/fsg/ - Fascist General

/Fsg/ - Fascist General- Late night Edition.

Thread for discussion of Italian Fascism, and other forms of fascism, Mosley, Codreanu, Falange, etc. Also for sharing fascist literature and information.

A Fascist general for Fascists and those interested


conservapedia.com/Fascist_Manifesto,_1919

worldfuturefund.org/wffmaster/Reading/Germany/mussolini.htm

reakt.org/fiume/charter_of_carnaro.html


uploadmb.com/dw.php?id=1389982155

Be respectful and please try to keep conversations relatively "intellectual"


Good fascists/similar or influential people to get an introduction

Oswald Mosely
Jose Antonio Primo de Rivera
Benito Mussolini
Adolf Hitler
Stepan Bandera
Corneliu Zelea Codreanu
Salazar
Ramiro Ledesma Ramos
Ettore Ovazza
Gaetano Mosca
Friedrich Nietzsche
Charles Maurras
Enrico Corradini
Filippo Tommaso Marinetti
Johann Plenge
Alceste De Ambris
Gabriele d'Annunzio
George Lincoln Rockwell
Juan Perón
Giovanni Gentile
Julius Evola

Types of Fascism

Italian
Falangism
National-Syndicalism
British Union
National-Socialism
Strasserism
Meme futurism
Clerical Fascism
Brazilian Integralism
Peronism

"[Fascism] was an explosion against intolerable conditions, against remediable wrongs which the old world failed to remedy. It was a movement to secure national renaissance by people who felt themselves threatened with decline into decadence and death and were determined to live, and live greatly."~Oswald Mosely

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=WyYTMA7MxMQ
soundcloud.com/obersturmbannfuehrer-music/cultivate-imperium-ep
archive.4plebs.org/pol/thread/161683906/#161688048
youtube.com/watch?v=aL3agVbX6K8&feature=youtu.be&t=29m44s
youtube.com/watch?v=utA-BrRWPSw
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Economics_of_fascism#Political_economy_of_Fascist_Italy
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

Aaaannnnnnddddd no one replies.

What is even the point anymore.

Any good fascist books?

Mosley's books and Codreanu's books are very good from what i hear.

Anyone has knowledge about Gentile's works? Where to begin? I'm kinda interested after watching this introduction to him
youtube.com/watch?v=WyYTMA7MxMQ

...

...

Ayoo
Where my fasci-monarquists at?
Mosley's

Indeed

You the Mexican user that was from the earlier threads in January? Spainbro just made a new thread.

bump

I saw him, but this one came first
And what did Wendy's taught us about those who are second place?
>January
Nah, I arrived to /fsg/ after giving Sup Forums a break at February, I think it was the Falange Edition

>Thread Theme:
soundcloud.com/obersturmbannfuehrer-music/cultivate-imperium-ep

Make America Great.

I think i recognize you. archive.4plebs.org/pol/thread/161683906/#161688048
This thread you talkin about?

anyone have tds 263?

Yep
That was a fun thread, even if it became less /fsg/ and more /lat/
Anyways, in a past thread about Brazil's monarchy restoration I proposed joining forces and have both Mexico and Brazil become Monarchies once again, I wish for a Hue to come here so he can lecture us on Integralism, as it could also be applied to Mexico

From a Fascist stand point, what Nietzsche is essential reading?

Every time I try to read Nietzsche I just tap out due to complete loss of interest.

I've recently read Men Among the Ruins, Ride the Tiger and Revolt Against the Modern World. For the most part I was very intrigued with Evola's work and to some degree these books have changed how I observe the world.

Yeah, 2 Mexicans and a Chilean, all of us talking about politics of the Hispanic world. Shill free as well.

There is nothing wrong with taking breaks from reading.

So, what shall we discuss today.

...

Views on the church?

Christianity is very important in a society, but like Salazar said, it should stay in a social position.

Let's discuss the Iron Guard.

These threads always die so fast whenever I get on.

Organized religion is a good way to unify people.

Well let's keep it alive, are you that user who really likes integralism?

fascism as a word has more utility than national socialism. though ideally we just stay out of politics and corner business. when the true whites control the economy there would be nothing to contest against us.

Can we discuss why the fuck democracies always flip-flop on who to join when it's facing communist/fascist, they did it in WW2 but then flip-flopped to the fascists in south america when communism reared it's ugly head.

No sir, another user.

Military dictatorships do not equal fascism, user.
My mistake.

Democracies are just retarded.

Intredasting that there are no polish representatives of fascism. Czechs didn't have fascism as well. I guess Slavs have mild approach to life

You guys had this fella.

because the facism of germany was populism, and the communism in south america was populaism. also in america the jews are capitalist, in europe the jews are communist. so there.

How do we make fascism mainstream and appealing?
I think it's becoming mainstream now but how can we make it more?
it's fine

Why stop at fascism? Why not just go full retard and be an illuminist?

I made that image, back when draw/pol/ was still active, I also made an Evola and a Corneliu wojak. Fun times, if you ask me Draw/pol/ was much more productive than the current /sig/ threads. Memes unite people, so does art, having Anons helping each other out in small ways, but actually doing instead of just planning helps out the individual and community a lot.
However, legislatures should always go according to a nation's religion. If you start making laws and allowing things that go agains religion only under the pretext of "If you don't like it then just don't do it" then religion will start feeling less alive and you will slowly find yourself in a country that goes away from religion
Because fascism seeks to unite the community that democracy separated. But it also killed commies in the times of the red scare, so they let fascism do it's thing in it's country, but once the communist menace is eliminated democracy will try to destroy fascism in the name of freedom

Yes but he was marginal and secondary, basically copying Western Europe

Any favorite Fascist symbol?

Alright, but that doesn't explain the stupidity of the democracies.

Well, for a start, make a party that supports the preservation of American culture that promotes peace. That would be very different.

by calling it something different. by just issuing it in argumentative form. define it by the dialectic of what democracy isnt, then birth the fusion of ideals into a popular policy.
>in2 realpolitik and win

Really?
I guess it just goes to show how democracies aren't very good.

>How do we make fascism mainstream and appealing?
Change the name and some symbols, go to the very basic ideas of fascism and bring back the Romantic Art-Deco-esque style it had back in the day.
>Speed
>Progress
>Unity
>Mixed markets
>Eja eja alala!
>F U T U R I S M
>Songs
>Art
Songs in specific, when you sing along a group you feel huge, songs about unity and the core aspects of adrenaline and the romanticism of struggle will make for some bitchin' good propaganda

Waiting for the economic collapse and fighting capitalism then
Also we have to construct the structure of the serious Fascist party in order to organize the masses when multiculturalism has destroyed any possibility of democracy

I have never seen this pic before, cool. I am not so sure about changing the name though, and futurism seems strange.

Mixed economy its not fascism, syndical-corporative-guild socialism is

Spainbro, is that you?

Its me

What’s your favourite type of Fascism, OP?

Welcome home. Make yourself comfortable.
Clerical Fascism. Something similar to how Salazar handled things.

Anyone here wondering how much Mosley's "Europe a Nation" would differ from the (((European))) Union?

Here is some stuff from the Polish user.
Well, there would probably be no shitty currency, like the Euro, and maybe the original intention wouldn't be to keep Germany from getting to powerful.

Why do prefer this form of Fascism?

It changes alot depending on the nation. What stats is the distaste for both capitalism and communism
The point is that we need to
1. differentiate ourselves from everyone else, have a clear doctrine and clear solutions
2. Create an atractive image. If you ask me a bunch of people that dominate authorithy, the arts, speech and culture is extremely attractive. The words “cultured thug” comes to mind

I guess there's two of us now. But I'm this Spainbro (pic related)

Some of the greatest dictators the western world has seen:

Antiquity:

- Sulla
- Caesar Augustus

Modern age:

- Pinochet
- Salazar
- Franco
- Castro

All of them died in their beds, and were never thrown out of office.

Because i believe that religions like Christianity can unite populations, and also keep people away from degeneracy, while also keeping them alert on the jews, being able to hate them for both political, and religious reasons. You have to understand, Fascism is always different in every country. A Spanish fascist isn't the same as a British fascist.

I am not a christian. But have been in the "well, Christianity has played a pivotal role in the shaping and foundation of western culture and society" camp for awhile.

However I find Bowden's words here really drive an important point home:

youtube.com/watch?v=aL3agVbX6K8&feature=youtu.be&t=29m44s

What are your guys' thoughts on him saying Christianity is essentially left wing?

Please see my post above with soundcloud link... I'm trying to make music with a higher purpose.

2 Spanish anons? Well, what ideology do you both believe in.

Maybe start by making a new flag...

Hm, I never really thought of it that way. So, you’re saying that fascism will be largely shaped by the issues of a country? Could you give an example?

As I said in earlier threads, some kind of National Socialism without the emphasis of Nazi Germany on racial hierarchy. I would rather have a non-capitalistic meritocracy based on moral and personal virtues rather than a racialist one.

Too be honest, i am not the true expert, maybe ask one of the Spanish anons, they know more than me.
So, like Falangism, that is of course, if you don't like National Syndicalism.

You can recommend some ideas when a flag thread comes around.

José Antonio's National Syndicalism was largely a response to his time. The "syndicalism" part hints at a decentralized opposition to capitalism, based (precisely) on syndicates. But that was 1920s Spain. We could probably devise an ideology that encompasses both workers and entrepreneurs' rights without being so focused on class struggle. I still agree with José Antonio's critique of capitalism, though.

Well of course, fascism is afterall, against capitalism and communism. I do prefer the idea of corporatism though.

How would you explain corporatism?

fascism is always a direct response to marxism stirring in the country

I don't know anything of fascist Spain, but:
>Mosley didn't hate slavs and wasn't an anti-semite. largely anti-war and thought Churchill was a degenerate Warhawk faggot
>Mussolini considered Italy to be a laughing stock, men were effeminate losers, and the people had lost their religious values. wanted to restore the Roman Empire.
>hitler hated slavs, hated jews for ww1, and wanted to undo the bullshit treaty their jewish government signed their country away to as a result of ww1. wanted to ensure Germany's survival by creating an economic powerhouse better than the US so they couldn't be used again

as an example of a future fascist ideology, America's fascism would probably create a Christian English speaking nation to force their population to fall under one belief. probably similar to Mussolini without the shit tier military

How do you feel about the F A S H W A V E

Well, from what an user told me, all companies work together for the good of the country. It's basically what was used in Fascist Italy and Salazar's Portugal.

Reee! Scum! All of you! Gahh

NO TRUMP NO KKK NO FACIST USA

Getting burnt out on it. That's why I decided to make my own music. But the movement needs to be edgy and "cool" for the kiddies - and Fashwave achieves this. The problem I have is any dumb ass kid can make electronic music. So the amount of quality content is very small.

You can join on the discussion if you want.

you will find race fits in easy
because africans are low iq in general and have little impulse control so rape kill and steal more often
same with arabs
so youll find with a meritocracy they self sort in the heirarchy

Ok, by that definition I stand 100% by that ideal. It can only be an ideal, though, as the very system of capitalism requires of intra-national competition between the companies. But the more we could attain that ideal state, the better. It's certainly not what is happening right now.

So, it’s only a temporary thing until you get your shit sorted? How would you move on from it, though? There will always be something trying to subvert society.

It's pretty cool.
I believe it still allows for competition between companies though.

But what I wanted to state is that either in NatSoc or Fascism capitalist system is abolished (Property exist in other economic systems like feudalism for example, the thing that caracterize capitalism is the property of capital as technic instrument of economic domination and as the only way the economy can work, Natsoc has the figure of the Betriebsführer, and replaces private property with "right of leadership" or Furherprinzip, in where everything was controlled by the state as in public property but the owner or entrepeneur holds the obligation to carry the administration of his property, and the right of inheritance of the said property, abd with high bushiness nationalized, while in classic fascism everything is structured around the vertical union / guild / corporation framed by the state, in which the property acts in a similar way to the same principle of leadership, in order to organize the nation as if it were the organs of a body)

Only if you allow for exceptions. Also I don't buy the whole "race realist" package. I think there's some truth to it, but not as much truth as white nationalists like to believe. I'm by no means an environmentalist, nor a social constructivist; I think there's a major part to be played by genes/innate traits in personality and psychological development overall, but it's still malleable. So no, I don't think it's as clear-cut as you think it is.

Not really, the Estado Novo only formed with most support of the public, since the first republic was very unstable.
I still believe Private Property is a right for every citizen, which is why i really don't like Strasserism.

How would that work out? Companies competing against each other but at the same time watching for the good of the State? Let's take the agrarian industry: if one company has to sell more to survive (to not be devoured by its opposition), it could try lowering its quality standards. That's bad for the nation (the consumers), but it could be the only way to survive in a capitalistic system. What do you think.

I believe in a sort of national-syndicalism with biological materialism, secularism, labour-based currency and a Spanish style "volkisch" ideal

Well, all companies will still remain private. I guess it more encourages companies to work for the better of the state, while at the same time, still staying in competition.. I do believe it worked out in Italy and Portugal.

Where are you from?

More than a flag, one should have an A E S T H E T I C that makes anyone think of you and your phylosophy.
In order to develop and A E S T H E T I C one should have a doctrine and stick to it, set up rules and follow them
So start asking yourself some questions, like why, how and what?
My philosophy can be explained with
>Unity
>Realism (Anti-fakeness)
>Timeless Progress
>Locality
Do something like than, then you develop a worldview, an A E S T H E T I C and then you start working on symbols
>Fascism capitalist system is abolished
Capitalism as we see it, yes, but in a society that sees things as Left vs Right it does seem as "Mixed market" and when you try to quiquly explain your economic system to a normie it would be much better to leave it that way for now, later explain in more detail but only after you have de-LeftVsRight his mind

I'm for companies remaining private as long as they don't undermine the fundamental values and necessities of the state or the people as a whole. I too reject Strasserism on the same basis. But still, the problem remains: how to conjugate private profit and intra-national competition with the ideal of being as good to the nation as possible? I refer again to my example about the alimentary industry.

its not temporary, but a radical correction. the Roman Empire.

From what i gathered, it does give give stuff in turn for political loyalty. I guess it means in the major corporations that work towards for the better of the state.

Salazar was epic glorious stuff.

youtube.com/watch?v=utA-BrRWPSw

Okay, yeah, that could be one way to achieve it. State-wide incentives for companies that are better for the common good, restrictions for those that aren't.

Yeah, people have to be given the right to work for themselves and be rewarded for their work. But always with a sense of belonging. Communists tend to forget that people don't five a shit about camaraderie, the revolution, etc when they are fucking hungry. Also, the countries that do better economically are those that protect private property, so communism is out, but aso capitalist countries that turn into plutocracies also do horrible
>how to conjugate private profit and intra-national competition with the ideal of being as good to the nation as possible?
Companies that behave are kept alone, companies that do more good are rewarded, companies that do bad are bought and re-organized (con't loose them jobs)

I guess this could give the Basic idea, yeah, it's Wikipedia, but there is nothing left without a citation. They privatized many things. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Economics_of_fascism#Political_economy_of_Fascist_Italy

I think that you are confusing personal property with private property.
Of course, personal and some sort of private are permitted under fascism, but the state decided what was to be produced, in what quantity, by what methods and to whom it was to be distributed, as well as the prices that would be charged and the wages that would be paid and what dividends or other income would be allowed to be collected from private owners, as a way to organize economy in order to create an organic united nation

Andalusia, Seville

Interesting. Thanks for the input. I think that's exactly the core of the matter It's good to see that most of us ITT are both against communism and against unrestricted capitalism.

Thanks for the link, I'll go read it.

Thanks for answering.
Also, Do you think it's desirable such a high level of economic centralization by the State? As you described it, I could be more liberal (in the European sense of the word) than you are, and I'm pretty anti-liberal.