As a libertarian I believe the government has a very limited job

A. ensure the security of the borders and block illegals immigration, if necessary by force

B. establish a civil and criminal law system and pay for judges and public prosecuters

C. build roads, bridges and train tracks to ensure commerce can function

I do not believe the state has a right to interfere in people’s personal lives, whether this is the growing, consumption and sale of drugs, the selling of one’s body as part of a prostitution business, engaging in same gender sexual acts, voicing one’s opinion, the private pursuit of religious duties or the ownership of knives, spears, bows and firearms.

Yet, while this is a very sensible positions I have repeatedly heard the argument from the left and the right that this is all well and just BUT... and then they bring up all kinds of BS, the left wants free speech to be curtailed and welfare introduced and high taxes... the right wants a big military that goes beyong defending borders, wants abortions outlawed and drugs made illegals etc.

How come both the left and right agree on a nanny state approach to the world?

I have abandoned the right in favor of libertarianism. Our government will always be a giant abortion of a mess.

Why is that? Same here. Nobody dares to lower taxes and eliminate unnecessary laws and government interference. Nobody reduces welfare. Why?

Here in the US, we have so many people on welfare and section 8 housing its sickening. We have illegals flooding our country from all over central America who get welfare, get housing subsidiaries, and work under the table. In turn, they send the majority of their money back to their shithole origin. I have no idea why we haven't eliminated this nonsense. I thought Trump would be our best hope, but he has been dropping the ball big time. I am sure you guys are experiencing the same.

have you noticed that the only libertarians are white, nerdy kids with no friends?

Jamal is not going to care what your ideals are, nor will Pedro. Your ideology is weak

If you take the non-aggression principle seriously then it necessarily leads to ancap. If you don't then it leads necessarily to the Kochtopus and leftism in general.

This is why lolbertardianism died. Rothbard saw the error of his ways so why can't you?

The same can be said about natsocs.
Fat people that would be considered subhumans by the Reich

Greetings fellow german libertarian. Good feeling having the best political opinion in the best county isn't it?

At least I am not a socialist and a hypocrite.

Yes, greetings to you too. I feel well today too.

Jamal and Pedro likely have no political opinions at all and probably don't vote.

>look at my picture of this fancy man
>I'm a very serious, fancy person
>why aren't you as serious and fancy as me?

As a rich person, I love the idea of libertarianism. Please, please let me fire my workforce for robots and slaves. I'll hire a tenth of you back for a tenth of your wages if you shoot anyone that tries to stop me. I'll label my products with different brand logos so no one even knows what to boycott.

The federal government is what keeps me from treating you peasants like what you are. Libertarians what to return to the feudal age, that's fine by me. I'll be a lord that follows the NAP. I'm just surprised that this system has any real momentum.

it's painful, because I know Germans will never vote for it

This is me and my trusted dog Jeffrey.

You're not a rich person. Otherwise you would know that the best way to stay rich is to get politicians to ban your competition.

>Libertarian

who the fuck cares, clown ideology for retards living in lala land

...

>partei der vernunft
Kek, this is just like atheists calling themselves rationalists or brights. I can sense all the tipping through my screen.

...

low-IQ people aren't able to make it in a free-market capitalist society

>B. establish a civil and criminal law system and pay for judges and public prosecuters
>I do not believe the state has a right to interfere in people’s personal lives
what will you do if anyone decided his personal right is going on a killing spree? will you violate his personal right? what are you? a facist?

Fuck off statist cuck

There is a constitution and criminal law in any libertarian state. Someone’s personal rights end where the personal rights of another person start. This is why religious expressions in public should not be allowed, but homosexual acts in someone’s private bedroom is none of anyone’s business.

If someone threatens you with a deadly weapon you have every right to shoot them. That's not a radical idea at all.

>Libertarianism
Jewish bullshit

wont a homophobic person will feel that his rights are violated if he hears them having sex?
its not, as long as you accept that the fact you can rob someone but you are not doing it, doesnt means that the person that is doing it does anything wrong