Hello Comrades. This general is for the discussion of Marxism-Leninism, the ideology of revolutionary socialism and communism.
Communism is the next stage of humanity following the capitalist stage and the socialist stage.
What exactly is communism according to Marxist-Leninists:
>Communism is a stage of society in which the productive infrastructure is socially owned, and goods are produced not in order to sell for profit, but in order to meet a social need. >Communism in it's full form is a stateless, classless society that follows the maxim "From each according to their ability, to each according to their need." >To achieve such a society Marxism-Leninism teaches us that we must replace the capitalist state, which is controlled by the capitalist class, by a socialist state, which is controlled by the working class. Then, a period of class struggle follows in which the capitalist class is liquidated by the working class. When the capitalist class has been completely vanquished, there will be only one class, the working class, and eventually the functions of the state will become indistinguishable from the functions of the society as a whole, and the state as such will 'wither away' as Marx said. marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1847/11/prin-com.htm marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1848/communist-manifesto/
More specifically, does it understand the danger of the pursuits of flesh or is it like Sup Forums says it's like?
Luke Fisher
no
Angel Roberts
Better dead than red, commie.
Caleb Edwards
Commie hate thread
Carter Foster
>posting from a Capitalist made phone or computer
Wyatt Turner
lmao
Owen Jones
For me it's Technoratic Socialism.
Sebastian Anderson
Sage this shill thread, anybody with half a brain knows this meme ideology is just the crystallized form of gibsmedats
Justin Foster
Funny seeing all these cucks defending capitalism which pretty much wholly owned by the jews.
Jordan Foster
No one is defending Capitalism, it just benefits us more then Socialism ever would.
Daniel Roberts
It's rigged against you and you don't even see it.
Hunter Young
death is the preferable alternative to communism
Camden Bailey
It sounds nice but it doesn't work and never will. "From each according to their ability, to each according to their need." That statement is too subjective and will lead to a breakdown. Who gets to decide what is an individuals ability and how much people need?
>To achieve such a society Marxism-Leninism teaches us that we must replace the capitalist state, which is controlled by the capitalist class, by a socialist state, which is controlled by the working class.
This is the big flaw. Nothing is controlled by the working class. They will cease the means of production and hand them over to a ruling class of career politicians.
Brody Gutierrez
I'm well aware of that but Socialism make it 10x worse. I'm somewhere near the middle class, not rich but not dirt poor either, but Socialism would completely destroy the middle class. I actually work 40-50 hours every week while there's plenty of people sitting on their asses collecting welfare. How is Socialism supposed to work when not everyone does their fair share of work; I may be a wage cuck but at least I get rewarded for my work
Isaac Clark
Not anymore. They focus mainly on bourgeoisie decadence. The workers are now replaced with niggers, faggots and trannys.
Brody Butler
Hello gomrades! XDDDD Dis general is for disgussion of margsism-lebonnism, da ideology of revolutionary socialism and gommunism.
Gommunism is da next stage of guckery following real society.
Wat exagtly is gommunism according to gommies:
>Gommunism is a stage of guckery in which the produgtive infrustrugture runs away from gommie country, and no goods are produced and beeple starve. XDDDD >Gommunism in full form is obressive, statist society dat follows maxim "gib gib gib!" :DDDD >To achieve gommunism we must replace broduction with murderous obressive rulers liek me, fug working glass beeple. XDDDD Struggle while I liquidate you all lol. When capitalists run away we win and I kill you all. Eventually the functions of state cease and state becomes murderous and indistinguishable from other gommies. Da state withers away liek da people. gommies.gom/fug/ gommies.gom/starve/
----------------------------------------- Da sdages of gommunism.
>Sdage one Bourgers aren't allowed to vode :DDD but otherwise da system is digtadorshib of gommies. Everything is stole by digtadors and digtadors rule all.
>Sdade two Withering All beeple who aren't digtador glass starve. XDDD Once glass disabears and we steal everything more beeple wither away. Bolice begome unnecessary as beeple are dead lol :DDDDD Central blanning begomes unnecessary begause sgarcity caused starving. Money is all ours.
>Sdage three Gommunism. No beeple. No food. My money. Much benis.
Levi Bailey
trying a dead ideology? NEVER but nazism is diffrent tho >Sup Forums
Lucas Sanders
there are better arguments, billy you wouldn't want him to say 'posting from government made internetz', would you?
Aaron Miller
communism is a great system for killing communists
Dylan Campbell
Summing up his historical analysis, Engels says:
“The state is, therefore, by no means a power forced on society from without; just as little is it ’the reality of the ethical idea’, ’the image and reality of reason’, as Hegel maintains. Rather, it is a product of society at a certain stage of development; it is the admission that this society has become entangled in an insoluble contradiction with itself, that it has split into irreconcilable antagonisms which it is powerless to dispel. But in order that these antagonisms, these classes with conflicting economic interests, might not consume themselves and society in fruitless struggle, it became necessary to have a power, seemingly standing above society, that would alleviate the conflict and keep it within the bounds of ’order’; and this power, arisen out of society but placing itself above it, and alienating itself more and more from it, is the state.” (Pp.177-78, sixth edition)[1]
This expresses with perfect clarity the basic idea of Marxism with regard to the historical role and the meaning of the state. The state is a product and a manifestation of the irreconcilability of class antagonisms. The state arises where, when and insofar as class antagonism objectively cannot be reconciled. And, conversely, the existence of the state proves that the class antagonisms are irreconcilable.
