How much does Sup Forums knows about pre-flood humans?
How much does Sup Forums knows about pre-flood humans?
Angel Rivera
Other urls found in this thread:
youtube.com
thelivingmoon.com
enterprisemission.com
m.youtube.com
en.wikipedia.org
en.wikipedia.org
youtube.com
en.wikipedia.org
en.wikipedia.org
twitter.com
twitter.com
Lincoln Reyes
not enough
don't know why it's suppressed though
seems anthropologists will admit it more than historians
Grayson James
A damn lot.
What do you want? conspiracies? facts? Pyramids or ufos?
Aaron Wright
Well the statues I posted in the OP are said to be statues of the peoples of Lemuria. They were said to exist before Atlantis. But my knowledge is lacking to say much more rly.
Andrew Garcia
Take the crimson pill, user.
Zachary Smith
In the origination story I’ve been told by dozens of B B+’ers mankind evolved from hybrid bird-lizards. Their culture revolved around a sun king type of small man named Larry (short for Law-rencia) and their only currency was larvae. The children were breastfed until age of 9 when the ceremonial tickle dance ended in two families offering a boy or girl for marriage. They used sticks as crude tools and grew their fingernails (and toenails) for combat.
Leo Garcia
jesus
Brody Barnes
Gigantic Buddhas?
Jacob Ramirez
You seem to think that there was only one flood, yet there were many floods. Atlantean civilisation was NOT the only advanced ancient human civilisation - it is simply THE MOST RECENT advanced ancient human civilisation. There were MANY advanced ancient human civilisations before Atlantis. Everything turns and returns.
"You Greeks are all young in mind. You have no belief rooted in old tradition and no knowledge hoary with age. And the reason is this: There have been and will be many different calamities to destroy mankind, the greatest of them by fire and water, lesser ones by countless other means...
But in our temples we have preserved from earliest times a written record of any great or splendid achievement or notable event which has come to our ears whether it occurred in your part of the world or here or anywhere else; whereas with you and others, writing and the other necessities of civilisation have only just been developed when the periodic scourge of the deluge descends, and spares none but the unlettered and uncultured, so that you have to begin again like children, in complete ignorance of what happened in our part of the world or in yours in early times...
You remember only one deluge, though there have been many, and you do not know that the finest and best race of men that ever existed lived in your country; you and your fellow citizens are descended from the few survivors that remained, but you know nothing about it because so many succeeding generations left no record in writing." - Timaeus 22d-23c
Aaron Sanchez
>cut huge ass statues for some insane reason
>transport them by chopping trees and rolling >them over these
>repeat until no tree left on island
>tree roots start rotting
>mud starts sliding
>tilts and burries all carefully placed statues
>everybody dies
Aaron Robinson
How much do YOU know?
Michael Williams
Why do you ask? And what do you wanna know?
Leo Reed
explain this for me then
Luke Brooks
Time to bust out the ol' pastas!
Luis Hill
it's a doorway in a rock sir
Elijah King
Humans are BILLIONS of years old and are NOT NATIVE to Earth. Here is merely SOME evidence (though DEFINITELY not ALL of the evidence) suggesting not only a human presence on Earth BILLIONS of years ago, but also suggesting complex human civilisations on Earth BILLIONS of years ago:
* A human skull fragment from Hungary dated between 250,000 and 450,000 years ago
* A human footprint with accompanying paleoliths (stones deliberately chipped into a recognisable tool type), bone tools, hearths and shelters, discovered in France and dated 300,000 to 400,000 years
* Paleoliths in Spain, a partial human skeleton and paleoliths in France; two English skeletons, one with associated paleoliths, ALL at least 300,000 years old
* Skull fragments and paleoliths in Kenya and advanced paleoliths, of modern human manufacture, in the Olduvai Gorge in Tanzania, dated between 400,000 and 700,000 years
* Neoliths (the most advanced stone tools and utensils) in China of a type that indicate full human capacity, dated to 600,000 years
* Hearths, charcoal, human femurs and broken animal bones, all denoting modern humanity, in Java, dated to 830,000 years
* An anatomically modern human skull discovered in Argentina and dated between 1 million and 1.5 million years (eoliths -chipped pebbles, thought to be the earliest known tools- at Monte Hermoso, also in Argentina, are believed to be between 1 and 2.5 million years old).
* A human tooth from Java yielding a date between 1 and 1.9 million years
* Incised bones, dated between 1.2 and 2.5 million years, have been found in Italy
* Discoveries of paleoliths, cut and charred bones at Xihoudu in China and eoliths from Diring Yurlakh in Siberia dated to 1.8 million years
* Eoliths in India, paleoliths in England, Belgium, Italy and Argentina, flint blades in Italy, hearths in Argentina, a carved shell, pierced teeth and even two human jaws all bearing a minimum date of 2 million years (end of part 1)
Jose Campbell
(start of part 2) Curiously enough, several of the very earliest artifact discoveries display a truly extraordinary level of sophistication. In Idaho, for example, a 2-million-year-old clay figurine was unearthed in 1912. But even this discovery does not mark an outer limit. Bones, vertebrae and even complete skeletons have been found in Italy, Argentina and Kenya. Their minimum datings range from 3 million to 4 million years. A human skull, a partial human skeleton and a collection of neoliths discovered in California have been dated in excess of 5 million years. A human skeleton discovered at Midi in France, paleoliths found in Portugal, Burma and Argentina, a carved bone and flint flakes from Turkey all have a minimum age of 5 million years.
How far back can human history be pushed with discoveries like these? The answer seems to be a great deal further than orthodox science currently allows. As if the foregoing discoveries were not enough, we need to take account of:
* Paleoliths from France dated between 7 and 9 million years
* An eolith from India with a minimum dating of 9 million years
* Incised bones from France, Argentina and Kenya no less than 12 million years old
* More paleolith discoveries from France, dated at least 20 million years ago
* Neoliths from California in excess of 23 million years
* Three different kinds of paleoliths from Belgium with a minimum dating of 26 million years
* An anatomically modern human skeleton, neoliths and carved stones found at the Table Mountain, California and dated at least 33 million years ago
But even 33 million years is not the upper limit. A human skeleton found in Switzerland is estimated to be between 38 and 45 million years old. France has yielded up eoliths, paleoliths, cut wood and a chalk ball, the minimum ages of which range from 45 to 50 million years.
There's still more. (end of part 2)
Oliver Hernandez
(start of part 3) In 1960, H. L. Armstrong announced in Nature magazine the discovery of fossil human footprints near the Paluxy River, in Texas. Dinosaur footprints were found in the same strata. In 1983, the Moscow News reported the discovery of a fossilised human footprint next to the fossil footprint of a three-toed dinosaur in the Turkamen Republic. Dinosaurs have been extinct for approximately 65 million years.
In 1983, Professor W. G. Burroughs of Kentucky reported the discovery of three pairs of fossil tracks dated to 300 million years ago. They showed left and right footprints. Each print had five toes and a distinct arch. The toes were spread apart like those of a human used to walking barefoot. The foot curved back like a human foot to what appeared to be a human heel. There was a pair of prints in the series that showed a left and right foot. The distance between them is just what you'd expect in modern human footprints.
In December 1862, The Geologist carried news of a human skeleton found 27.5 m (90 ft) below the surface in a coal seam in Illinois. The seam was dated between 286 and 320 million years. It's true that a few eoliths, skull fragments and fossil footprints, however old, provide no real backing for the idea of advanced prehistoric human civilisations.
But some other discoveries do.
In 1968, an American fossil collector named William J. Meister found a fossilised human shoe print near Antelope Spring, Utah. There were trilobite fossils in the same stone, which means it was at least 245 million years old. Close examination showed that the sole of this shoe differed little, if at all, from those of shoes manufactured today.
In 1897, a carved stone showing multiple faces of an old man was found at a depth of 40 m (130 ft) in a coal mine in Iowa. The coal there was of similar age. (end of part 3)
Jason Hughes
I read somewhere that after we are gone some new humans shorter in stature than us called Muvarians will take our place. Can't remember the book name's though.
Evan Parker
(start of part 4) A piece of coal yielded up an encased iron cup in 1912. Frank J. Kenwood, who made the discovery, was so intrigued he traced the origin of the coal and discovered it came from the Wilburton Mine in Oklahoma. The coal there is about 312 million years old.
In 1844, Scottish physicist Sir David Brewster reported the discovery of a metal nail embedded in a sandstone block from a quarry in the north of England. The head was completely encased, ruling out the possibility that it had been driven in at some recent date. The block from which it came is approximately 360 million years old.
On 22 June 1844, The Times reported that a length of gold thread had been found by workmen embedded in stone close to the River Tweed. This stone too was around 360 million years old.
Astonishing though these dates may appear to anyone familiar with the orthodox theory of human origins, they pale in comparison with the dates of two further discoveries.
According to Scientific American, dated 5 June 1852, blasting activities at Meeting House Hill, in Dorchester, Massachusetts, unearthed a metallic, bell-shaped vessel extensively decorated with silver inlays of flowers and vines. The workmanship was described as 'exquisite'. The vessel was blown out of a bed of Roxbury conglomerate dated somewhat earlier than 600 million years.
In 1993, Michael A. Cremo and Richard L. Thompson reported the discovery 'over the past several decades' of hundreds of metallic spheres in a pyrophyllite mine in South Africa. The spheres are grooved and give the appearance of having been manufactured. If so, the strata in which they were found suggest they were manufactured 2.8 BILLION years ago. (end of part 4)
Hunter Roberts
Nothing.
Dylan Martin
(start of part 5) What are we to make of these perplexing discoveries? They cannot simply be dismissed. If even ONE of these discoveries is TRUE (and I believe that MANY if not ALL of these discoveries are TRUE), then it changes EVERYTHING that modern mainstream anthropologists THOUGHT they knew about the human species. (end of part 5)
Carter Phillips
Never heard about that. Sounds interesting.
Jonathan Ward
>NOT NATIVE to Earth
nooo
Jonathan Flores
(start of part 6) Evolution is true, but evolution is caused by a conscious, intelligent field of energy underlying the entire universe (which you can call 'God' if you want, but I won't, because that word has religious connotations that I would rather avoid) which cranks out life anywhere and everywhere. Start watching this video from 10:27 (ignore the whole 2012 thing, because Wilcock is still right about how evolution really works):
youtube.com
I also don't like the term 'intelligent design', because 'intelligent' is a loaded word and somewhat anthropomorphic. I prefer using the term 'self-aware design' or 'intentional design' and what I'm advocating is not magic, as it can be described in a purely scientific way. Evolution is correct, but (((Darwinian evolution))) is false. Evolution is never random. Also, humans are billions of years old and not native to Earth. Dr. Peter Gariaev is a Russian scientist who took eggs that were laid by a frog and then zapped those eggs with a laser light that had gone through eggs laid by a salamander. When the 'frog' eggs hatched, salamanders emerged from them - not frogs. The only thing that is necessary to rewrite DNA is wave information, which means that evolution can occur not through millions of years but instantaneously.
The agricultural division of the Ciba-Geigy corporation (now Sygenta) discovered that existing plant seeds could be transformed into extinct varieties, simply by zapping them with a weak electrostatic current. This process generated stronger and faster-growing wheat, extinct fern species and tulips with thorns. Italian scientist Pier Luigi Ighina energetically transformed a living apricot tree into an apple tree, actually causing the fruits on the branches to metamorphose from apricots into apples in only sixteen days. Ighina also zapped a rat with DNA-wave information from a cat, and this caused the rat to grow a cat-like tail in four days. (end of part 6)
Luis Ward
yesss
Robert King
obviously, howd they do it?
Angel James
(start of part 7) I'm interested in the cyclical conception of human history that pre-Abrahamic cultures had. The Ancient Greeks had a cyclical conception of human history that was similar to the cyclical conception of human history that the Hindus had (and STILL have). The Ancient Greeks had a Golden Age (equivalent to Satya Yuga in Hinduism), a Silver Age (equivalent to Treta Yuga in Hinduism), a Bronze Age (equivalent to Dwapara Yuga in Hinduism) and an Iron Age (equivalent to Kali Yuga in Hinduism). I call the model of human history that is currently dominant among historians 'the linear-progressive model of human history'. The linear-progressive model of human history basically says that the further back in human history you go, the more primitive that humans, their cultures and their technology becomes. The linear-progressive model of human history embraced by modern historians and modern anthropologists actually has its roots in Judeo-Christian beliefs, ironically enough. Virtually EVERY pre-Abrahamic culture WORLDWIDE embraced a conception of human history that was CYCLICAL, with civilisations rising and falling one after the other over VAST periods of time and humans being EXTREMELY OLD. Take the Puranas (a collection of ancient Indian writings), for example. The Puranas describe human lineages going back over a BILLION YEARS into the past and we have SUPPRESSED ARCHAEOLOGICAL EVIDENCE (in the form of human fossils and human artifacts) that CONFIRMS this. (end of part 7)
Jacob Roberts
(start of part 8) There's a book by Ellis Silver called 'Humans Are Not From Earth: A Scientific Evaluation Of The Evidence'. He says (among other things) that sunburn, our relatively high chance of experiencing back pain and pain during labour are types of evidence that Earth is not an optimal environment for human beings and that we come from elsewhere.
My theory regarding the origin of the human species is that the human species comes from elsewhere in the Milky Way galaxy and, at some point in the distant past, our extremely ancient ancestors colonised vast swathes of the Milky Way galaxy (and are possibly still doing so) and both Mars and Earth were colonised by them along the way. There are pyramidal structures and a Sphinx-like object in various NASA photos of Mars. I also think that a fiercely destructive interplanetary war caused the destruction of a planet that used to exist between Mars and Jupiter, leaving only the asteroid belt that we know today. This war also sterilised Mars, turning what was once a lush, verdant, Earth-like planet into a cold, lifeless desert. (end)
Easton Rogers
you went full zechariah sitchen .we are native to earth man.
I can believe we've been here a long time, but were not aliens.
Anthony Lopez
A lil of each
Elijah Phillips
Anything is possible and (((they))) are obsessed with suppressing our sense of the possible - one of the ways (((they))) accomplish this is by restricting our access to correct information. (((They))) are hoarding knowledge of TRUE history, TRUE geology, TRUE astronomy, TRUE health, TRUE physics, etc. and, most importantly of all, knowledge of the TRUE nature of 'reality' itself while teaching a false, incomplete and distorted version of those subjects to the general public, who usually unquestioningly accept all of it. To anyone who dismisses anything that I post as being 'crazy', just remember that all it takes to suppress a person's sense of the possible is to restrict his or her access to correct information. Simple as that. Don't let others dictate to you what can and 'cannot' be done, what is 'real' and 'unreal' and what is possible and 'impossible'. You can do ANYTHING YOU WANT TO DO and you can be ANYONE YOU WANT TO BE, while still facing the karmic consequences of your actions. People are AWAKENING to a MORE EXPANDED CONCEPTION of the world and life in general and this is a PROFOUNDLY GOOD THING. We owe it to our innate intelligence to QUESTION EVERYTHING and that includes EVERYTHING that I tell you. (((They))) are obsessed with suppressing our sense of the possible. There are two things that (((they))) do not want you to know above all else:
1. That who and what we ALL really are is Pure Consciousness, which is infinite and eternal, experiencing life in a temporary human form (you can call Pure Consciousness 'God' if you want, but I don't, because the word 'God' has religious connotations that I would rather avoid).
2. That what we call 'reality' is illusory and therefore malleable, which means that nothing is impossible (indeed, even the word 'impossible' itself literally says "I'm possible!").
Ryder Ortiz
Why are you trying to summon that autistic kraut? He makes 80+ posts a thread.
Oh great, the sourceless pasta faggot
Lucas Hall
The Mahabharata (an ancient Indian epic poem) describes a war fought with weapons called 'astras'. The most powerful astra is the Brahmastra, which I have no doubt was/is a nuclear weapon. Brahmastras are nuclear weapons that are even more advanced than modern nuclear weapons, because the Mahabharata describes a Brahmastra that can 'lock on' to a specific target and then completely destroy ONLY that specific target but NOTHING that surrounds it. I think that such a weapon is today known as a 'phase weapon'. A Brahmastra was actually sent into the womb of a pregnant woman to kill the baby inside it, but the baby survived. There's even an astra that causes people to go to sleep. Not only that, but there are irradiated places in India, which suggests that astras might have been used in those locations. Also, there are ancient Indian writings that describe vimanas (which are flying vehicles) that use mercury as a fuel source and we know today that mercury is a legit fuel source.
Caleb Nelson
Disagree that humans aren't native, but fully functional (honestly more functional than we are) humans have absolutely been around for more than 30,000 years.
I disagree that humans are not natives because the human brain resonates at the same frequency of the Earth, 7.83Hz. Until we can observe frequency changes on the human body on other planetary bodies, it's more believable that Humans are well rooted within the earth.
Juan Reyes
Thanks for the plethora of information will look into it
Colton Myers
Sounds like my fetish
Daniel Myers
>we are native to earth man.
No, we are not native to Earth.
>were not aliens.
We are aliens.
>I can believe we've been here a long time
What you believe has no bearing whatsoever on that which is true. Humans are not native to Earth. What matters is not whether or not you believe a thing is true, but whether or not that thing IS true. The correct attitude one should take when investigating a thing is to learn whether or not that thing is true, not whether or not you believe it to be true. That which is true remains true regardless of whether people believe it to be true or not. For example, the law of gravitation worked equally as effectively BEFORE Newton discovered it as it did AFTER Newton discovered it.
Brody Carter
You're welcome. More information is coming. The message is more important than the messenger.
Leo Jackson
With tools kind sir
Isaiah King
A coin with curious and indecipherable inscriptions was discovered in Illinois in strata that would date it between 200,000 to 400,000 years ago. The finding was reported in 1871 by William E. Dubois of the (((Smithsonian Institution))). What makes this coin so significant is what Dubois said about it - he described the UNIFORM THICKNESS of the coin and concluded that it must have "passed through a rolling-mill; and if the ancient Indians had such a contrivance, it must have been pre-historic." Pic related (it's a depiction of the coin).
Dominic Butler
it's from a conspiracy book, i've seen this guy before and checked it
Easton Davis
>What you believe has no bearing whatsoever on that which is true.
>The correct attitude one should take
yet you are arrogantly talking out of your ass and claiming with 100% certainty that which you believe in. nice LARP
David Martinez
Here is the Nampa figurine (placed next to a coin for size comparison). The Nampa figurine is a tiny figurine made of clay found in 1889, when workers were drilling near Nampa, in southwest Idaho.
“The record of the well shows that… they had penetrated first about fifty feet of soil, then about fifteen feet of basalt, and afterwards passed through alternate beds of clay and quicksand…down to a depth of about three hundred feet when the sand pump began to bring up numerous clay balls, some of them more than two inches in diameter, densely coated with iron oxide,” geologist of Boston Society of Natural History, George Frederick Wright (1838-1921) reported in his book “Origin and Antiquity of Man” (1912).
The Nampa figurine appears to be of a female human and was discovered at a strata dated to about 2 million years.
Jaxson Flores
Ryder Gomez
>what caused x?
>God (iq=80)
>Aliens (iq=80)
>Don't know (iq=120)
Jonathan Parker
I'd love to believe this but it's just plain fantasy
Nathaniel Long
The book 'Forbidden Archaeology: The Hidden History Of The Human Race' by Michael Cremo and the late Richard Thompson is my source. The bibliography of Forbidden Archaeology is SO BIG that it could be ITS OWN BOOK.
Elijah Collins
Nothing is new. They were as technologically advanced as us hence we don't find a trace. Expect the weird fossilized cellphone we found with the sumererian alphabet
Nicholas Sanchez
Well answer the question, where are the door and the hinges for this supposed doorway??
Isaac White
hmm have you looked into masonic kabbalists or hermeticism? You seem to have swallowed their load if you know what I mean.
there is no evidence that we are not from earth.
If you have some please present.
your conjecture does not suggest we are aliens.
As for the law of gravitation that can be questioned quite thoroughly as a belief system on its own when you account for electromagnetism and density
Levi Scott
The evidence for the Darwinian theory of evolution is based on fossils that have been carbon-dated. If the carbon-dated evidence for the Darwinian theory of evolution is flawed, then it calls into question the entire Darwinian theory of evolution (which means that I win). If the carbon-dated evidence for extreme human antiquity that I posted earlier in this thread is not flawed, then it ALSO calls into question the entire Darwinian theory of evolution (which AGAIN means that I win). So either way, I win. :)
Jose Bell
The red parts of this map used to be land. Daily reminder that sea levels around the world were 400 feet lower just before the end of the last Ice Age.
Near the end of the last Ice Age 12,800 years ago, a giant comet that had entered the Solar System from deep space thousands of years earlier, broke into multiple fragments. Some of these fragments struck Earth, causing a global cataclysm unseen since the extinction of the dinosaurs. At least eight of the fragments hit the North American ice cap, while further fragments hit the Northern European ice cap. The impacts, from comet fragments a mile wide approaching at more than 60,000 miles an hour, generated huge amounts of heat which instantly liquidised millions of square kilometres of ice, destabilising Earth's crust and causing the global flood that is remembered in myths all around the world.
A second series of impacts, equally devastating, causing further cataclysmic flooding, occurred 11,600 years ago, the exact date that Plato gives for the destruction and submergence of Atlantis. The evidence for all of this shows beyond reasonable doubt that a civilisation at least as technologically advanced as 19th-century England at the onset of the Industrial Revolution (if not more) that flourished during the last Ice Age was destroyed in the global cataclysms between 12,800 years ago and 11,600 years ago.
A distant memory and a warning to the future - for the comet that wrought such destruction in remote antiquity may not be done with us yet. (end of part 1)
William Hughes
>, a giant comet that had entered the Solar System from deep space thousands of years earlier,
source?
Jackson Garcia
(start of part 2) A lot of our technology today is metal-based and metals oxidise over time. Our metal skyscrapers, if untouched by humans and unharmed by tsunamis, earthquakes, tornadoes, etc. would probably become dust within 10,000 years. If you want to build structures that will last for eons, you would build those structures using stones.
"Man fears time, but time fears the Pyramids." - Arab proverb (end of part 2)
Bentley Bailey
Prais God and get right with Him by genuinely repenting or suffer the dire consequences faggots. Simple as that, time is running out. If you don't see it now you never will and deserve to be purged ( but I hope you will not really)
Jace Rivera
(start of part 3) Antarctica is Atlantis. Remember that Plato said that Atlantis was larger than Asia Minor (present-day Turkey) and Libya (which in those days referred to Northern Africa minus Egypt) combined. Antarctica is larger than Asia Minor and Libya combined. Read up on Charles Hapgood's theory of crustal displacement and keep in mind that Charles Hapgood died suddenly in (((suspicious circumstances))). Antarctica (Atlantis in those days) used to be near the equator and thus had a tropical climate. Also, Plato said that there were elephants and bananas in Atlantis. Elephants and bananas naturally exist ONLY in tropical climates. Crustal displacement made Atlantis slide southward to its present position.
"You Greeks are all young in mind. You have no belief rooted in old tradition and no knowledge hoary with age. And the reason is this: There have been and will be many different calamities to destroy mankind, the greatest of them by fire and water, lesser ones by countless other means...
But in our temples we have preserved from earliest times a written record of any great or splendid achievement or notable event which has come to our ears whether it occurred in your part of the world or here or anywhere else; whereas with you and others, writing and the other necessities of civilisation have only just been developed when the periodic scourge of the deluge descends, and spares none but the unlettered and uncultured, so that you have to begin again like children, in complete ignorance of what happened in our part of the world or in yours in early times...
You remember only one deluge, though there have been many, and you do not know that the finest and best race of men that ever existed lived in your country; you and your fellow citizens are descended from the few survivors that remained, but you know nothing about it because so many succeeding generations left no record in writing." - Timaeus 22d-23c (end of part 3)
Brody Gonzalez
(start of part 4) This page contains what appears to be a photo of a so-called 'Inca city' on Mars:
thelivingmoon.com
This page contains what appears to be a photo of a 'Sphinx' or a Sphinx-like structure on Mars:
enterprisemission.com
I am NOT saying that the Incans and the Ancient Egyptians colonised Mars. Even so, consider these similarities between Egypt and the Americas:
* Both had huge pyramids precisely aligned to the cardinal points.
* Both had temples with megalithic stones with extremely fine joints of less than a fiftieth of an inch.
* Both had head-dresses of similar style.
* Both employed a unique style of construction using L-shaped corners.
* Both used the same style of metal clamps to hold huge stones in place.
* Both cultures used the process of mummification to preserve and honour their dead.
Is it not reasonable to suggest that the civilisations present in Egypt and the Americas in antiquity are both the legacy of an even earlier civilisation that existed before recorded history as we know it began? (end)
Ryder Torres
Source for this map bro? Need a better version.
Justin Bailey
you're the same australian who always posts this?
can you put all your stuff in a pastebin
Gavin Rogers
What would stop us from creating a technologically advanced civilisation hundreds of thousands of years ago? Smaller brain size? I doubt it! Our planet's resources would still be much the same (such as water, oil, metals, minerals etc.), our curiosity would still be much the same and our general intelligence would still be much the same too. The knowledge learnt by the people of previous human civilisations could not have been vastly different from the knowledge that we humans can learn today. After all, we still have the same Sun, the same Moon, the same stars in our night sky and the same oceans that we had many millennia ago! I can easily believe that all of the different fields of knowledge we have accumulated in our present civilisation such as music, art, astrology, geology, astronomy, physics, biology, chemistry, medicine, mathematics, making weapons, alchemy and so on, have already been expounded by our human ancestors from distant past civilisations. We're only recycling this knowledge. Have you heard the phrase 'There's nothing new under the Sun'? Well, I believe that phrase is true. Also, don't forget that people in prehistoric times would've still experienced EXACTLY the same emotions as we do. We get angry, they ALSO got angry. We shed tears, they ALSO shedded tears. We fall in love, they ALSO fell in love. We endure suffering, they ALSO endured suffering. We celebrate our joy, they ALSO celebrated their joy. Okay, I'll stop rambling now. I could honestly go on and on about this topic forever, I feel VERY passionately about it in case you haven't already noticed. kek
Aaron Cooper
>Antarctica is Atlantis
More likely Mount Meru. Atlantis was in Central/South America
Anthony Brooks
...
Sebastian Brown
...
John Jenkins
Gautama Buddha was once asked by one of his disciples about the antiquity of humanity. In response, he stated that if one were to stab a pin into the ground, there is not a single spot on any of the spaces on the surface of Earth that doesn't contain deteriorated human corpses. In other words, EVERY spot on the surface of our planet was once a human burial ground. If what Gautama Buddha said was true, then consider the vast durations of time that so-called 'anatomically modern humans' must have spent on this planet for THAT many deteriorated human corpses to accumulate on the surface of Earth! To be completely honest, I doubt that humans even originated on this planet. Also, if we had the ability to nuke ourselves in the deeply prehistoric past, don't you think that this would also open the doors to MANY other similar possibilities too? For example, if humans possessed nuclear weaponry in forgotten eras, does it not then seem similarly likely that we also possessed electronic appliances (for example) which would parallel the computers and televisions we take for granted today? Most modern mainstream anthropologists (and most people in general) can't seem to embrace any other view of extremely ancient human civilisations other than the orthodox, linear and progressive view that the further back in time you go, the more technologically primitive human civilisations become. But if you truly think about it, if so-called 'anatomically modern humans' have existed on Earth for 50 million years (for argument's sake), why wouldn't we be able to construct highly technologically advanced civilisations for ourselves even over a million years ago?
Nicholas Nelson
This.
Jewtube: age of deceit 1 & 2
m.youtube.com
Bentley Ramirez
>so-called 'anatomically modern humans' have existed for about 200,000 years, according to (((mainstream scientists)))
>humans created the first civilisation about 5,000 years ago, according to (((mainstream historians)))
>our distant ancestors spent about 195,000 years being as inquisitive and industrious as humans are, but nevertheless did nothing but hunt for food and shit in caves, according to (((mainstream historians)))
Kek. People actually believe that shit?
Aiden Bailey
We have actually DE-evolved (or 'devolved', if you prefer that term) from our distant ancestors. Our distant ancestors were taller than us on average, stronger than us on average, faster than us on average, smarter than us on average, lived longer lives than us on average and had a better memory than we do on average. What we call 'evolution' can occur not through millions of years but instantaneously, because evolution is caused by a conscious, intelligent field of energy underlying the entire universe. DNA is energetic wave-form information at its base state (just like everything else) and at certain periods of time, the information input in the DNA of the human species is relatively simple, and it is during these periods of time (like now) that we, for example, only live up to a hundred years (if even that) - among other things. But when the information input in the DNA of the human species becomes more complex, the human species lives for hundreds of years, is stronger, is faster, is taller, is smarter, has a better memory, etc. Our ancestors called these periods of time when the information input in the DNA of the human species was more complex 'golden ages'.
Jaxon Allen
>make an anime character
>give them poo eyes
Why?
Justin Hernandez
It's suppressed because their technology fucked up the world. Fuck the Atlanteans
Parker Mitchell
According to mainstream Hinduism, the Kali Yuga began on the 18th of February 3102 BC. The cycle known as the 'Fifth Sun' in the Mayan calendar began in 3114 BC. 3114 BC is a mere 12 years after 3102 BC. That is NOT a (((coincidence))).
Isaiah Cooper
Fuck Budhha though. Fuck pantheism. Christ is Lord and this truth is ABSOLUTE. There is no place for demons elevated to share seat with Our Lord. This is Truth and not truth == lie, there is no in between.
Gavin Allen
There is a cycle of time known in the ancient Vedic scriptures of India as a 'manvantar'. There are 14 manvantars in each Day of Brahma and each manvantar is 306,720,000 Earth years in length. In the current Day of Brahma, 6 manvantars have passed and we are currently in the 7th manvantar. Each manvantar ends with a cataclysm which wipes out most of the life on Earth. What's interesting here is that according to modern mainstream science, there have been 6 major extinction events in the past. I strongly believe that there is a connection between the manvantar cycle and the supercontinent cycle. One complete supercontinent cycle is said to take 300 to 500 million years and one complete manvantar cycle is 306,720,000 years.
Here is a list of the supercontinents on Earth with some information about them (including the manvantars I believe they formed in):
Kenorland: Believed to have formed 2.7 billion years ago, it corresponds to the Svayambhuva manvantar.
Nena: Believed to have formed 1.8 billion years ago, it corresponds to the Svarocisha manvantar.
Columbia: Believed to have formed 1.5 billion years ago, it corresponds to the Auttama manvantar.
Rodinia: Believed to have formed 1.1 billion years ago, it corresponds to the Tamasa manvantar.
Pannotia: Believed to have formed 600 million years ago, it corresponds to the Raivata manvantar.
Euramerica: Believed to have formed 300 million years ago, it corresponds to the Chakshusha manvantar.
Pangaea: Believed to have formed 250 million years ago, it corresponds to the Vaivasvata manvantar (which is the current manvantar).
P.S. My calculations could be incorrect. kek
Henry Adams
Manetho was an Egyptian historian and priest who lived during the 3rd century BC. According to Manetho, the total number of years covered by the Egyptian king-list equals 36,525 (which matches the fossil record for the era of Cro-Magnon Man) and that the 'rule of the demi-gods' immediately follows the reign of the gods.
Easton Collins
that's a cute kanna
Nathan Wright
In Hinduism, there is the creator god Brahma and his wife Sarasvati and in the Abrahamic religions, there is Abraham and his wife Sarah. Although Abraham is not a creator god in the Abrahamic religions, he is still considered to be the main patriarch of the Abrahamic religions and since Brahma created this universe, he is also kind of a patriarchal figure too, so there seems to be a definite connection there which I think is NOT a (((coincidence))). I believe that there might be some type of link between the Indo-European people and the Afro-Asiatic people (including the Semitic people). There is even a hypothesised language family known as the 'Indo-Semitic language family' (although I call it the 'Indo-European—Afro-Asiatic language family'):
en.wikipedia.org
If Indo-Europeans and Afro-Asiatics were originally one people, that's most of the entire caucasoid race covered - except for Basques (who still belong to Haplogroup R1A/R1B, if I remember correctly), Georgians, Hungarians, Finns and Estonians, if I remember correctly. Although there IS a hypothesised language family known as the 'Indo-Uralic language family' (which you can read more about here: en.wikipedia.org
Julian Nguyen
(start of part 2) I believe that the Aryans/Ancient Indo-Europeans were the original Israelites. If Aryans were the original Israelites as well as God's chosen people and Semites were merely defeated cousins of the Aryans, it would explain why the kikes today want to genocide white people. Although I think that 'God' in the Bible does not refer to an all-powerful being, but rather to some type of extraterrestrial being (or a group of extraterrestrial beings). (end)
Kayden Bailey
talk to me about why high level people go to places like Antarctica. And why those places are censored on Google Maps. Why do they keep sending people underground, what is written on those walls. Why are there so many traps and who build them. What is being protected in that place. Whos DNA?
Jaxson Wright
Where can I shill the plasma universe theory and how mainstream science treats it as pseudoscience? This is the place right? Doesn't get talked about enough.
Daniel Parker
These carvings of a helicopter, a blimp and a spaceship on the temple of Abydos in Egypt are real and are depictions of our futuristic past.
Jose Moore
>How much does Sup Forums knows about pre-flood humans?
This video applies to anyone who takes this shit seriously
youtube.com
Owen Murphy
About 241,200 years ago is when the first kings of the Sumerian king list started reigning (if I remember correctly). Check this out:
en.wikipedia.org
People say that the Sumerian king list is not legit because it describes kings who reigned for many thousands of years, but that still doesn't explain how near the end of the Sumerian king list, the lengths of time that the kings reigned approaches more 'believable' lengths of time (for example, the last king reigned for a mere 23 years). Also, both the Bible and the ancient Vedic writings describe people with very long life-spans who lived many thousands of years ago. Indeed, the ancient Vedic writings describe human lineages on Earth going back over a BILLION YEARS into the past and there is suppressed archaeological evidence that supports this.
Hudson Adams
Underground cities like Derinkuyu in present-day Turkey (en.wikipedia.org
Nathaniel Turner
Paradise exists inside Earth. The word 'paradise' comes from an Old Persian word that means 'walled enclosure'. This walled enclosure is referring to Earth's crust. Earth is hollow. I believe that humans reached Earth very early in Earth's history (billions of years ago) and colonised Earth's outer surface, then they colonised Earth's inner surface (AKA 'Agartha').
David Flores
Here are some ancient myths that suggest human histories different to the one taught to us by the academic orthodoxy:
* The Pima tribe of Arizona speak of how their ancestors came from an island at the centre of the world before that island sank beneath the ocean. Leading the relatively few survivors from that island was South Doctor, the heroic progenitor of the Pima tribe. South Doctor was a powerful medicine man. South Doctor held magical crystals in his left hand and guided the survivors from a cataclysmic deluge to safety between the Gilla and Salt Rivers.
* Ancestral traditions throughout Mesoamerican civilisations and Andean civilisations consistently describe their founding fathers as tall, bearded, light-skinned and blonde-haired/red-haired. (end of part 1)
Joshua Kelly
(start of part 2) * The Australian Aborigines recall the 'Land Of Mystery', which is also known as the 'Land Of Perfection'. The 'Land Of Mystery' was a huge city surrounded by four walls, their exterior covered entirely in white quartz. The 'Land Of Mystery' was described as mountainous, volcanic and luxuriant in plant growth, among which stood great buildings of domes and spires - this from a people to whom architecture was unknown until relatively modern times.
* The Incas believed that their civilisation had been founded by Kon-Tiki Viracocha, a red-haired, light-skinned man who appeared in the Andes from the east following a terrible flood.
* Polynesian legends tell us about light-skinned, blonde-haired culture-bearers who fled to the Pacific islands after their homeland sank into the ocean. (end of part 2)
Gavin Long
(start of part 3) * The Aztecs traced their earliest origins, not to America, but to a vanished island far away across the Sunrise Sea (their name for the Atlantic Ocean). Their founding fathers were culture-bearers from this far away island.
* Several Native American tribes, such as the Menominee of the Upper Great Lakes Region, recount in their oral traditions how a worldwide flood was precipitated by greedy foreigners, the light-skinned 'Marine Men', who dug into the ground to gain riches (especially copper). (end)
Jeremiah Wood
The Basque language fascinates me. It's a language isolate spoken mostly between Spain and France. My theory regarding the Basque language is that it's the last living remnant of the Atlantean language being spoken by an ethnic group that are the descendants of Atlanteans who sought refuge in Western Europe. They went to the Pyrenees to escape the sea levels that were rising at the end of the last Ice Age. Oh, and I think that the Lady of Elche is an Atlantean woman. I could be wrong, I don't really care either way. It's fun to speculate and we'll probably never know for sure.
Ethan Morris
There was a cultural ancestor common to both the Basques and Aztecs, two otherwise disparate groups, and I am convinced that cultural ancestor was Atlantis. When Atlantis was destroyed, I think that survivors sailed to places like Mexico, Peru, Northern Africa (especially Egypt), Gobekli Tepe, Western Europe, etc. and spread their knowledge to the hunter-gatherers who existed in those lands at that time, transforming them into civilised peoples, with the possible exception of Egypt, as Egypt might well have already been civilised at that time, since the Ancient Egyptian historian Manetho outright stated that the total number of years covered by the Egyptian king-list equals 36,525. I think that places like India, Greece (in particular Athens, who Plato describes as an enemy of Atlantis) and China had civilisations that co-existed with Atlantis, were wiped out along with Atlantis and, unlike Atlantis, were re-created thousands of years later (like the Indus Valley Civilisation, for example). Not only that, but the myths of places like India, Greece, China, etc. themselves describe their civilisations as having vastly ancient origins.
Juan Thomas
Less than I'd like.
Jordan Richardson
The thing is this, you ask people "How do you know X?" and they'll probably reply by saying something like "Well, because it's in my science books." or "Well, because it's been peer-reviewed." or "Well, because it's been agreed upon by a majority of scientists.", but these are flimsy defences, because unless YOU can verify for yourself whether something is true or not either by OBSERVATION or by doing an experiment about it BY YOURSELF, you are relying essentially on external sources for your information and it is naïve to think that those sources don't have agendas.
What people call 'mainstream science' has been hijacked by politics, religion and corporations. So-called 'peer review' these days is usually nothing more than a circle-jerk. Just as people support the separation of church and state (and RIGHTFULLY so), I support the separation of SCIENCE and state. We owe it to our innate intelligence to QUESTION EVERYTHING and that includes EVERYTHING that I tell you!
Christopher Bennett
Have you heard about the Face on Mars, user?
There is a 2-km mountain which looks like a face from orbit.
Oh, and it's right next to a fucking five-sided pyramid.
And bunch of other weird shit.
And the site is more radioactive than the rest of the planet. And the isotope ratios are fucked up.
Pic related.
Cameron Miller
You guys should check out this guy
Jordan Wilson
>hey were as technologically advanced as us hence we don't find a trace
Let's assume that was true. Where are all the emptied out mines? Where are the non-literal garbage dumps, where are the billions of tonnes of metal and whatever fuck they used? I won't even bother asking about the buildings.
Jason Baker
I differ from the mainstream Vedic claim that we are currently in Kali Yuga and that there are currently 427,000 years left of Kali Yuga (a dark prospect to be sure - and one fortunately not true!), I completely agree with Sri Yukteswar that we are actually in Dwapara Yuga right now and that the reason why most Hindus today think we are in Kali Yuga is due to a mistake made during the previous Kali Yuga which was caused by the corruptive influence of Kali Yuga itself. I firmly believe that the yuga cycle is caused by the Sun revolving around another star. The closer the Sun is to this star, the more expansive human consciousness becomes, which ushers humanity into a Satya Yuga/Golden Age. The further the Sun is from this star, the less expansive human consciousness becomes, which ushers humanity into a Kali Yuga/Iron Age. There are two types of yuga cycles - an ascending yuga cycle and a descending yuga cycle. I completely agree with Sri Yukteswar that we are currently in the Dwapara Yuga of an ascending yuga cycle.
Zachary Long
I've seen his Jewtube channel, he's a great guy.
Aiden Butler
DELET THIS!
Charles Green
Nathaniel Brown
Demons will sell you 95% truth + 5% lies, but the lies will confuse and predominate. This is why Islam was created. Don't buy into people who claim truth aka Christ is not absolute.
It is hard for us as angels fallen or not ( aka devils) have many orders of magnitudes knowledge co!pared to us. If you were to play chess against therm there isd no way you could win. But us humans dumb as we are have a part of God's nature that angels nor devils have. Hence why they/,aliens do not have a sense of humour, you can't have that if you are all-knowing. Anyway, we are created in Gods image in a way angels nor devils will ever understand, but these days that appear the most comfortable and advanced yet ate actually the worst, most people now after dying end up in hell. After death it is too late, if you fucked up eternal doom is certain. Hence why you shouldn't listen to this shithead polytheist Aussie as so many well poisoners. You got only one chance and this is it. Yes the world is evil and beyond repair. Ultimate cleansing is coming soon. Get right with God. And most importantly reject FALSE IDOLS.
Oliver Young
Cute Rumia dude.