>signed the first no-fault divorce bill when he was Governor of California.after which it spread to all other states >passed the NFA that banned further production of Class III automatic weapons. >enacted gun control and outlawed open carry in California in 1967 and signed the Brady Act, banning automatic guns >signed the 1986 Amnesty Act, legalizing millions of spics and turning California blue permanently 2 years later >removed landmines from the borders with Mexico >pro-abortion as governor >tripled the national debt >actually raised taxes multiple times >Iran-Contra >Nominated Justice Kennedy to the Supreme Court. >Grew the federal government >MLK Day became a holiday under him, celebrating a literal Jewish communist puppet who was emblematic of the movement that marked the irreversible decline of America >destroyed Florida by importing millions of Cubans and Guatemalans >armed and funded (((Afghan rebels))) that would become Al Qaeda >veto'd a comprehensive anti-Apartheid act. which placed sanctions on South Africa and cut off all American trade with the country. Didn't go through but the destruction of Apartheid is the reason for the current sorry state of South Africa & the past & ongoing genocide of tens of thousands of whites in South Africa >said "America was not founded on race" despite the 1790 Naturalization Act >his admin had the first big batch of neocons: Richard Perle, Jeane Kirkpatrick, Elliot Abrams, Eugene Rostow, Paul Wolfowitz, Kenneth Adelman, Richard Allen, William J. Bennnett... Gaddafi at some point called Reagan an "Israeli Dog" >created modern cuckservatism and made the American right-wing complacent because of "muh landslides" even though the country never stopped going downhill >is now a neocon mascot
Why do cuckservatives worship this man?
Is it just because of gaslighting by the (((media)))?
>gas-lighting That's as good an answer as any. A personal has to be anti-white to be published, so that follows your line of thinking.
Eli Brooks
pointless, Sup Forums will keep sucking his cock
Noah Price
I don't remember Sup Forums ever liking him, in fact it was browsing this board in 2013 that really made me reconsider his relation to the "right-wing".
I had heard of how Reagan was this great conservative icon before, and how he led to some conservative renaissance in the 80s, but it seems all he did was subvert "conservatism" and most of it was gaslighting.
Brayden Cooper
...
Charles Fisher
...
Hudson Gray
Not saying Reagan didn't have his problems, but he's not the President anymore and it's odd you homos never spam these threads talking shit about Obama or Clinton, only Republicans. I'd say you were being genuine if not for the fact that you reek of libfag
Asher Myers
>libertarianism >conservative
Adrian Peterson
Not really sure why this man is popular when any scrutiny is applied. He had some nice soundbites that are popular today I guess. The only positive things you could say about him were the tax cuts and a booming stock market that got so overheated it crashed 25% in one day.
Thomas Green
He was the first neo-conservative and he had a boomer brand of conservatism that was carefully shaped by the media over many years. You only see a revolt against this brand of conservatism now the media is losing its influence and the long term results of such policies have become obvious.
Mason Jones
Because I take it for granted that most people who browse Sup Forums realize that the left and Democrats as a whole, and Obama & Clinton especially are shit. There is no point trying to reform the left since they're in another dimension entirely, and have totally different goals and groups they pander to. It becomes a problem when most of the opposition to the left is controlled opposition, so even the opposition to leftism is ineffectual because of this. Most of the right-wing at this point realizes George W. Bush was shit, but for some reason they don't critically examine Reagan as much.
And I'm going after him exactly because he's dead, so questioning him isn't gonna hurt anyone.
It becomes a problem when even some of the right-wing uses Reagan to justify amnesty, or gun control, or neoconservatism, or the idea that a wall is bad because "Reagan tore down walls".
I'm also open to know about his redeeming qualities other than "he hated commies".
Isaiah Wilson
You can't reform the political left, at this point it's hell-bent on exterminating us, enslaving our children, and giving our country away to big megacorps to do what they will
Christopher Russell
Same reason ‘conservatives’ in the uk worship thatcher. Neither of them were actually conservative (as your examples show, regan didn’t conserve shit), but the public image of them is because they each had one or to very highly publicised policy platforms that were ‘right wing’(i.e. libertarian.) That image allows ‘comservatives’ in the present to agitate for transparently non conservative policies and attitudes while confining the entire movement to a spergier, more libertarian version the local poz party that either does nothing to stop them or simply agrees with them because of Principles. (‘in the finest principled traditions of the deeply principled regan I’ll have you know!’)
Julian Cook
Reagan and the neo-cons are globalist faggots just like the neo-liberals, the only difference is that neo-cons like raping poor people in the ass while neo-liberals only like raping poor white people in the ass.
Luckily both are dying as the right embraces nationalism and the left swings toward socialism.
Thomas Richardson
Reagan was a failure
Aaron Bennett
Revolutionaries like armed citizens whether it's communists or the founding fathers but only one of those wanted people to keep their guns once they were in power.
Dylan Watson
It should also be noted that only one of those still exists in their respective countries.
Carson Cooper
(((Marx)))
Marx was only saying this because he wanted to use to guns to get communists and "the workers" to overthrow governments and implement a communist tyranny.
But then after the "revolution" they would take away all the guns and shoot the "useful idiots" who helped them overthrow the government, as every communist regime has done.
But it is funny that Reagan posed as this big anti-communist, even though amnesty (workers of the world unite), gun control, no-fault divorce (destruction of the family unit and marriage), the idea that race isn't tied to nation, growing the government and opposing Apartheid (the ANC was created and funded by Soviet communists) are all similar to what the Soviets did. They're basically communist policies. Even most of the neocons that were in his admin were "ex"-Trotskyists.
The slogan he often used "Peace Through Strength" is also like the line "War is Peace" from 1984, which was a dystopian novel based on Orwell's take on Soviet communism.
I believe Reagan was a good person and one the last manly leaders we had. However, many of his policies have brought us to the point where we’re at now. God rest his soul, but we need some serious change. We need Fascism.
Lucas Allen
>What is revolutionary Catalonia or Ukrainian Free Territory Full fucking retard
Justin James
Only existing for a few years is bad even by communist standards. Sometimes their flawed system can almost survive a century.
Jace White
Created by people who didn't know what Marx really had in mind or didn't follow Maxist-Leninism, and how long did they last? 2 years for Ukraine? Catalonia was during the middle of the civil war in a total state of exception.
Every communist regime that lasted became a totalitarian shithole
gb2 facebook anarkiddie.
James Cook
this is a massive redpill for me.
i was reading a lot of bakunin during my anarchism phase when i was anout 15 y.o. reading that this great thinker is still relevant today feels great.
James Powell
Kaczynski & Bakunin are some of the only anarchist intellectuals that are worth reading for me.
Communism = Jewish dictatorship. Marx was a cousin of the Rothschilds and dedicates an entire chapter of the Communist Manifesto to establishing a central bank, which is how they get control of nations and tie them to their international finance system.
Basically, the "Bourgeoisie" wanted a system of complete control, so that the masses gave them 100% of their wealth, property and legal rights voluntarily (this is why private property doesn't exist under Communism, it's all owned by the state while they tell the stupid masses it's actually all theirs, and it's also why Marx talked about "seizing the means of production")
So they got this Jew, Marx, to indoctrinate the poor fools into giving all their wealth and property to the "state". Not only that, but he also indoctrinated them with ideas such as national borders being bad (globalism), the family unit being bad, that Christianity should be destroyed, etc. Fooling the "workers" to destroy their own nation and traditions.
That's why people never become rich in Communist/Socialist nations, only poor, and why so many people starved in the USSR. The solution is to end the Central Banking Systems
It's evil if you think about it. They hijacked any opposition to their economic exploitation and turned it into self-destructive garbage that only gives them more power.
>Iran-Contra Your boy the peanut farmer let Americans die. Regan literally freed the hostages on his first day.
Ryder Flores
Kaczynski & Bakunin are some of the only anarchist intellectuals that are worth reading for me.
Communism = Jewish dictatorship. Marx was a cousin of the Rothschilds and dedicates an entire chapter of the Communist Manifesto to establishing a central bank, which is how they get control of nations and tie them to their international finance system.
>Jewish financiers and the Russian Revolution [YouTube] The Driving Force Behind the Russian Revolution of 1917 (embed)
>Putin confirms, 85% Jews behind the first Soviet Government [YouTube] Putin; 80-85% Bolsheviks Revolution were Jews. (embed)
Basically, the "Bourgeoisie" wanted a system of complete control, so that the masses gave them 100% of their wealth, property and legal rights voluntarily (this is why private property doesn't exist under Communism, it's all owned by the state while they tell the stupid masses it's actually all theirs, and it's also why Marx talked about "seizing the means of production")
So they got this Jew, Marx, to indoctrinate the poor fools into giving all their wealth and property to the "state". Not only that, but he also indoctrinated them with ideas such as national borders being bad (globalism), the family unit being bad, that Christianity should be destroyed, etc. Fooling the "workers" to destroy their own nation and traditions.
That's why people never become rich in Communist/Socialist nations, only poor, and why so many people starved in the USSR. The solution is to end the Central Banking Systems
It's evil if you think about it. They hijacked any opposition to their economic exploitation and turned it into self-destructive garbage that only gives them more power.
