Since WWII, the USA has lost every one of the last 4 wars with militias. Vietnam, Korean War, Afghanistan, and Iraq War. Desert Storm was against a structured army. The USA loses against militias.
>insurrection thread
Since WWII, the USA has lost every one of the last 4 wars with militias. Vietnam, Korean War, Afghanistan, and Iraq War...
Blake Butler
Other urls found in this thread:
youtube.com
streamable.com
twitter.com
Kayden Baker
So, what's the plan? Go innaground, or go innawoods?
Brody Davis
SHALL
Logan Cox
Beating down insurrections needs brutality. Western nations cannot apply that because of mass-media and education of its people. I think that is a good thing, to some extent. I don't want to fight for the Jews in the middle east anyways and that is what the last wars were about.
Anthony Adams
NOT
Justin Reyes
*blocks your path*
Nicholas Jackson
All these meme flag posters are chinks.
Kevin Sullivan
*truck of peace*
Nathaniel Reed
IRA proved UK govt same thing
we need to start anti muslim rape gang militias
Owen Perez
Not sure if this should go here, /k/, or /mlp/, but I seriously want one of these done up in pony.
Ian Morales
We should all turn in our guns.
Lincoln Young
Korea was a tie, we won the Iraq war (both times), and Afghanistan was due to the incompetence of the bongs and leafs tbqh
Robert Stewart
US Army cannot win against armed civilians.
Therefore, US government wants to disarm American civilians.
Noah Martin
Vietnam lost their own war, not us. We reached our objective when the treaty was signed, what happened after that is not on us.
Justin Walker
>blocks your path
Ayden Russell
We did not lose the Korean war. Technically it never officially ended. Also we weren't up against Militias it was 300k chink "volunteers"
Jonathan Walker
you'll need a weapon that cops can't take from you. Are baseball bats legal in UK?
Cooper Perez
youtube.com
Finite players against infinite players
>inb4 kike game theory.
Jacob Collins
I like where this is going
Luis Campbell
innawoods wont work, they'll just burn them down
with bombs, drones, and sat cameras innaground is the only valid choice
they have tech for detecting and mapping underground air pockets (tunnels) but underground is still the only place we will have any amount of control
urban areas would be good too, they wouldnt want to destroy their crucial infrastructure. we would have to take them over though and with how much presense they have it will be tough
Levi Moore
>he thinks the purpose of the US going to war wasnt to benefit corporate DOD contractors with fat military contracts, access to resources (opium and oil) and construction contracts to rebuild what the military fucked up
You must be new. The Military industrial complex achieved exactly what it wanted in every war. The whole point is to grind out the longest war as possible, if we killed all the militia who would we fight and how would we justify trillions in military contracts?
Lincoln Powell
this. dont disgrace our military with your horseshit revisionism OP. we won korea in every possible way we just decided to end it to get peace and avoid a nuclear ww3 with russia so we signed an armistice, which is not technically a permanent solution and we are still at war with them
Jordan Collins
Yes, but in everyone one of those cases the KDR was on the side of the Americans by far. Let's go over them one by one
> Korea: That was a structural war because of the Chinese forces that were stopped at the current border. Before that NK was BTFO badly and the only way they were saved was by bugman who died in the hundreds of thousands while US casualties were smaller.
>Vietnam: Mainly lost overall due to inept politicians and the Chinese threatening to bum-rush again. Other than that US forces were successful and by the time we left Vietnam was stable-ish. North viets broke their word though and invaded.
> Iraq. This one however is inexcusable because the KDR is actually even despite tech advantage.
>Afganistan: KDR is good yet this is the notorious place where empires die. So, fuck it.
John Rogers
Ready now
Matthew Moore
>Vietnam
I'll give you this one
>Korea
The objective was to halt the northern advance and maintain the sovereignty of the democratic South Korean state. An objective we achieved.
>Iraq/Afghanistan
In both cases we defeated the former state governments/militaries and installed new ones in a matter of weeks. Hard to see how anyone could consider that a loss.
Ayden Wright
South Korea was a latter objective, the original goal was the entire peninsula.
Iraq and Afghanistan were over in a matter of weeks?
>wat?
Connor Russell
This video shows what are these gangs currently doing tonight. Lavapiés neigbourhood has officialy became a no-go zone like those in the largest capitals of Europe.
streamable.com
>streamable.com
streamable.com
>streamable.com
streamable.com
RUNDOWN:
>Drug raid from Police in Lavapies multicultural neighborhood neighborhood
>Senegalese suffers heart attack and dies
>Police come to attend him
>Senegalese chimp out because of "fascist oppressive and racist police" and cause important riots
Blake Hill
usa terible warrior force. all show no substence. tell pilot where to drop bombs and press the buttons. is all. good at wacthing bette midler stage show and playin the cards tho. LOL
Gabriel Hughes
But does the country they are in tax their tea?
Cameron Cooper
Grayson Bailey
It should go up your ass, as you are clearly a faggot
Henry Martinez
Korea is still going on, that war is not yet over.
Justin Russell
>*blocks your potato*
>mass starvation
Liam Collins
So, fighting a structured army is not a war or must we just use your very narrow, specific and fluid definition of a war? Sage because op is a nigger.
Gavin Foster
>Another self aggradizing faggot
>Korean war was a militia
Lmao kill yourself
Also
Israeli Military> Russian
Charles Ross
You are literally the type of American cancer this world doesn't need. The KDR not counting innocent civilian casualties means nothing. You lost, still, never won in Iraq and are losing in Syria.
Oliver Taylor
Handing America its ass since 2001.
Nathaniel Martinez
How they hell do you consider the Korean War a loss? How do you explain the fact that South Korea still exists?
Jonathan Rodriguez
>Never won in Iraq
Funny, beause in 1991 we rolled over the 4th largest military in the world with combat experience in 100 hours, and the second time hung him on national TV after turning his sons into swiss cheese, banning everyone from the lowest private to highest general from ever serving in the government again, and left behind a military that defeated ISIS in 2017. "Loss"
Jose Lewis
>You lost, still, never won in Iraq and are losing in Syria.
First of all, what do you mean "you"? Second, Iraq was not and is not a loss. Iraq has withstood its trial against ISIS and won by taking back all the territory.
Nathaniel Sanchez
ISIS/Taliban is defeated?
>why are troops still there?
Bentley Mitchell
I just made this.
William Brooks
Whose in Iraq now?
, politically and business wise? No you Who gets contracts? Not you. Who murders civilians and leave their bodies to rot in raqqa. You.
You're cancer, a traitor, an idiot, and can burn inHell.
Jeremiah Rogers
I don't know if you've noticed, but
A: it is defeated in Iraq. It still exists beyond the borders
B: do you really think the Mid East isn't filled to the gills with crazies?
Camden Roberts
The US hasn't lost those wars, they just haven't won.
Militias are incredibly easy to defeat, it just takes strength of will.
The US won numerous wars against guerrilla forces in the 19th century.
They did this by practicing total war against insurgents.
They treated the fighters and the populations supporting them equally.
They killed warriors and civilians until the remnants begged for peace.
Then they took what was left and confined them on designated reservations.
This is why you don't see Indians walking around your cities to this day.
Failure to put slaves on reservations after the civil war is why you see niggers in your cities to this day.
Populations of hostile natives are easy to defeat when you have superior military strength and the will to use it.
Christopher Rodriguez
Burgers are delusional warmongers desu. You can't reason with them.
Jeremiah Evans
Iraq 2.0 was against a structured military too. They just surrendered after like 2 weeks
Jace Williams
>Doesn't realize cities are reservations/ nigger containment zones; literally the only reason we have suburbs is so that people can live close enough cities to work but not have to deal with diddndus
The corruption
We leave troops in every country we defeated, we still have troops in Germany and Japan brainlet
of middle eastern governments is not inherent to us interventionism or our problem
Jordan Brown
afghan dudes in our AO had underground tunnels tall enough for semi trucks that were hundreds of meters long
Andrew Foster
>The US hasn't lost those wars, they just haven't won.
The US did lose Vietnam though.
Kayden Howard
Using military forces against civilians is for cowards. Maybe you need a taste of it for yourself. Then you'll grow up.
Brandon Gomez
>urban areas would be good
This is the largest factor I never see people talk about. Any raw superiority that the non-defecting government forces have goes out the window when you can't airstrike a street in a city without instantly losing civilian support.
Families of all government forces would be enormous liabilities as well. The amount of people you can expect to resist the government in the event of insurrection brought on by tyranny would probably be anywhere from 500,000-1,000,000. We can also assume that while all of this chaos is going on that ordinary criminals and gangs are going to be way the fuck out of control.
Joseph Martinez
w-we didn't lose we just haven't won!
pathetic.
Lincoln Stewart
We won against almost all the militias we fought in South America, mostly because we suppresses a lot of the news of the mass slaughter required to defeat citizen militias.
Nathaniel King
You don't get to complain that an army of civilians isn't being beaten fast enough AND that too many civilians are being killed.
Henry Johnson
>The USA loses against militias
not at fighting, they win every engagement and battle with ease but no one can fight generations of populations without mass exterminations
Juan Thomas
The US was playing the long game.
Isaac Reed
Sooo that's why we want to keep the 2nd amendment user.
Justin Cox
>they wouldn't want to destroy their own infrastructure
>they own the construction companies
Please pick one. The only thing they care about is comms. Disrupt the comms and you can drive them out. Because then you can start to pick off the juicy targets. Get enough of them and they will fold like cheap suits. No one wants to die for money.