No one needs a weapon of war!

>No one needs a weapon of war!
How do you respond to this? Or do you just accept that you have been BTFO?

Attached: ruger_ar556_ar15_semiauto_rifle_1477980_6.jpg (738x640, 25K)

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=OXQ7GZII5os&t=0s
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

>>No one needs a weapon of war!
No one needs a whiny bitch either.

No?! YOU SAY 'NO' TO MY AR-15, YOU FUCKIN' PRICK! YOU AIN'T GONNA ABLE TO SAY 'NO' TO ME WHEN I GET TO YOUR HOUSE, YOU MOTHERFUCKER!!

Attached: rick.jpg (928x608, 229K)

What if we need to fight a war?

Attached: georgewashington.jpg (1200x630, 135K)

I didn't need *pic related* but I wanted one.

Attached: yamaha-yzf-r1-2014-old.jpg (513x390, 40K)

They don't use semi autos in war lol

Tell them that far more people die from cars, cigarettes and prescription drugs.

a weapon or a toy ?

Attached: 570ba77952bcd01a008bbc9a-750.jpg (720x540, 63K)

Because if a burglar breaks into your house with a pistol and you have an AR-15, you gain a major advantage.

“If you find yourself in a fair fight, your tactics suck.” -John Steinbeck

>no one needs a weapon of war?

Do you know what the future will bring?

bring this thread to K. Pussy

>"it's not your fucking business to determine what other people wants or needs, you raging communist faggot."
>unload the magazine

"Either try to come and take them or continue to whine while i have fun shooting. We know you're a pussy, so option 2 it is."

Inform her that medical malpractice kills over 20 times as many people as guns.

Yeah I do

its really that easy

youtube.com/watch?v=OXQ7GZII5os&t=0s

I like how you now call them weapons of war instead of assault weapons like you used to do. What you don't realize now is how people are going "oh jeez".

Attached: IMG_5391.jpg (3264x2448, 3.93M)

>> No one needs a weapon of war

Until they try to take mine...

But these are not argumentrs

I need it to shoot people like you.

Bitch I decide what I need. And if I need an AR15 then I'm going to get an AR15.

you dont go to war with something like that

Attached: 05d3d15b542fe030c47a2f29b15a5951.jpg (1008x756, 152K)

I do, and who are you to say otherwise.

Alright then heres one for you
>needs

You saying that doesn't make it true.

No one needs to offend me.

How isn't it. My R1 can easily hit speeds of 180+. The fastest you can go in the US is 85. Why do I need a bike that was basically engineered for the track? I just like it. A lot of people love to lawfully shoot their M-4's. Do they need them? Well, look at South Africa's current situation and look at the parallels with here, in the US. I'd say I need a proper rifle more than a sports bike.

>You don't need a weapon of war
>Also not an argument

I'm sure if you'd stop being a faggot and actually talk to one of them they'd elaborate.

Attached: 1521566810971.jpg (575x1024, 67K)

Ok, I am listening faggot.

Or, for the lower brow

No one needs to piss me off!

>needs
I say you dont need a big house for yourself and that lot of food either, am I right, comrades Jamal and Carlos?

What do you plan to BTFO me with? Harsh language? Get rekt.

My house and my car don't kill anyone. And I need a license to operate a motor vehicle.

>My house and my car
what do you mean my house and my car?

you dont need that iphone do you.

>bill of needs

Larping faggot.

Then your house and car are worthless. Go get something that kills people before a nigger rapes your woman, steals your car and burns your house down.

>
>Well regulated

Says the faggot with incredibly shitty bait.

ar15 isn't a weapon of war.

/thread

you tell em, kiddo!

Attached: 8bq9qralfhxz.jpg (2048x1536, 817K)

Yes, yes they are. Your right to whine is the same and my right to own a weapon of war.

IT IS A FUCKING RIGHT PROTECTED BY THE CONSTITUTION.

You give up your rights, then I will give up mine. So shut the fuck up.

Attached: 1512091257825.jpg (480x480, 53K)

But do you need them? I have seen people killed by houses, cars, phones and once by a fucking carrot. You dont need any of those.

only a retard would use an AR-15 in a war. You want an automatic weapon for combat.

Fellow anons, remember to kill hoplophobic faggots like OP first and take their shit on DOTR.

I make a right arrow bracket with my hands and then say with a green voice the word "need"

your pic make no sense at all

Read the heller decision.
Assault weapons are not covered. You can have a gun but we can well regulate them
its not an epidemic. We need houses to live. We have licenses for cars.

Fuggg
That is extra baby easy mode for duck hunt.

The fuck is this nigger trying to say?

Attached: QAOveqg.jpg (513x405, 29K)

Ever considered the idea that if a criminal can get a "weapon of war" why shouldn't the common citizen have equal if not better fire power to deter disenfranchised urban youths?

Attached: 1520961272634.jpg (500x375, 19K)

>bear arms

Literally no one uses semi-auto AR-15s for their military. OP is an ignorant faggot.

I DO need a weapon of war. Anti-gunners are no different than anti-vaxxers. You live in an artificial world made safe by guns and vaccines and you only see the dangers that cause not the dangers they prevent so you assume they're dangerous and must be banned. You aren't one of those anti-science anti-vaxxers, are you? You know the science is settled.

We need fully automatic weapons for when the zombie apocalypse happens

Zombies being codeword for the crazy racist left

Attached: residentevil_c.jpg (500x250, 85K)

In britian very few people actually use these guns for crimes, same with japan.
Yeah they use cars but those casualties are much lower.

>weapon or toy
Neither, it's pure awesome.
>imblying you made a argument

>bill of needs

Rifle regulations create even more dangerous weapons. Pic related

Attached: 450925.jpg (880x660, 87K)

Weapons of war are what is intended by the second amendment. Our forefathers needed them, and we might need them again.

semi auto rifle is not a weapon of war

also I do need a weapon of war and that is exactly what the 2A intended

During the revolutionary war all weapons were considered weapons if war.
During the civil war all weapons were considered weapons of war
During the ww1 all weapons were considered weapons of war
During the ww2 all weapons were considered weapons of war.
During the the korean all weapons were considered weapons of war.
During the the Vietnam war all weapons were considered weapons of war.
During the the oil wars all weapons were considered weapons of war.
During the ww3 all weapons will be considered weapons of war

weap·on
ˈwepən/
noun
a thing designed or used for inflicting bodily harm or physical damage.
"nuclear weapons"
a means of gaining an advantage or defending oneself in a conflict or contest.
"resignation threats had long been a weapon in his armory"

Attached: Screenshot_2018-03-21-13-42-32-1.png (667x342, 21K)

>How do you respond to this?
kill him. transfer everything. then find another.

Attached: 1514497547972.jpg (640x360, 30K)

"Yes you do"

/thread

Hit them back with the same logic. Technically open borders aren’t needed. Almost no one needs to be vegan. Schools don’t need to be diverse. Shitty soyboy IPAs aren’t necessary, etc...

If you don't have a gun, there are no arguments - you just do what you're told.

No one NEEDS to get high, really, yet people won't shut up about legalizing weed which isn't in any country's Constitution.

You do not need house to live. Hut will be perfectly enough. And 20m room is enough too, more than generous, in fact.

Btw, do you really need a license to own a car, or just to drive it?

based

Attached: 1485979356971.jpg (458x515, 45K)

You need a weapon of war because if you give in on that, soon you won't be able to own a .22 LR

please explain in detail how the weapon in your pic related is inherently more dangerous than any other standard semi-auto rifle.

A frog that can't understand English.

Never seen that before...

Then so can speech. If my right to own weapons is limited, so should your ability to speak. They are both FUNDAMENTAL rights guarded by the Constitution.

No amount of jewlawyering should change that.

People wonder why this country just keeps getting worse...

Attached: 1342242414318.jpg (467x500, 102K)

> Nobody needs a weapon of war

Why not? The primary purpose of the law is to protect against tyranny. If the state becomes tyrannical, the people can go to war with it. I've always wondered why the ban on full automatic rifles isn't unconstitutional.

A long time ago rocks were considered a weapon of war

Why would anyone need a car when public transportation exists? I mean, do we really need all these people with cars that will get into accidents?

Not an argument

>The state becoming tyrannical
Holy shit will you gun owners give this shit up.

i fell for this bait.

goes to show that gun owners are all soyboys. real men dont need guns

Attached: 1520792797792.png (1286x1090, 873K)

Is that a stormtrooper's laser blaster?

Shorter barrel and removable stock makes it easier to conceal than a full size rifle. My logic is that someone who wants a full size rifle might have to settle for an ar15 pistol if they can't get a rifle.

No guns:
>respect our rights
>lol no

guns:
>respect our rights
>ok

>Trump is literally Hitler! Resist!
>give up your guns to the govt!
Are liberals chaotic evil or retarded?

>No one needs a weapon of war!
dont tell me what i need nigger, is how i would respond

We have the guns. Looks more to me like you'll be the one
>giving shit up

I am not a liberal, I voted trump, but come on. The government isn't gonna be 1984 in your lifetime

I live in the UK. 20 years ago we gave up guns. Today we live in a literal police state where you can be imprisoned for thought crime. It's not a meme. My country is a living example of what happens when a citizenry is disarmed,

Attached: 525525351.jpg (916x2608, 725K)

Tell that to the bongs.

SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED

Attached: slide2.png (1500x1500, 926K)

You know this how?

Hes a faggot so he wont answer because he dosnt know. However I guess one reason would be that it is more concealable. I understand that barrel length effects velocity and a longer barrel creates higher velocity which increases the chance of bullet fragmentation and soft tissue damage. Im guessing thats where you were going with that, in which case I agree. I think we can both agree that anti-gun posters are inherently bigger faggots as well.

Attached: 8cbfdda48228a4744f32f44f9734d005f8fde3ba975b3be5de7c8474a2aa9a9b.jpg (509x512, 71K)

dae empires never fall???

America IS war

DID SOMEBODY SAY "MY"?

So you are saying that if you had a gun then the government wouldn't do that?
I hate those stupid anti-islamophobia laws too, but you having a glock isn;t gonna solve that.