Why are more collage graduates democrats?

support for the Democratic party is stronger among college graduates

Attached: Party-support-by-education-level.png (420x714, 14K)

Other urls found in this thread:

aei.org/publication/harvard-we-have-a-problem-too-many-liberal-arts-majors/
youtube.com/watch?v=TaJLEUg5DrM
bestcolleges.com/features/top-colleges-with-jewish-communities/
reason.com/archives/2014/06/13/are-conservatives-dumber-than-liberals
theroot.com/black-women-now-the-most-educated-group-in-us-1790855540
twitter.com/AnonBabble

Democrats are smarter in general.

Leftists choose easier majors with high pass rates most of the time, meanwhile most of the people doing STEM or similar lean right wing

Split that up by race now
You and I both know how bad diversity quotas are in universities

Indoctrination

Groupthink and intermediate economics courses aren’t required. I’m a big believer in the conspiracy that schools don’t teach economics because they want the population to be stupid with money

Why are more uneducated people Democrats?

>average college graduate is democrat
>average college graduate makes less money than the republican without a degree
>somehow Democrats are more intelligent

>STEM graduates lean right-wing
Lol, no. Not even close. I’d say it’s about 30% right-leaning at max, and that’s only because they’re mostly men.

Hogwarts had four houses. College only has one.

Democrats are higher on every graph

Because the core curriculum of most institutions is highly indoctrinatory and most college attendies are weak willed normies. I saw it among many friends. They were conservative because their parents taught them so and then became more liberal because the professors taught them so. They did not, nor will they ever really critically examine their own political stances, either from a personal standpoint or from the stand point of the general good.

specialized fields that require high college education are generally under the wing of government/big corporations that work closely with the government. For example if your a biologist or a researcher, it makes sense for you to be a democrat because 90% of the money for your grant comes from the government.

Today's academia is a racket, and hands out "college degrees" for feminist aromatherapy and such, government funded of course. Most now recognize this racket, and we're seeing a backlash as the feminist aromatherapists can't find work despite their "college degrees".

You'll find that the feminist aromatherapists and high school dropouts vote leftist, for the gibs. Both groups are equally dumb.

1. They tend to be teens going into college
2. They're forced to take GE classes -- which includes humanities and other courses are available like Sociology and Negro History.

You combine being young and dumb with an openly-liberal teacher and you get a Democrat.

aei.org/publication/harvard-we-have-a-problem-too-many-liberal-arts-majors/

Attached: 1491844965286.gif (366x206, 1.61M)

College education is a means to perpetuate class privilege. America's elite figured out the nobles oblige is a lot harder and more expensive than virtue signalling, so they moved to the white guilt Left and cashed in harder.

How would you know when those are the people who know not to discuss politics in public?
The chemist in my department are the first to joke about AGW and how it is the next big religion.

Mayors in social studies and genderfluids shit is not ok

/thread
liberals run college
they turn conservatives into liberals
or the conservatives quit cause they realize college is just brainwashing

Conservative administrations expand NIH funding as much as liberal ones. Though if you're a zoologist or something, I guess it would make more sense to identify as liberal

Indoctrination. Most people do not think for themselves and are not smart, so they are easy to indoctrinate (tell them how to think, and they will think that way).

This

Just because he knows it’s a Chinese hoax doesn’t mean he isn’t in favor of things like universal healthcare. Anyone who stays in an (((institution))), academic or not, for a long time turns into a statist. It’s inevitable.

Those classes are always extremely left.

Chemists are fucking weirdos in the scientific community.

It's like democrats are smarter and republicans are the retards or smth

More leftists go into education and other social services while Right wingers often choose manual labor and entrepreneurship. And since these leftists teach young people, those young people adopt their dogmas

>A college degree is a measure of intelligence
This hasn't been true for at least a decade. Most of the people I graduated with were complete fucking retards who get C's in easy majors.

Had to explain gel electrophoresis to a group of nursing students one time. Was like talking to my dog.

Because they are taught by their liberal professors that in order to be
"intellectuals" they have to believe certain things. If they do not tow the line they are not "enlightened intelligentsia."

t. that guy who always told the professor to fuck off and made him cry.

If i had to hazard a guess it woudld be that people that lean right want to just get to work. While it may be helpful to them to do so in a trade or cities they grew up in.

Also lets be honest. Outside of a few fields where you need far more information to understand it the background, most things you do in an office you could probably learn on the job and come out ahead.

Because college is a liberal indoctrination system.

What I find interesting is more of the top graph, the trend of people with only highschool education or less that are solidly democrat by a pretty big gap. All the other graphs fluctuate with who stays on top in regards to some college or having a graduate degree.

Democrats really are the party for the stupid and poor senpai but they know how to sell it to look like the more intelligent ones or at least lie to themselves about it.

Attached: 1518967576789.gif (300x225, 971K)

>tfw too intelligent to earn more than $50,000

Attached: 1521380852407.png (1124x1078, 334K)

Ever heard of echo chambers? This video sums it up quite well.
youtube.com/watch?v=TaJLEUg5DrM

Yeah brainwashing will do that.

White college graduates favor nationalism.

Non-whites are the ones who get indoctrinated by the propaganda that open borders and a one-world-government controlling everything would be good things.

Attached: nigger.png (768x512, 19K)

Support for democrats is strongest among the welfare niggertrash and illegal spic communities.

They want Uncle Sucker to forgive their student loans.

Because colleges are indoctrination centers.

College is a gauntlet of "role models" that all share the same anti-american opinion. Weak minds kowtow, strong minds are galvanized.

Attached: 2992.jpg (460x276, 21K)

"College graduates" includes a multitude of completely useless liberal arts degrees. Liberal Arts majors heavily lean liberal, while business (esp. economics) and engineering majors lean conservative.

Academia is leftist based on the campaign contributions. More money goes leftward, but they also protest money.

>leftwing universities turning out democrats using easily indoctrinated, naive young people
This is like asking why people who attend church become religious.

You must not have gone to college.

Yet their policies end up destroying wealth and socialize poverty

RURAL

Why are people that go to christian schools more christian? Hmm almost as if certain political ideologies are pushed hmm...

They didn't turn me or other people I knew into dems. They can only make you shut up about things, not really change your opinion. I was surprised by how many niggers apparently went to my college with me. I never saw them even in required classes, which is highly unlikely unless they count some coasting classes as requirements for them.

You've clearly never been in a science department.

Because college is a Marxist Jewish indoctrination center

Well if we believe the whole rebelling against your parent thing, then chances are their parents were conservative who raised then well enough to get into college.

On the other hand having liberal parents isn't so good at raising you to go to college.

>not a socialist at 20, no heart
>not a conservative by 40, no brain

Keyword there is graduates, my friend. While politics isn't a big dscussion point in those departments, I could agree that between undergrads we could have a smaller percentage of right wingers than leftists.

This has been my experience as a right aligned individual going g through school.

Most students know 1 thing about politics: racism is bad.
In more extreme cases they want to abolish whiteness/ their culture.

None of this is noble or an inherently 'good' position.
Look at Reddit today, circlejerking about Mueller all day every day.

Being democrat is not an achievement. They have no appealing policies and therefore have to use shady techniques and violence.
Oh yeah and import voters as well.

Nepotism is a real problem in higher education. Before the Affirmative Action was cracking down on Ivy Leagues, students were already observing increase of Jewish student body. What made them more noticeable was how their politics weren't just pushed onto the campus, but into classes others wanted to learned from. School personnel were quickly replaced with Jewish Alliance members. There are still rumors that multiple professors were baited into discussing social justice, leading to their suspension.

>bestcolleges.com/features/top-colleges-with-jewish-communities/

Same. I was in school during Trayvon/Mike Brown timeframe. No joke, I would have black dudes I never met walk up to me starting arguments about it (fit white guy) and because of that I know almost every single fact about those cases.

If they truly were smarter their ideas would thrive on their own without the need for censoring the opposition. If their ideas were truly smarter they wouldn't need to shut down speeches of Conservatives and censor the voices of the Right on sites like YT. The only thing the Left is "smarter" at is dirty slimy political tactics like endless race baiting

Attached: Smart woman.jpg (1022x599, 61K)

Good LARP, now serve me that hamburger

because literally all of the professors are liberal democrats and they force their politics onto the students.
we need laws that prevent political opinions from being expressed by teachers ffs. its getting out of hand.

Democrats are easily indoctrinated.

>collage democrats

Attached: IMG_0209.jpg (225x225, 44K)

Because details actually matter in chemistry.
>I don't agree so it's LARP
It amazes me how many French anons are full subscribers to the cult of global warming.

lack of rare life experience like receiving a paycheck and paying taxes

Leftism is a disease that convinces you a couple things. Your place in the world matters, you are truly unique and your viewpoint needs to be shared, you are better than those who disagree. This causes them to lash out violently when exposed to the opposition. They shut down speeches they harass people they full on make it unacceptable to support a right wing ideology until you are infected and become left like them.

Also the first two points drive them to go to college/university because as far as they are concerned that's the starting point to getting their truly unique opinion blasted.

>I’d say
Stopped reading there

>The chemist in my department are the first to joke about AGW and how it is the next big religion.
study chemistry, can confirm. The joke is CO2 promotes plant growth while also needing less water

Also chemistry is easily the most autistic field of study in STEM, next to maybe the higher maths. It's not surprising that they are a bit odd.

>reason.com/archives/2014/06/13/are-conservatives-dumber-than-liberals
>Comparing strong Republicans with strong Democrats, Carl finds that Republicans have a 5.48 IQ point advantage over Democrats. Broadening party affiliation to include moderate to merely leaning respondents still results in a Republican advantage of 3.47 IQ points and 2.47 IQ points respectively.

>theroot.com/black-women-now-the-most-educated-group-in-us-1790855540
Black women are the most "Educated" in that larger numbers of them get joke degrees that will never be useful than whites, who might just forgo university education and enter into a trade.

Its also important to note that Trump won the middle and high income brackets while Clinton only won the insolvent welfare classes as anons have said here and here

Attached: most productive states voted trump.png (1421x1447, 134K)

>High IQ they say
Recent (and not so recent) reports catalogued the widespread non-prescription use of amphetamine pills among college students, something someone with friends would have known for over a decade.

You can pass tests and do your homework til you drop dead, doesn't mean you ain't a gullible schmuck. Good luck getting a meaningful job in an era when >60% of job growth is service sector. Enjoy the debt, "educated" fuckwits!

I find the orchestrators of the grand lie aren't often well versed in chemistry, as the misconception formed around CO2 is cleared up once you dip into basic thermodynamics.

Then again everyone always struggles with P chem so maybe it isn't too surprising the CO2 lie is so widely believed.

It's amazing you're deluded enough to make up shit about how people who have probably the best knowledge of molecular radiation absorption and water acidification would somehow deny the science and evidence around global warming
Moron

I wonder how much smaller the IQ gap would be if you adjust for race.

brainwashing you dumb faggot

The real questions is why did Trump do so porely with with College educated people over but dominate the makes over 50k vote?

because Collages are really tough to make.

You have to get the size and scale of multiple images to fit into a single one. You want it to be comprehensive, but not too big. Collaging ain't easy.

Attached: trump jidf.png (1298x972, 1.11M)

Indoctrinate U by Evan Coyne Maloney addressed this in a good documentary back in 2007

Only a European would assume that the chemist is wrong because he doesn't agree with the cult findings. And it's for the very same reasons you listed: those things indicate climate change is the status quo, not a grand deviation from the historical set.

Again, it is amazing what the cultist are willing to do to protect their religion, including denying physical facts of thermodynamics.

LOL -- tryhard
So, basically, you mean the monkeywrench set.
Where manufacturing is located because red states give tax breaks.

Circular logic. Why are most people leaving Toyota dealerships driving Toyota?

.

But their politics ARE smarter.
Remember, they don't want happiness for citizens, they want control, they want money. And what they create gives it to them.
Communists in Soviet Union didn't want equality for everyone. They wanted equatity for EVERYONE BUT THEM.
And it worked. Oh, it worked fucking so well. The party members lived like kings.

>never heard of formalism

If college taught economics then students would learn real quick that most of them are getting scammed

>why are more coll[e]ge graduates democrats
Why are most meme majors democrats?

(You)

Spouting vague bullshit assertions like 'physical facts of thermodynamics' without refuting decades of data and basic molecular mechanisms (infrared absorption of CO2 and ocean acidification due to the latter) probably sound good on the sub-r*ddits you hang around but you can still shove it up your ass here
Kindly point out what facts of thermodynamics are denied according to you

>collage
Brainlet detected.

Why are Democrats so poor?

Attached: TrumpRich.jpg (600x471, 27K)

I’m a right wing college grad, but I also identify as white

Because there is a lot of corruption in colleges (not collages you meme degree fag) and democrats enjoy/are used to corruption. I couldn't stand it at the big university and got a specialized degree from a skill school then ended up traveling most of America and Singapore.

>why are people coming out of leftist indoctrination camps more leftist
They choose garbage majors and suck dick for 10 semesters then consider themselves enlightened and do exactly what every other peer of theirs does: operate in state and media sanctioned fashion.

Here brainlet munch on this one: what do these numbers represent, and why does it matter that water's number is so much higher than CO2's?

The answer is the reason why CO2 being responsible for climate change is preposterous.

Attached: heat cap.jpg (203x47, 10K)

College shills push the lefty stance.
They don't actually encourage critical thinking, just how to spew more propaganda.
With modern media reinforcing currently accepted societal "norms", people are put into a corner where media reinforces what the teachers speak as fact and because the majority of people are sheep, peer pressure takes care of solidifying their currently held belief system.
If I have to give credit to the left, it would be for the efficiency of how they push their ideology. The trifecta of successful memetics has been established, continue to consume, goy.

Attached: PicsArt_08-27-10.28.02.jpg (520x559, 59K)

Data about employed/unemployed voters?
It would be interesting to see...

I haven't had P chem yet. What's the rundown?

>what mass media wants you to believe
The Democratic party is the more intelligent and well-informed party! Vote for us because everyone else is a bunch of stupid paranoid rednecks!

>the reality
We've been indoctrinating America for decades in preschool, PhD programs and everything in between and we have made it almost impossible to succeed in the education system without publically adopting liberalism or at least pretending that you have!

hahaahahahah

Because they don’t have any money and don’t have any work experience because they were too busy getting high or drunk with their liberal arts degree. That results in Liberal economic policies appealing to them. But they’ll learn when they start actually making money that having more in your pocket is better than living paycheck to paycheck like most of them.

English and social justice classes are part of every college's core curriculum and these fields have been completely taken over by marxists.

Because it takes less energy to heat it up ? It's not really refuting anything, that's more of a favourable argument on why adding it in the atmosphere leads to increased temperature