What's wrong with this sentence?:

What's wrong with this sentence?:

"Hate speech should be illegal"

Attached: madjenna.jpg (355x381, 44K)

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=g_gRCOfZ8BI
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

illegal,
whats hate speech too some is love speech too others.

hate speech is free speech

>What's wrong with this sentence?:
>"Hate speech should be illegal"
Define "hate speech."

i imagine the market for silly cuckold porn would dry up fast if women in leather couldnt call naked liberals sissy faggot bitches while they get fucked by a tyrone straight out of the slammer

What's wrong with this sentence:

"OP should kill himself soon"

Hate isn't illegal.

what is considered hateful is tottaly subjective to a particallr believe.

>should be

Attached: 1521236179639.jpg (390x310, 17K)

>particallr
particular

WRONG. "Hate speech" is whatever is deemed offensive by one or more person(s).
Hate speech is still free speech. Don't let (((them))) tell you otherwise

>what is considered hateful is tottaly subjective to a particallr believe.
Exactly. So in reality, those that want to ban "hate speech" actually want to restrict certain people from saying certain things.

Hate speech. Lets respect our freedoms.

>WRONG. "Hate speech" is whatever is deemed offensive by one or more person(s).
Except if that person or persons happen to be White, Christian, heterosexual and/or male.

"Hate speech should be illegal."
>"Speech should be illegal."
This part

WRONG. It's applicable to everyone and anyone.

Free speech is free, anything else than everything allowed is not free speech

absolutely nothing

if you are in the US and a nazi sympathizer you are a treasonous traitor.

Attached: 1505228311578.jpg (960x1280, 318K)

Scalia was being a moronic hypocrite in Heller.
Reverse Heller NOW!

It doesn't exist. Just more kike newspeak garbage.

>WRONG. It's applicable to everyone and anyone.
Except in practice, it's only applied to Whites, heterosexuals, Christians and/or men.

You should define hate, an opinion someone has about something else, in an objective - not subjective - way.

Then you'll understand that you can't.

Replace "should be" with "is"

because this is whom they usually hire to define hate speech.

Attached: 21272360_1569809516372426_7669769316068873689_n.jpg (650x628, 63K)

Mate, you should report anything you find offensive as HATE SPEECH?
Get it now?

Right now, hate speech is code for white nationalism speech. Tomorrow, it might mean the assertion that homosexuals shouldn't be stoned to death or that universal healthcare is anything but parasitic and a net drain on society.

I don't get it, you guys truly have me so stumped I can't even begin to empathize with you anymore. You believe the president is a tyrant trying to become a dictator, yet youre begging him to take away your freedom of speech and your right to defend yourself. So whats your angle? Is Trump not nearly as bad as you think he is, are you so sure he's gonna get impeached and you'll reassume power uninterrupted for the next 1000 years so youre confident this won't totally blow up on your face, or are you completely retarded?

Censorship hasnt hit Canada just yet.

Keep punching those you consider to be "Nazis."

Eventually those "Nazis" will be shooting back.

>tottaly
totally

>believe
belief

>Mate, you should report anything you find offensive as HATE SPEECH?
>Get it now?
Again, if a White, Christian, heterosexual or male were to report "hate speech" to the police or to the government, they'd be ignored.

But if a non-White, non-Christian, homosexual or female were were to report "hate speech" to the police or to the government, they'd be listened to.

Get it now?

Are you saying what I think you're saying?
Ugh oh, we're in trouble if that's the case

It’s actually an anagram. Should be hate illegal speech.

No human being is illegal

Nothing

>Are you saying what I think you're saying?
That the laws and rights increasingly don't apply to and protect Whites, heterosexuals, Christians and men anymore.

>Ugh oh, we're in trouble if that's the case
We are in trouble and voting will not get us out of this mess.

lol the holocaust isn't real, dumbass

>speech should be illegal
Right there

what is hate speech?
>the left keep pushing that anyone right of marx's is a ebil nazi kkk mixed with the devil
so we going to limit what we say to leftist scum?
1488

I am Liberty-gendered, you've just committed an act of hate speech against me by saying hate speech should be illegal.

What can we do about this bro?

>Hate speech
Go ahead, and define that in a way in which everyone can agree. I'll wait.

>What can we do about this bro?
If White people had a country of our own, this would not be happening.

The SCOTUS disagrees. The 1st Amendment protects "hate speech".

Attached: 1521571553672.png (541x627, 310K)

I find that sentence grossly offensive and hatefu... I see what you did there.

tromp's dorter or whoeveer u spel it is fkng hoit

This post is very hateful to me. You should be locked up. OP is a hateful faggot

WHAT IF we all report "anything and everything" as hate speech, overwhelm the system

The part where It says speech should be illigal.

It doesn't matter what you put in front of it or behind it. No speech or writing should be illigal.

soon isnt quick enough

How long until "hate-think" becomes illegal or is it a thing already

>Jenna Haze

This is the correct answer.

>WHAT IF we all report "anything and everything" as hate speech, overwhelm the system
They'll just ignore it, filter it or worse, arrest you for false reporting.

>What's wrong with this sentence?
> speech should be illegal

People should have the right to say whatever they want to say whether I agree or disagree with it

Attached: 775179633822.jpg (2478x2086, 1.43M)

Whom decides what "hate" is and what is their personal investment.
What does the decider gain from their definitions?
It's built for corruption.

>hate speech
Not a real thing. If I say I hate niggers its because that is my belief and this country was not founded on punishing people's beliefs.

How can one prove/determine what I find offensive or not?

>speech
>illegal

Heyyyyy those don’t go together!

Attached: F19FD536-7171-479F-85E8-70C7580937E3.jpg (110x125, 10K)

Why haven't brits started making "offensive" jokes on mass yet? Overwhelm the system.

>How can one prove/determine what I find offensive or not?
They ignore you based on the fact that you're White, heterosexual, Christian and male.

In addition to what you're reporting.

Also, "Progress" is a vector, not a scalar.
Ones progression is anothers regression.

Unironically, everything except the word “hate”.

You're not American.

Neck yourself.

hate speech can be interpreted in many ways, so the definition of hate speech needs to be made clear before a proper assessment can be made.

Remove the first word and say again.

That's what's wrong with it. Hate is a matter of perspective.

The fact that their big threat is to punch someone in the face is why I can't take these people seriously. You punch them in the face, then what? Getting punched in the face isn't the most comfortable thing in the world but it's not going to really achieve anything.

I refuse to accept this, seriously.

That sentence /is/ hate speech. Paradox.

If this is the reality I live in, I may aswell just fuckin end right here, right now

"WrongThink" it's in 1984.
Orwell predicted everything that happened, it's only a matter of time.
They will probably do it with algorithms of census questions.

I'd pay real cash to watch some soy boy punch a real nazi. It'd probably end up as a rekt vid.

its supposition.

What he said isn't wrong. You both just said it is subjective and meaningless.

Always take subjectiveness out of a sentence to realise what is actually being done.

"Speech should be illegal"

>I refuse to accept this, seriously.
You should.

Because the evidence is staring you in the face.

In your very own country someone is about to go to prison because he posted a video on youtube of a dog lifting its front leg when he said "Sieg Heil"

Meanwhile your government does nothing about the Muslim rape gangs and literal no-go zones.

A White-only country is the only solution and only salvation from this.

We do, and get arrested.

I'm all for it as long as I get to decide what qualifies as hate. I've just decided that every leftist idea is hateful and offensive. Therefore illegal. Off to the gulag with you commie.

That is some very good advice.

nothing if youre a fucking fascist commie faggot

Attached: 1497471512670.png (664x648, 313K)

I do all the time, in person though since I got off any kind of social media years ago. I think a better tactic would be to report everything as hate speech, especially famous comedians.

If you are in the US and support any restrictions on the first amendment you're a traitor you fucking jew.

it implies hate speech is a real thing

>hate speech
The constitution of value in "hate"

>If you are in the US and support any restrictions on the first amendment you're a traitor you fucking jew.
Pornography is Jewish and therefore not free speech despite the fact that the jewish courts and Jewish lawyers said it is.

I agree with this, I think this could actually prove to the masses how absurd it is

Porn isn't speech at all.

I don't really know what to say to such an idiotic statement.

Idiotic statement based on factual reality

All speech should be legal, that's why it's called free speech.

>Porn isn't speech at all.
The Jew says otherwise.

Just like they say all the faggotry, diversity, race mixing, sex and violence they shovel on us via the media isn't free speech either.

>What's wrong with this sentence?:
It's fucking stupid, and un-American. You have
to go back.

>I don't really know what to say to such an idiotic statement.
I'm sure you love fapping to porn so you'll side with your Jewish masters to defend it.

All good ideas.

Another would be to make "hate speech" comments as LARP's coming from someone
you dislike.
Just manage to squeeze in some slight doxing material in a tweet, FB post, etc.

Attached: 1984Fdm.gif (500x267, 1018K)

No such thing as hate speech when you have "Free Speech".

youtube.com/watch?v=g_gRCOfZ8BI
>OH my god good time to post this
say hello to your JEW WORLD ORDER

Then video isn't speech.

>should