Someone immeasurably more intelligent than you deduces there's no god

>someone immeasurably more intelligent than you deduces there's no god
>you still believe the bullshit you've been fed by goat-fuckers and pedophiles who just want your money

Attached: bwU6VIj.jpg (720x697, 85K)

Other urls found in this thread:

hawking.org.uk/publications.html
youtube.com/watch?v=IEEHZdxkOfo
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

>and a meme flag with a meme scientist quote are the voices of reason
(You) + noose = best solution

Did he say this before or after he died?

>meme scientist
>hawking.org.uk/publications.html

literally kill yourself and your family, imbecile

and he suffered in life, much like he will suffer in death.
he'll regain feeling in his body, only to have his flesh blister off in a lake of fire.
*dabs*

Attached: 1479517436525.jpg (1280x720, 76K)

>someone immeasurably more intelligent than that spastic cripple believes in a God
>spastics who have never made any meaningful contribution to science believe otherwise

Hmm which one to believe

Attached: JCM.png (331x398, 101K)

Isaac Newton believed in God and people like Hawking would be lost without his work.
>inb4 but that was a long time ago we are smarter now!
Werner Von Braun believed in God and engineered NASA'S rockets, in particular the Saturn V which NASA used for decades.

We can reverse engineer nature proving nature is engineered.

The fact we can reverse engineer volcanic rock, which makes up 70% Earth's crust, proves a Creator, because without volcanic rock the Earth wouldn't be able to sustain higher evolved life forms.

If you want to prove me wrong then show evidence for no design.

No design: a material that exist without a process.

Three things to look for when looking for no design:

1. Any process can be used to get a particular end.

2. The same process used produces different results or doesn't have the same end result each time.

3. A change in the process doesn't change the final product.

The claim that what I was just observing the natural process of nature is a illogical claim, because it goes against all three laws of logic.

If you believe a man can design something and find those same actions taken to design in nature but believe it isn’t design then you have violated all three laws of logic. By saying design isn’t design in nature only when man does it violates the law of identity. Design is design. The actions performed is what is classified design. By saying man can design and manmade design can be observed but these same actions found in nature isn’t design is in violation of the second law. The law of noncontradiction. There is either design or no design. You cannot have both. They are contradictions to each other. The fact is we can reverse engineer nature proving nature is engineered. To say man can design but when design is found in nature it isn’t design is a contradiction. Finally since design is design and design is a contradiction to no design you have no middle ground meaning the actions taken to design cannot be applied to both design and no design. This is what atheist try to do with their counter argument. They only prove themselves charlatans. It is time we destroy their false god of nothingness.

Attached: IMG_20180314_154330.jpg (960x954, 111K)

Of course he would not belive in God. Would you believe in God if you were a brain trapped in a decaying body that is worse off than a paraplegic person?

Attached: KbEUf.png (2057x1127, 416K)

Someone much smarter than Hawking that actually contributed something to the world says otherwise.

Hawking did nothing and now he's in hell. Lolz

S

Attached: b618c45f14e39e083981e22c11b3fda4.jpg (403x403, 108K)

Attached: i-canot-imagine-a-god-who-rewards-punishes-the-objects-of-his-creation-whose-purpose-are-modeded-aft (700x321, 55K)

>>someone immeasurably more intelligent
no his intelligence level is quite measurable, despite him not thinking so
>calling a personal feeling logical deduction
>t. reason for communisms failure

Attached: d5eeb0d3b4512b75bfafac10ad1af2c5.jpg (700x394, 46K)

Attached: utried.png (300x250, 22K)

Attached: 10658763_759215250819629_58902159351854531_o.jpg (1400x1060, 150K)

>black man who has made literally no meaningful contribution to science knows better than Heisenberg and Clerk-Maxwell

:think:

Attached: atheisteinstein2.jpg (700x321, 55K)

Newton beats Einstein
In fact... Clerk-Maxwell beats Einstein too for sheer impact his work has had on the world.

>be godless heathen
>get smote with Lou Gehrig's disease

>Newton beats Einstein
No, he doesn't. Newton's laws of motion are incomplete without special relativity.

>shill (((black holes))), regurgitated kikestein nonsense and atheism
>god turns you into a crippled amerimutt

you are next commie

Nice quote however: Not believeing in institutionalized religions is not equal to being an atheist.

Attached: einsteinquote.jpg (850x400, 72K)

>A man immeasurably smarter then you says niggers are dumber because of their head shape
>but you choose to believe people who say to mutilate your body to be accepted by society who say we're all equal

Attached: Franz_Joseph_Gall_(1758_-_1828),_German_neuroanatomist_Wellcome_L0036005.jpg (2958x3984, 2.63M)

>Swerige
>4th leat religious country in the world
Hello, Mohammad. How's the welfare? Has the 13yo wife bled yet?

roasted

> someone immeasurably more intelligent than you
Actually he has an IQ of 162 and I have an IQ of 164. And I think 162 for him is pushing it.
That jackass said that since life was incredibly unlikely to have formed on earth by itself, an asteroid must have brought it here.
I'll leave you to deduce how that causes more problems not less.
Not impressive logic there.

Attached: 1513986176322.jpg (238x192, 9K)

I'll never understand people with such low self-esteem that they would blindly agree with someone because they have some credential.

A bird tells a man that there's nothing above the trees.

The components of one's life are like a computer, yes, disassembled, they all amount to their bare components, and one could say that an afterlife is silly. Our blood washes away, our teeth and bones decay, our skin shrivels, and our muscles and organs are eaten and become fertilizer until there's nothing left. But that's assuming that all of the bare components have been buried. The bodily energy has been displaced, and the information has scattered, but they're still there; the observer may have traversed his physical vessel or may have been born anew.

cause and effect based on physics and chemistry is not design.
even if it were, a material that couldn't figure out how it was made would actually be proof of god, (needed to make it), not the opposite.

Take a cue from a real scientist. Not a meme with pr staff, ghostwriters, and an endless stream of rotten toothed cripple liars that are shoved in and out of wheelchairs like (((hawking))).

Attached: IMG_0089.jpg (564x703, 80K)

God hath decreed in himself, from all eternity, by the most wise and holy counsel of his own will, freely and unchangeably,

all things, whatsoever comes to pass; yet so as thereby is God neither the author of sin nor hath fellowship with any therein;

nor is violence offered to the will of the creature, nor yet is the liberty or contingency of second causes taken away,

but rather established; in which appears his wisdom in disposing all things, and power and faithfulness in accomplishing his decree.

( Isaiah 46:10; Ephesians 1:11; Hebrews 6:17; Romans 9:15, 18; James 1:13; 1 John 1:5; Acts 4:27, 28; John 19:11; Numbers 23:19; Ephesians 1:3-5 )

I pray in JESUS' name that you may repent of your sins and turn to THE LORD JESUS CHRIST for the salvation of you soul!

>Heisenberg
Don't toss stones from glass houses, user.

>if we explain something God did, that means God isn’t real
Wew, science.

>there is no God
>appreciate the grand design
derp

Attached: 1521046570140.jpg (1917x1069, 264K)

if you explain everything accredited to god, then where is god?

>special relativity
>extreme conditions can’t possibly change the behavior of my measuring device, the only solution is that TIME ITSELF is changing.

Attached: 0241778F-7E23-462B-9168-6C10624898E6.jpg (550x543, 92K)

If you explain how a painting was created it does nothing to diminish the painter
Kys

Attached: 6E59F7BE-2720-4783-BBDC-1ACB1B906C2B.jpg (334x470, 115K)

youtube.com/watch?v=IEEHZdxkOfo

Attached: 1521034749709.jpg (497x250, 111K)

ah so you are one of those "god did it, but made it look like he didn't" people.
well, there is no argument against blind faith so I'm out.

Everything has a creator , and if we believe in big band theory someone had to create atoms which collided and made "bang"

>there is no god
>appreciate the grand design of the universe
>grand design
Fucking moron.

>there was nothing and then it exploded

>what do you mean I can’t kill God by explaining stuff?
>fuck you im leaving
Lel

>everything has a creator
There's no basis for this though

Issac Newton
>single handily creates calculus and physics which have immeasurable uses and benefits
>believes in god

hawking
>works with (((theoretical physics))) with no inherent usefulness
>doesn’t believe in god

Hmmmmmmmmmm

>He's smart at physics and quantum mechanics and a dumbass at the rest

Whats next for you stupid fucks? Asking your dentist to do brain surgery because they're both doctors

Does your dad work at nintendo ?

Even the smartest human litrrally cannot comprehend a godlike being.
Are we that full of ourselves that we can boldly claim there is nothing out there?

Attached: 1509807125454.gif (499x367, 488K)

Yes, we are
Fuck god

>goat-fuckers and pedophiles who just want your money
sounds like hollywood or the jews. What's your point?

>>someone immeasurably more intelligent than you
Yeah, some of us might have a problem with that statement. Nobody that intelligent goes into a dead discipline like Physics, so that he can tell us about the time when the universe was born, rather than contending with real world issues, like race realism, or medicine for cancer and heart explosions.

>no God
>"design" of the universe