Why does Sup Forums make moral arguments against leftists while simultaneously abandoning morality and advocating for...

Why does Sup Forums make moral arguments against leftists while simultaneously abandoning morality and advocating for violence against non-whites?

it's completely justified because communists and non-whites don't have souls and therefore aren't human

So if someone comes along with their own arbitrary definition of "human" and does not apply it to you, they would be justified in killing you?

This is a video of Casie Naistat that puts emotional and bystander guilt to promote and support Hillary Clinton. Whom he has had apparently ties with.


Thing is he congratulated Trump later without any sort of directed anger on a flight vlog video after the results of the election.

Even LATER in a interview he not-quite admitted that the video may have been paid for by the Clintons to get YouTubers to promote for Hillary.

Of course since Hillary is such a stupid old fuckin bitch she never quite understands how influence works.

We are trying to stop communists and scum from destroying our people,culture,and fabric of our country

They could try with all those guns they voted away.

No one advocates for harm to others races. Only preservation of our own. Also apparently we're inherently all racist anyhow. At least they teach it. So other races are far better off without whitey.

>violence against sub-humans
>immoral
pick one

>Sup Forums is one person

My moral stance is that life is easier, healthier and less complicated when people keep to their historical ethnic roots. No more colonization, no multi-ethnicism or racialism, no slavery, no genocide, just individual communities more or less keeping to themselves save for the occasional war.

I'm a race realist because I want a world that works for everybody, not one who's own community becomes swarth with hatred and instability because it has two or more racial interest groups vying for supremacy.

Really, people just need to stop mass importing useless third-worlders.

Because the one thing extremism doesn't tolerate is a sense of irony.

This

Holy shit we found the missing link between man and ape.

Violence against non-whites isn’t against morals. It’s agsinst YOUR morals that you’re trying to impose on other people.

>No one advocates for harm to others races.
You're either lying or seriously deluded. Sup Forums would support rounding people up by force and removing them from the host country regardless of legality.

morality is group-based. what is good for the group is, and has always been, the chooser of the moral. Race is the organic group. Violence against non-whites and leftists alike, if it is in the interest of whites, is moral for whites.

You mean arguments like this?

>Why does Sup Forums make moral arguments against leftists while simultaneously abandoning morality and advocating for violence against non-whites?
These things are not mutually exclusive. You can tie up a weak opponent in an argument by applying their own "standards" to their positions and forcing them to argue against themselves and at the same time advocate for violence against an opponent.

>Me: You leftist support the killing of black babies via abortion.
>Leftist: But you want to kill black people.
>Me: But I am not the one who cares about blacks. You are or so you say. They can all die for all I care but you only care about them when you use them against me.
>Leftist: But you only care about blacks when you use them against me in the abortion argument.
>Me: Pointing out that your support for abortion and the fact that large numbers of black babies are killed via abortion does not mean that I care for blacks. Pointing out a weakness in your positions does not mean that I care either way about the subject of your hypocrisy.
>Leftist: Then why point it out at all.
>Me: Because it binds you by the hypocrisy of your positions. That allows me to use your agenda against you.

My point is you can have it both ways and it will drive your opponent mad.

Most of the alt-right is transitioning out of the pseudo-Christian morality that’s dominant today.
Morality centered around “being nice” is not morality. It’s a disguise to enable weak people.

Leftists and non whites want us dead, our kids raped for a sense of racial revenge and state enforced homosexuality. We can make a call to morality of leftists to avoid escalation of violence, non-whites are just their attack dogs and irrelevant to talk about in any serious manner.

Current state of our country is result of your cowardice and treason you hide behind "morality" of "conservative movement". We do not need morality anymore, we need swift and direct lethal action against all traitors, including conservatives, and invaders.

Based Croat gets it

>how blacks legally kill 1.2 million other blacks in 5 years
hmm

i like the mock dialogue btw

wow that guy is ugly

They are mutually exclusive if you're trying to maintain an ideological consistency. Your example pretty much concedes the alt right has no moral basis and is made up of primarily sociopaths who have no right to talk about morality.

I made the image to argue the point of my post. While whites are being called racist nazi bigots because they do not want to live around blacks or ever see blacks in their daily lives the left has actively supported a 200,000+ per year genocide against blacks and their own countrymen on the basis of progressive abortion agenda.

My not liking blacks have not killed any blacks but leftist support for abortion has directly supported literal genocide right under our noses.

Again, my point is to bind them in their own positions. Either to force them to submit or argue for the points I layout. They are free to ignore those points by the way but in a public discussion those around will be made aware of my points and take over for me.

Finally, I am not white. I am Korean-Japanese. My English is not very good and I hate leftist with a passion.

It's called self defense, dipshit. These "people" are invaders.

>They are mutually exclusive if you're trying to maintain an ideological consistency.
I have already said "My point is you can have it both ways and it will drive your opponent mad.". I have no responsibility to operate by your guidelines in the discussion.

>Your example pretty much concedes the alt right has no moral basis and is made up of primarily sociopaths who have no right to talk about morality.
But we have and will continue to steamroll you with your own leftist positions. This is why I constantly advocate for the left being pushed further left. The leftist positions are piled up with hypocrisy which makes it nearly impossible for them to escape simple logical traps.

Keep in mind the positions I state are not those I hold personally. I can argue from any position without a personal conviction being my guide. You can not pin me down because I can flip on an instant. This is all a game. You are fighting a ghost a phantom. The fact you do not realize this is what allows us to control and manipulate you.