Do you think its okay to betray your leader if you know you are right and he is wrong?

Do you think its okay to betray your leader if you know you are right and he is wrong?

in proportion to the importance, if the disagreement is of such a fundamental importance that it overshadows their qualities as a leader and the unity of purpose, then it is necessary

>Hollywood praises him as a god

No it's never right to betray our Führer and race. Stauffenberg faggit.

He was old german aristocracy and of course they are better than nazi scum.

>schweiz untouched

That's why I hate him. I hate Aristocrats and elites no matter what.

No, because some things that you think are his fault are not always his fault. Ambitious revolution, violent or legal, leads a country further into disaster than it would just leaving the issue alone.

So you mean like what Hitler did to Weimar?

Hitler already shat the bed at that point sadly.
Should've offed him way earliert or at least changed his mind.

>aristocracy
>better than nazi scum

Wew, you're a special kind of retard.

Actually, probably, yes. Ambition always leads to disaster

>Betraying...and race
You Krauts are pretty good at that

fuck you Nazi, revolutionary conservatism forever.

Based Crusader

Alright christcuck

Biggest issue may not have been the Führer but the coterie of politically convenient sycophants that surrounded him ... the Party did sweep up some very incompetent people into positions of influence.

He did betray Hitler but he didn't betray Germany. The July plotters wanted an accomodation with the western allies in order to deal with the soviets.

Depends on how you "know your right". It also depends on if the people want the leader or not, and if that leader is violating individual rights (and what they are violating those rights for). It's really complicated, but what it comes down to: if the leader is left-wing then yes you should get rid of him/her(almost always since leftism is not based on any evidence or a logical framework beyond nihilism); if the leader is right-wing then maybe.

>revolutionary
>conservatism

one of these is not like the other.
in fact, they directly contradict each other.

also, you're retarded.

Nah, first, that faggot literally thought that if he assassinated Hitler that the war would be over and Britain/Russia would just let it go. No, they were going for unconditional surrender. Modern Germany would still be cucked, only if would have been sooner rather than later. You're forgetting who were behind the (((allies))).

Second, if you're a soldier you obey your leaders no matter what. If the ship sinks, you sink with the captain. Only cowards would try and stage an assassination, especially if the leader is fighting a battle which will effect of the country/Europe forever(see modern day Germanistan) This mentality of "my leader is wrong, gotta kim him XDD" is the reason why the West has been fucked since Roman times.

>meme flag
Checks out.

>cuckservatism
So hows Trump doing with the whole gun thing?

your leader was the epitome of a mudling.

Greatest goy ever...

>This mentality of "my leader is wrong, gotta kill him" is the reason why the West has been fucked since Roman times.

That is true, but rampant ambition and individualism is written into our genes. We are NOT a collectivist race (unless you consider the varying amounts of Neolithic Near Eastern farmer DNA in European genomes).
Our ancestors had been bellicose semi-nomadic horse warriors ... go figure. Generations of selective pressure have shaped us that way and this 'weakness' has also been our biggest strength so far. A double-edged sword indeed.

why was he right?

He was basically all for second Reich and we all know it was the best empire on earth.

...

Second Reich was the best.

Näin