How come literally 0 conservaSHITs have beaten him in a debate? If he's such a "Le soyboy cuck xDDDD...

How come literally 0 conservaSHITs have beaten him in a debate? If he's such a "Le soyboy cuck xDDDD," then why does he always wipe the floor with the competition?

>RIP JF.

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=BHfYrYjpiJg
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

>the "man" who couldn't prove why it was immoral to fuck your daughter

Oh okay so you have a logical argument against Destiny's posi- oh wait, no you are making an appeal to popularity. Get out.

>"Man"
>Under 6 foot

His axiom for victory is only ever stated after the dialectic, for which is always in his favor. saged and gay

Stop. Please. I'm cringing so hard

Fuck off destiny

>manlet pedo
is there a worse combo?

Literally who?

He doesn't win, he red herrings and acts like he's right when he talks philosophy despite him being demonstrably wrong.

Destiny is the byproduct of a post-enlightenment society that deems consent as the standard for quality.

Unfortunately, "it doesn't affect you, therefore it shouldn't matter" stops being a valid debate technique after 8th grade.

21st century sophist. He wins on personality not reason. His viewers are usually too retarded to understand.

JF literally beat him in a debate tho lol. Destiny literally accepts that race realism has basis in reality.

Because jews don't argue. They lie.

Lol, I watched this cuck get btfo by jf. His fans are such soyboys, they completely ignore the fact that he’s just another disingenuous leftwing retard who can’t disprove anything that jf says so instead he just says “I don’t like the normative approach you guys come up with”. Of course that’s only because he’s a beta male who hates conflict but still. Destiny fan boys are the rick and morty fans of politics. This faggot couldn’t even take on naked ape.

He's a sophist and he doesn't argue in good faith. Plus he's a kike

you talk this man up, but don't post any of his argument. What do you want from us?

...

He uses clever but dishonest debate techniques to push his agenda. I think of him as good at arguing, not what he's arguing. There is a certain finesse to being able to support a stance on the fly, but that's more in line with a con-man.

MFW I don't even know who this guy is and OP didn't mention his name anywhere

but he's a douche. thats an instant disqualifier in any debate

KEK

We have found no one who has taken the platinumpill yet. We are all too weak.

youtube.com/watch?v=BHfYrYjpiJg

>this is the face of an insufferable faggot who makes this thread every single time he's between a match
ftfy tiny kys

>KEKing your own post

>Ryan Dawson’s your path

You need to stop making threads shilling him
You're really embarrassing yourself.

The Beard surrounds his gaping hole pussy. Doofus.

>manlet
>does not use condom so he makes a retardo baby
>has his dick pictures tweeted to 35K people by a failed pornstar, whom he gave password to his twitter
>could not win shit at starcraft 2
>always wondering why advertisers shun him
>shitposts himself on 4chin to get viewers

kys niggershit manlet

just report and sage

So how does it feel like not knowing what you’re talking about?

pedophile detected, reported to FBI

you can't beat anyone that uses talmudic debating techniques
the best you can do is use your own talmudic techniques and end in a stalemate.