Why were the Nazi's so shit when it came to strategy?

Why were the Nazi's so shit when it came to strategy?

Attached: down in the dumps.jpg (236x299, 18K)

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=iqrF67D0fr8
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

Because OP is a faggot

they werent that bad at it

Because of hitler who started making bad decisions.

Because Hitler was literally a vegan autist with a micropenis. The Nazis were a fucking joke, doomed to fail.

Hitler was an autistic moron and everyone had to listen to him
>durr the ussr will fall without a fight don’t bring the japs
>hurr they won’t need winter coats for the invasion
>blurrrgh send more divisions to search for the holy grail but stop all that nuclear weapon research it’s jewish physics
fucking embarrassing desu

It's hard to fight on two fronts.

Hummmmmmmm...

Attached: Israel_Q1.jpg (2031x4783, 3.68M)

germans lack lateral thinking, why do you think germanic tribes just rushed roman formations?

Attached: 12th-ad-soldier-1945.gif (600x455, 107K)

Hitler was a meth-addled lunatic. Most of his generals were very competent, but he routinely overruled them because he thought he was divinely inspired.

The blitzkrieg revolutionized modern combat. What are you talking about? Germany seriously almost conquered Russia before the winter took hold.

Many mistake were made in Russia and nobody wanted to defy Hitler. Even if someone did (Guderian) Hitler would just tell them to go fuck themselves.

Hitler should have invaded Russia sooner.

They didn't expect the Jews to hold so much global power over the JewSA.

Attached: 1512840246127.jpg (538x754, 68K)

They weren't bad at all. The entire world had decided to destroy them, and Germany made their enemies pay first. It was the best anyone could have expected from a country at war with Britain, France, USSR, and America.

Their invasion of France was pretty spot on.

battle of arausio
battle of teutoburger wald
gothic invasions
vandal invasion

and the massed wedge as described by caesar wasnt a bad tactic against legions actually. caesar and his underlings where just insanely good at what they did.

Arrogance unfortunately

If they did kill millions of jews they did us all a favor

You can erase britian and france from your list. Hitler destroyed both of them very badly

Because German's autistic overcomplicating brains work well in engineering but can't comprehend the nuance of tactics and accounting for the decisions of the opposition

Not really considering tens of millions of strong, patriotic White men died in both wars also. It was a net loss

Hitler was a fool and in the end became incompetent in terms of tactics. Wouldn't listen to his generals. So much for the "aryan" race

I thought Hitler died in Argentina and went to the UK for a wedding in 1972? Can't you kikes keep your hallucinations straight?

Attached: cruzhat.png (609x645, 532K)

Hitler couldn't get to the British Isles. Didn't have the fleet or the transport ships. He offered them peace after finishing Poland, and again after finishing France, but Britain refused.

The Eternal Teuton is great at following orders but shit at adapting to circumstance. Beating them at war is merely a case of discovering which order they’re following to the last man this time around

Go pick a fight with 20 other motherfuckers and lets see how your Master Plan turns out, Napoleon.

>beating them is just a matter America which was 2x the size to come murder them

Dude was fighting two fronts at once, of course the fatigue and stretched out manpower was going to get him someday.

This. Their early tactical decisions were brilliant. Then Hitler got it into his head that he was divine and couldn't lose or whatever and started making a ton of absolutely retarded decisions. And When Germans started losing, he made sure they lost even harder, and even said something to the effect that the German people had let him down and deserved to be wiped out.

>and even said something to the effect that the German people had let him down and deserved to be wiped out.

How right he was, yet again.

Bad strategy = fighting two fronts at once.

Because they were white.

t. 1eWS

Because Hitlers inner circle were crony buddies. Hitler did not hire talent, but chose people based of loyalty & friendship. It failed like all organizations that do not advance/promote people based on merit.

>germans suck at strategy

Attached: Clausewitz.jpg (210x261, 14K)

>Why were the Nazi's so shit when it came to strategy?
They weren't, Rommel was considered one of the best generals in all of history, unilaterally during and after the war.

Attached: somal.png (189x267, 93K)

meth

They weren't. Hitler made one justifiable blunder (diverting Army Group Centre south during Barbarossa) and that cost them the war. Their performance from 39 to 41 shows they were without equal in strategy and tactics. But that mistake dragged them into a war of attrition that they could never hope to win.

Because Hitler was fucking autistic and fought against the world for no reason

No shit. Why would Britain believe a guy who regularly broke treaties and deals?

Attached: Woman-Drinking-Water-Gives-Thumbs-up.jpg (1000x667, 178K)

They were not. TLDR
youtube.com/watch?v=iqrF67D0fr8

Attached: 1519617646845.jpg (500x700, 132K)

>Their performance from 39 to 41 shows

Because they were prepared for a war noone else was ready for. As soon as everyone else weaponized, they got thier face pushed in.

Give any country time to stack units while everyone else is whistling, you'll have great performance for a while. The trick is to make that short 'while' count. Dick around too long, and the enemy is coming hard & fast.

Hitler used germans pride to jump start another war.
Pride is the stupidest sin.

Becuase the wisest man knows he knows nothing.

France had a better military and had all of 39 to prepare for war. Hitler didn't want war until the mid-40s at the earliest.

x d

Unironicly true

Hitler fucked up bad. He should have knocked down every set of barracks at all the camps. He shouldn't have fed one single jew anything to eat. He should have dug holes, lined up every worthless Jew the second they got off the trains, and blown their heads off with machine gun fire. Systematically, all of em.

Attached: napoleon.jpg (500x350, 67K)

Do the math on how many Jews we’d have today if not for them. Imagine 6 gorillion more Sarah Silverteins and Amy Schumers ::vomit::

Hitler took control of military operations over his generals.
The generals were experts in the art of war. It was an enormous mistake.

pic unrelated

Attached: shoe guide for morons.png (1296x540, 538K)

david irving is comfy listening tbqh

thats not an argument

unironically this

His tactics along with Vo Nguyen giaps are studied in military officer college around the globe

They weren't. The allies won thanks to the massive logistical support of the USA. Without American goods and resources literally keeping Russia and Britain afloat hilter would have taken all of continental europe and would hold it to this day.

yeah, he changed plans too often and focused on the wrong things, like taking stalingrad instead of moscow and oilfields.

true, Even with the infamous blunder of delaying the russian invasion by supporting mussolini in greece, he still would have recovered and won the war in europe for the most part if it wasn't for the JewSA military machine

>b-but muh russians lost more soldiers than anyone else
>t-that means they won and were the real reason the allies won

Take the entire rest of the world to stop one little nation.
>Why were their strategies so bad?
You are one stupid motherfucker, do you know that?

Attached: HistoryNazismVsCommunism.jpg (1039x672, 149K)

Hitler took charge instead of allocating decision making to better people

Everybody knows they lost because they weren't praying to the real God, Jesus Christ. And he brought the victory to the Jews and Christians.