All Pagans are cucks

All Pagans are cucks

Attached: anti-pagan.png (600x1945, 1.88M)

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=Mbsc-3T6o4M&list=PL1v7lYZYduJdKrjiRofKre0rAXSnrhUoB&index=4
translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&sl=sv&tl=en&u=http://www.friatider.se/mohammed-v-ldtog-p-kristet-l-ger-men-personalen-v-grade-ingripa
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

There are literally no people more pro mass-immigration than Christians, just look at the pope.

Literally every single fucking Christcuck I know is a limp-wristed niggerloving faggot.

youtube.com/watch?v=Mbsc-3T6o4M&list=PL1v7lYZYduJdKrjiRofKre0rAXSnrhUoB&index=4

Yeah
It's Sweden
Your churches literally removed crosses and have female priests

Attached: 96e.jpg (600x530, 54K)

Attached: 1512968728135.jpg (484x299, 61K)

I'm not aware of the Anglo saxons forcing the locals to convert.

Didnt druids practice ritual sacrifice? DESU any religion that worshipped idols or practiced sacrifice is satanic

Churches have consistently praised and protected immigrants who have raped Swedish children.

translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&sl=sv&tl=en&u=http://www.friatider.se/mohammed-v-ldtog-p-kristet-l-ger-men-personalen-v-grade-ingripa

Yup and any religion that follows their traditions are cucks as well eg. Christianity

Are you keks actual traditional Pagans or romanticised, women lead Neo-Pagan larpers?
How was it morally right for VIKANGZ to go around and rob fellow white inhabitants of Europe?
Do you consider slavery to be righteous and kidnapping women from neighbourhood to be used as sex slaves your right, like nogs do in the US and South Africa all the time?
Is raping others morally righteous in your opinion?
Are you going to follow your ancestral traditions and conduct human sacrifices on regular bases in time of celebration to receive blessing from your gods?

If Paganism is superior to other religions, why is the practise dead in Europe?
Why is it only such shitholes as Amazons and African jungles where pagan traditions are alive and ruling their KANGZ societies?
How did Christian steal your traditions when your own ancestors chose to convert their ritual habits for embracing Christ?

> their traditions
do you see civilised Western Christians conducting human sacrifices?

>The pope
>Leftist churches
>Christian
Catholics and leftists are heretics who should be burnt along with pagan faggots

Attached: swedecuck.png (800x532, 291K)

Christianity is a fraudulent religion begun by opportunistic Semites to enact proto-Marxist class struggle and destabilize Rome by creating a fictional culture hero based on distortions of esoteric sects' encoded teachings derived from mushroom cultism.

Based on the explanations of how Christianity is a degenerate, Semitic religion as laid out in Alfred Rosenberg's "The Myth of the Twentieth Century," the NSDAP undertook a campaign to rid Germany of Christianity by replacing it with an Aryan folk religion through the twin maneuvers of creating a fake version of Christianity that denigrates the Bible and claims Yeshua was an Aryan while at the same time reviving folk traditions such as local harvest festivals and establishing the elite organizations of the Reich as Aryan religious orders.

Attached: dead sea materials prove christianity is fraudulent.jpg (360x626, 54K)

The many pagan rituals that Christianity has based their traditions on and you go with human sacrifice.
Still cucked to the hilt.
You could also ask the same question about pagans.
Do you see civilised western pagans conducting human sacrifices?

Attached: 49043c460c38bc805e5ccf1246692d39abd04f49588a81e1d430f9364f9e7f44.png (500x352, 46K)

what are the legitimate sources of paganism

First you have to narrow down what you want to learn about beyond "paganism." Paganism could cover everything from the Vedas to the Pyramid Texts. The most general guideline you can go with is "nothing written by a Semite or a Christcuck propagandist."

>Do you see civilised western pagans conducting human sacrifices?
Not really because "pagans" these days are just LARP-ing hippie fags

Attached: paganism.png (1137x815, 923K)

(((greenberg)))
They're obsessed with debasing everything with their faggotry. Is there any sauce that isn't kosher?

Attached: 1520932191097.png (960x1656, 1.95M)

> The many pagan rituals that Christianity has based their traditions
Such as?
Does Bible forbid Christians from dancing around a bonfire while praising Christ?
>Do you see civilised western pagans conducting human sacrifices?
No because they are dead, as social outcast larpers don't live according to their traditional rituals, such as human sacrifices demanded by Odin.

Nordic pagans were white tribal niggers who killed both other VIKANGZ tribes' members and foreigners that tried to civilise them.

I agree. British Christianity is Anglo-Israelism and is therefore an ethnic religion.

Attached: stonehenge-celebration-2016-01.jpg (838x558, 97K)

> larping Neo-pagans
> proof of paganism being alive
What kind of ethics do these people believe in?

See, that's the thing about you Christcucks, your terminology makes no sense. You call everyone LARPers under the assumption that they claim to have beliefs without acting on them, yet you then also call them LARPers when they do enact rituals.
What else to expect from some shitskin infected with a Semitic mind virus though?

Attached: 1458512464456.png (571x618, 111K)

ask me anything about Old Norse.


it's from on a book named The Construction of Homosexuality written by a gay Jew David Greenberg. (who surely had no hidden agenda, of course.) anyway, he based it on a reference to this one article, called "Runes, Mandrakes and Gallows", written by Jeannine Talley. she grossly misunderstands the Old Norse language in pic related and assumes that "frævask" ~ "frævaz(k)" means "semen", and that these lines therefore must mean "I took cum" (and not approx. "I began to grow fertile"), which is absolutely preposterous and laughable.

Attached: 5.png (360x246, 22K)

Christian “Eucharist” Founded in Ancient Semen-drinking Rites

While there is no evidence that the historical Jesus, himself, ever advocated the use of semen in either the Last Supper or otherwise in religious ritual, yet there is intriguing evidence that some of the most ancient Christian sects, known as “Gnostic Christians,” that predated Catholicism by many centuries, found deeper symbolic and spiritual meaning in using semen as the sacramental wine of the Communion. This more erotic interpretation is founded upon even more ancient rituals in which semen drinking was considered the drinking of Life, itself. Thus, its amalgamation into the symbolic drinking of Jesus’ blood so as to attain Eternal Life could not help but ring very familiar to such pagan converts. It should therefore come as no surprise to discover that in combining both rituals together, the semen-drinking adherents connected both with their pagan ancestral beliefs in semen as Life and also their newly found Christian beliefs in Jesus’ “body” and “blood” as Eternal Life.


FUCKING ROFL Chrsitians are such fucking idiots just like the kikes dicks they suck. Accuse your enemy of that which you are guilty. You motherfuckars must leave white lands and go to the desert with the rest of the semities whose dick you suck

Attached: 1520918026762.jpg (1200x1073, 176K)

Attached: captn fag.png (1904x7200, 1.93M)

However, to the dismay of the orthodox Church, some Mystery sects were still practicing an uncensored version of the anointing ceremony that used actual semen… In the Roman Church’s version of the mystic solar rites, the ‘good chrism’ is swallowed in order to infuse its allegedly life-giving potential. This act of performing ‘sacred fellatio’ for the male saviour – swallowing the royal seed, so to speak – leads us to the notion of the receiver of the ‘good chrism’ as emulating the goddess – in particular, Isis – servicing the male god.”

“In very ancient times, sexuality and divinity were seen as inseparable aspects of the ever-begetting Universe; sexual rites were an attempt to harness the generative powers of creation, as well as a celebration of the mysteries of life and rebirth. That the Church saw fit to preserve the essential elements of the sexual mythos, while prudishly hiding their meaning, indicates that the Church recognized the mystic potency of the ancient rites.”

Sexual Mysticism in Christianity, Michael Clair, 2009

Based

Lol this reminds me. My best friend was married to a guy and he would keep going on his shitty play station after he got home from work. My friend got soooo pissed off and once so she smashed his PlayStation into tiny pieces with a bat lmao.

Good riddance. He was a loser who didn't spend time and commit

that image is so inane that I don't even know how to help you.

so are they conducting animal and human sacrifices or not?
Are they enslaving people?
Do they rape those who are not from their tribes?
Are they stealing from others like proper niggers, because they believe they have self determined right to posses others' property?

Neo-pagans are emasculated cucks who don't even live according to their ancestral traditions nor conduct worship rituals their "gods" demand from them.
That's why they are larpers.

>Accuses goverment planted neopagans of LARPING.
>Posts deus vult on the templar song on youtube and on Sup Forums

>calling Europeans niggers
How to spot a shitskin shitposter 101

okay, here's my attempt to help whoever actually takes this picture seriously.

the issue of -sk versus -z or -zt or -zk or -st is not an issue of semantics, it is an issue partly of morphology and partly of orthography. we often normalize these forms to -sk to highlight the etymological origin of these mediopassive verbs, which are wholly unique to North Germanic languages. that is: they are reflexive, etymologically speaking. specifically: within "frævask", "fræva sik" (= 'to "fræva" itself/oneself') is hidden. this is how we understand these forms in terms of morphology and etymology. but the mediopassive verbs serve *many* different functions beyond just reflexive.

>"For the learner the best procedure is probably to treat -sk verbs as separate words from their non-sk counterparts, until s/he has developed some feel for Old Norse."

orthographically speaking, the manuscripts – by the way, reading manuscripts is an art in and of itself – show -z or -zt sporadically. the form evolves towards -st in Old Norwegian and Old Icelandic, with elder forms quickly becoming archaic.

>"In younger texts not only is the 1st person sg. -umk replaced by the 2nd/3rd person sg. form, but a bewildering variety of suffixes is found as well as or in place of -sk, -umk. The more common are -zk (which spreads from its original domain, cf. above), -s, -z, -st and -zt; hybrids such as 1st sg. -umsk, -ums also occur.
>Ultimately, the -st form replaces all the others, and is the one used in modern Icelandic, Faroese and Norwegian nynorsk."

(Old Danish and Old Swedish shows evolution towards -s.)

note also that North Germanic has no /z/. the symbol ⟨z⟩ is strictly speaking superfluous; often used when an /s/ is near a /t/ or a /d/.

anyway: the fact that this word, frævask ~ frævaz, is a VERB and not a NOUN – which is the entire basis of the woman's understanding – is beyond dispute.

Attached: 1518468700547.jpg (770x760, 70K)

Attached: Nordic niglets.jpg (1505x1959, 568K)

leaf

All of the achievements of Rome and Greece were due to Nordic migrants, which you'd already know if you weren't a shitskin faggot.

Attached: The-Myth-of-the-Twentieth-Century.jpg (600x800, 190K)

Attached: 1490145516841.png (800x1200, 204K)

> implying
> implying it wasn't Greco-Roman origin
pagan keks, every time.
VIKANGZ couldn't build a shit except fine boats

I really like how you compare two pagan societies while your jewish overlords couldn't find the exit of the desert at the same time.

"pagan" isnt a religion.
it literally means "anything that isnt semitic", semitic meaning the arab shit like muslim, jew crap and christcuckery.

nobody has ever said "convert to paganism or die"

You think such success that was Greco-Roman origin just ended at a wall after Christianity was adopted?

>There are literally no people more pro mass-immigration than Christians
wrong, christians are among the most conservative and nativistic people while also giving the most through private charity

>Christianity destroyed Rome
>We wuz roman destroyerz!
>not the millions of Huns invading the roman Empire

nobody claimed what you just said nigger

Friendly reminder that the semen drinking meme Christcucks are so fond of, is literally from a book written by a kike.

But i suppose Christians are used to books written by kikes anyway.

But the Anglo Saxons were the ones who converted you fucking retard.

det er *egentlig* fra ei kvinne som heter Jeannine Talley. Greenberg bare spredde det videre, se .
om Jeannine er jǿde eller ikke vet jeg ikke. det hadde ikke overrasket meg. det hun skriver her er helt hårreisende vanvittig uansett.

Attached: this is 100% bullshit.png (716x112, 54K)

Name a comparable bzantine person to ancient greeks

This

They are no different from jews. See goy your ancestors were retafds. Giive up on your culture

Any Emperor since they only the only one that Ancient Greeks can cling on was a Macedonian lmao.

Your map is Christian-tier research you low IQ Jew worshiper. And 99% of those monarchs were Satanists because Christians don't act like that.

Attached: viking odin map.png (838x524, 201K)

Thanks norsebro. The christcuck shitposting is so insane it blows my mind.

>Tacitus remarks on the Germans drowning gays in bogs
>literally all aryan cultures are about the absolute man and absolute woman
>but the chief male deity totally engaged in homosexual acts guise!

Lithuanian population didn't convert until like 16th century, slightly different from Germanic paganism but still. They defeated the crusade against them, and the first Christian to rule the grand duchy invited a bunch of Jews and Tatars to settle there lmao. Absolutely BASTE

I'm not even triggered by the notion that "Odin drank cum". I've seen way too many crazy opinions and theories about all sorts of things to even care in the slightest. no, it's the linguistic/grammatical illiteracy that really rustles my jimmies. in this case, it is so wrong, it's so obviously wrong and so EXTREMELY wrong that I can only conclude that it is wrong on purpose. it shouldn't even be possible to reach these conclusions. this woman was actively trying to hurt the language and the mythology.
(and so was Greenberg, of course.)

Attached: church of sweden.jpg (2084x1362, 673K)

>brings down the Roman Empire which had 50 million people more than Germania
>Viking Age Scandinavia had 250k people, yet it colonizes Frankia, which had 14 million, at it's peak, while also founding Russia and sailing to the Americas and Persia

>Nordics wuz niggers guys! It's not like they were people of good stock and sheit.

Attached: what the jews fear.png (962x891, 350K)

>"Epiphanius of Salamis records that The Greater Questions of Mary contained an episode in which Jesus took Mary Magdalene up to the top of a mountain, where he pulled a woman out of his side and engaged in sexual intercourse with her. Then, upon ejaculating, Jesus drank his own semen and told Mary, "Thus we must do, that we may live." Upon hearing this, Mary instantly fainted, to which Jesus responded by helping her up and telling her, "O thou of little faith, wherefore didst thou doubt?"

Attached: 1520337029421.png (1920x668, 729K)

Attached: a6e06b06d89659484a0816ce7d1c93d8a9ae37be8b0eb9dd2a0c61e92480879f.jpg (2504x1670, 629K)