Should it be legal to rape slutty women?

In Ancient Rome, it was completely legal to rape sluts and prostitutes. Through this method, Rome stopped women from being whores and lasted for over a thousand years.

>As a matter of law, rape could be committed only against a citizen in good standing. The rape of a slave could be prosecuted only as damage to the owner's property. People who worked as prostitutes or entertainers, even if they were technically free, suffered infamia, the loss of legal and social standing. A person who made his or her body available for public use or pleasure had in effect surrendered the right to be protected from sexual abuse or physical violence.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_rape#Ancient_Rome

Should we bring this law back? Would it solve the problem of the modern woman being an unredeemable whore?

Other urls found in this thread:

dontmarry.files.wordpress.com/2009/03/sexualutopia.pdf
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

If both parties are of breeding age and penis is only entering Vagina then it shouldn't be classified as rape.

Forcing your Penis into the following
>Anus
>Mouth
>Other
Should be classified as Rape.

The reason rape was regarded as a particularly odious form of assault is
that it violated this superpersonal moral principle by which a woman subordinated
her momentary private desires to the wellbeing of those closest to her.
Modesty had to be respected, or else protected, if it was to perform its essential
social function of guarding the integrity of families.
Under Roman law it was not considered a serious crime to rape a prostitute:
A man could not violate the modesty of a woman who had none to violate. In
later European law it was made criminal to rape even prostitutes. But this does
not mean that the concept of rape had been divorced from that of feminine
modesty; it was rather that law came to recognize and protect the possibility
of repentance for immodesty. (Christianity is relevant here.)

read: dontmarry.files.wordpress.com/2009/03/sexualutopia.pdf

this is retarded, we need to bring back modesty, not normalize fucking random bitches and leaving fatherless children. dumbass

Don't stick your dick in crazy.

Intercourse with underage should be classifed as sodomy if one party is of breeding age.

If Both parties are underage it should be classified as vandalism.

Exactly, it should only be illegal to rape virgins or wives, because they are the property of another man (e.g her father or her husband). But loose feminist slutty women have no owner, and thus are public property for anyone to use.

Using a vagina as nature intended is not "fucking"

incels?

How about it's not a crime if unattractive people do things girls want from attractive men?

So, yes, OP.

Ya good luck

Lol what the fuck is this thread?

I'd support it, but it's a pipe dream.

From a societal point of view why should a slutty woman be protected from rape? She has already surrendered her purity to countless men. Is one more dick in a vagina that has seen dozens really that much of a difference?

By all means, virgins and upstanding wives of husbands should be protected from rape. But why should the society waste resources on a whore crying that she had one more cock in her worn out pussy?

Sounds great, make it happen!

Gud idea

Women are only get angry that the person fucking them is not Chad.
If Chad were to force himself on them they would titter coquettishly and allow him to have his way ergo rape is not real it is just a social construct made up in womens minds.

We want to encourage modesty in women so those who behave modestly should be protected. Women who engage is "sex work" and those who behave immodestly should be punshied

there's a wikipedia article about history of rape

let that sink in

>you can help by expanding this entry

i wonder what the thots of ancient Rome thought about this law
supposedly Roman thots invented high heels to show off their legs and bum in addition to showing everyone they were "on the clock" as it were

>supposedly Roman thots invented high heels to show off their legs and bum in addition to showing everyone they were "on the clock" as it were

Nope. Heels were invented in France and were initially male footware. Whores in Rome actually wore some sort of purple garb.

Rome had it right to separate sluts from normal women. That way a woman/girl couldn't keep her skeletons in the closet and trick men. I think prostitution should be legalized where every whore must have some sort of public marking, so no girl you want to date can hide her dirty secret.

Well, in the Middle East Islamic shithole countries it's kinda morally acceptable so it depends on wchich country you're talking about. On the other hand, West European countries openly tolerate rape if the raper is migrant because of the retarded neo- liberal kinda masochistic political correctness which is in power there.

>People who worked as prostitutes or entertainers
>entertainers
>be a roman musician
>get raped

>Heels were invented in France and were initially male footware. Whores in Rome actually wore some sort of purple garb.
interesting

>I think prostitution should be legalized where every whore must have some sort of public marking, so no girl you want to date can hide her dirty secret.
>where every whore
>whore
how is this attribute of a person determined? is it a choice people make when they're an adult? or?

Yeah it seems fair to me.

Oh Mohammad, your Koran is showing.

Muslim shills, newfag.

Girls are stupid, for one. Second, with all the anti-slut shaming nonsense where a whore/prostutute is supposed to be referred to as a sex worker, you know a girl is willing to be a whore. Why'd you think they chose to be pornstars and camwhores?

By markings or apparel, I mean it should be a legal requirement if a girl wishes to be a prostitute.

>Meet girl
>Seems cute
>Want to date
>See whore sign
>Avoid and dodge bullet

Rome was a European city-state, not Muslim or from Arabia in any way.

Please provide an argument as to why this is not a good idea that will solve female degeneracy.

>Girls are stupid, for one.
so are a lot of men

>Second, with all the anti-slut shaming nonsense where a whore/prostutute is supposed to be referred to as a sex worker
you're after a terminology change?

>By markings or apparel, I mean it should be a legal requirement if a girl wishes to be a prostitute.
i would almost say that most thot's already make it known that they are thots through their thoughts and their actions.
i feel there's no need for additional laws in this case

The eternal cuck strikes you as he screams
"MISOGYNY, TRADITION!"
SPQR>every civilization
Fuck off Varvaric scum.

Most of the female models in classical art were male because it was considered indecent for wamen to pose naked. The painter had to make do and use his imagination.

So help yourself.

So far no arguments as to why whores, strippers, and irresponsible sluts being raped would not correct female behaviour within a month.

Yep. The cucks on here have no response other than MUH FEEFEES.

Because they would enjoy it for one. Secondly we don't approve of Sharia Law.

How is it Sharia law when Ancient Rome did it? And sluts only enjoy it when chads rape them.

>Legalize raping thots
>Massive upswing in fat girls and burn victims dressing like thots

Thanks a lot, user!

It's Sharia Law because it's Sharia Law you stupid goat fucker. I don't care what Ancient Rome did.

Fuck off Chang. It doesn't matter what sandniggers do, Ancient Rome was the most successful Western civilization to have ever existed. The fact you dismiss it shows how retarded you are.

This is why muslims rape western women and don't feel remorse about it. They see it as justice, as the right thing to do.