YouTube marks RT as russian government

>when you see it

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=pswQLA9mWmA
bbc.co.uk/editorialguidelines/guidelines/impartiality
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

Go look at BBC. They change the wording. It's fucking bullshit.

...

fucking kikes

What about AJ+ or Al Jazeera?
Are they marked as Qatari?

If so are Young Turks marked as Qatari state news seeings as how they are partnered with AJ+

HAHAHAHA this is great stuff

Russian Television is funded by Russia? I can't believe this.

Look up Voice of America. It has the same wording as the RT notice, while PBS has the same wording as BBC.
Technically both are accurate. PBS is mostly funded by public donations and BBC is mostly funded by tv licenses. RT and VOA are primarily funded by their respective governments directly. It’s a small distinction.

WTF. this is surreal. why is the BBC not marked the same?

>you cant use wikipedia to write your essay! find a real source
>i cant trust this news video on youtube, wikipedia says its from Russia!
the absolute fucking state of this country

This couldn't be less surprising from jewtube

Because the BBC is impartial unlike RT which is right wing propaganda

...

really makes you think

>BBC
>impartial
kek

...

...

kek AMERILARDS actually have this kind of warnings
HAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAH

...

The British government does not directly fund or own BBC. It’s technically owned by the British public. Doesn’t mean it isn’t government propaganda though.

>Impartial

It's all so tiresome.

I expected an american flag.

>BBC
Big Black Colt?

...

>Implying U.S media isn't entirely owned by the CIA.

Great now tag all israeli-run media outlets

I don't have those mark...
>checks flag
AHAHAHA...

Yes, I've seen al-Jazeera videos marked as funded by Qatar.

this isn't so bad. people should know the tru-
gas the bikes race war now

They are registered as Russian propaganda.

How do liberals continue to guilt trip people over blacks and asians being persecuted, but not see this as a modern-day version?

Is telesur marked as Venezuelan propaganda?

Hickok45 here

...

...

>impartial

...

bbc

bbc not being cuckpraganda

yeah us too

old pic is old

>in whole or in part by several Latin American governments
Why not just say Venezuela and Cuba? Do they protect their names because its literally communist?

Really makes you think

bbc only hires negros

This one mexican sure got a kick out of that.

certainly looks like it

It's not even as bad as Channel 4 or Sky News.

youtube.com/watch?v=pswQLA9mWmA

youtube.com/watch?v=pswQLA9mWmA

Which one of those stuffed doctor who and ancient rome with token blacks?

Yeah they're still bad. I don't care about Dr Who but Shakespeare is where I draw the line entirely.

BBC is European union funded as well and is full far left bigoted biased corrupted news and fake news.

It's one most worthless piece shit news agency's due to left wing biased and distorted news story's.

Impartial my fucking ass

How British of you ol' chap

bbc.co.uk/editorialguidelines/guidelines/impartiality

Wrong.

...

British police are manly

>bbc.co.uk/editorialguidelines/guidelines/impartiality

Just because they claim they are doesn't mean that's a fact

Utter Hunks

>So impartial they politicize everything into a leftist-sjw agenda and sympathize with communists

>in whole or in part

thats a massive difference wouldn't you agree?

it's not a distinction, it's virtue signaling.

>in whole or in part
So which is it then?

That Simpsons screen of UK changing into Pakistan ... Sauce?

right, but if BBC receives some sort of subsidies or similar (cant really think of the word) they would technically be "funding them" right?

like if RT is getting money through a russian regulation that affects all businesses then they can say its funded partially by the russian gov.

God you're retarded. If you even bothered to watch you would know that RT is not right wing. It is pro-Russian propaganda.
The BBC is pro-egalitarian and cosmopolitan propaganda.

>RT is funded in whole or in part by the Russian government

...

heres your free (You)

...

...

ok nigel farageson of scotlandson portlandson

...

n-no. no way

>Because the BBC is impartial

that's classic thanks mate hahaha

>Totenberg
literally Deathmountain

Really activates my almonds.

Are you actually mentally challenged, BBC and RussiaToday are on the same tier.

Is there a Russian version of youtube?

>RT is funded in whole or in part by the Russian government

But go to NPR, which is partially funded by the American government, and it says

>NPR is a publicly funded American broadcaster

Why not use the same language?