Attached: A2FA9B05-8764-4ACD-8AC8-F4114699FADC.jpg (620x388, 47K)
Redpill on (((them)))?
Alexander Perry
Other urls found in this thread:
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
twitter.com
Caleb Ramirez
gamin(g)
Christian Sanders
Hunter Gutierrez
Rothschild men have been intermarrying for decades; at this point the family is pretty much racially white.
Robert Sanders
You’ve got all you need to know about them just by accepting the fact that they own every dollar ever printed.
David Morris
I'll drop a 4 page story that starts off in the 1700's
Suffice to say their bloodline goes back a lot further but this explains their climb to the top of the central banking pyramid
Lucas Perry
checked
thanks kek
Connor Young
Zachary Clark
Adam Cruz
every major head of important industries in society are run by a star of david...........
Jeremiah Bennett
Destroying Europe since 1918.
They are partly responsible for all the death and destruction of the last century.
Luke Lopez
here you go user.
Michael Ward
Korea's are a Rothschild project
Neutral Nations Supervisory Commission (Sweden/Switzerland joint venture) guard the border of the Korea's
Swiss businessmen conduct NoKo trade for the country too.
Dominic Garcia
They consider themselves Jews, Zionists and even the King of Jews
youtube.com
Isaac Evans
Rothschild are related to Saxe-Gotha-Coburg (aka Windsor)
James Turner
Their powers are usury and debt by getting leadership of nations to incorporate the country and make companies out of citizens whose tax debt is sold on the treasury bond market in order to create more money. (eg, Federal Reserve Act 1913)
Logan Scott
The Rothschild family is based.
Honestly, I don't care about wh*Tes but Jews deserve their own land.
Ryan Hill
They were the Knights Templar and worked in concert with the French king to depose the order and charge the knights with heresy, this allowed the Catholic church to appropriate all the wealth and land the knights had captured during the crusades. Their reward was the use of the captured gold to slowly invade nations by installing a bank and charging usury fees (eg, Poland)
Jack Flores
Communism has three branches that stem from Karl Marx : Revolutionnary communism (which /pol is already familiar with), purist communism and accelerationist communism.
All of them are "waiting for the late-stage of capitalism to start the world revolution". Revolutionnary communists see the misery in the world in the now and think that this is already late-stage capitalism. Purists and Accelerationists see the state of the world and think that late-stage capitalism has not arrived : they believe that late-stage capitalism will be the exact opposite of the communist system, a hyperviolent, rigid class system where an oligarchy/despotic tyrant appointed for their plutocratic value dictate both the means of production and the lives of every single citizens, and aprticularly workers.
Purist believe that until this stage of capitalism comes, nothing really matters, per historical determinism. They are the centrists of the communists thought. They can be anything on the political spectrum except three ideologies in particular, but will usually favor social democracy.
The accelerationists, however, seek, like their namesake suggest, to accelerate the progress of history toward late-stage capitalism. They are the great financial establishments, the Federal Reserve of the United States, the great corporative oligopoles. They seek to corrupt the capitalist system into one that will mirror their vision of late-stage capitalism.
All three branches are really led by atheistic Jews who don't really seek a communist utopia, but the in-between socialist state that will govern the world into transition; of course, that transition will take forever, and the Jews will eventually abandon it to rename that State Zion, and its population their slaves, reuniting with their orthodox brothers by being their messiah.
(1/?)
Anthony Adams
Thanks user, really great posts.
Christopher Hall
Three systems are hated by the three branches of communism intensely : monarchism, which is seen as a step back in historical dialectics, and completely opposed to their egalitarian viewpoint, unlike a democracy/plutocracy; despotism in any form, whether through a dictatorship or a reactionnary democracy, which limits the power of the working class immensely; and finally, national-socialism.
Why antional-socialism and not fascism? Fascism can still be enjoyed by the purist communists and the accelerationists. Fascism is a symptom of social-democratic inefficiency; it is a reactionnary movement against a premature communist uprising, when even the working class is still on the side of the oligarchs.
National-socialism isn't a symptom, but the ultimate cure to financial capitalism. All three branches have found it completely unacceptable to tolerate even its existence, as its system works not only as an opposite to marxist socialist conception, but also a s a viable option, even with its "spooks"; to the demoralized communists, this is simply an abomination that wasn't planned by Marx nor Engels and therefore be eliminated, since it endangers historical determinism.
(2/2)
Jack Cruz
>tl;dr : Jews control financial capitalism, as accelerationist agents, to usher in late-stage capitalism
>Jews also control purist communism to make sure the whole of the working class rise up when its time (IE late-stage capitalism)
>They ALSO control revolutionnary communism so that they can either shill the virtues of financial capitalism or usher in a trotskyist/maoist state that'll cover the world (Plan B)
The only ways to prevent communism would be to either :
>Create a monarchist world
Or
>Create a national-socialist world
Or
>Create a synthesis world of the both of them
As depostism and reactionnary monarchy will never settle with anything less than total world-domination for one state, which is equally as dangerous as communism.
Luke Harris
reactionnary democracy*
Isaiah Phillips
National Socialism is clearly the synthesis that historical materialism predicted would be produced but just like Jesus the Jews didn't like what reality gave them so they killed it and attempted to substitute their own reality. Hence the mess we are in currently.
Thomas Cruz
Everyone who claims to understand governments here needs to watch this video, stat:
youtube.com
Owen Cook
you're welcome, user
Christopher Edwards
The keyword you're searching is equity.
Marx and Engels never even strayed one bit from naming their utopic society egalitarian; in consequence, not fair.
Meritocratic, national-provincialism monarchism/imperialism and National-Socialism are unironically the only two system that are viable.
Dominic Jones
The Republic is the only answer as the rest lead to oligarchy and anarcho-tyranny
Luis Hill
This, I cant help but admire their rags to riches story.
Alexander Ward
There's a lot of them