Why has capitalism failed to eradicate poverty?

Why has capitalism failed to eradicate poverty?

Attached: images (1).jpg (433x340, 30K)

Other urls found in this thread:

tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/01436597.2015.1109439
data.bls.gov/timeseries/LNS11300000
youtube.com/watch?v=u6XAPnuFjJc
bloomberg.com/news/articles/2018-03-16/russia-wheat-stocks-to-rise-to-record-in-blow-to-european-rivals
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

Because niggers are fucking useless
stupid and lazy, and capitalism only rewards hard work or intelligent people that can find easy way to profit, or way to profit from other people
also sage you fucking nigger

Because that isn’t the aim of capitalism. In order to have winners, there must be losers, the more losers, the more the (((winners))) can steal..er, win.

Crony capitalism. When monopolies are allowed to exist it creates a disparity of wealth.

When you create more and more people who become impoverished then they're less likely to sympathize with those who have money.

The rich are slowly but surely creating their own hanging date at some point... or at the very least their children's.

Because people are only ((successful)) when you compare them to the mean.

Mexico is socialist LARPing as capitalist, AKA your fucking stupid, nigger

>capitalism only rewards hard work or intelligent people

Attached: images (2).jpg (323x456, 27K)

It is though, global poverty has been on the decline ever since the 1800s.

Socialist cancer subsidizes the poor.

It’s impossible to eradicate poverty. No economic or political system has ever and will never end poverty.

We don’t live in some shitty sci-fi movie where man kind magically Kumbaya‘d and war and poverty magically dissapaeared

No we live in reality where there will always be a top trot class of people and a bottom tier class.

What capitalism does is give you the opportunity to climb Higher up the food chain. The higher you climb the harder it is to get to the very top, but it’s not impossible. Most of us hang around in the middle, and it’s very comfy in the middle.

We can never totally eradicate poverty. Now matter how you slice it, there will always be a bottom tier of people.

>intelligent people that can find easy way to profit, or way to profit from other people
Didn't you cocksuckers advocate the idea that IQ isn't good indicator for intelligence, he's intelligent in the way that he's selling himself as a established brand and selling it for stupid fucking niggers like you lot, that eat that shit up
He's relatively a fucking genius considering rest of the world is filled to the brim with low IQ maggots like you, that thing his shit is 'entertaining', when it's in reality trash

He's fucking genius in nigger kingdom, but still a nigger when compared to actual humans, so yes - he's relatively intelligent

Attached: 1509155156806.jpg (1024x768, 222K)

Under capitalism, wealth flows from the bottom up. Then it just concentrates at the top. It's like trying to water your plants except gravity accelerates the water towards the sky.

>illegals in california
>anything to do with capitalism

Yes

Shitty people will always be shitty, no matter what system they're in.

It was the greedy luciferians who see the peasants as mindless pawns.

Commie faggots love to say 'Capitalism' when they really mean niggers. It's their favorite overused cliché.

Attached: aejaaeae.png (433x340, 190K)

A better question is, "Why do socialists fear competition so much?"

Why do capitalists hide behind patents and capital walls. Why do capitalists buy out and sabotage the competition. Why are they so scared of competition?

Only Liberal education in capitalist countries

Cheap labour.

without capitalism those people wouldn't even have those shitty favelashacks

Because we allowed you to live.

fpbp

despite having a central bank and income tax, most people went from a few dollars a day in the 19th century to what we have today.
welfare recipients live like kings.
fuck off.

Attached: gs.png (4672x1800, 186K)

Why is it anyone's job to eradicate poverty?

The problem w yr question is in yr frame- your assumptions... Why is it anyone's responsibility to fix poverty but the people that are actually in poverty?

You may think you have a lofty answer to that, but I assure you, if you just sit around and wait for somebody or something to fix poverty you're always gonna be a pov.

Capitalism is the ownership of resources,
and gives not a shit about poverty.

Why have airbags failed to eliminate traffic deaths?

No right-wing dictatorship.

Poverty is the basic state of humanity. Capitalism is the system that eliminates the most poverty. It is not a perfect system, so it cannot eliminate all poverty, but it eliminates MOST poverty for MOST people.

There will always be people who are stupid, or lazy, or disabled. The law of nature says that these people, who cannot provide for themselves, die. Capitalism at least makes room for charity so that those who can provide for themselves and other MAY, should they wish it, give some of what they earned to another.

Socialism, on the other hand, glorifies the poverty stricken, subsidizes them and makes more of them, while punishing those that produce. This is why the first thing that happens in communism is that those who can work are enslaved, and the second thing that happens is that those who cannot are purged.

Poverty is the base state of existence.

The real (rhetorical) question is, why can't communism bring about prosperity?

>Zero-sum fallacy strikes again

Attached: Chile-GDP-miracle.jpg (740x400, 103K)

Because it's not supposed to.

>Why has capitalism failed to eradicate poverty?

Because the Democrats and their 'Great Society' programs.

Because it hasn't evolved into Falangism

capitalism has done more then anything to lift people out of poverty
but beaners will bean
niggers will nig
and jews will jew
so there you have it

>Posts pic of Brazil
What are you doing

eradicating poverty is not the goal.

Niggers and spics that’s why.

You can't "eradicate poverty" in any economic or govenmental system

That would require all humans to be self reliant and stand up for themselves

Communism makes everyone impoverisehed to an extent
Capitalism makes the disparity between poverty and success much larger

thats it

West is a Trump Supporter.

That's an old as dirt shop of a shanty town onto the Detroit cityscape.

ever since free trade in the 80s, more then half of the earths population has been risen from poverty. btfo fucken mexican

No helicopter meme in this thread. I am glad people are finally wising up to crook Pinutchet.

Attached: Tree_map_export_2009_Chile.jpeg.jpg (1024x802, 137K)

>Why has capitalism failed to eradicate poverty?
Why has any other system?

Because the Judeo-Anglo Empire attacks anyone and anything that stand against capitalism.

Capitalism has drastically increased the standard of living. Anyone can live like a prince if they're willing to work, but communists would rather everyone lived like peasants so that we can all be equal.

Capitalism doesn't guarantee you free gibs, spic. Work for what you want and quit bitching.

because that is not it's purpose you greedy wetback. now fuck off

Nothing can eradicate poverty, the best course of action is a system where people can lift themselves out of it if driven enough. Hence capitalism.

>Capitalism has drastically increased the standard of living

There is no evidence for this.

>communism in action

Attached: 1466209429326.jpg (2186x1300, 470K)

Capitalism HAS eliminated poverty. Look at the average person living in poverty in the US, and then compare it to the average person from anywhere else living in poverty. Night and day. Our poor people live like kings compared to those in Africa, the Middle East or SE Asia.

>capitalism was invented to exploit niggers like you.

>There is no evidence for this.
He types on his computer, in his warm house, to inform me over the internet, cramming down hotpockets, instead of starving in a Soviet prison camp.

There are likely Americans posting in this thread who live in poverty. Posting on an internet thread, AND living in poverty. Do you fucking understand?

There is evidence. Just one you will accept because you've made up your mind, and your pride is worth more to you than the truth.

sorry our country cucked your country so hard, mexibro.

the real 'curse of the aztec tomb' is all the mestizo dna

Fallacy after fallacy. Is that all you can do? I'm not a communist, I'm a traditionalist.

"Marxism is shit, therefore Capitalism isn't."

libertardians in a nutshell.

This.

>Capitalism HAS eliminated poverty. Look at the average person living in poverty in the US, and then compare it to the average person from anywhere else living in poverty. Night and day. Our poor people live like kings compared to those in Africa, the Middle East or SE Asia.

This is wrong.

tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/01436597.2015.1109439

Attached: flooriscapitalism.png (500x343, 121K)

imagine being this deluded

Not an argument

Attached: porkyinequality.png (1200x615, 683K)

If i was in charge lf our society no one would starve

Attached: DU_IkhhW4AEdqYE.png (1000x1000, 270K)

This would be informative if it addressed where all of this wealth comes from.

why are there so many fucking commie threads tonight holy shit keep it in a single thread you autists

because capitalism isnt about getting rid of poverty its about making as much profit as possible for the rich jewish elite

it's because under capitalism people are forced to sell their labour power to survive. Not everyone is in a place where they can sell their labour and sometimes the wages they earn aren't enough to sustain them

Attached: d950058806f14b0ef423e1f929f4054ada7b842a2dbb86aa764172d664b6cf11.jpg (1156x763, 103K)

That is a great question user. Luckily, Marx answered this question 150 years ago. Wealth comes from meaningful labor.
Couldn't have said it better myself user.

capitalism only works when the nation state is making the moves from undeveloped to developed nation

>Why has capitalism failed to eradicate poverty?

Because capitalism is a fantasy sold to the proletariate. Like communism, socialism, et. al. it doesn't actually exist.

Direct quote from Che too... Except the capitalism bit. Poverty isn't something that can eradicate until we have infinite resources.

And what other system has eradicated poverty? Are you suggesting communism? Because communism created a far worse disparity of wealth than capitalism ever did.

Fact is, Capitalism has reduced poverty dramatically, far more than any other system to date. Is it perfect? Nope, but there are a lot less poorer people because of it. You can post all your stupid graphs of what people "expect" of wealth disparity, but without comparisons to other systems, your points are quite stupid. You could post up a comparison of China, but then again, China's poverty is being eradicated by Capitalism of all things.

Attached: 1519337763143.jpg (665x462, 79K)

Poverty existed long before capitalism. Capitalism is the reason more than 1% of a kingdom actually have any wealth

You don't think he works hard? I don't care for rap but he's dedicated at least

Because we have this stuff called "human rights" so we can't exterminate niggers and people below 100 IQ.

so how is the labor of the bottom 40 percent of society meaningful in any way? most of them don't even work.
>data.bls.gov/timeseries/LNS11300000

Capitalism has driven otherwise self-sustaining people living off the land to slave away in factories in the process becoming entirely reliant on men for their daily bread and sustenance.

Imma letcha finish, faggot

Labor allocation under capitalism is inefficient.

Patents are protecting yourself against theft.

I suppose that would be something a socialist like yourself wouldn't understand.

>over half the world is lifted out of absolute poverty
>look at these filthy poor people that still exist capitalism has failed

kill yourself

Why does every other system spread poverty?

Self-sustaining people living off the land? Where? Our history is littered with famines because of horrible systems with these supposedly "Self-sustaining people living off the land".

It wasn't until the onset of Capitalism that famines have been widely eliminated.

And that's why (for the most part) americans still live better than even some developed parts of the world? And are continuing to innovate? Take note of space x, a private company, that has made more progress than nasa in doing useful shit to exploit spess than our shitty gubbermint

Because niggers are poverty.

>let me tell you about competition
good one, m8

Attached: shark_lego.jpg (1728x1227, 602K)

>Capitalism onlt rewards hard work
The thing your autist mong brain would just spout out is so awesome

Listen fucking Pekka, your people, finmongs, were hard working peasant for Swedish cucks over 800 fucking years, and still were dirty poor.

Niggers are not lazy, they literally built America for working free, hence they refused to work for free is when racist rednecks started calling them lazy. As low tier desperately wannabe European so much, you should know that working hard doesn't fucking mean getting rich. Or your whole country would be richer than anyone else. People here work literally super hard and barely had any money.

>profit motive is inefficient
how efficient is the Department of Motor Vehicles?

>Patents are protecting yourself against theft.
Damn, I guess capitalism really isn't about competition. Wouldn't want other people to use "your" innovations.
>I suppose that would be something a socialist like yourself wouldn't understand.
Says the guy who espouses a system entirely based off exploitation.
See dumbfuck
Well that was how capitalism started off. Rich capitalists would buy out land creating an influx of workers for their factories.
>It wasn't until the onset of Capitalism that famines have been widely eliminated.
Kek, famines have been decreased because of technological advancement, not because of your magical God you call capitalism. Give me a fucking break.

Attached: capitalistworld.png (1588x2246, 652K)

Actually, profit isn't a great motivator. Watch this video and educate yourself:

youtube.com/watch?v=u6XAPnuFjJc

This is your brain on ideology.

If that was the case, there wouldn't have been massive famines in Russia and China with all this technology. China still is not self-sustaining with food production and heavily relies on the US greedy Capitalists to live because of their idiotic small farm policies.

Sorry buddy, your story doesn't stick. The big push for mechanization in farming actually came from labor shortages in the agricultural business in the US. If these farmers didn't have money (Thanks to Capitalism), they would have never advanced. This is mainly why you would see pristine American farms with high tech stuff while pictures of the Soviet Union showed ass backwards farmers as if they were living in the 18th century.

> 8 000 000 a year

Damn right capitalism isn't efficient. That's clearly not enough.

Russia only industrialized after communism. Famines in Russia ended after the Great Patriotic War under communism.

>This is mainly why you would see pristine American farms with high tech stuff while pictures of the Soviet Union showed ass backwards farmers as if they were living in the 18th century.

>Russia’s wheat stockpiles are set to swell to the highest levels since at least Soviet times

bloomberg.com/news/articles/2018-03-16/russia-wheat-stocks-to-rise-to-record-in-blow-to-european-rivals

>When you have absolutely no idea what you're talking about so you post a load of shit and hope it sticks to the wall and that no one catches you in the act of being a worthless brainlet

Stalins industrialisation plan was shit and hardly worked.

Why would capitalism eradicate poverty?
Why can't fucking faggot retard losers be happy and accept that their stupid useless asses are living better than 99% of the world in poverty in the US. Commies are so dumb and gay.

>w-w-we killed 94 m-million, b-b-but y-you guys k-killed 100 million!
Never mind that the shithole countries in Africa and the Middle-East that your image refers to are almost entirely authoritarian dictatorships, the exact opposite of capitalism.
Leave the US and go live in Russia if you think it's so great. No one will miss you.

Attached: jsvtwexusgc01.jpg (720x621, 22K)

>Stalins industrialisation plan was shit and hardly worked.
Kek yah it "hardly worked." It was good enough to stop the Nazis. Most ridiculous shit I've heard.

Attached: world without stalin.png (500x424, 205K)