over a whole new continent is not the same as taking over a region you are in.

I didn't say segregation. You can deport them from your nation altogether.

You can't just take someone else's land.

how is settling completely uninhabited land unjust?
are all the migrations throughout human history unjust to you?

Well Mexico was independent since 1821. So robbing their territory was wrong.

...

But YOURE the invader, the alien force and the occupier. It isn't YOUR nation.

South africa didnt exist as country or place where people lived until the europeans settled it apart from a few khosian tribes, who are pretty chill and got on o.k. with the boers. If anything the bantu invaders are the imperialists, coming down through to the tip from the congo genociding all in their path. The fact of the matter is that nations such as the united states or south africa or australia did exist until they were brought into being by the white man. The land is ours. Any attempt t disposses us should be met with forceful retribution.

>hypocritical fools
so?

Well you're attacking like the Dutch didn't have wars with the blacks.

Every single square inch of habitable land on Earth, 100% of it without a single
exception, was at some point taken from someone

Nothing wrong with separate and equal systems. Everyone gets to support their own respective tribal communities.

if the blacks attacked first then they were just in defending themselves

Texas chose to willingly seccede and join the usa. No one lived near new mexico

>hypocritical fools.
just tribal

You're also an occupier, although I would agree that the Abos are a repugnant population. Your White Australia policy was unjust and any attempt to reverse the Asiatizing of Australia is a monstrous imposition.

is it true 100% of jews are mongrels?

Just don't call yourself National Socialists who believed in Blood and Soil.

What do you mean? Whose nation would it be? No people are indigenous to North America, different peoples came to it from different continents, Europeans being the first ones to ever get there, and fought each other and amongst themselves for control of territory. There was no United States of America before it was declared.

But when America was doing it, if stopped being acceptable.

>Imperialism stopped being acceptable when America was doing it.
And imperialism will come back into fashion once the West is dead and nothing can stop the Arabs, Indians, Chinese etc from colonizing Africa again. Imperialism, racism, etc are all only taboo in nations that have enlightenment ideals. Do you think the Japanese feel bad about their empire? Nope. Arabs about their caliphate? Nope. What about the only non-enlightenment European nation, Russia: Nope.
Face it. Once the West dies, Western values like human rights and rights in general will die with it.

>And taking over a whole new continent is not the same as taking over a region you are in.
It's really no different.

Yes...whites can have their separate tribal system in Europe. You're a thief!

There were essentially forced into it with their back against the wall, same with the rest of the south

Tribal? A white outside of Europe is an invader!

And also in every other Anglosphere country.

Guess whats the difference between us? My blood is pure, my roots have always been in the area called Finland, there has been one swede in my ancestry in the past 22 generations. I dont care if you consider me as a white or not, because I identify as a finn in the first place.

You have no roots, you are a mix, a mutt. Only thing you can be proud of is that your ancestors have all had white skin.

Mexico never accepted the secession or the annexation.

How was Mexico legitimate? Spain took control of that land, then Mexico rebelles against them. Then the US went to war with Mexico, Mexico lost, the US paid them millions of dollars and Mexico signed over control of land to them.

You didn't answer the question about Turkey

Indians were there longer. I don't care about a prehistoric white precense.

> You can't have white nationalism in America, just like you couldn't have it in South Africa.
Oh yes we can. We just have to remember who we really are and find our balls. And remember that we are conquerors of the planet.
And once we remember all that, we'll start killing off everyone else again and have glowing societies and empires again.
Something the other races can barely manage at best.

The Japanese were in their region. They threw out the Dutch and Anglo imperialists.

It really IS different.

The Russians in Syria are monstrous imperialists and hopefully their overreach will lead to the liberation of Chechnya, Georgia and Ukraine.

So land belongs to whoever was there longer? This means you would want to kick the Bantu out of most of Africa

Still robbery outside of England, you invader.

Pure Chinese lmaaaaao

>We just have to remember who we really are
You are all mixed race. You have conquered nothing.

Yes they did, and received a shitload of money for it

No we're not all mixed race you fucking idiot.
> believing jew memes

t. 1/64 irish 1/12 french 1/12 german 1/1 mutt

Mexico is a mixture of Indigenous and Spanish heritage. The Anglos always were more ruthless to the Commanche Indians than the Mexicans acted towards them.

Turkey? Anatolia and Mongolia are closer to each other then England and America.

bitch I’ll have it wherever the fuck I want and your faggot ass isn’t gonna stop me

Bantus are more related to the Blacks then you invaders are.

Most of you are, and you keep mixing it up all the time. Are you really saying that both of your parents have ancestors from the same country?

>my roots have always been in the area called Finland

No they haven't, no humans are indigenous to Finland. It was completely covered in ice sheets only a few thousand years ago.

>if you don't want to be turned into a hated minority in your home, it means you are proud of the color of your skin

What?

>The Japanese were in their region. They threw out the Dutch and Anglo imperialists.
Kek. I'm sure the Chinese really care so much about whether Japan was still "in their region".

Saying it doesn't make it so. If someone comes along with a bunch of guns and you can't stop him or find someone else who can to help you, whatever he takes is his. Possession is 100% of ownership.

No, they didn't. Pancho Villa and El Chapo are liberators. They are poisoning the imperialist occupiers and every day, California and Texas become more Mexican.

> ancestors from the same country?
LMFAO!
Seen you do this already....
> t. 1/64 irish 1/12 french 1/12 german 1/1 mutt
Let me explain something to your stupid fucking ass. Those are nationalities dumb fuck. Not races. French is not a fucking race of people. British is not a race of people you mongoloid.
Dumb....ass.

t. fagoli finn

No. America had slavery after Europe stopped.

Occupier implies that we a imperialistic minority population imposing our will on the native ethnic mjaority. That is clearly not the case. The fact of the matter is that no one is magically entitled to land because they got there first. Rights do not exist. History is replete with such cases where the native populace is unable to adapt and is replaced. This is not suddenly going to change just because "enlightenment" fags commit the intellectual equivelent of sniffing their own farts. It doesnt matter whether or not I throw in my lot with such values as they will not protect me. The intent to dispossess and kill me there irrespective of how much I conccede. It is far better that I get you to admit that your intent is to kill and disposses me, so that everyone will know where they stand.

Ice age ended 11 000 years ago, people considered to be finnish have been living in the current location for over 10 000 years.

Oh noez... not slavery! Once again, your "Western values" are going to die in the future. Slavery will probably be seeing an overt comeback throughout the world in the coming century.

We should nuke all of africa

youtube.com/watch?v=tIeEotdOVew

No one is dispossessing or killing you. You have a land called England if you aren't willing to share your ill-gotten gains of Australia.

Yes they are, and they have distinct looks, different ways of thinking, different characteristics. Only americans use blanket term "white" on all of europe.

>Turkey? Anatolia and Mongolia are closer to each other then England and America.

I know OP is trolling but I have to point out that no, actually, they aren't.

Lol.

Your either a jew

Or brown

No, no. Saudi Arabia banned slavery in 1961 and China is a very principled society.

>oh no, we cant have white countries because we might be called hypocritical
fuck off jose

Maybe, but the original people are no longer here so your point is moot.

No there is no such thing as the British race. Or the French race. Or the German race.
You're a dumb fuck.
And for that matter, in this regard, I'd assume Europe has every bit as much mutt mixing as you call as we do. You all live RIGHT NEXT TO EACH OTHER. Do not pretend for a second you fuckers aren't mixing it up left and right and all over.
Stupid as hell.
But it's not a worry because race is not some magical thing that exists within a countries borders. Idiot.

You're definitely not in your native land, though.

America isn't a white land, Cleetus.

The Mexicans are more original then you. And they are retaking their birthright much as you Alt-Righties screech.

Not really. The Aztecs were more central America than the northern Hemisphere but nice try.

>sweden

>british is not a race
>french is not a race
But there are many subpopulations under those banners. From anglo to norman to celt. There are very real distinctions between these populations. There is no shame in admitting that you are mixed race. You have to be honest. I am, i am hlf slavic and half norman. Miscegnetion espcially between closely related populations is not so bad but it does have a noticeble effect through outbreeding depression.

>Do not pretend for a second you fuckers aren't mixing it up left and right and all over.

We are not, its a minority that mix with a person from a different country in europe, and has been in the history too. You can find genetic differences between almost every european country, some bigger than others. And again, its not just genetics, its roots, its the way of life. When you mix up you give up all of these. Language barrier is the thing that keeps mixing at bay, in america thats not a problem and people dont care if their wife is from france and your heritage is from italy.