What is it about the indic peoples that's made them so easy to conquer, enslave and subjugate throughout history?
The peoples depicted on pic related have basically never ruled themselves, only for short periods of time did they have native rule. The majority of their history consists of being ruled by various groups, from the aryan iranians, to the turkics and finally the europeans.
Every conqueror that has ventured into india had but one thing to say, that the people were meek, weak, dirty and meant to be conquered/enslaved. Just look at what Babur has to say about india:
"Hindustan is a country of few charms. Its people have no good looks; of social intercourse, paying and receiving visits there is none; of genius and capacity none; of manners none; in handicraft and work there is no form or symmetry, method or quality; there are no good horses, no good dogs, no grapes, muskmelons or first-rate fruits, no ice or cold water, no good bread or cooked food in the bazaars, no hot-baths, no colleges, no candles, torches or candlesticks"
And we all know what india is like today (poo in loo). So what gives, what's kept them this way for their entire history?
Because India has never truly been united. They are made up of a bunch of different ethnic groups. India should really be split up, like the map in your pic.
Mason Ramirez
Or it could be the fact that indic peoples are simply inferior, much like niggers and aboriginals.
Easton King
>every conquer Are you sure ahmed, alexander army rebelled when saw indian armies
Robert Russell
You mean alexander the great's soldiers who were very tired and so far from home that they didn't feel like fighting yet another army? That's a natural reaction.
Besides, everyone in the world knows indians are pathetic betas who have been conquered/raped/enslaved by everyone. Your entire mythos and culture (hinduism) has even been brought to you by said foreigners (aryans).
Jeremiah Rivera
The religion is much older than the migration ahmed, let's talk about conquered theory, it's what Europe is going through currently when a population becomes complacent after years of having it too good it becomes easier to conquer for savages pretty simple
Xavier Long
nonsensical driven written from a pajeet
Cooper Collins
Oh and selectively ignoring thousands of years of history for the last 500 Year is something an abrahamic cuck will only do
Luke Sullivan
The vedas are atleast 10,000 years old
Ryder Perez
let's go back thousands of years then, even before islam india was always invaded and ruled by foreigners, groups like the kushans invaded and blew indians the fuck out
and those came from aryans who did not resemble poo in loos, but rather resembled nordic Iranic peoples (who are now extinct)
Chase King
like let's be honest here, indians are basically pic related, ugly subhumans, their history is basically that of being slaves their throughout the annals of time
>their entire history? It isn't their entire history. They are a broken people currently, but that is one aspect of the cycle of civilization. Further, they are currently much less pathetic than USA, Britain, etc. The cycle is turning.
Chase Bailey
this includes pakistanis too by the way, who are just muslim pajeets
Jack Rivera
How are they less pathetic than UK/USA? UK in one year of its existance probably contributes more to humanity than indians ever have in their entire history if we're talking about scientific progress. Let's not forget a trading group from the uk conquered all of india.
Julian Myers
>iranic people describing dark gods >KUSHAN why aren't we talking about Indian rulers in Iraq or Afghanistan? Oh i forgot it does not fit into your narrative
Zachary Green
>e nvm noticed your flag, you're probably indian yourself
The aryans invaded and subjugated the native populace of whoever it was residing in india. These same aryans brought with them sanskrit and hinduism. Hinduism is a foreign religion to the people of the indian subcontinent at its root.
Connor Reed
also, once again, a nonsensical drivel of a post by a pajeet, please don't reply, I want actual historically learned people to speak itt
Justin Gomez
Leaf what is happening in Europe right now, muslim refugges are taking over Hwhite people why is that
Mason Scott
Aryan invasion has been debunked by Hwhite historian and on the language, why can't European into language why are all their languages foreign?
James Nelson
>UK in one year of its existance probably contributes more to humanity What a pathetic materialist loser.
Easton Ortiz
nonsensical drivel, don't you have a street to be shitting on or a monkey to be worshipping?
the only people that deny the aryan invasion theory are buttblasted pajeets like yourself, the majority of academia and learned scholars, even ones from india accept it as a fact, some debate on the nature of it (invasion vs. migration) but the fact still exists and is backed up by genetic studies
Aaron Lewis
Actual name of Singapore is Singapura. All because of Indic influence in SEA. Fact.
you indian peoples are slaves throughout history: FACT
Ryan Jones
The real terrifying thing is that when you live in multicultural britain you quickly realise that as bad as the Indians are, there are far far worse. Arabs, Turks and Pakis. Arabs are perhaps the worst.
Christian Collins
Yep. Indians are not too bad but that's because of their servile nature, they exist to appease us, a lot of them suck up to us in many ways. Turks and arabs on the other hand view us as enemies and treat us as such, rather than being slaves/servants like indians, they chose to be antagonistic.
Bentley Rogers
If you ever did study Indian history beyond le brown people xd you would know india was never really ruled by foreigners, yeah sure the government at the center was foreign but all of them had treaties with the local kings, that's like saying EU is a foreign government in Europe as its run by Jews No one accepts it as a fact specially in academics. Explain me again how genetics explain this so called aryan conquest, they were steepe horse whispers nothing more
there's plenty of studies and shit done, why do indians love denying historical fact?
Evan Sullivan
I've gotta go, continue being slave people, disgusting pajeets. Deep down you know that your entire history is that of servitude and being enslaved, conquered and assblasted. Don't shit your guts out too hard today at the shitting street lads.
Cameron Ward
Indians are a race of leeches. Their culture is simply a cheap ripoff form of Western culture combined with their poor, wretched vision of the world. They're superstitious and weak from evolving in an environment that, instead of being harsh, coddled them and gave them all they needed. Europeans became great because we evolved in harsh, unforgiving environments. Indians did not.
Dominic Price
The "unity = strength" thing is a bit of a myth. Unity can = centralisation which can allow for people to be conquered more easily. Sometimes the lack of centralisation is exactly what makes a place difficult to conquer. It very much depends on the people living there, their intelligence and warrior ethos.
Zachary Flores
Posting articles from newspaper isn't scientific lad, post proof genetic proof of Aryan invasion, it's quite funny all of you post the same article every time.
ARYAN INVASION WAS DEBUNKED BY HWHITE HISTORIAN
Nathaniel Turner
Pakistanis were raped into adopting foreign religion of Islam by their invaders, who they worship now. Being meek and low caste, they didn't fight. Sikhs and Hindus DID. Fact.
Only because Turks are extremely homosexual. They probably just wanted to get butt fucked. Turks and Arabs are races that have almost exclusively homosexual men. They have a saying, "boys are for fun, girls are for breeding".
Let's discuss how Anglo are literal island monkeys and how they were raped down from trees by the Romans, now that's a theory we don't need any genetic proof for
Asher Jackson
What the hell are you talking about? Thousands of years ago they had their own civilization which was not conquered by anybody. They had the Dravidian civilization, whatever it was called, don’t remember, and then when the indo-Europeans migrated into the north they had their Vedic kingdoms. I don’t see how they are particularly more or less “conquerable” than anyone else. If ever there was a group that was conquered by probably everyone it came into contact with, it would be, broadly speaking, the Africans.
Tyler Ward
why are brown races so inferior?
Mason Bennett
This thread is worse than India hate thread. Atleast those have cheeky humour and wit. OP you're on wrong place, try Jewbook or Twatter.
Benjamin Bailey
The inferior Indian races come crawling from their bath in the Ganges with the rest of their spawn to post itt. When you're surrounded by superior civilisations left and right, you grow weak and give up.
It doesn’t matter if he was white or not. By the way the aryan migration theory doesn’t mean that the aryans were nordics, only retards believe that. Aryans were Caucasian but not Nordic at all. They were not blonde and blue eyed. How do you explain that some Indians todays are clearly different from others? With more caucasoid features and pale skin? How do you explain the transition from pre-Sanskrit script to Sanskrit? Modern India is a combination of Dravidian and indo-European people.
Jace Price
>If you ever did study Indian history beyond le brown people xd you would know india was never really ruled by foreigners, yeah sure the government at the center was foreign but all of them had treaties with the local kings,
Could you elaborate on that please? That sounds quite interesting because you never hear the end of "le evil British rule".
>Yep. Indians are not too bad but that's because of their servile nature, they exist to appease us, a lot of them suck up to us in many ways. Indians seem to want to be a mixture of Italians and Japanese people I've noticed, but they never quite pull it off.
>Turks and arabs on the other hand view us as enemies and treat us as such, rather than being slaves/servants like indians, they chose to be antagonistic. Turkish and Arab self hatred is really strange. They want to breed with everyone but themselves but are try to be loyal to their own kind whilst never wanting to dwell among their own kind. Really really strange people. Killing every last one of them would be doing them and the world a favour.
Benjamin Gray
Why do all pakis hide behind meme flags and UK flag? Pakis have been THE most submissive race in the world. Language food religion everything is IMPOSED on them by outsiders. Pakistan's "Father of the Nation" who created that nation had 0% paki in him. He was Gujarati Indian. Fact.
>Caucasian I'm not debating the migration, but the most aryan of Indian have a 15 percent add mixture >pre sanskrit to sanskrit A little thing called PIE It does not mean our rulers didn't betray us or the foundation of modern day Britain wasn't built on stolen wealth from the empire
Nathan Moore
whydo pajeets assume everyone against them is paki? pakis are also subhuman, they're 100x worse than pajeets by virtue of being muslims
Isaac Wilson
So what you're saying is that India was conquered very easily by just a handful of raped tree monkeys?
Josiah Hughes
Learn some history dude. Native Indian empires have been around since forever. The thing is they aren't alike at all and even speak different languages, which is why smaller kingdoms have been the norm.
Michael Hill
>sometimes Unironically have bong flag as post this. An empire that would use rival poo's and rival native americans pitting them against each other for bong expansion.
Blake Morales
>Posting articles from newspaper isn't scientific lad, post proof genetic proof of Aryan invasion
How about this chutiye:
>Read the research paper: A genetic chronology for the Indian Subcontinent points to heavily sex-biased dispersals
> Indo-European, spoken across northern and central India, and also in Pakistan and Bangladesh, has been frequently connected to the so-called “Indo-Aryan invasions” from Central Asia ~3.5 ka and the establishment of the caste system,
>South India, on the other hand, is dominated by Dravidian languages.
> In particular, genetic influx from Central Asia in the Bronze Age was strongly male-driven, consistent with the patriarchal, patrilocal and patrilineal social structure attributed to the inferred pastoralist early Indo-European society. This was part of a much wider process of Indo-European expansion, with an ultimate source in the Pontic-Caspian region, which carried closely related Y-chromosome lineages,
Joseph Robinson
>I'm not debating the migration, but the most aryan of Indian have a 15 percent add mixture Ok, so what exactly do you disagree with then, if you admit that some indians have indo-european admixture?
>A little thing called PIE Yes, proto-indo-european, what about it? The dravidian script is not related to it, sanskrit is, which means sanskrit came from outside the indian subcontinent. Because otherwise the only other explanation is that PIE arose within india, but there is no evidence for this. Evidence points to PIE arising immediately north of the Caucasus and turkey, in what is modern day ukraine.
Connor Myers
Yes, now inbred Indian are taking over the island monkeys
Andrew Carter
>the Mexican anti-Chinese .webm poster isn't around when you need him for some banter
The only thing you got going for yourself is you are not a paki.
Josiah Wood
Long story short: primitive brains.
Parker Sanchez
PIE was spoken from the steppes to India, the Indus valley did not use a Dravidian script Don't sperg out thambi the migration is a well accepted fact
Brody Anderson
And yet they creamed your people like small milk.
Carson Bell
>hue education
Jacob Mitchell
We *are* the aryans, poopman.
Noah Sanders
Nah, I'm fair skinned light eyed Brahmin. Going lot going for me actually.
Christian Johnson
Ok so then what do you say about the dravidians? A lot of modern indians are dravidian, and claim that they are the descendants of the indus valley civilization, but this doesnt seem to be the case. This is why the disagreement exists probably. Because the southern dravidians are not the same as the people who inhabited the indus valley thousands of years ago. They may have mixed and coexisted to some degree, but they are not one and the same.
Chase Cox
This man has done more in mathematics than every paki ever lived combined. Fact.
How come every Indian on Sup Forums or the internet is suddenly a 6'2 Brahmin Aryan?
We all know what you are: a manlet, ugly, dark subhuman Paki.
LOL
Caleb Clark
Both of them are primarily Australoids genetically who follow different language groups
Anthony Collins
>Don't sperg out thambi the migration is a well accepted fact
and
>ARYAN INVASION WAS DEBUNKED BY HWHITE HISTORIAN
What are you trying to say, immigration happened but no invasion? And are Brahmin priests native to India or were they "immigrants" from Pontic–Caspian steppe?
Landon Brooks
Look who's talking, Mr. Island Ahmad
Gavin Phillips
> typical-indian-people.jpg
Oliver Fisher
Shitskin detected.
Christian Howard
Ahmad, don't you have some irl dawah to make rather than argue with kafir online
Zachary Lopez
>hurr durr Ahmed hurr When you have no arguments LOL
Yes immigration happened with no invasion that is what the evidence points towards, and the caste system is somehow related to race is some grade A lulz material, do you even know how the varna system worked, the le brahmins are foreigners isn't supported by genetics or history
Anthony Russell
>It does not mean our rulers didn't betray us Weren't "your" leaders foreigners to begin with?
>the foundation of modern day Britain wasn't built on stolen wealth from the empire
Doesn't work that way. The foundations of modern Britain were British laws, British economics, British schooling,, British engineering, the British police and the British armed forces. There is absolutely no way that wealth magically creates a first world country of as much influence as Britain. Just look at Saudi Arabia and Qatar for example. Massively wealthy countries but ultimately crappy and uninfluential. Nobody looks to Arabs for lessons on anything. Everyone that wants to study modernity and how to run a good country needs to study the work of the British. That's not even boasting that's simply an established fact.
I don't care enough right now to post a pic. But believe it or not, I'm a Brahmin. There's millions like me.
Xavier Bennett
>Yes, now inbred Indian are taking over the island monkeys So you admit that your people are hostile invaders that need to be killed?
Connor Nelson
Millions? I think you mean billions, even trillions.
Wyatt Gonzalez
>when you have to write a fucked up space opera fantasy just to point out that gandhi cucked to muslims and Hindus don't like that Fuck off, I can smell you from here, paki.
Indians are a black race related to aborigine Australians. Their coasts were colonized, the Indus River valley was colonized, northern Indian was colonized. Various amount of mixing took place which lightened a lot of them up but they are still primitive and shit in the street. Even in one of their myths, their ancestors were monkeys who lost their tails. Monkey people also help out the gods and cultural heroes and of course there is hanuman. These are all obvious references to the original black primitive Indians who looked like melanisians and abos (literally monkey people)
