Do you really think it's necessary to own one of these for home protection?
Do you really think it's necessary to own one of these for home protection?
Jaxon Nelson
Other urls found in this thread:
Dominic Green
Depends on how big your home is.
Luke Richardson
Do you really think it's necessary to be such a fag?
Ethan Thomas
Yes
Eli Stewart
Yes.
/thread
Jordan Cooper
Recreational Atomic Artillery™
Isaiah Campbell
Yes
Robert Richardson
ok
Isaiah Young
and this
Kevin Moore
Certainly not not necessary
Kinda funny
You still get a sage
Ian Lewis
Yes without a doubt. I should be allowed to own whatever I can afford.
Asher Watson
SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED.
Camden Gomez
>home protection?
That's not what the 2nd Amendment is about
Jordan Davis
No, but for the security of a free state it is.
Joseph Nelson
Yes.
Camden Allen
Of course not.
But both police and criminals won't want to fuck with you. And Johnny law will be nice enough to provide round the clock surveillance
Aaron Rivera
You're gonna need a few more of those if you live in Detroit.
Anthony Carter
Is it literally called atomic cannon? Can a burger explain? I would buy it if I could afford it obviously, to protect my big safehouse up on a hill, i mean, if anyone tried to come in my property they would be spotted within 5kms and this thing would obliterate anything by the looks of it.
Jaxon Diaz
Andrew Ramirez
sure, I'd love to zero in on Trump when he's busy 5-putting at Mar-A-Caca and fussillage his stankin mongrel ass
Noah James
Well Regulated Militia
Oliver Powell
No, but i like to use one every hunting season to fill my ‘tyrannical government’ tag.
Joshua Morgan
That property looks pretty safe now though, doesn't it
Jason Hall
So brave
Sebastian Cruz
Pretty much us burgers loved nukes so much we figured we should make nuke artillery then we realized it was a horrible idea because it would kill our own troops as well as the enemy.
Matthew Walker
Mutually
Assured
Destruction
Gavin Hernandez
yes
Levi Foster
too bad you're a liberal or you'd actually know how to use a weapon.
>nb4 i know guns!
joy‑con™ controllers don't count as weapons training, soyboy.
Jason Price
Hilarious, I shit you not.
I just got done telling some anti2nd faggot how awesome it would be if I had a howitzer. Cuz he said i must own guns.
Charles Adams
Depend on how big your government is.
Grayson Ward
Well, yeah it kinda is. You are allowed to protect your home against tyranny. In all its forms.
Lincoln Thompson
I wanted the USS Wisconsin. Its a home and a home protector at once.
Bentley Young
Yeah thats why we made the missiles. The artillery kind of fucked up a our field capabilities.
Jaxon Hall
Conquerors do not, as a rule, give up their arms
Austin Ross
Holy ass-fuck. It shoots nukes! Fucking nukes! Well shit cant realistically use it for home defense then. Probably could afford 20 automated sentry cannons and ammo to spare for the price of that thing plus 1 nuke.
David Rodriguez
Maybe not necessary, but it would pretty fun.
Carson Butler
I need one for each cardinal direction, and four more to fill in the gaps.
Henry Martin
True but the more direct, implied meaning is the security of a free state. That undoubtedly includes home defense but starting from an explicit "home defense" position unnecessarily gimps your position in an argument in my experience.
The purpose as written was that the population could be as armed as the army so that the citizens could fight off invaders or their own government turned tyrant. Predicating the argument on defending your personal home or shit like "hunting" is already ceding ground to your opponent and not true to the spirit of the 2nd
Julian Fisher
Yes. Gibmedatritnao
Eli Hernandez
Eh if I had 1000 acres I would buy one, I can deal with 20 acres of nuke waste ground.
Henry Green
You may need to deal with the fallout. I believe thats why the military abandoned the project. You couldnt fire it without being caught in the fallout zone.
Nathan Sanchez
Absolutely. To shoo gypsies in case they show up.
Carson Moore
that's pretty much it, strontium 90 and ruthenium 106 poisoning, the reason why open-air nuke tests were halted
Camden Russell
Necessary to own?
Probably not.
Necessary to be allowed to own?
Yes.
John Reed
You don't know what "regulated" means you fucking spook
Leo Young
That is why you don't use a 15kt warhead, but merely a 1kt warhead, but yes I understand that see here I was just doing some burger posting.
Michael Stewart
Yeah so we can lock-on to Sup Forums users IP addresses for a dose of reality.
Nicholas Turner
>tfw we were burger posting so hard I took a joke about recreational McNukes® seriously.
Joseph Russell
Ya
Bentley Martin
Murica at its finest.
David Rogers
Atomic Annie isn't quite that big.
Adam Cook
Carter King
As long as you shoot niggers with it, I could care less
Alexander Taylor
If you can afford a $7,000,000 piece of artillery, why shouldn't you be allowed to buy it?
Jonathan Anderson
Yes, how else do i defend my self from commies
Brayden Sanders
No, but I think an assault weapon is necessary for my home protection.
Asher Green
YES, IF I can have an unlimited supply of ammunition
Hunter Wood
Both correct.
Christian Martinez
Shall. Not. Be. Infringed.
Ethan Hernandez
Yes. Privitize nuclear weapons.
Cameron Martinez
don't forget the commas!
Andrew Richardson
>Do you really think it's necessary to own one of these for home protection?
>OWN ONE
>Implying all Americans should not have pic related and more...
Benjamin Wood
I advocate personal nukes for everyone, but I am willing to compromise and accept only a complete repeal of all existing gun laws. See? That's exceedingly reasonable to meet you half way.
Benjamin Long
Yes. I should also be able to carry it concealed as well.
Kayden Williams
Yes.
But the full-sized version
Brandon Ramirez
The first proposed delivery device was artillery, perhaps from warships. They couldn't miniaturize it though. We still made artillery nukes in the 60's though. They had neutron nukes, which has less fallout and a more destructive blast for the size of the materials used. Nukes with low fallout, and at a tactical yield don't fit the MAD parameters though. Official we got rid of them. We started on missile defense, Russia recently back to tactical artillery nukes. Probably of the neutron variant.
Benjamin Sanders
No, I think at last three would be best considering the circumstances, don't you?
Carter Green
lmao op BTFO
Dominic Harris
Yes and sage