Someone explain cultural marxism to me. I think I understand, but I'm not sure

Someone explain cultural marxism to me. I think I understand, but I'm not sure.

Other urls found in this thread:

thechristianidentityforum.net/downloads/Death-West.pdf
rstb.royalsocietypublishing.org/content/368/1631/20130079
twitter.com/AnonBabble

It’s really just a buzzword that describes a general theory of the destruction of Western Civilization through moral degeneration. Some people will say it was created by the Frankfurt School to destroy Western culture and make it more susceptible to communism, but I haven’t looked into that theory much

jews

...

Why the fuck is this the only video where she's semi-attractive?

/thread

Facts=feelings aka postmodernism

You destroy reality, anything is fair game.

Look up "Critical Theory"

boys didn't used to be this hot

Oprah 2020

>It’s really just a buzzword
>Some people will say
>I haven’t looked into that theory much
kill yourself shill rat

It's the interpretation of culture through a leftist lens, eg. PBS Idea Channel. Not some grand destruction of the west like these guys would have you believe.

I understand cultural marxism, but why does it come across as Sup Forums wants to be some kind of censored puritan society?

marxism means communism
communism means judaism

pol os not a jewish board.

Fuck you, retard. You know nothing.

Cultural Marxism is the application of Marxism not to class (that failed) but to inborn-trait-identity (including some false claims of inborn traits that don't exist, ie gender). It presumes people to be inherently oppressive based on the situation of their birth, in order to oppress them. It calls this mass oppression "social justice." It uses the inherently fallacious denial of meaning itself within postmodernism and deconstructionism to make its claims mean whatever it wants them to mean, doublethinking without consistency, desiring only to win, that is, to destroy.

Also pic related.

Holy shit dog, you did not just compare PBS with cultural Marxism. Oh my god you did...

Read chapter four on page 73 (84 in PDF):

thechristianidentityforum.net/downloads/Death-West.pdf

the current term is "Social Engineering"

do not talk about things which you do not know as if you know about them and then admit you haven;t looked into it.

For the correct answer, see

The connection between what I said and pic related is that the winners are the ones deemed inherently oppressive by their birth situation, because some demographics are naturally, genetically prone to be more successful than others. Read: White Men. Social Justice / Cultural Marxism does not differentiate between success and oppressiveness. Success inherently oppresses others, zero-sum style. The only way to be a successful Cultural Marxist is to hyperemotionally play victim.

Also pic related. This has its roots and power in the female competition style. Study: rstb.royalsocietypublishing.org/content/368/1631/20130079

Cultural Marxism is Critical Theory, it's taking the work of Marx and replace every instance of the world class and replacing it with race and every instance of the word "capital" and replacing it with "white social capital" or "white privilege." It's a stupid and tortured way of looking at the world.

>"We hate having standards"

If I jumped into a time machine and blew up the entire nation Marx existed in his time, will this save the future?

You want the true answer? Cultural marxism is the organic end result of social engineering and intervention globally over the last 100 years. It's the people who actually latch onto and purchase the concept of "progress" which is a never ending effort, guided by the wealthiest people in the world. It's been happening as a social phenomenon since the early 20th century. Marxism is the process of "preparing" for communism aka socialization. The thing you must understand is that communism/socialism/marxism are contronym systems. This means that there is a public definition, and also an (actual) non-public definition, which is basically an inversion. This makes it a topic too complex for low iq people to understand, they tend to accept the public/common definition which describes the economic categorizations of wage control, and ownership of goods and services. The actual meaning is that a bunch of really smart people who control the production of currency, developed it and introduced it into eastern europe through proxies, trotsky, lenin, stalin, mao, the list goes on, if you research history you will learn. The three types of socialism introduced were, USSR type, China type, and FDR/wilson type. They are all different methods of resource centralization and apex control of global populations. The modern united states is categorized under fascism with unelected, unaccountable executive authority expressed in the federal regulatory agency structure, which is a system designed to monitor production and development and control of a nation's actual organic labor. The other systems evolved much differently. Anyone who doesn't understand this concept has no idea what they're talking about. Ive read very few books on the actual subject, a handfull of dissertations from the late 80s/ 90s and some amatuer conspiracy books, that were actually acurate, although narrow.