Banning guns won't save liv-

>banning guns won't save liv-
Uh, you were saying, Sup Forums?

Other urls found in this thread:

injuryprevention.bmj.com/content/injuryprev/early/2015/06/09/injuryprev-2015-041586.full.pdf?keytype=ref&ijkey=doj6vx0laFZMsQ2
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_U.S._states_and_territories_by_life_expectancy
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Murder_in_the_United_States_by_state
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

Ownership isn't necessarily legal ownership which you're trying to ban, is it? Where does Chicago or NY fall and why is RI on there twice?

>Rhode island on there twice.
Where's the second RI user?
I think you meant New Jersey. Which is indeed on there twice.

I think the NJ on the left is supposed to be New York
injuryprevention.bmj.com/content/injuryprev/early/2015/06/09/injuryprev-2015-041586.full.pdf?keytype=ref&ijkey=doj6vx0laFZMsQ2

The graph clearly includes sucides which would happen with or without firearms

This graph only shows the relation between guns and deaths related by guns. It does not show other causes of death. It could very well be possible that where there are less guns people get killed more with knives... which is not taken in to account in this case. This graph alone is a shit argument. Try again

Not sure why people need statistics for this.
More guns = more gun deaths.
However less guns doesn't mean less people are gonna die.
Death rate will be around the same just with a different tools. (see Shistralia example).

The US has a non-white problem, not a gun problem.

>firearm related deaths
Nice try, schlomo.

Keep it up. You gun grabbers will never learn. Let’s see if you can grow the NRA by another 500,000 this week. Thanks for your hard work!

Yes, banning guns saves lives. Just look at Mexico!

Take out suicides and then you'll have a graph depicting how many "minorities" live in each state.

what about total murder rate?

but what's the point of saving lives if we can't even have guns?

This.

Suicides are more successful when done with a gun vs most of the other popular methods

Violent deaths in general tend to be lower in states with less gun ownership

As is life expectancy
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_U.S._states_and_territories_by_life_expectancy

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Murder_in_the_United_States_by_state

Remove suicide and post it again, fgt. Meanwhile, sage.

MORE KIDS DROWN IN COASTAL STATES, BAN OCEANS!!

No one cares if suicides are more successful or not, the reality is that these stats are very misleading as the include suicides.
Look at homicide rate for white Americans and compare it to European countries, and African Anerican homicide rates compared to African countries, then please shut the fuck up. Why don’t you post the stats showing that gun deaths are more likely in gun free zones.

...

>Violent deaths in general tend to be lower in states with less gun ownership
Nice theory, too bad it isnt true

Eat a dick, pussy

But what about Chicago, or El Salvador, or Brazil. They banned guns go live there bitch fuck your painting

>having millions of niggers in your country doesn't increase murde-

So you're saying that:
More people own x = proportional number of people die from x.

If 15% of people die from guns in a alabama, one could expect 15% to die from guns in jew york.

Pic related;
Guns do NOT influence homicide rates

Vermont has a very high gun ownership rate, but it's 96% white.

Many of the top murder rate states you mentioned are full of niggers. See pic.

How stupid are you?

Depsite having a lower rate than WV, NJ has about 10x the total amount of gun related deaths.

How's those progressive gun control laws working for NJ blacks? There real solution is to stop housing all your didindunutins in projects/public housing and stick them in rural homesteads. If they aren't caged in poverty traps, they might stop killing each other.

I NEED MUH GUN FOR UH.. FUN. YES FUN.

West Virginia's murder rate per capita is higher than New Jersey's though.

Updated.

Deceptive graph. Who ever hears about all those supposed massacres that happen in Alaska?

Shame people just seek out and cite statistics that confirm their biases one way or the other, instead of arguing off of principle. You're just wrong on this issue. Your position is not reality-based.

It actually is though?

/thread

It's funny because 90% of the guns used in Mexican crime came from or through the USA and their problem is exactly that we don't give 2 shits about gun control.

>tfw Russians are niggers, but also hackers

meant for

The 'gun deaths' would become stabbings / poisonings / jumps of bridges etc.

>deaths per 100k
Stop fucking trying to cross information based on an equal population you kike. Obviously the states with a higher population density are going to score lower on something that is compared to a state that has barely a 3rd of the represented population.

Every single one of you cunts can't realize that most gun control is in coastal states and in high density cities, where the majority of gun crime is commited aside from chicago.

Alaska's number is high because of massive suicide rates stemming from it being shit to live there. The chart didn't say anything about massacres.

Not to mention the statistics were pulled from 2013. I hope OP dies in their sleep for being so useless.

Gun crime has sky rocketed within the last few years. Mainly by niggers.

cuck, who cares. even tho its not true, life alone doesnt matter, but it matters how you die and for what.

You might want to include the millions of firearms related deaths that will happen if you try to confiscate our guns.

>Stop fucking trying to cross information based on an equal population you kike.
Deaths per 100k means deaths per population times 100k. Because 2 people are twice as likely to commit 1 crime as 1 person and you don't want population size skewing results. The times 100k is just so the number isn't a stupidly small to work with.
>Obviously the states with a higher population density are going to score lower on something that is compared to a state that has barely a 3rd of the represented population.
This has nothing to do with population density.

pic related says nothing. lets see how much total deaths went down and factor in the causes, then we see total violent crime and deaths goes up
>firearms related deaths
>banning cars reduces vehicular h0m0cide
no shit, but people will still kill in other ways, same with guns

See
Crime rates are from 2016, the most recent year with a completed FBI report on crime rates.

>guns are illegal in France
>still the victims of mass shootings
H-HOW IS THIS POSSIBLE?!

Because guns aren't illegal in France. There are 30 guns per 100 people in France. They have like the highest gun ownership rate in Europe after Switzerland, Finland, and Sweden.

Now do it by demographic

Now hear me, I want to ask you a question
Is high gun ownership caused by niggers?

Where's Vermont?

There's a direct correlation between gun ownership and shilling for gun control. Though that's probably just America.

It's crime that causes niggers.