I am mostly a libertarian, however I do believe that a government is required to keep foreign invaders out. This government won't act like a normal one. It gets it's money from providing protection services from a subscription based model in which citizens pay £25 and businesses pay £100 or so (adjust for financial requirements). No taxes.
This society's economy would be free markets other than the protection monopoly the government has.
I see this model as pretty much necessary due to anarcho capitalism's biggest faults are threats from foreign nations and the shit-show that the security market would be - with each security company becoming a pseudo state.
The government I propose is essentially a glorified monopoly that values the people's security rather than sum profits.
Opinions?
Pic unrelated.
What am I?
Other urls found in this thread:
Maybe I should have used some bait pic
sounds like communism to me
Come on, man. Lay off the b8. My idea was to keep the best parts of anarcho capitalism and remove the faults with it whilst still trying to keep it mostly voluntary.
commie
You are torn and everywhere on the political chart?
Minarchism
>shadman
an-cap is retarded though. you'd have an easier time teching up an-prim or de-spooking an-ego.
Interesting. While not directly related, what do you think about modern welfare programs?
kys statist fuck
nationalist
the rest is two headed snake distraction
Welfare programs are a bad idea. They encourage people to not work and leech of the state, as seen here in Britain. A better alternative is charities where tax payers decide if they want to give money and where they want to give it to.
Expected.
Shadman's hot now.
Anarchy will always fall to either outside armies or internal private security forces making their own state. While I would like it to be real I also have to accept that ancap is a utopia and that this is probably going to be the best alternative.
paris you gay?
Hate to break it to you Dad...but you are a commie and its far too late for the old home
You're more of a commie than I
>Shadman
The mahfia
a pompous little nazi faggot in denial who mostly has no clue what the hell is going on. kys retard. no bump.
I'm talking protection such as theft protection, not protection from itsself.
In what way is my idea anything like national socialism?
woah im not reading that
here take this isidewith.com
in any case just B.E. yourself
Is this supposed to be a riddle?
...
>It gets it's money from providing protection services from a subscription based model in which citizens pay
so taxes
You're Batman.
Sounds retarded, nigger. As a Libertarian, your ideology has a flaw.
If we're all bestowed unalienable rights by our creator, what right does a government monopoly have to exclude the lesser races from entering your shores?
Absolutely none, it runs completely counter to your own ideology, which is that everyone has individual rights.
Acknowledgement that everyone isn't equal, and because of this certain people shouldn't have rights even within your country, let alone OUTSIDE of your country, is the core tenant of fascism.
A right is earned by blood.
No. It's barely complex English. Go back to school.
It's entirely voluntary.
I meant this entire thread in general. Are we supposed to guess what you are? Is this like 20 questions?
American libertarians will have to pick a side. The neoliberal, socialist, communist, progressive, feminist, black nationalist side...
OR
the neoconservative, fascist, national socialist, white nationalist side.
Choose wisely!
First of all, gb2 r*ddit
Secondly, the only 3 rights we have are Life, liberty and property.
Lastly, where in my short paragraph did I mention anything about immigration or what my stance on immigration is?
...
I stopped at libertarian
>What am I?
>I'm mostly libertarian
lol. textbook natsoc, dummy. sa was privat founded in the beginning
Get fucked and take your meme ideology back to 2011.
...
sovs
>more commie than I
So you admit you are a commie then?
Sounds like minarchy to me.
Looked into this. It mostly fits my views. Thanks.