What is the point of brick and mortar schools anymore? Why not utilize the internet to educate children?

What is the point of brick and mortar schools anymore? Why not utilize the internet to educate children?

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=tIeEotdOVew
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Taylor_Gatto
youtube.com/watch?v=bGYs4KS_djg
youtube.com/watch?v=eeEWPbTad_Q
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

To socialise children with their peers.

Ever meet home schooled kids? It's almost like they're autistic, they're socially stunted, immature and invariably carry on their parents narcissistic hang ups.

You could replace education with another time intensive social activity, but school is a good way to get them varied exposure to a range of people, activities and ideas.

numerous studies have shown that typing is shitty compared to writing things down and just makes people dumber

what is even wrong with schools?
white kids for the most part perform pretty well still. you get to socialize and play sports, you meet girls, etc.

If someone gets bullied and ostracized by their peers enough they begin to hate their peers and begin to love isolation

like schools are """failing""" only because of ghetto schools and niggers. If you actually care and do the work or whatever in a normal school, it's fine.

>What is the point of brick and mortar schools anymore? Why not utilize the internet to SHOW OUR KIDS THE WORLD'S MOST DEGENERATE PORN?

Really makes you think

>what are firewalls

yup, I've thought about home schooling any kids I may have, but realized that socializing is a very important aspect of school. I've known a few people who were homeschooled and doing that is asking to make your kid a sperg. Just sit down with them with their homework when they're young make sure they don't believe all the brainwashing.

They should kick out illegals, let kids drop out again that just absolutely can't "do" school. Once the illegals are kicked out then HS drop-outs can still get a labor job.
And kids that actually try will have less toxic kids in their schools clogging up the system trying to """graduate"""

They need to shill the jew messages

youtube.com/watch?v=tIeEotdOVew

>To socialize children with their peers
>what are malls, places of worship, sports teams, etc

George Washington, Benjamin Franklin, Thomas Jefferson, Abraham Lincoln, Queen Elizabeth, they were all home schooled.
Read this guy:
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Taylor_Gatto

institutional education was barely even a thing in america back then you idiot

You missed the time intensive part. No kids are going to church, playing sports and going to the mall for 7 hours a day 5 days a week.

Also important is time away from their immediate family, it helps children find out who they are without the constant influence of someone who they feel is in control of them.

And only 1 language. English.
When the teachers have to accomodate for both, both suffer.
You don't hear German, French, Italian, etc still being a primary language because those immigrant populations assimilated

Queen Elizabeth is still alive, dumbass!

Public schools serve to indoctrinate people. Also, they're welfare programs for teachers and for construction companies who get the bid to build them and repair them. In addition, to other companies that service them. All in all, you have stupid education majors, who are getting paid more than they would in the free market all because the government coerces us into paying them.

But school can make someone hate socializing.

What can go wrong if the immediate family spends tons of time with the kids?

Home schooling in modern times is significantly different than in the time of Lincoln or Washington when it was actually pretty standard.

Queen Elizabeth believes she is the head of state by Devine right, literally gods chosen woman. She is a poor example of mental stability or good socialisation.

I did most of my bachelors at a brick and mortar, and all of my masters online. Can confirm online education was at least in my case completely effective.

that's oddly true too, I've seen absolute retards get into education for college and get fast-tracked into teaching. the administration plan out all your courses and shit and you basically just have to show up and get a degree. It's ridiculous, counselors never do that for other degrees, not even STEM.
it's pretty infuriating while I've had to talk calculus 3 and physics and shit for my degree.

They already do spend tons of time with them. Mornings, evenings, weekends, and pretty much constantly from birth til age 5.

Exposure to what the rest of society is like is important for development. It's vital kids understand that not everyone in the world is like their immediate family, not everyone will treat them like their immediate family do, and not everyone shares the views they hold.

no this can go horribly wrong
america is too dysfunctional in most places for children to be interacting with other (dysfunctional) children

this is how dysfunction gets worse

Uhhhhhhh... that is definitely not me... I definitely don't despise social interaction...

ONE. NOTHING WRONG WITH ME

If you beleive that keep your kids at home locked away then. Meanwhile the rest of the world wants their children to experience the world and make friends.

You can still discourage dysfunctional behaviour, social schooling and teaching your kids not to be retarded are not mutually exclusive. It sounds like you're a bit dysfunctional if you're really that scared of what's outside your door. That's exactly the sort of neurotic hangup you'd pass on to your kids I'd their only interactions were with you, all day every day.

Definitely teach them to be cautious of the world and their peers, but don't tell them to be scared.

Also, who decides what's dysfunctional vs what's normal? It used to be "dysfunctional" to be gay, now it's totally acceptable and in some cases desirable. Probably the wrong board to be espousing this view, but out of the closet, socially accepted gays are far far less dysfunctional than repressed gays. They are emotionally more mature and form closer and more open relationships with their friends and family.

TWO. NOTHING WRONG WITH ME

Im not sure if this is a serious post or not

THREE SOMETHING'S GOT TO GIVE

REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE

It is a serious post. Why don't you submit to technology you faggot? Are you too much of a coward to see your children become instrumental parts in our future technological cyberunk utopia? Fuck off

I'm from Canada. If I send my future child to school, they are going to get indoctrinated with the worst of the worst liberal SJW brainwashing imaginable. They'll come out as muslim converts that want to chop their dick off and insist I call them xir. I'm definitely going the homeschool route and will be doing additional work to socialize them with extra curricular sports and activities. They will be raised to behave like adults long before any of their peers.

Besides, most of schooling is BS. I got pulled out for a few months when I wasn't getting along with one of my teachers, and my parents saw the type of cunt she was. I did the entire day's work in about 3-4 hours, freeing up the rest of my day to help out around the house. Makes me wonder how much of my time they wasted.

Someone else noticed that a big difference between homeschool kids, who aren't raised to be spergs by their weirdo parents, and trad school kids was this: the home schoolers were able to interact and speak to anybody of any age. The trad schoolers could only fully interact with others around their own age. They couldn't have a meaningful conversation with those who were older. It's just an observation, but still.

>this is a serious post
>cyberpunk utopia
See i still dont know

To steal most of your tax money, leave minimal left to fund the schools, and then force your kids into the hands of underpaid communists to fuck your children's minds up.

Why do you think the best schools come with an actual cost? Because they want a "quality" that the gubmint won't provide since they are skimming the funds.

>internet isn't social and doesn't let you connect with people
yeah, cause nobody has ever communicated over the internet and kids will never form friendships outside of school, and kids won't just play videogames after school anyway

you can learn nearly everything on the internet, and chances are it'll be taught better than your avg teacher

but noooo, lets waste endless money building schools to put every kid through 10-12 years of low quality schooling so they come out the other end as retards anyway

parental controls

They are essentially state run daycares

usually only crappy teachers who have never done anything in the real world go to get education majors

I'm sure I want some feminist cow who knows nothing about the world to teach my kids the abcs

a britbong had to teach you mini burgers what food is
youtube.com/watch?v=bGYs4KS_djg

>he thinks shitposting on Sup Forums is socializing
Sad

the purpose of schooling
youtube.com/watch?v=eeEWPbTad_Q

>he thinks eating in the same room and doing mundane activities is 'socializing' and bond creating

I didn't say the internet isn't social. I happen to beleive it's not, I think it's fuckin antisocial as fuck they way people perpetually lie about themselves and the details of their lives online in a way they never could in real life. You can tell buckets about a person by how they stand, speak, look, sound, the way they respond, how they look at you and how you look at them. Can't tell any of that online, and if you think you can then they're an exceptional catfish.

I'd agree the internet is a more important educational tool that a school is, if I ever have kids I would encourage them to endlessly browse whatever interested them and learn about everything they could. But I wouldn't want their only social interactions to be online, otherwise I'd end up with /pol personified.

Also what's with the attitude of "I don't wanna send my kids to school cause they come out retarded/sjw/dysfunctional"? No matter whether you home school your kids, public school your kids or put them in a swamp to fight gators, if you take an interest in them and ask what they're learning, how they feel about it and what they're thinking then you can easily ensure they're not corrupted. How are you people so disconnected from your kids? not that I beleive you have kids....

this

because nobody could ever run a classroom like a skype video conference or in VR with photorealistic avatars?
it's not going to be like online dating

you can tell loads about how people are from how they conduct themselves online as well

they'll still get human interaction, its not like they'll be locked in a room and given food through a chute in the door from their parents

they can still observe "functioning" humans in media which is where most people get their worldview and learn human interaction from anyway

look at the annoying way trendy youtubers present themself now, do you think they learnt that behavior from their peers or from dreamworks cartoons?

schooling has little to do with teaching kids about socialising, it's more like a correctional facility for little people, unless you think prison is a good social environment

>I wouldn't want their only social interactions to be online, otherwise I'd end up with /pol personified.
thats the key isn't it?
how much school time is actually socialising?
just lunchtime and after school, and they're just playing handball, trading cards or other games
kids just play online videogames now and make friends through that