What the fuck is a LibCom?

How on Earth can these two belief systems be compatible? Why does the far left treat this as an actually sane form of communism?

Attached: libcom star transparent.png (565x534, 30K)

It's retardation.

>authoritarianism, but we'll totally let go of power later, totally promise, you can trust us go-.. Guys

Trade unionism.

Communism means stateless and classless society, it's inherently libertarian/anarchist. Whether such society is possible or not is a different question.

I swear nobody on this board has even read Marx or any other socialist literature. The goal isn't to have an authoritarian state, it's what happens when socialism fails in practice.

I've read The Conquest of Bread.

>it's what happens when socialism fails in practice
You mean like everytime.

We break up into small communist tribes who trade with eachother. Within each tribe it's communist.

>become leader of glorious soon-to-be commie society
>make enemies in doing so
>asked to give up power
>consider how hard my enemies will fuck me if I do
>remember that the state has a lot of enemies as well, because we had to violate people's property rights long before even I got in to power
>decide that I value my life and therefore must keep my power
>go authoritarian socialist
>country becomes a shithole
Every fucking time.

The point of any non-authoritarian forms of socialism is that there's the belief that places like the USSR devolved into state capitalism because of their authoritarianism.

In reality libertarian forms of socialism are rather unworkable or simply not resistant enough to both internal reaction and foreign imperialists.

Attached: 29fc45104ea16681ec41da113152b9440bd238815f9748a2a56791e31e450be5.png (1600x1200, 117K)

>How on Earth can these two belief systems be compatible?
easy
They are both controlled opposition who never criticise institutional power and globalization, they both kick down, and they both hate the general population.

Attached: Scrt016059t41m.png (1064x677, 836K)

>Why does the far left treat this as an actually sane form of communism?
Because it is *by definition* the ONLY true form of communism.

Attached: Communism.png (1177x126, 29K)

Anarcho-Communism is the most incoherent bullshit ever proposed.

Attached: IMG_20171117_025905.jpg (1024x989, 206K)

>ancom bumps the thread on page 10
Colour me surprised.

>lib means stateless
Sure.

Because the only people who know less about communism than capitalists are people who calls themselves communists.

Nope. Anarcho-Capitalism is.

Attached: Marx on property.jpg (1479x82, 63K)

There’s no such thing as “true communism” spunk bucket. You either have a communist society or you don’t. So far, no one ever has.

What economic principles does AnCom work under without also working with AnCap? People giving to others out of the good of their hearts means they value altruism. AnCap is totally fine with charity as long as it's all voluntary.

>Communism means stateless and classless society
Lol no, when?
Just because the mogrel Marx set out to prove this and failed doesn't make it so. Gullible steppe apes, baka. The absolute state of Russia...

Because they don't live in the real world and cannot realize that their worldviews are oxymoronic?

Think Marxism, but the workers get to own the stuff they produce and personal property is allowed. In short, a pretty fucking stupid idea made by people who’ve never heard of the Tragedy of the Commons.

Hey jizz monkey, that’s exactly what fucking communism is. Which is also why it’s probably impossible. Stop mining colon custard for ten minutes, shake the dog water out of your brain, and maybe you’ll be clear minded enough to know what this shit actually means.

>thinking Marx has anything relevant to say about modern capitalism

Ancoms are usefull idiots for actual communists, although they seem to think otherwise.

Why is the t34 driving backwards?

Gotta agree on this, both are shit however.

Can you actually read his post before shitposting?

>The goal isn't to have an authoritarian state, it's what happens when socialism fails in practice.
If by "fails" you mean "plays out."

And kill off all non productive self loathing adolescent heroin junkies.

Attached: 1519535324452.jpg (420x360, 57K)

rational self-interest exists independent of the state...in fact it exists in spite of the state. your whole philosophy is contingent upon the asinine idea that people value their collective as much as they value their extended family and friends, and extended family as much as nuclear family. that somehow, despite vast differences in race/sex/religion/creed/profession people will vote cooperatively with each other rather than competetively because reasons and a magical 'one size fits all' solution will be obtained because dialectics and google bookchin!!!1 etc.

Attached: 1512852596778.jpg (558x754, 89K)

Just ask George Orwell its what he believed. He fought for libertarian socialists during the Spanish Civil War

Orwell vs socialism isn't a pretty topic.

Orwell opposed authoritarianism, not socialism.