What does Sup Forums thinks of centrist?

What does Sup Forums thinks of centrist?

pretty much all they have on centrists is "you're not extreme enough"

>its another nazis are extreme rightwing meme

Checked. Praised.

digits confirm

...

>it's another Nazis are the right wing version of extremist lefttards.

Can we stop associating the side left with their political movement? They have abandoned all true principles regarding enlightenment and classical liberalism. They are just mentally ill retards who escaped from the mental institutions when we disbanded them in the 20th century.

Well they are.

Centrists are betas to stupid or cowardly to pick a side. They get the bullet too

Race realism is Nazism , reality is Nazism .

Accurate comic for the centrist to be preening while his neighbors are butchered

>literal what does Sup Forums think
>1 post by this ID
SAGE

If both sides suck then picking a side sucks.

Centrists dont acknowledge race realism . Centrists still believe the lie that everyone is created equal . Sargon and Jordan Peterson fight marxism but dont point out where it came from .

I hate these 1 post faggots . Shills ?

What did that take like 90 seconds to make?

They're a joke, but there's another thing kind of like centrism that I like. That's the understanding that the future isn't going to belong to either of the two extreme positions. It is going to be a new position we haven't seen yet that incorporates parts of both extremes.

The solution to the problem of the extremes is to do the work of integrating the two extremes. For example, there's no real threat of communism anymore. The communists of today are a joke. That's because communism and capitalism sparred for decades and worked out a new solution, which is the welfare state.

Capitalism and fascism, the same can't be said. Because the conflict was solved with total violence and repression of fascism, rather than defeating it intellectually and actually integrating the good parts of it, we constantly see echoes and ghosts of fascism and people are aware that fascism could come back. Why? Because it was never "solved" in the way it needed to be.

So there is an idea like centrism, that is "solving" the situation of extreme ideological opposites facing off, by actually integrating those ideas. But that's not as simple as taking a position in the middle. It's more like taking parts from both extremes.

took me 2 or 3 minutes to draw this comic, if that's what your asking.

Nerds.

You want me to post again? There. Happy? :P

Quick question, should I post this comic on reddit? I heard there are a lot of centrist there and I want to see their reaction.

When has a neutral party ever won a war?

...

spbp

Idk... Poland....? kek

Centrists are just normie retards that feel like you are talking to a NPC. I’d genuinely prefer to talk to a communist.

>he thinks ignorants and centerists are the same thing

t. brainlet

National Socialism is actually authoritarian centrist.

They either fall off their big brained wall into a gulag or an oven. Either way, they lose and are forced to choose a winning side or get consumed.

just raise corporate tax and lose the Judism in the press and schools

I think war is coming against the corrupt government and the Kikes and anyone not on my side is a target.

No I’m not talking about apoliticals. Centrists just spend 40 minutes muh freedom muh classical liberalism in the most pretentious way possible while really saying nothing meaningful.

This is exactly why i hate centrists

>implying skepticism of extremist ideology can't be a seriously held conviction

Fence-sitters have zero value. If you're not willing to stand and fight for your freedoms than we will not allow you to have any.

I think they’re faggots.

Digits loop

>"""""extremist""""

"Fence-sitting" implies lack of conviction. There are a great many centrists that are centrists because of a healthy belief in skepticism of any extreme ideology. In other words, they are moderates because they don't trust zealots of any stripe, especially because zealots tend to take away freedoms for some in favor of others in a tribalistic way.

Btw, who counts as "we"? Just so I know what kind of zealot I'm dealing with...

I don't subscribe to any political ideology other than truth and freedom.

>They have abandoned all true principles regarding enlightenment and classical liberalism
No they haven't, they still retain the essence of your nonsense.

This whole post could be summed up with "muh hegelian dialectic" and you could've saved me a few seconds of my life.

Good one. Do you also support "strength" and "achievement" and "justice"? Any other meaningless platitudes you'd like to throw around while we're at this? Ideology is about values...as in favoring some values over others. It's also about support or opposition to certain policies. Maybe you could take a stance on something a little more controversial than support for "freedom and truth"...

>OUR FREEDOMS
>"Centrist": The issues you care about do not actually matter. The world is fine as it is.
>LOW IQ BETA FENCE SITTER VIRGIN REEEE WHERE IS YOUR CONVINCTION CLEARLY THERE IS A FIGHT TO BE FOUGHT
>"Centrist": No there fucking isn't. I don't see a problem with the world .Piss off.
>REEE FENCE SITTERRRRRRR

>they are moderates because they don't trust zealots of any stripe
You're not describing anything different; that's exactly what people are talking about. It's antithetical to the European tradition to take this moderate stance; the hero doesn't compromise with evil in case his judgement's wrong. Be a hero or be quiet and be led.

Truth and freedom are the only things that matter and I'm willing to kill as many people as necessary to achieve them.

Because they don't

Because they don't believe in your dumb larp fantasies?

>implying that reason wasn't a fundamental value of the European Enlightenment

You ought to know better. The Enlightenment was a direct response to the zealotry of religious fervor that flew in the face of human reason. Reason leads to knowledge, and knowledge leads to moderation, not extremism. Extremism is born of emotion (specifically fear), not reason. Lack of compromise does not indicate heroism, but foolishness.

Which "truth" are you willing to murder as many people as necessary to achieve, for the record? Asking for a friend...

The same truth our founding fathers fought for.

Which truth? Be specific. Enough with the platitudes.

All I see around me is Jews pushing lies. We'll start with their destruction.

Blessed thread?

So, "all Jews are liars and deserve to be destroyed" is the "truth" you're pushing (and willing to murder people for)? Just to be clear...

Absolutely. We will give them that Holocaust they've been begging for.

You sound like an intellectual libertarian faggot yourself, obsessing over "rational and intelligent debate". You're no better than centrists.

You were the one who was saying that you'd fight for the "truth our founding fathers fought for," right? Please direct me to the part where Washington, Jefferson, Jackson et al. established that Jews were all liars and that they deserved to be exterminated, because that's certainly not any history I'm familiar with.

>extremism
There you go again, what is it?

Learn your history faggot.

A complete lack of willingness to compromise, a steadfast adherence to a belief system. To be a Maoist Red Guard or an SS Stormtrooper (or any such ideological zealot) is to be completely lacking in wisdom and to fail to understand human nature and history. Want evidence? Just look at some of the idiotic comments in this very thread.

>The Enlightenment was a direct response to the zealotry of religious fervor
ohoho
aha
but seriously you're memeing us right?

i like centrists.

but then i'm one myself.

Jackson fought the kike bankers

radical centrism is best

...

.

I suppose if I told you that this was complete bullshit and that the founders never said any of it, you'd ask for a source (forcing me to prove a negative), and then debate the veracity of said source, if provided, regardless of what that source is. Instead of trying to provide sources countering this nonsense, I'll ask for something more from you than image macros and links to fucking blogs.

Good contribution.

>brings jew hate memes to the centerist debate
This is why no one takes you seriously.

Do your own research faggot. In the meantime i'll be preparing for war..

You don't have to take me seriously, I'll let the corpses do all of the talking.

Don't lie, you're center and 1pt north on authoritarian

fucking fence sitting normies

>to be things which have existed throughout history and which occur even in our most 'progressive' times is to diverge from human nature and history
Sure thing.

I see the problem though; you're not "centrist" at all but fundamentally left wing. You don't accept hierarchy; you don't want to accept that there are those who aren't the supreme intellectuals you desire them to be. Zealots will continue to exist no matter how hard you try to tell them they're stupid and misguided.

le radical enlightened centrist

Jesus Christ, you're nothing but a pawn. You're like a dog on a leash, slavering at the opportunity to sink your teeth into some hated enemy of your indolent and malicious masters. No thought, no understanding, just hatred and bloodlust. Only fools relish war and only the fearful indulge in pointless hate. The wise know the toll of both. If you're not a troll, then you seriously need to think long and hard about your beliefs and possibly your life choices.

Radical centrists do fight for your freedoms. Just look at Voltaire.
"I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it"

>yoda
Yeah, thats about the level I expect of you.

Never said that.

I am not left-wing. I actually lean right. I also accept hierarchy as a natural part of the human condition. I just don't support a hierarchy that isn't created through meritocracy and equality of opportunity. I agree that zealots will always exist. Hopefully there will also always be reasonable people willing to point out the foolishness of such zealotry and the dangerous amount of human suffering it inevitably brings about.

Way to rebut my argument. Want to try again?

Wow a silly picture and an effortless joke. You totally proved centrism wrong. /s

You are a coward and probably a kike. It's ok. I know that you live in fear. I do not. I am ready to take a stand against the tyrants who would try to infringe on my free will and agency. There is no compromise on my God-given rights and like my forefathers before me, I will fight to the death to secure a future for my people.

JBP, go back to your lectures, Sup Forums is far too advanced for you, bucko.

Nice strawman, I never implied he said it himself.
It was said of him, and in the context of how I used it, it is completely accurate.
I did my research.

We could also debate whether or not voltaire was truly centrist, but the quote itself still speaks to the mentality

>strawman
What? Telling you that you've misquoted someone isn't a fucking strawman.

>meritocracy
Democratised hierarchy completely misses the point.

>he really thinks it takes more than a tired joke and a shitty meme to make horseshoe theory believing retards look dumb

That's all well and good. Do you also agree that every single person who voted to violate the 2nd Amendment in Florida should be hunted down and summarily executed?

lol, never expected to see a debate on this thread.

if you had a winning argument you'd make it.

Nobody is risking death posting trite nonsense on the internet, unless you count DVT.

I didn't misquote anybody, because I didn't attribute the quote at all.
You're strawmanning by implying I misquoted (by implying that I implied Voltaire said that, which I never did).
Evelyn Beatrice Hall is the origin of that quote, which was used in a biography of Voltaire to describe his beliefs.
The manner in which I used it is completely accurate. As I was describing Voltaire's beliefs in the same manner that Evelyn did, using her quote.
I deliberately chose not to attribute the quote, to see if anyone fell for it, and also because it is unecessary in the context and would only serve to confuse brainlets.

Wait, what?

How did you get there. Like literally how did you go from that statement to hunting down and killing people for voting.

it would be one thing if they actively just wanted to "do it anyway" like trump suggested a week or so ago and "then" try to make it a legal seizure of guns.

But, then again, I forget where I am.

Well, I'm not a coward, nor am I Jewish, but, again, I can't prove a negative. In your hate-addled brain, all Jews are somehow tyrants and deserve to be destroyed utterly. That is not a belief system based upon "fighting for personal agency," it's just insanity and a completely unrealistic and false understanding of individual human characteristics. Your preaching lacks substance and won't convince anyone who isn't already full of fear and hatred themselves. Keep saying you'll "fight to the death," though. I don't see that happening. You call me a coward, but I'm not over here talking about committing genocide because I feel threatened by a race of people I don't like. Heroism is more than a willingness to put one's life in danger...if that were the case, then every Jihadi terrorist would be a hero.

It's heavily implied in your post that you were quoting him. Don't be such a baby. Well done for Googling the quote.

SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED
Anyone who would even suggest gun control should be hung for treason.

So why aren't you rallying to hang Trump then? The literal commander in chief suggested this.

And if its okay that he changed his mind, then why are you holding a weird double standard to everyone else?

It is completely ambiguous whether or not I was quoting him.
That's because the quote was originally used to describe him. Hence in proper context, there is no implication of quotation.

You fail in your assumption that I am preaching or trying to convince anyone. Nor do I care about being a hero. These things are trivial to the matter at hand. Life is simply about choices and personal agency. I can only make my own decisions and I've decided that I will not live as a slave to kike overlords and tyrants. So, I am tasked with bringing down the system. It's a lot easier than you might imagine, because man's hubris provides for vulnerable infrastructure. Jesus said to build you house upon a rock. The Kikes didn't listen. But, as I said, anyone not on my side is a valid target.

Trump can hang right next to the other Jew puppets for all I care. You assume too much.

You're trying way too hard to prove something, just admit you made a mistake next time and get on with your life.

In future if you're going to post a commonly misattributed quote make it clear. Pic related keeps cropping up, for instance.