....optics????

what did striker mean by this?

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=0Pgnng3bVlc
youtu.be/lq6Q6Ulh0DI
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

All soyboyim tis fake news

what?

he is right, the middle class has no reason to engage in revolution

None of these """"men"""" look like workers, they look like maybe they have a part time cashier job. I work construction and i am one of the only white people on my site. Everyone else is mexican. Capitalists acknowledged the growing power of the working class so they allowed illegal immigration to keep the working class vulnerable, brown and ignorant. All the whites are in management and are therefore cuckservashits.

you honestly cant say that is good optics... please

Striker is saying all the alt-right fags often overlook - no one except the workers has any reason to break the status quo. Especialy not the kids on Sup Forums who have a lot of time to post frog memes. If the far right keeps their conservative circle jerk of wannabe middle class people it will fizzle out.

You need to go for the worker and no, not with the faggy christian message. Protestant work ethics kicked the workers in america for far too long to be a credible way of a new awakening. Tough luck.

all this optics shit is meaningless bullshit invented by anonymous armchair generals who think they can convince the comfy middle class to engage in a revolt by """optics""". Oh and optics is the favourite topic of concern trolling the far right, very effective I might add

there's barely any working class in the us outside of illegal mexicans, and even then white go with Trump-tier politics

I don't give a shit. Let them do their thing and you do your thing. Infighting over optics is pointless division.

Of course they do, the middle class were behind protestantism and liberalism, they're the group most likely to support change

>theres no working class in the US
you know how retarded you are?

you really think that the middle class has any interest in pursuing a white racist state?

Yes, if they feel their position is threatened by non-white groups. In the US this isn't the case because they import uneducated spics and the like who contend primarily with the working class, but places like here, Australia and Canada most of our immigration is skilled Indians and Asians who displace the middle class

yet nowhere in those countries the middle class meme people advocate for restricting immigration. The level of Sup Forumstards not understanding politics is astounding. The middle class has no reason to engage in that sort of thinking, they got their cars and their iphones.

Yes they do, our leftist party ran on reducing immigration and cutting foreign ownership

>leftist party
there you have it - protectionism is pretty much a left wing idea, the conservative free market dorks support unlimited migration and muh free trade

It's not the 60's any more. Labour targets the middle class, as an aside our free market neo-liberalism was brought in by the left unlike the rest of the West, the right were strongly protectionist

well, that seems like a kiwi novelty, in the rest of the world its as I described

> someone who thinks the only revolution that happens must be communist
kys

>all those comfy middle class people will engage in a revolution
wew, yeah, just waste time on optics nigger, while deluding yourself the average Joe will take up arms only if muh optics are good enough, lol

>Stahlheim
Based

youtube.com/watch?v=0Pgnng3bVlc

This whole (((Optics))) thing is just jewish shucking and jiving to prevent passionaries to actually acoomplishing anything.

>guys, guys, sure we're making our position heard, attracting attention and plating flags out there - but we're scaring Boomer "Top Cuck" McNeocon here, who wasn't going to support us either way, so we really need to rething our (((optics)))

His version of good optics is SS uniforms

exactly

optics is just a phrase which means "this isn't good, but it LOOKS GOOD."

That's retarded and patently untrue. The middle class is the most likely TOO engage in revolution.
So long as you break a society down into 3 classes anyway.
The lower class usually has to work shit jobs or starve. They have the impetus, but not the time or energy to revolt. They only revolt when things are absolutely garbage, but they're usually too dumb to stay organized or propagandize effectively; this is every peasant rebellion throughout history and why they fail. But when they succeed, a LOT of people die in the end.

The upper class has the time, but not the impetus to revolt. Why would they revolt? Things are going well for them. The only time the upper class tends to revolt is when there's a split of power due to geography, such as in the US revolution, when the upper class of the American colonies revolted against the upper class of the British Isles.
It's the Middle Class that is the most susceptible to potential revolt and revolution entirely because things are OK, but they could be better for them, and they work, but also actually have some time and energy for non-work activities to test the waters at protests and such and become more open to going further. They are very effective at propaganda, and create and distribute it constantly.
The only thing is that usually the middle class' problems are pointless trivialities and when they revolt, things usually get worse, than better.
Lower class revolutions include: Spartacus's revolt, Haitian revolt.
Middle class revolutions include: every single communist/socialist revolution. Every single fascist revolution.
Upper class revolutions include: The US War for Independence, Most of the Civil Wars or Attempts at successor Kingdoms in any Empire [Such as Zenobia in Rome, etc).

It's because anti-Semites are plebs, plebs are too retarded for maths and science.

>The middle class is the most likely TOO engage in revolution.
No, the middle class is the classic historical hedge against revolution. Its why the classical liberal establishment cultivated it, and the marxists labeled them the enemy. People with an incentive to keep their head down and not complain are counter-revolutionary. Historically, the most radicalize-able class are peasant small holders under heavy stress on their land by market cycles. The second most radicalize-able are blue collar skilled labor. The least are the middle class, who always side with capital, as they famously did once the fascists and NS sided with big capital.

youtu.be/lq6Q6Ulh0DI
youtu.be/lq6Q6Ulh0DI
youtu.be/lq6Q6Ulh0DI