Naked little boy in anime

>Naked little boy in anime
>This is ok
>Naked little girl in anime
>YOU A FUCKING PEDO

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=YccozjEe9f4
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

Context is everything.

Not sexualized

Guru Guru: challenging the norms since 1992.

old 80s OVAs had lolis naked all the time and nobody gave a shit

gundam 0079 had naked lolis and it was TV

...

Dr slump historian

if you want to blame anyone, blame pedos, they're the reason for the censorship.

Goku isnt sexualized so no one cared, hes just a hick that doesnt know better.

Fuck off you egalitarian redditor normalfag

Males and females are inherently different

homo pedos are superior and more respected by society.

Ah, looking back seeing Shizuka bathing, stripped naked, or brainwashed to be a nudist feels so normal. Those were the days, simpler times.

The male body isn't sexual.

mods mods!!!!!!

the same is true for western cartoons youtube.com/watch?v=YccozjEe9f4

Everyone has seen Goku naked though. I think the only reason he wear's clothes is because Gohan/Bulma/ChiChi forced him over the years.

MOOOOOOOODS

...

only dudes watch anime so obviously it's not okay to have naked girls on screen compared to naked guys

#
#

These. If it was a bottom to top panning shot of Goku's boy body rendered in loving detail, OP would have a point. As it is, he might as well be a potato sack, and the scene context is not meant to be titillating.

It's about how these things are handled, and what the context is. Kemono Friends has the occasional upskirt shot, but due to the use of modesty tails, and the camera showing no interest in showcasing the girls' bodies, this doesn't register as fanservice to the audience. Compare this to Dragon Maid, where Kanna is suddenly transformed in to a gravure model in some scenes.

>Mutilate baby boy genitals
>Kosher as fuck
>Mutilate baby girl genitals
>Absolutely anuddah shoah

you don't see it as sexualized because you're a dude