the most advanced species to ever inhabit the earth and these are the shit choices we get to pick from
capitalism: corruption, worker exploitation
communism: food shortages and secret police
fascism: dictator and forced labor camps
socialism: see communism
anarchism: lol
why even fucking live at all?
Other urls found in this thread:
Why doesn't pol invent a new form of government?
yeah man
nihilism and apathy is my choice
the first one is likely crony capitalism, plus who gives a shit about fat fucks
>Dictatorship
>Wrong
i'd love to but my savage caveman brain cant even conceive of anything better - thats the ultimate black pill
makes sense you feel that way sergei. you guys have tried everything
Fascism wouldn't be bad as long as you weren't Jewish/Communist.
Like if there was no corruption with communism and fascism
>fascism is bad
off my board redditor
>worker exploitation
Just get an useful skill (e.g. an engineering or CS degree) and employers will figuratively line up to lick your ass.
As the burgers say, give me liberty or give me death.
I choose option 3
You're not even half right
There appears to be something wrong with your list, let me see if I can fix it:
>communism: food shortages, secret police, corruption, worker exploitation, dictator and forced labor camps
There we go, now it's accurate.
Better dead than red
capitalism: Better than Feudalism, Has been getting better for lower classes as it went on
communism: Impossibility
fascism: See socialism
socialism: Lets a fascist take control.
anarchism: Happened one time for 3 years, Anarchists thinks is the rule, not the exception, See fascism.
This.
>why even fucking live at all?
at least with capitalism, you get to suck it up and take it like a man and in the end you can choose your own death
the other ones, someone chooses your death for you
>capitalsm
>food shortage
>posts pic of fat guy
Are we fat or skinny user?
>capitalism: corruption, worker exploitation
congrats the commie propaganda got to you
being fat is a choice bro and if you truly truly knew what starvation was like, you would choose fat everytime. what a low iq level thread, seriously do better
>pleb
we just have to kill the (((liars)))
Fascism creates clear rules and borders. Clear rules and borders are the bedrock of order. Order is the only place you can build a sustainable, just, progressive society. (actual progress, not feminazi sjw blm "progress")
The problem isn't the capitalism nor the communism nor fascism is the people that are in charge, i mean if everyone liked the way they were and stick with that we wouldn't even need someone in charge
two can play that game
>fascism: food shortages, secret police, corruption, worker exploitation, dictator and forced labor camps
The world has always moved like this
Feudalism -> Capitalism -> Socialist Revolution -> Totalitarian State(Be it based on Facism, or Marxism) -> Capitalism.
Communism was a drug-addled fantasy by Marx, We either crave for Daddy state to take control or a state of being barely awake for things to happen in a fight between an authoritarian State and Feeling that nothing matters.
I just invented fascism but without a Napoleon syndrome affected leader
Could it work?
You are making the same mistake every utopian make, You are assuming people are just going to go against their self-interest.
This. It is why every "perfect" system will always fail.
Fascism was great and was working perfectly, up until some autistic Austrian painter took it for himself, twisted it completely, took a gigantic shit on it, and then immigrated to germany.
Mussolinis fascism---- awesome.
Everything the germans touch turns to AIDS.
>poland
>greentext story about plumbing
kek
Capitalism and fascism is fine. YOu're only going to get that outcome if you choose it. In capitalism's case, you have to be a fat fuck. In fascism's case, you have to be a traitor. But under communism, you just have to not be jewish to be in danger.
Anarcho-fascism
until Stalin comes around and decides he hates them too
Free market is the best system OP.
kek
the fire rises
I think we should leave making laws in the hands of a neural network that optimizes them, and law enforcement in the hands of machines that are expendable, and therefore will only use lethal force when needed to protect other human life. Passing judgement would also be in the hands of the AI. Maybe we can keep a democratically elected meatbag as a president to ratify our laws, but I'm not too sure about that.This is literally the best option that has been made available with the advance of technology.
>slow death of suffering and supressed instincts by desease and osesity
>slow death via starvation and powerlessness
>death on the battlefield striking a last time in the face of destruction
I would rather die standing than on my knees thanks
i propose the following as a theoretical form of government: a constitutional despotish-ism.
there's a leader who has absolute authority over only what is spelled out for him on paper (the constitution).
the despot has a term limit of 5 years (we think in base 10, election years will be in years that end in 0 and 5) and there's a no father/son law--if your father was despot, you cannot be.
women can't vote.
the constitution needs to be very explicit that it only limits the power of the despot and that the rights of the people come from god,especially the right to bear arms(necessary to put the fear of god in the despot).
On its way. Decentralization is the key.
First step, bitcoin, build from there.
Because it's the only thing in this world which is inmutable and verifiable by everyone.
further, in a manner similar to the spartan diarchy, laws would be written by a panel of randomly selected citizens (if laws can't be understood by the average person, then they're no good). the first thing that a new panel does is review the works of the old panel: the new panel has the authority to punish the old panel for bad laws. This system has been demonstrated to work for the hundreds of years that the spartans were around for; it keeps the laws simple and discourages jackassery.
Well I've always wanted to give technocracy a try but most scientists these days are liberals and technocracy could only work with a conservative society.
I like it. Good luck convincing normies tho.
i'm going to think about this some more, and then maybe write a book. it wouldn't be able to be established until a massive war had ravaged a land, a new land was created, or we traveled to a new planet.
the third possibility is most likely as people will naturally resent being ruled over by people on a different planet.
Anarcho-Capitalism works
Capitalism please
Youve made a variation on the roman republic. Wont work. See Ceasar.
so, you're saying that there is a historical example of it working for a while, only now we how it failed the last time?
>anti-racism activist
>al-jazeera
totally unbiased and trustworthy.
Because we already have the "benevolent dictatorship with a constitution".
>fascism: dictator and forced labor camps
There is LITERALLY nothing wrong with that.
Forced labor camps / POW camps existed just as well under the Allies in WW2.
And there is LITERALLY NOTHING, wrong with a dictator.
>LITERALLY NOTHING wrong with a dictator
Depends on the dictator.
Hitler wasn't a bad one, nor was Qadaffi.
Then again they weren't communist.
Pol Pot was, and so was Chairman Mao, Stalin, etc.
Just remember that whenever the left cries about dictatorship, they're only pointing at their own political enemies.
"The universe wouldn't be so chaotic if I was God"
Fuck off with your leftypol memes
>Depends on the dictator.
Of course, just like a democracy *can* also work well, depending on the people running and the intelligence of the people.
Fascism is corporatism which is essentially state capitalism
Powerful conglomerates rule along with state blessing
Could be useful in a developmentalist third world country with infant industries