So who exactly will the Democrats choose to challenge Trump in the 2020 presidential elections?

So who exactly will the Democrats choose to challenge Trump in the 2020 presidential elections?

Bernie Sanders?
Joe Biden?
Oprah?

Attached: 3058345882304.jpg (402x392, 24K)

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=CjBXfCoWC-4
amp.cnn.com/cnn/2018/03/10/politics/warren-not-running-for-president/index.html
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

They don't even know themselves yet because there's still the uncertainty about the Mueller case and the 18000 sealed indictments filed since November.

The person who runs against Trump will lose and have their career destroyed. All they do is whine, they have absolutely no message.

?

Attached: 1511844608909.jpg (1524x3014, 2.43M)

as of right now, Sanders is the only one that would even stand a chance of competing, and he'd get destroyed by Trump in the first debate, if the Cruz vs Sanders debates are any indication

they have no plan, they're going full steam ahead off a cliff

I really think Trump would lose if they pick anyone semi decent.

Hillary is probably close to being the worst person on the planet and he barely beat her. Let's be realistic. They run any decent moderate and they win.

this is what dems really think

trump has the incumbent advantage and he will have at the minimum some concrete results to make his case this time around. the dems are also a fucking nutjob party of wacked out leftists. i don't think there is a single middle of the road dem left in the party. it's going to be a slaughter.

Attached: 1517268823266.jpg (500x500, 144K)

Not with the electoral college still in existence. Dems have to court those swing states that went towards Trump surprisingly. It doesn't really matter how many people vote blue in New York or California.

I guess 2018 will reveal how much the general public has turned against Trump, if any.

Jon Stewart was a cancer on the nation

Attached: _comedy_central_2011_-_3-line.jpg (195x195, 8K)

How common is it that a couple hundred sealed indictments are filed in a span of 4 months?

The average over the span of a whole YEAR is around 2000.

There have been EIGHTEEN THOUSAND filed in ONLY 4 MONTHS.

Kamala Harris

Zuckerbot

Oprah won't
Bernie Sanders and Joe Biden are old and probably won't. Joe Biden is almost a certainty

Quite the anomaly, wouldn't you say?

Does she like Spirit Cooking?

POTENTIALLY the biggest single purge of corruption that this world has EVER SEEN.

>Joe Biden
Is that really all they have? That dude would be demolished in the coming Second Meme War.

youtube.com/watch?v=CjBXfCoWC-4

Intredesting

If it has to be between those three then probably Oprah.

I am a registered democrat and I voted for Bernie Sanders and I really do think that they'd back Oprah if she ran. Otherwise Joe Biden.

Delusional, but also bought out as all hell. They value losing over being corrupt.

I'd vote for her if she ran, but I don't want the progressive ticket to be divided if Bernie Sanders was running also.

f they were smart, they'd pick Tulsi Gabbard

>Served in Iraq
>Supported Bernie Sanders
>Has the charisma and personality Hillary lacked
>She's actually hip with the kids, unlike Hillary
>She doesn't have a closet full of skeletons
>People actually support her WILLINGLY because they WANT her to WIN
>NeverTrump """conservatives""" will flee to her in droves

But since it's the post-Obama Democrats we're talking about and apparently expecting them to do anything smart and reasonable like NOT spending millions of dollars on on the campaign of a fucking film maker that has never ever held anything close to public office is asking WAAAY too much it's probably gonna be:

>Cory Booker: Obama 2: Electric Boogaloo
>Kamala Harris: Literally fucking Obama with a wig
>Elizabeth Warren: I AM A ROBOT BEEP BOOP
>Kirsten Gillibrand: Hillary 2 Electric Boogaloo

Noticing a pattern here?

Attached: 220px-Tulsi_Gabbard,_official_portrait,_113th_Congress.jpg (220x331, 26K)

Holder

>She doesn't have a closet full of skeletons
Then she has no chance of getting past the DNC elites in the primaries. They like candidates they can easily control user.

Attached: 392816503.jpg (718x540, 104K)

>Cory Booker: Obama 2

I think he'd be worse than Obama.

>Kamala Harris

Don't know much about her, but I've heard of her and what I heard didn't sound good.

>Elizabeth Warren

Perhaps. I wouldn't mind her so much if she was the progressive democrat running. I would prefer Bernie or Tulsi.

>Kirsten Gillibrand

You're probably right about that. Although she has stopped taking Super Pac money, but I'm cautiously optimistic about it.

>18000 sealed indictments
You should say 18 trillion indictments. It has more dramatic effect.

I don't like the DNC either, but I don't think extortion is really their MO. It's more of the case that whoever they back has to already be bought out. So if who they back do have skeletons, they'd try to hide or downplay it.

Pocahontas is asked to take a DNA test by a local newspapers that endorsed her.

12 hours later, she declined to take the test

24 hours later: amp.cnn.com/cnn/2018/03/10/politics/warren-not-running-for-president/index.html

Those digits deserve a reply.

They are so retarded that probably oprah or some other nigger or weird ass.

Tulsi Gabbard is almost a republican so maybe if they realize that appealing to centrist is the best options.

But i dont think so, they are going to push their agenda even harder.

Attached: 110049.jpg (889x741, 100K)

>if they realize that appealing to centrist is the best options.
Doubt it, they're going to learn the hard way.

I guess the monster they created became too powerful to handle. Not the progressive Marxist-lite socialists run the show.

>Appealing to the centrist

I disagree. I'd argue that's what Hilary was doing. No, instead the strategy should be to run a grassroots campaign.