Why do religious people think they can just pretend gays don't exist?

There are hundreds of thousands of married, taxpaying gays in the United States alone, and yet, still these people have the gall to pretend we aren't even a real thing. Some people are innately attracted to the same sex. I'm sorry to religious people of ANY stripe who live their lives in denial of basic biology.

I hope every religious person who thinks gays are not real has a gay son or daughter so they can understand the pain of watching someone related to you be treated as if their emotions are invalid.

metro.co.uk/2018/03/10/school-removed-references-to-being-gay-from-gcse-textbook-7377513/

An image of Fred Astaire dancing with Ginger Rogers was among the content blocked out by Yesodey Hatorah Senior Girls’ School, an Orthodox Jewish school in Stamford Hill, east London, in copies of the book seen by Humanists UK.

A spokesman for the school defended the censorship, saying it was well known that it redacts textbooks and this is done to ‘protect girls from sexualisation’ in line with parents’ wishes and religious beliefs.

References to homosexuals in a section on Aryan ideas, racial policy and persecution were redacted and mentions of women drinking in public and driving with men were censored from ‘Understanding the Modern World’, an AQA GCSE history resource, according to an investigation by Humanists UK.

References to the court case of Roe v Wade which made abortion legal was also crudely crossed out, the group said.

A number of images of women were censored to hide parts of the body including chest, arms and legs.

Genetic Evidence of Homosexuality:

archive.is/grwgp

Attached: Screen Shot 2018-03-11 at 12.12.40 PM.png (1084x688, 939K)

Other urls found in this thread:

discord
psychologytoday.com/blog/fetishes-i-dont-get/201102/do-gay-men-have-more-sexual-interest-in-children
individual.utoronto.ca/james_cantor/blog1.html
ipce.info/sites/ipce.info/files/biblio_attachments/every_fifth.pdf
beyondhomophobia.com/blog/child-abuse-research/
psychology.ucdavis.edu/rainbow/html/facts_molestation.html
pandys.org/articles/abuseandhomosexuality.html
dailykos.com/stories/2010/09/18/903178/-Gays-are-pedophiles-No-Here-s-the-proof
archive.is/ztjf2
blog.donnawilliams.net/2011/12/17/mothers-who-sexually-abuse-their-daughters/
centerforinquiry.net/uploads/attachments/Anti-gayActivismandtheMisuseofScience_1.pdf
patheos.com/blogs/warrenthrockmorton/2009/06/05/a-major-study-of-child-abuse-and-homosexuality-revisited/
thenewcivilrightsmovement.com/religious-rights-top-anti-gay-researcher-says-he-was-attracted-to-men-as-a-boy/politics/2012/05/16/39681
shadowproof.com/2011/10/19/paul-cameron-why-the-religious-right-cant-keep-him-in-the-closet/
washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/04/16/AR2010041602026.html
archive.is/a2iRU
religioustolerance.org/hom_chil.htm
childluresprevention.com/research/profile.asp
childprotection.lifetips.com/cat/63573/sex-offender-statistics/index.html
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25635900
onlinelibrary.wiley.com/wol1/doi/10.1111/cdev.12989/full
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3000058/
whatweknow.law.columbia.edu/topics/lgbt-equality/what-does-the-scholarly-research-say-about-the-wellbeing-of-children-with-gay-or-lesbian-parents/
slate.com/blogs/outward/2015/02/12/what_we_know_about_lesbian_and_gay_parenting_making_sense_of_the_studies.html
archive.is/j0S7Q
dx.doi.org/10.1037/dev0000228
williamsinstitute.law.ucla.edu/wp-content/uploads/Patterson-Farr-Forssell-AppliedDevScience-Jul-2010.pdf
bmcpublichealth.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1471-2458-14-635
onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2009.00678.x/abstract?deniedAccessCustomisedMessage=userIsAuthenticated=false
pediatrics.aappublications.org/content/131/4/e1374
ibtimes.com/study-having-gay-parents-does-not-affect-childs-gender-identity-2579343
pastebin.com/PaAFXqQj
bmcpublichealth.biomedcentral.com/track/pdf/10.1186/1471-2458-14-635?site=bmcpublichealth.biomedcentral.com
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29144882
lifelongadoptions.com/lgbt-adoption/lgbt-adoption-statistics
taxpolicycenter.org/sites/default/files/publication/153351/same-sex_married_tax_filers_after_windsor_and_obergefell.pdf
sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0049089X1500085X
rightwingwatch.org/post/new-research-further-debunks-regnerus-study-on-gay-parenting/
archive.is/Z4Gu4
washingtonpost.com/news/volokh-conspiracy/wp/2015/05/10/new-criticism-of-regnerus-study-on-parenting-study/?utm_term=.dc5cef00d5f8
archive.is/SePdG
slate.com/blogs/outward/2014/03/04/mark_regnerus_testifies_in_michigan_same_sex_marriage_case_his_study_is.html
archive.is/ehXt8
advocate.com/politics/prop-8/2013/03/11/debunked-antigay-parenting-study-commissioned-sway-supreme-court
archive.is/QVAQz
thinkprogress.org/conservatives-seize-on-hugely-flawed-study-about-same-sex-parents-bd797734bf40
archive.is/aym23
slate.com/blogs/outward/2016/07/12/new_gay_parenting_study_is_a_dishonest_assault_on_lgbtq_families.html
archive.is/o3DYW
care2.com/causes/5-things-to-know-about-the-new-gay-parents-are-bad-for-kids-study.html
psc.dss.ucdavis.edu/faculty_sites//rainbow/html/facts_mental_health.html
journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0051088
archive.is/jH4L3
journalistsresource.org/studies/society/public-health/teen-pregnancy-bisexual-lesbian-heterosexual-women
chaladze.com/files/publications/Chaladze2016ASB.pdf
youtube.com/watch?v=r7T6qU16fT4
cdc.gov/hiv/group/msm/index.html
answers.com/Q/What_is_the_average_number_of_sex_partners_a_gay_man_has_in_a_lifetime
onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jomf.12141/abstract
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

I'd like to just throw them all in a fire.

Everybody is gay to some extent whether they openly admit it or not.

Why do you care? Do gays want to fit in with christfags? Gays being fake isn't even the weirdest shit christfags believe.

I want to be treated equitably for my same sex desires and be allowed to marry and raise kids without intrusion on my privacy.

I want a billion dollars and a woman who likes small dicks

I don't have a single problem if someone is gay or decides to chop their balls off. You can keep your little enclaves of communities to yourself. But the moment you start trying to make an agenda or trying to convince kids of your bullshit is the moment where the line is drawn. I'd have no issues with people like you if you didn't try so hard to draw attention to yourself as if YOU are doing something so spectacular or great.

What kind of idiotic crap are you reading, Op?
The Germans were pro-German, and they were STARVING TO DEATH.
You think they're going to starve the able bodied to feed those who can't work? To feed aliens? Yes, they persecuted aliens and put the food to feed those who can produce more food. That's Ethics 101

that looks yummy.. i need to go look at some gay porn now.

Everyone is also straight to some extent. Exclusive homosexuality is a meme. All animals who are supposedly gay will actually do straight sex when given the chance (except domesticated sheep).

discord gg/q8GpMn

add a .

Attached: Pic.png (957x1024, 958K)

So at the very least you can admit some animals are exclusively homosexual or simply just that some animals are preferentially homosexual and would endure emotional distress if discouraged or banned from acting on same-sex interests?

I am an animal and I would be very distressed to have sex with a woman but sex with a man is right as rain.

If there wasn't such a strong aspect of pederasty innate in homosexuality you might have an argument.
The fact of the matter is that two men raising a son from birth would cause tremendous confusion within the child. The child would never know the embrace of a maternal figure. The child would know on an instinctual level that something was wrong.
You're cursed with an existence as a sexual deviant forced to live on the outskirts of society. Consider yourself lucky that our society is as tolerant as it is. If you were born in any other time or even another place today you'd be publicly executed and nobody would care except your felly sexual deviants.

Attached: gay pedo couple.jpg (960x468, 89K)

Question
Why should gay and lesbians be given the same tax exemptions as straight couples?

>Everybody is gay to some extent whether they openly admit it or not
So it's not genetic than?

>be allowed to marry and raise kids without intrusion on my privacy.
You can't create children in a same sex relationship

Anecdotal evidence does not imply a trend. I can find examples of straight couples preying on kids too.

Your false conflations of pedophilia an homosexuality are convincing nobody and are a piss poor excuse to intrude upon our privacy and right to have equitable treatment. Non-consensual sex, including sex with minors is still a crime, wholly separate from homosexuality.

If you had a SINGLE study showing DIRECTLY that gay men are attracted to younger kids on average than straight men, you might have a point, but you don't and you don't.

psychologytoday.com/blog/fetishes-i-dont-get/201102/do-gay-men-have-more-sexual-interest-in-children

Child sexual abuse (CSA) is a pervasive problem with myriad short- and long-term consequences for victims and their families. Its impact is far-reaching with recent estimates that 26.6% of girls and 5.1% of boys experience sexual abuse or assault by age 17 (Finkelhor, Shattuck, Turner, & Hamby, 2014).

individual.utoronto.ca/james_cantor/blog1.html

ipce.info/sites/ipce.info/files/biblio_attachments/every_fifth.pdf

beyondhomophobia.com/blog/child-abuse-research/

psychology.ucdavis.edu/rainbow/html/facts_molestation.html

pandys.org/articles/abuseandhomosexuality.html

dailykos.com/stories/2010/09/18/903178/-Gays-are-pedophiles-No-Here-s-the-proof

archive.is/ztjf2

blog.donnawilliams.net/2011/12/17/mothers-who-sexually-abuse-their-daughters/

centerforinquiry.net/uploads/attachments/Anti-gayActivismandtheMisuseofScience_1.pdf

patheos.com/blogs/warrenthrockmorton/2009/06/05/a-major-study-of-child-abuse-and-homosexuality-revisited/

thenewcivilrightsmovement.com/religious-rights-top-anti-gay-researcher-says-he-was-attracted-to-men-as-a-boy/politics/2012/05/16/39681

Rom 1:18 For the wrath of God is revealed from heaven against all ungodliness and unrighteousness of men, who hold the truth in unrighteousness;
Rom 1:19 Because that which may be known of God is manifest in them; for God hath shewed it unto them.
Rom 1:20 For the invisible things of him from the creation of the world are clearly seen, being understood by the things that are made, even his eternal power and Godhead; so that they are without excuse:
Rom 1:21 Because that, when they knew God, they glorified him not as God, neither were thankful; but became vain in their imaginations, and their foolish heart was darkened.
Rom 1:22 Professing themselves to be wise, they became fools,
Rom 1:23 And changed the glory of the uncorruptible God into an image made like to corruptible man, and to birds, and fourfooted beasts, and creeping things.
Rom 1:24 Wherefore God also gave them up to uncleanness through the lusts of their own hearts, to dishonour their own bodies between themselves:
Rom 1:25 Who changed the truth of God into a lie, and worshipped and served the creature more than the Creator, who is blessed for ever. Amen.
Rom 1:26 For this cause God gave them up unto vile affections: for even their women did change the natural use into that which is against nature:
Rom 1:27 And likewise also the men, leaving the natural use of the woman, burned in their lust one toward another; men with men working that which is unseemly, and receiving in themselves that recompence of their error which was meet.
Rom 1:28 And even as they did not like to retain God in their knowledge, God gave them over to a reprobate mind, to do those things which are not convenient;

Rom 1:29 Being filled with all unrighteousness, fornication, wickedness, covetousness, maliciousness; full of envy, murder, debate, deceit, malignity; whisperers,
Rom 1:30 Backbiters, haters of God, despiteful, proud, boasters, inventors of evil things, disobedient to parents,
Rom 1:31 Without understanding, covenantbreakers, without natural affection, implacable, unmerciful:
Rom 1:32 Who knowing the judgment of God, that they which commit such things are worthy of death, not only do the same, but have pleasure in them that do them.

>sex with a man is right as rain.
Why is the average life span for homosexual males 30 years less than for heterosexual men?

We all know faggotry exists, we just want you abominations to get back in the closet and stop poisoning society. We don't really care if you keep your degeneracy behind closed doors, but when you start demanding we celebrate your perverse lifestyle, that's when we have a problem.

Because equitable treatment is merited for equitable taxpayers. Some gay couples DO have kids, and the benefit of filing married is granted solely on the basis of union of two, not addition to three. Stop trying to intrude on our private capacity to form families. You are overstepping your boundaries and thus losing the legal fight.

shadowproof.com/2011/10/19/paul-cameron-why-the-religious-right-cant-keep-him-in-the-closet/

washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/04/16/AR2010041602026.html

archive.is/a2iRU

religioustolerance.org/hom_chil.htm

childluresprevention.com/research/profile.asp

3/4 victims of molestation are female:

childprotection.lifetips.com/cat/63573/sex-offender-statistics/index.html

ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25635900

"A 2015 study (linked above) looked at virtually every substantiated child sexual abuse case reported to child protective services in the United States in 2010. It concluded more than 20% of child sexual abuse cases reviewed involved a primary female perpetrator – so estimates vary significantly."

>Because equitable treatment is merited for equitable taxpayers.
So my roommate and I should be given the same tax exemptions?

[citation needed] lemme guess, you are gonna cite an HIV clinic at the height of the HIV epidemic or a sample from the heart of San Francisco as representative?

Even if gays had dramatically shorter lifespans, why does that justify discriminatory animus?

being non religious is fucking gay. Like look at you right now you don't belive in an afterlife and yet you come here to tell us how you spend your time filling your ass with pozzed semen. Is that really the best way to spend your very limited existance on earth as an atheist. If you become christian you'd stop being gay.

If you marry, yes. A union of two is a union of two, with the still same exemptions if you are blood relations or there are coercive elements involved.

My point is if gay sex is right as rain, why does it lead to an average life span which is 30 years less than heterosexual men?

What makes you think you deserve to be able to raise kids when you can't even make one? Don't even come with the impregnate a woman and just take the kid bullshit.

>le ebil nazis were like scared children
>they somehow turned their country around and almost beat the allies singlehandedly

Gays aren't real, they're just turbo perverts.
Get over yourself, you're not special youre just a degenerate.

You present this false forced dilemma that gays must either totally hide who they are or are therefore going to destroy society. It is possible to live as an openly gay or bisexual person with no further negative harms towards larger society. If anything, being pressured to live in secret and live a lie has caused greater society harms by having to cope with the reckoning of the punishment they are imposing upon gays with pressures to silence.

Because you are sourcing those numbers out of your ass.

How can all these gay people walk around and think there is no god?

Attached: 77795919-713B-4FDB-B56B-D3CA64EB5EAA.gif (400x224, 912K)

Parental Sexual Orientation and Children's Psychological Well-Being: 2013–2015 National Health Interview Survey:

onlinelibrary.wiley.com/wol1/doi/10.1111/cdev.12989/full

Nontraditional Families and Childhood Progress Through School:

ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3000058/

whatweknow.law.columbia.edu/topics/lgbt-equality/what-does-the-scholarly-research-say-about-the-wellbeing-of-children-with-gay-or-lesbian-parents/

slate.com/blogs/outward/2015/02/12/what_we_know_about_lesbian_and_gay_parenting_making_sense_of_the_studies.html

archive.is/j0S7Q

www.asanet.org/documents/ASA/pdfs/12-144_307_Amicus_%20(C_%20Gottlieb)_ASA_Same-Sex_Marriage.pdf

Farr, R. H. (2017). Does parental sexual orientation matter? A longitudinal follow-up of adoptive families with school-age children. Developmental Psychology, 53(2), 252-264.
dx.doi.org/10.1037/dev0000228

williamsinstitute.law.ucla.edu/wp-content/uploads/Patterson-Farr-Forssell-AppliedDevScience-Jul-2010.pdf

bmcpublichealth.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1471-2458-14-635

How Does the Gender of Parents Matter?

onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2009.00678.x/abstract?deniedAccessCustomisedMessage=userIsAuthenticated=false

pediatrics.aappublications.org/content/131/4/e1374

ibtimes.com/study-having-gay-parents-does-not-affect-childs-gender-identity-2579343

pastebin.com/PaAFXqQj

Australia gay parenting survey:

bmcpublichealth.biomedcentral.com/track/pdf/10.1186/1471-2458-14-635?site=bmcpublichealth.biomedcentral.com

Closeness to fathers best predicts quality of health for sons raised by gay dads:

ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29144882

lifelongadoptions.com/lgbt-adoption/lgbt-adoption-statistics

Gay married men with kids make on average more than a quarter million dollars a year:

taxpolicycenter.org/sites/default/files/publication/153351/same-sex_married_tax_filers_after_windsor_and_obergefell.pdf

This pattern in which families with dependent children are higher income is also true of FF and MM couples, but is particularly striking for MM couples, for which the average income of couples with children is about $264,000. Almost half of MM couples with children earn more than $150,000. Differences between same-sex female couples with and without children are much smaller.

If you want kids, marry a woman.

>Columbia university, the slate.

Quite the source list you’ve got there.

Attached: 4C5AC091-63B1-4F8D-A814-DC5D567ECC9A.png (617x571, 341K)

>If you marry, yes.
It's not the marriage that is the impetus for the tax exemption
It's the fact that children are the natural result of a man and woman fucking
Since children are not the natural result of homosexual sex, it's not comparing like to like
With that in mind, why should gay couples be given that special privelege?
Also, the fact that my labor via taxation is being used to subsidize your realtionship which does not comeback to benefit me in anyway, that forces me to take a political position on your relationship, which leads to the discrimination which you claim to abhor

1. A non-negligible number of respondents were miscounted as having been raised in LM or GF households. The sources of these potential errors—which we estimate to exceed one-third of Regnerus’s subsample of LM and GF—were the inclusion of individuals whose highly implausible responses to other questions call all of their responses into doubt, individuals who reported living in these households for a very short period of time, and individuals whose responses in the calendar data were incompatible with the original categorization of being raised in a LM of GF household.

2. A number of other methodological and modeling decisions made by Regnerus—decisions that have plausible alternatives that at minimum should be checked to assess the robustness of the patterns—appear to artificially inflate the differences between LM/GF and IBF households.

3. Once corrections to these potential coding errors and alternatives to these methodological choices are made, the putative disadvantage in the outcome profile of respondents from same-sex parent families (both single-parent LM and GF house- holds and two-parent LM and GF households) decreases dramatically—with some of the remaining differences not ‘‘sub- optimal’’ (e.g., whether or not the respondent identifies as entirely heterosexual and the number of other-sex partners) or a function of one or two influential cases.

sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0049089X1500085X

I like the Chinese system of dealing with faggots. If you are a faggot in China you have to go and register with the government that you are in fact a faggot, you then get a government card that says that you are a faggot. After that if you want to engage in faggotry you will be taken to a designated government operated facility where you will present your faggot card to the authorities who will direct you to another faggot carrying the faggot card after which you are given the necessary time to engage in faggotry in a designated room with the other card carrying faggot and you are allowed to do this several times a month. Being a faggot would also ban you from advancing in careers in the military and politics

My twin brother is gay and I still doubt that gay people exist.

It's a fad choice to be gay, religion is full of hypocrisy but they're right on this.

Attached: turtle.jpg (354x314, 22K)

Again, what makes you think you deserve the right to raise kids if you can't make one, I want your opnions of why you should have this right.

>You are gonna cite they gayest place in the world as a representative of gay degeneracy

Nothing wrong with that kek

There are no explicit requirements for having kids. Childless couples are not punished. Tax credits for children are handled by separate laws. Theoretically, by your point, gays who don't have kids would be penalized by inaccessibility to child tax credits regardless of marriage status.

Get a cat faggot, don't force yourself on a kid.

Being gay isn’t a lifestyle, it’s a fetish horribly twisted to make people think it’s normal, like how furries try to justify themselves being “animals in a human body”

That I think abilities to raise kids are equitable between sexual orientation and your evidence that they are not like Regnerus and Sullins are garbage poor quality research with tons of flaws and methodological errors. I can hire a surrogate or adopt kids. Both are entirely valid methods of parenting employed by many heterosexual couples.

So because it’s not directly corroborating your narrative, the study was done wrong?
Well then I guess the slate is the complete model for scientific testing.
Hahahahaha!
>testy fairy.

Attached: F9451C03-E061-42BB-816D-1F3643A8024D.png (1080x675, 151K)

Source?

If I have a faggot child I'll put him in the grave myself.

No the studies were done wrong for a variety of reasons.

rightwingwatch.org/post/new-research-further-debunks-regnerus-study-on-gay-parenting/

archive.is/Z4Gu4

washingtonpost.com/news/volokh-conspiracy/wp/2015/05/10/new-criticism-of-regnerus-study-on-parenting-study/?utm_term=.dc5cef00d5f8

archive.is/SePdG

slate.com/blogs/outward/2014/03/04/mark_regnerus_testifies_in_michigan_same_sex_marriage_case_his_study_is.html

archive.is/ehXt8

advocate.com/politics/prop-8/2013/03/11/debunked-antigay-parenting-study-commissioned-sway-supreme-court

archive.is/QVAQz

Kids don't like gay people either, that hole in your being isn't from lack of kid it's from not believing in god.

Stop hating yourself, then you'll be qualified to have a kid.

If you have to ask anyone else then the answer is no.

thinkprogress.org/conservatives-seize-on-hugely-flawed-study-about-same-sex-parents-bd797734bf40

archive.is/aym23

slate.com/blogs/outward/2016/07/12/new_gay_parenting_study_is_a_dishonest_assault_on_lgbtq_families.html

archive.is/o3DYW

care2.com/causes/5-things-to-know-about-the-new-gay-parents-are-bad-for-kids-study.html

slate.com/blogs/outward/2015/02/12/what_we_know_about_lesbian_and_gay_parenting_making_sense_of_the_studies.html

archive.is/j0S7Q

Faust’s story is being publicized by the Witherspoon Institute, a conservative religious group that helped steer and fund the National Organization for Marriage’s campaign, as exposed in court documents, to artificially “raise the costs of identifying with gay marriage” by linking it with pornography and a threat to children, and to fund a “media campaign to support the idea that children need mothers and fathers.” The effort sought to “commission polling and other studies to document consequences of gay marriage” and “identify and nurture a worldwide community of highly credentialed intellectuals and professional scholars, physicians, psychiatrists, social workers, and writers to credential our concerns” about gay marriage and parenting. Never mind what the actual research says; you can always hire people to “credential your concerns.”

You're seriously mentally ill and need to fuck off.

That's literally just your opinion.

Is being gay a mental illness?

psc.dss.ucdavis.edu/faculty_sites//rainbow/html/facts_mental_health.html

There’s a good reason kids don’t think being gay is normal.

>There are no explicit requirements for having kids
If a straight couple chooses not to have a kid, that's a net loss, but we know that's the exception
It would take more money to go through the process of removing the childless couples from the tax exemptions than it would to just go with the net loss
The same can not be said about homosexuals
You believe you're entitled to my labor even though you're not giving anything back
That's why I hate you

Seriosuly stop LARPing as a Queer, you'll do better if you stop distracting yourself.

Unnatural genetic defects that are are determent to society.

I got that from a conversation I had with a Chinese immigrant here

discord gg/EgWaMKR

add a .

Attached: Pic5.png (960x960, 1.27M)

Wash po, the slate, the advocate. Sorry try again.

Attached: 207D94B4-B8EE-47B5-8826-320AC3488A37.png (4000x3000, 197K)

> slate
> thinkprogress

come on now

Female relatives of male homosexuals have 1.3x as many kids:

journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0051088

News article summarizing the study:

archive.is/jH4L3

-
Bisexual females have more teen pregnancies:

journalistsresource.org/studies/society/public-health/teen-pregnancy-bisexual-lesbian-heterosexual-women

-

Straight males carry gay genes:

chaladze.com/files/publications/Chaladze2016ASB.pdf

It isn't a disadvantage if it causes some women to bear more kids on average.

It isn't unnatural if it repeatedly exists in stable frequencies from generation to generation.

Attached: GayGenerations.png (1934x1038, 471K)

Yes. I don't care what (((psychiatrists))) fantasize about.

Why do gays insist that the dangers and STI rates not be included in the sex-ed curriculum being taught to children, especially regarding anal sex?

Statistics only make you gayer.

why can't you just stop being a faggot? Do you understand that you are cringe inducing to the majority of the population? The cringe reaction is perfectly natural response to you behavior. Just be a faggot somewhere else and stop making a political cause out of your faggotry

Common queers are the worst and should be among the first to get the gas. Traitors to humanity

No one cares About faggots.
We also don't care to have faggot shit crammed down our throats.

Case closed.

Imagine that, women get the women genes work right and men that get the women genes are defective...

Good work guys for not liking faggots, I thought I'd be alone in this.

Why do straights insist that they dont engage in more anal sex than gays and have more diseases; when that isnt statistically true?

The only thing I worry about when a gay couple adopt a kid is the kid itself, believe it or not, being different from normal kids is a great pain for them because kids will bully them and the psychological aspect, this being said, I do believe a gay couple can give good parenting, anyone with some knowledge and willing to put the kid before them can really, I may have seemed like It's just the problems of not being normal that worry me, and don't think you can change society to make it normal, even if people start pretending it is they will just hate you.

I could say the same about your religiously funded studies. That they are garbage solely if only because they are funded by religious zealots who have a priori bias against gays. At least read the fucking content rather than making fallacious arguments against them based on branding only.

You won't even engage with the text because it doesn't meet your branded stamp of approval but expect me to engage with your biased sources without complaint. a double standard at best. These sorts of illogical arguments may hold here on Sup Forums but courts require better argumentation skills than you have to offer.

>Why do religious people think they can just pretend gays don't exist?
Because they can.

Kek so everyone is straight too ???
Wait so this means u don't HAVE to be a faggot and it's not genetic ?

U wot m8??

Can I start putting links from info wars then? Cause that’s the type of pool your picking from. Simply put, in North America the American constitution and the Canadian bill of rights were based or catholic beliefs, even with that in mind you’ve been given rights that are unheard of in the world today in so far as tolerance. If you don’t like it go to Russia, any Middle East country, most European countries.
>b b b but, I wanna eat cock and teach my kids it’s fine to do the same, theres nothing illegal about that! Sigh nope there sure isn’t.

Attached: AnalSex.png (1302x1172, 564K)

My argument is not religious, it's about the moral fabric of society. The agenda you're pushing is pushed it's hardest in public schools to grade school children, so to pretend that this isn't about indoctrinating children is dishonest. In Canada if your child tells you he's transgender because his grade school teacher told him gender is fluid and you tell them they're confused, the state steps in and takes your child from you.
Family is the foundation of every nation and marriage is the foundation of every family. The gay marriage debate is intentionally framed incorrectly. Everyone has the right to get married, the debate is over the definition of marriage. Marriage is and always has been between a man and a women because it is organic and is the most effective way to create a healthy environment for children to develop. You're proposal of two gay men raising a boy would create a fucked up confused child.
You're selfish desire for equity would produce a sizable minority of fucked up children that would destroy the fabric of society.
youtube.com/watch?v=r7T6qU16fT4

Attached: ben levin canadian sex ed.jpg (2600x3704, 3.25M)

Yeah if the content of the links is valid and backed by original research and links to primary sources, the branding is irrelevant.

Here's a health fact. An asshole is a health hazard, not a sexual organ. The only people saying different are kikelike doctors trying to make modern medicine into a state religion. So jump off a building already. We're sick of you militant idiot victicrats.

I'll search about it but sounds like bullshit.

My understanding is that there really are no gays in China because the Chinese are conformist, gayness is a fad, and it's not in style there.

Their almost nonexistant fag population is just stigmatized, excluded and left to rot in the margins.

>I didn't bring any facts, but just buy into my made-up bullshit!

Attached: HomoMentalIllness.jpg (1680x1050, 563K)

Answer my question and then I'll answer yours

they know you exist, they think yer all abomination

sweetie plz check out the institute for advanced homophobia thread on MPC:

Gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men (MSM) represent approximately 2% of the US population, yet are the population most severely affected by HIV. In 2009, MSM accounted for 61% of all new HIV infections, and MSM with a history of injection drug use (MSM-IDU) accounted for an additional 3% of new infections. That same year, young MSM accounted for 69% of new HIV infections among persons aged 13–29 and 44% of infections among all MSM. At the end of 2009, an estimated 441,669 (56%) persons living with an HIV diagnosis in the US were MSM or MSM-IDU.

cdc.gov/hiv/group/msm/index.html

"A.P. Bell and M.S. Weinberg, in their classic study of male and female homosexuality, found that 43 percent of white male homosexuals had sex with 500 or more partners, with 28 percent having 1,000 or more sex partners." [1]

"In their study of the sexual profiles of 2,583 older homosexuals published in Journal of Sex Research, Paul Van de Ven et al., found that only 2.7 percent claimed to have had sex with one partner only. The most common response, given by 21.6 percent of the respondents, was of having a hundred-one to five hundred lifetime sex partners." [2]

"A survey conducted by the homosexual magazine Genre found that 24 percent of the respondents said they had had more than a hundred sexual partners in their lifetime. The magazine noted that several respondents suggested including a category of those who had more than a thousand sexual partners." [3]

"In his study of male homosexuality in Western Sexuality: Practice and Precept in Past and Present Times, M. Pollak found that 'few homosexual relationships last longer than two years, with many men reporting hundreds of lifetime partners.'" [4]

answers.com/Q/What_is_the_average_number_of_sex_partners_a_gay_man_has_in_a_lifetime

Attached: 1519857228949.png (1000x1300, 387K)

You wouldnt believe 'facts' if they were presented. Why even post your drivel? :^) Perhaps you can showcase some propaganda from the 1960s-1990s; maybe even early 2000s. I bet we'll all be so very impressed.

If you must keep "coming out
and telling the world gays exist that says it all.

I did answer your question. You are being disingenuous and you are not correct; but if you arent specifically asking for a 1970s """study""" talking point then I suppose logic and critical thinking is just a lost concept to you user.

The only reason why we're encouraging faggots is so they fall out of the breeding cycle and allow their distorted behavior to die with them.

kids would ruin that.

>survey conducted by the homosexual magazine Genre

what a reliable source!

your studies from decades ago are thoroughly outdated. I notice all of these citations consign the year of the study to the footnote to disguise how outdated these studies are.

Who is M. Pollak? Did he actually sample real gay people? I doubt it!

Rosenfeld 2014:

onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jomf.12141/abstract

Attached: GayMarriageStability.png (902x612, 159K)

So is info wars, it’s who is telling you that makes the difference, Or can’t you figure that out yet? It’s called “spin” to either increase or decrease validity of a statement depending on the narrative that’s being pushed.
>I’m showing raw data, I’m not sure other than directly lying, one can “mess” up these graph as it’s from vital statistics.

Attached: 7BDA40C1-0C70-4F6D-9B17-7B81A4CD5472.jpg (1200x594, 127K)

I think gays are an abomination and I don't even believe in the bible. It's just fucking weird as fuck. Gay acceptance is the gateway to all the darkest degeneracies.

Gays and gay couples are effected by pedophilia and HIV more than regular non abominations for sure buddy.

>gays havent been around for thousands of years of recorded history
You really are retarded user. Please think before you post. :^)

Gays aren’t natural
Gays are mistakes of nature
Nature makes mistakes
Those mistakes aren’t good for a healthy society