I’ve never seen the media carry out as many attacks on a president as they have trump...

I’ve never seen the media carry out as many attacks on a president as they have trump. Even at the height of W bush hate it wasn’t this bad.

Other urls found in this thread:

nationalreview.com/2017/01/obamas-many-scandals-abuse-government-power-worse-sex-scandals/
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CNN_controversies
youtube.com/watch?v=O2KYg49fvjA
google.com/amp/s/amp.usatoday.com/amp/694719001
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

Fxuk drumpf

...

...

American media is owned by just a handful of people. If they dont like you then the media will continuously attack you. I guess they worry Trump may actually do something that is pro american rather than just pro business.

Remember, wages are no longer linked to productivity. You will not see benefits from a growing economy. Only the rich will reap the rewards because they have designed things that way.

Ireland with the black pills this sunday morning.

I love how everyone who hates trump can never tell me something he did that warrants the hate when obama did so so much worse and c they gave no fucks then but as soon as trump does the same thing its the end of the world. Its a Damn shame more people don't think for themselfs and just blindly follow whatever side sounds nicer.

Um, sweetie, CNN told me he's racist and that's all I need to know.

Mad magazine is making fun of the president? This is unprecedented.

Mad magazine makes fun of every celebrity and politician you whiny fuck

what you call 'attacks' are just regular news reporting on a daily scandal, Trump is his own worst enemy. He is guilty as fuck. Look at Kushner extorting the Arabs to bail him out of 666. If Trump is so fucking rich why doesnt he bail out his own son in law? They are both broke as fuck.

...

Trump may introduce protectionist policies that lead to higher wages for workers but lower profits for multinationals.

So of course the rich hate him. The rich own the media. So the media hates him. The sheeple trust the media because so many of them are braindead and of course a lot of them think they are the winners when they earn $50,000 and have million dollar mortgages. So they support candidates that screw over the working class.
We have lost. I dont think there is any way for such a disunited bunch that is the common man to resist such concentrated wealth and power.

Good. They are so obsessed and angry that all they have on their minds is Trump. This is a good thing, if nobody was talking about him, then you should start worrying.

Its pretty clear to me that the american rich hate trump and thats why all this shit is in the news. Obama carried out actual crimes and the news barely batted an eye since he was their guy in politics.

A whole edition dedicated to it? Also flatout calling him “unlikeable”

No, it's because almost all media is owned by liberals. Not that complicated.

The rich are neither liberal nor conservative. Which is why the american news media is always trying to push various ideological ideas that are contrary. They just happen to serve business.

If you are talking about Soros rich than yes. They have transcended any need for a political party. The only thing they serve is evil. Sometimes I can't even blame them, if you look at society from the outside looking in, there is an involuntary reaction of complete disgust.

That wasnt even true

It was true and it was fucking hilarious.

6 corporations control 90% of your media. There are 6 men that if they can agree on something, it is fact in the eyes of all american media.

For example, Trump risks damaging their business. So Trump is bad.

Which crimes?

Drone bombings of americans without trial. Fast and the furious scandle. He actually killed people.
nationalreview.com/2017/01/obamas-many-scandals-abuse-government-power-worse-sex-scandals/

This article lists many.

Mad is still a thing?

That's because America has never had a clown for president before. He just gives off way too much material for people to ignore. He makes comics and entertainers jobs easy.

What did they for Obama?

How do you tell the good news sources from the bad ones? How do you tell the difference between real and fake news? One minute the media is owned by rich corporations and can't be trusted, and the next someone will cite a right-wing news article or fox news segment in defence of him. Which is it?

Saying that Mad is the problem is a strawman. Its not a problem if a satire magazing mocks a politician. The problem is that all news media is united against him.

Hush up bong, your country can't even decide if they want to stay in the EU or not while simultaneously getting cucked by muslims. And your police force is the laughing stock of the world.

You can't. Your news is either run as a business and is compromised for that reason, or it's state run and is compromised for that reason. Why in the world would anybody want to willingly give you the facts and just the facts.

I have no idea if that is a trustworthy news magazine. I do know that it contains a handy list of things that Obama did wrong. Things that I am aware of from other sources and that people do not claim are made up so I linked it to you.

Instead of deflecting maybe try and say which things are wrong in the article?

Has Trump gotten rid of the muslim prayer curtains?
Any apologies over dijongate from Hannity?
When are tan suits being banned?
Where is Trumps long form birth cert?

Single biggest defamation campaign against a single person in human history.

I'm not the person you linked the article to, friendo. I didn't ask for it. I'm just generally asking how to tell the difference between real and fake news. Because you never hear the left screaming fake news, only the right. It does genuinely seem to be like the pic here

>How do you tell the good news sources from the bad ones?

You can only trust primary sources, i.e. raw one-hour long video of a speech that Trump gave. You cannot trust edited sources, i.e. the same speech edited down to 5 minutes to be broadcast on CNN.

i have some lefty family members.
no matter what the subject, they can drag in Trump.
when they start that shit, it is fun to ask what he has done wrong. no replies.

Thank you Ireland
Royal is my Race

>Fuck Trump, Trump is a racist woman hater

>Fuck Obama, 13% of the population commits over 50% of the violent crime

Not so subtle there.

You made an accusation that one minute im claiming that news cant be trusted and then i link to a news site. I explained that as you asked. Its just out of the convenience of linking to a list of things obama did wrong. So dont be such a little bitch.

The term "fake news" wasnt in use until recently to slander any alternative news sources. Then it stuck to the MSM because there is an awareness that the american MSM is not real news. Its a narrative meant ot persuade people to think certain ways rather than to inform them.

...

I agree with this sentiment, but you also have to be willing to acknowledge that right wing news sources are guilty of this also, just to make him look good instead of bad. Also, it's really not hard to make Trump look bad when he's barely literate, repeats himself and has a seemingly tiny vocabulary, and says things like "we'll take the guns first, and do due process second".

If you think that's all that's wrong with Trump, you haven't been paying attention. You can give him the benefit of the doubt on the race thing, but he falls short in almost all areas. Also, why do right wingers constantly mention Obama and Hillary? Get over it, just because they're shit as well doesn;t make Trump good. It's just a way of deflecting.

Stop being a subversive fucking nigger Muhammad, we notice.

MAD makes fun of everyone OP, they did it with Obama as well.

.

It’s a good magazine, better then Cracked by a long shot.

Also hilariously Facebook has stopped using the term "fake news" and CNN has called for everyone to stop using it. Why?

Because it undermined their credability. The idea being out there that news could be fake is a dangerous one.

>Remember, wages are no longer linked to productivity
If you're a nigger, maybe. Anything resembling a business owner is doing pretty good right now.

Every mannerism in your speech is "I'm a day 1 faggot from Twitter here to subvert"

They did it with Hillary as well

...

>Also, why do right wingers constantly mention Obama and Hillary? Get over it, just because they're shit as well doesn;t make Trump good. It's just a way of deflecting.
The fucking irony

Also, im not a right winger. I can just see Hillary was a monster and the American media is attacking Trump.

I agree that he is not presidental material however it has become clear that the American media is of one mind on things and tries to influence rather than inform. Thats dangerous to a democracy.

It wasn't an accusation, it was a genuine inquiry. Stop whining, you sound triggered, it's embarrassing.

My point is, how do you (or people like you) tell the difference between what's real and what isn't. That news article could be bullshit, and if it was about Trump, you'd probably say it was.

How do you know the MSM isn't real news? It's an institution that's been around for decades, way longer than Trump or any other living president. Why is it all of a sudden untrustworthy? Just because it's saying things you don't like? Where's the proof it's fake?

We were literally in the middle of a conversation about Trump, though. I wasn't deflecting, I was asking why they deflected.

he said mean things...

We've literally reached a point where reporting on the things Trump is doing wrong reflects badly on the people reporting it rather than Trump himself. It's a dictators wet dream

Because Bush the shabbos goy, slave of Israel, did not challenge the establishment like Trump did. Bush played by their rules when it counted. Be careful comparing the two they are both R but are not on he same side.

>presidential material
only a dumb ass left winger would think this is a thing. same people that worship Hollywood actors

I don't know if you noticed, but most of us couldn't care less about obama and hillary. Obama is gone and Trump is reversing the shitty policies obama put into place. Hillary is barely alive anymore and probably won't live past 2020. Nobody cares.

I think the Trump hate is a psyop to not only divide the country and push white hate but also to prop him up as a

Trump is in deep with the Moosead.

Momo links:
Roy Maxwell
Ghislaine Maxwell
Cohn
Epstein
Silverstein

All these characters ran/run spy rings/ underage sex trafficking schemes to get blackmail material to keep the government of the US under their thumb.
Unless the Clintons are charged and Obama gets unmasked...then I won't believe that the current POTUS is not a tool of the elite.

Like how no one here talks about Soros compromising voting machines and flipflopping vote machines?
That the records are done with float not int or double?

>It wasn't an accusation
It clearly was and you do it again in the same post LOL.

>Stop whining, you sound triggered, it's embarrassing.
yes everyone who calls you out on your bullshit behavior is whinning. Nice of you to frame it that way. We are all whinning and triggerd when we say you are full of shit. You feel embarrassed? You should.

>My point is, how do you (or people like you) tell the difference between what's real and what isn't. That news article could be bullshit, and if it was about Trump, you'd probably say it was.
That is the accusation i mentioned. You cant drop it even after I explained that it was just a convenient way to link to a list of Obama crimes. and that i dont trust the magazine itself.

>How do you know the MSM isn't real news?
Based on their behavior and collaberation on political news stories. They have been caught so many times.

So fuck off.

>Playing ignorant so you can gum up the thread with nothing talk over things everyone already knows just so you can vanish when you are forced to make a statement or or answer a question with an ounce of subtance

>Things we haven't seen every day for a year

Pick one kike.

>most of us don't care about Hillary or Obama
Could've fooled me, honestly. The man himself still tweets furiously about them to save his own ass.

that's because not even dubya was this retarded

...and that guy was borderline mentally challenged and started two wars

so.... go figure.

...

You let me know when you're ready to pull my dick from your throat.

...

You are singing to the choir. Politifact is very very biased.

It gets to a point where it is beyond wrong. It's unamerican in every way. The entire media, DOJ, FBI, CIA attacking a family every minute of every day trying to completely destroy them for simply running for office. Nobody, not even king nigger would deserve this and us conservatives despised him. Not for who he is but because his socialist policies don't work. The tea party protested his policies, never attacked anyone and even picked up their own trash at their rallies. The "resistance" want Trumps family execution and for what? It has nothing to do with policy. We are criminalizing elections now. People complain why good people never run for office. This is why. Now good people will be scared to death to run after this. I don't give a fuck what anyone says. It is wrong. Nobody deserves what the Trump family is getting. Nobody.

>The man himself still tweets furiously about them to save his own ass.
Mainly because liberals give him no choice but to speak about them. Because it is the liberals that cannot give up on speaking about obama and hillary. They are keeping it alive.

CNN actually started the fake news term in response to the kid who took a shotgun to that comet pizza place. I was unemployed finishing up my degree so I remember that happening. Trump turned it on the media. This goes beyond the retarded left right spectrum. It’s rich elite vs other rich elite.

so what is that supposed to mean?

They look like an unlikable bunch of people and i completely agree with you. They are being attacked. There are personal attacks on his family in the american media because he isnt the candidate that works for big business.

Jewgle has started manipulating search results hard for narratives, try to find the video of CNN admitting live on air they're Hillary's biggest supports, go into image search and type something like "white couple"

Google has fucked with their algorithm to way over represent blacks in their search results so they can avoid the accusation of racism.

They are both fucking retards. Trump is just way more retarded, much like his fanbase.

He dodged the draft and he collided with the Russians

He's a traitor

Protip: It's easy to find if you search through bings videos.

Another good test? Type things like "Hillary is" in both Google and Bing. See what auto-completes.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CNN_controversies
This is an interesting read actually. It lists all the bullshit CNN has done.

Also I think that british (who knows if its a VPN or not) faggot is gone lol.

(((panic)))

Oh he colluded, with Russia? Funny because it's never been proven leftist degenerate faggot.

only cucks and soygoys dislike the GEOTUS

Right on my fucking cue too, the fastest way to get rid of a kike is to force them to say something of substance becuase they have none.

The FBI said its happened and that seven states were hacked to vote pro Trump.

It was on NBC. It's a matter of open public record.

What you're seeing is simply the result of anti-white racism. Anybody that stands up for traditional European values will be labeled as the next Hitler. This wouldn't be possible without our current demographics.
And it will only get worse.

They hate him because they can't control him.
He is the only US president in recent history that has the balls to fight back against them, and they are terrified because of it.

They are losing and they know it.

>How do you know the MSM isn't real news? It's an institution that's been around for decades, way longer than Trump or any other living president. Why is it all of a sudden untrustworthy? Just because it's saying things you don't like? Where's the proof it's fake?

I don't know how to put this neighbour, without seeming like a condescending prick, so I apologize
The MSM has never been anything other than making money. I've been watching these people for the better part of the last half a century. One thing I have noticed again and again is a lack of partisan coverage in political arenas, a propensity to tell lies in such a way to over hype whatever they speak about. A good example is the whole global warming thing that started in the early 70's. By the year 2k we were supposed to be living in a flooded world with a much higher temperature
That doesn't even include stupid hit pieces on people who disagree with them (in whatever fear mongering they were engaged in)

As you get older and your way of thinking inevitably changes, you'll notice that all MSM get paid by alot of governments to do positive reporting or, alternately, pay them to not run true, but damaging stories. Literally being paid by governments to do or not do news

But don't feel too badly neighbour, you've done exactly zero research on how governments have regulated news in all is mass marketed forms

ps. The MSM hate trump simply because he cuts them out in getting his message out to the public. They have no chance to twist what he is saying. He just tweets it or has a press session without them. If you think thats wrong, I ask you examine how many lies get told about him. With such disqualifies as "Sources familiar with his thinking" or "Sources close to Trump"

I just tested these out and they're all fake, either the search terms weren't completed at all, or the search results came up completely different. There could be a whole bunch of reasons for this, but it's possible (and is quite likely) that the image is just edited.

The rest of those images just seem to be
>politifacts bad, mmm kay?
I didn't realise that one site was the entire MSM media now, across all countries, including every individual worker at these stations.

No they didn't, you are spinning facts.

Could you link me to a description of voting machines being hacked? I was under the impression that was total nonsense that everyone laughs at now.

Also why is a proven Russian spy the president of the US and not in jail?

They were easy on bush considering all the destruction he got away.

Oh you're determined little faggot ain't ya, gotta give you credit for that at least.

youtube.com/watch?v=O2KYg49fvjA

You're in denial. The FBI has flipped how many Trump cronies to testify against him? 50 people have left the Trump White House.

It's done. He knows they'll have him soon.

google.com/amp/s/amp.usatoday.com/amp/694719001

Russia is done and Trump will hang for betraying his country

Google suggestions work differently for everyone, depending on their region and search history. Also, suggestions are generated from things that people search for. So, if a lot of people search for "why do white guys have small dicks" that's going to be at the top of the suggestions. That doesn't mean google is manipulating that.

On the other hand, I tried all of the searches for "american ..... " and I got the same results, so google is obviously responsible for that. But I don't see the problem in trying to push diversity.

Half of you americans are racist as fuck anyway, so who can blame them.

I will say that there is an old episode of "The Awful Truth" that show how someone could hack the Diebold machines without detection.

...

>google.com/amp/s/amp.usatoday.com/amp/694719001
>This scanning had no impact on Wisconsin’s systems or the election,

pfffft

The term 'white couple' shows mixed race couples because a page having an image of an ordinary white couple would not explicitly describe them as being a 'white couple', they would be simply be called a 'couple'. Pages featuring images of mixed couples are more likely to mention the fact that they are mixed and would have the words 'white', 'african american/black', and 'couple' in the text somewhere. It is the same with searching 'american inventors'. You get more blacks because they are described as 'african americans' whereas white americans, if they're described at all, are known simply as 'white'. Change the search term to 'american inventors -african' and you'll see that this is true.