This book can save Western Civilization

If you hate women, it's probably because you don't understand them.
Every single Sup Forumsack should read this. It explains why women and men are different in an unbiased way: it's due to the different ways we communicate.

>when men have a problem, they isolate themselves to think about it because fulfilling problems fills them with pride, and only talk about problems with other men in order to get a solution
>when women have a problem they tend to prefer to talk about them because talking about eachother's problems is for them a sign of trust, and aren't looking for a solution and just want the person to listen leading to leading to misunderstandings when a man gives her an answer
>women criticize to show affection to someone else
>men do because they have a reproach against someone else, leading to misunderstandings when a woman whines to them about their flaws every day even through she has genuine good intentions
Every Sup Forumsack likely knew some of these but it's filled to the brim with redpills. If you want to save the West, you have to understand how women communicate, and this book does so perfectly. I don't know why this book isn't as praised as the Bell Curve on this board when it's ten times more truthful -- it's only flaw is that it was written by a californian.
What do you think, Sup Forums?

Attached: 220px-Men-Mars-Women-Venus-Cover.jpg (220x349, 24K)

Other urls found in this thread:

npr.org/2010/12/02/131753267/eat-your-worms-the-upside-of-parasites
statnews.com/2016/04/15/parasite-benefits-humans/
ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/5364739/?reload=true
academia.edu/download/43874464/Gender_Invariance_in_Multitasking.pdf
youtube.com/watch?v=oC_Ih47fUhM
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

>if you hate something, it's only because you don't understand it
Is that why you hate Hitler?

Attached: hitler WPAP.jpg (480x480, 29K)

fpbp
OP you're a faggot if you genuinely believe women have good intentions, ever.

are you really that retarded
men had no problem dealing with women for ....since the dawn of time and you think suddenly men forgot how to deal with women ?
women are parasites just like jews that why the both team up so well
Wanna know female nature read "sex and character" by Otto Weininger

hating women is fine
a healthy society needs a healthy does of misogyny

this guy is 100% right

>Hitler hated women
Topkek.
>are you really that retarded
men had no problem dealing with women for ....since the dawn of time and you think suddenly men forgot how to deal with women ?
Look at our divorce rates. The vast majority of men can't hold a stable marriage. The jews have indoctrinated us into believing men and women are the same, hence why we've lost control.
This laughable notion that women are inherently evil is the most retarded position you can
>women are parasites just like jews
You're not gonna save the white race by calling for a female holocaust, you fucking retards.

actually, learning about womens biology and nature is what made me hate women. before i saw what they really were i thought they were people like men are. now i see that they are only breeding machines serving themselves above everything and their own emotions and endless hypergamous nature. they don't have the same nature and biological function as a man. a man is born into the world with desires to move forward for mankind and offer things to society by sacrificing his time and energy for the benefit of everybody in exchange for female eggs to reproduce. men want to protect and to serve. women just want children and that's literally it. that is their contribution. birthing and raising children. literal breeding sows. they choose the best male genetics they can get their hands on, and just get cummed in.

>This laughable notion that women are inherently evil is the most retarded position you can
Coming from a frog that can't even quote properly I'll take it as a compliment.

MARS NEEDS WOMEN

>Parasites
>Give your son life

Gamma males are truly the worst

>wat is parasite

you can have a symbiotic relation with a parasite you know right ?

ps married with kids but i had to move all the way to Estonian to start a family.

The entire point of the book is that men build civilization whilst women provide emotional support, two pieces that essentially compliment eachother.
Women pick the best genes. Yes. Natural selection. Men also fuck the hottest women. Hating nature rather then embracing it is a liberal trait - something a communist does.
Understandable, have a nice day.

I know what women like and how they communicate and how they think pretty well. I think its cause I grew up with 5 sisters. I dont like the way women think, act and communicate tho and therefore dont like them. That being said thanks for the suggestion I may learn something.

Parasite by definition harms host.

Symbiosis refers to mutual benefit, which is the case in relationships that result in reproduction (ignoring that we are within the same species so the terms are applied in a suspect way to begin with).

Try learning wtf you’re talking about, give it three months, then see if you still hate women.

I refrained from trashing you all bc it’s way too easy.

Pearls before the swine, OP. Let they gays and permavirgins rot.

>Women just love to talk and not solve problems and will resent a man for trying to solve a problem
Yes, we already knew this.

>when women have a problem they tend to prefer to talk about them because talking about eachother's problems is for them a sign of trust, and aren't looking for a solution and just want the person to listen leading to leading to misunderstandings

I've noticed more that the people in charge get to complain, and the people on the bottom don't. This is basically women complaining, which means...

>women criticize to show affection to someone else

They aren't showing affection - they're dominating people by running their mouths, getting angry when they get a reply, and then condemning the person replying to them of misogyny for interrupting them.

They're really setting up a situation where they get into a social conflict and win, gaining social power which they then use to justify talking about their problems, and claiming your problems don't exist while they leach off you financially.

>men do because they have a reproach against someone else, leading to misunderstandings when a woman whines to them about their flaws every day even through she has genuine good intentions

No - the man criticizes to challenge other people to a game of turkey, where the loser either physically assaults the winner or walks away humiliated. The losing man is presented as the bad guy hitting someone 'because he lost an argument,' but it's really because he knows that if he loses this social battle, the other man will mock him more.

>you have to understand how women communicate

They don't. They all talk at once while listening to themselves. The wests' problem comes from the fact that we delude ourselves into thinking women care about something other than their own beauty.

Lol, didn't think I'd ever see someone else who likes trashy Rob Zombie songs on Sup Forums

look at what you just fucking typed out.

>men build civilization
>women provide emotional support

jesus fucking christ. they are cheerleaders? that's what they offer the world?

relevant:
Just because it is biology doesn’t mean it isn’t cruel. Women all want to fuck the alpha, men want to fuck as many different women as they can. Both are attempting to maximize genetic fitness. If women didn’t care about having material support in the form of a long term partner, they would only mate with the top 5-10% of men, leaving 90-95% of men sexless, without family, love or children. This is why women always support leftist socialism. It’s not empathy. Consciously or subconsciously, they want the government to take over the role of provider/protector male, so that they are free to only mate with the top 5-10% of men. Feminism is nothing more than women wishing to be untethered from provider/protector males so that they can fuck the alpha. Women are hard wired to want to reduce 90% of males to an existence of loneliness, meaninglessness and pain, while they have the government steal the money of these lonely men and redistribute it to them in order to fund their alpha breeding and alpha child raising. Women want institutionalized cuckoldry through wealth redistribution. The are certainly cruel. Women are a dog shit organism. They are born that way, hardwired by millions of years of evolution. This is why they must be controlled by men in order to have a stable, prosperous society.

>Parasite by definition harms host.
What is intestinal parasites

>I refrained from trashing you all bc it’s way too easy.
You don't say?

Btw obvious roastie is obvious.

>when women have a problem they tend to prefer to talk about them because talking about eachother's problems is for them a sign of trust
No, women talk about their problems because they expect someone else to fix it. That's why women complain a lot. Complaining is a sign that you want someone else to fix the source of your discontent.

>women criticize to show affection to someone else
This is horseshit.

>What do you think, Sup Forums?
That you're retarded. Men and women are different, but that book is useless.

are really that fucking stupid ?
didnt you do biology in high school moron

do you even know what Mutualism is ?
women consume alot of time, resource and energy of the man but in return the give birth to his offspring aka Mutualism that is beneficial parasitism.

but modern women take all the resources and divorce you taking your house money and kids just like a parasite
or dont have kids making them a harmful parasite.

why dont you go read up a little before making retarded post you dumb fuck.

>married with kids but i had to move all the way to Estonian to start a family.
Story time?

>They aren't showing affection - they're dominating people by running their mouths, getting angry when they get a reply, and then condemning the person replying to them of misogyny for interrupting them.
That's exactly what i said through poorly formulated. The point is that they run their mouths, but end up satisfied after that as long as if they feel they were listened to. The husband doesn't have to change at all and the wife gets a new found appreciation for him because she felt as if she was acknowledged.
From a rational perspective, it certainely looks like domination -- but that's the entire point of the book, that men and women communicate -- and think -- differently. They genuinely see whining as a form of affection.

>The wests' problem comes from the fact that we delude ourselves into thinking women care about something other than their own beauty.
Beauty and attention. The problem we have is that Sup Forumsacks loathe women for this whilst the muslims embrace it, which is why the west is quickly becoming less and less white. The spiteful tone in your post shows you want to deny reality instead of embracing it.

read this book about 20 years ago when i was an idiot. Its fuckign bullshit becuase all women are whores.

Apart from family obviously.

>No, women talk about their problems because they expect someone else to fix it. That's why women complain a lot. Complaining is a sign that you want someone else to fix the source of your discontent.
Yes. From a male perspective, men seek to solve problems far more then women do, who use problems as a mean to communicate trust and have stronger social bonds. Women and men communicate differently. That's the entire point of the book.
>This is horseshit
Denying reality. Enjoy removing yourself from the gene pool -- through seeing your flag, it likely wasn't much of a loss.

hmm.. so you are telling me ukrainian are all bitchss? thats interesting twist! hahahaha!

Attached: DY5b-ISXkAA506g.jpg large.jpg (469x450, 37K)

Disregard thots, aquire male companionship

Attached: mancave.jpg (800x1150, 683K)

>Hay pooool, check out this meme book from 25 years ago, I'm sure nooooone of you have heard of it before

Fuck off Gary.

Its basic biology. Because I'm an average looking guy, to get a decently attractive woman I'd have to land some type of bad ass CEO top tier career job that pays a lot and gives a lot of status or else I don't get anything but table scraps. And even if I did land that type of job, it would be so fake. It would be so clear she was only after the money and status and not myself, the sex would probably be terrible with zero intimacy.

>image fucking related

Attached: maxresdefault.jpg (1280x720, 42K)

Parasites that steal resources from your food by eating it themselves and shitting inside you.
Try again.

So the TLDR is you're denying biology.
Instead of seeking to embrace women's and men's differences and improving yourself to be Chad,you irrationally lash out at how unfair and mean the world is. Boo hoo, it's not fair!
Grow the fuck up. The peak of civilization has consistently been built on the family unit, with women as caretakers and men as the providers. The best men always won out, even in those times.
As for women -- they are genetically predisposed to want attention. Maintaining a marriage is easy in that case. Give them attention.
If you're so convinced that you're a beta right off the bat, you may as well off yourself, since you have no hope of reproducing.

But they simply aren't acting as caretakers now, they're consuming

Why do I have to like something just because I understand it?

Women drive me up the fucking wall, and they regularly admit (at least in my experience) that they drive each other up the fucking wall. I've found the best way to deal with them is to listen to their bullshit ramblings just enough so they think you care, and when they do fucked up shit you give them the cold shoulder and ignore them completely until they crawl back and apologize.

I hate it, and modernity has only made them worse. But whatever, that's life. If you can't work with a girl to make a family, find a new one who can

npr.org/2010/12/02/131753267/eat-your-worms-the-upside-of-parasites
statnews.com/2016/04/15/parasite-benefits-humans/
etc
>Parasite by definition [only] harms host.
One can't possibly be this retarded.

But they simply aren't acting as caretakers now,

Oops

good point

more like

- men are smart, reflective, moral, just and creative
- women are dumb, petty, shallow ,selfish and destructive

gtfo with your egalitarian bullshit.

Whoa dude, rad! I have some other tubular recommendations my dude:

Who moved my cheese?
Chicken Soup for the Soul
Rich Dad Poor Dad

And for some fiction:
Not Without My Daughter

>egalitarian
>men are supposed to be the rational, strong shoulders to rely on and women the caretakers whom provide emotional support
Ok

>women the caretakers whom provide emotional support

women are terrible caretakers and despite the prejudiced notion that women provide emotional support, men are better at providing emotional support too. men are better at everything, without exception. there is absolutely no way whatsoever, that women are of any genuine value to men other than giving birth. they are completely and entirely useless.

a creation of satan.

Attached: images(6).jpg (240x210, 8K)

Misogyny =/= Hating on women

This pic sums up women perfectly.

Attached: girl.jpg (1300x928, 559K)

Btw this book is pretty entry tier. Men in general need to take back control of their women and a lot of people don't even need a book to realise that either.

True. Most Sup Forumsacks aren't hardcore readers through so i thought i'd talk about a entry level book.

>men are better at everything
what about the whole ''multitasking'' thing, or is it just some feminist meme?

You ever travel outside the city, boy?

no it cant

t. king jupiter

>The entire point of the book is that men build civilization whilst women provide emotional support
Holy shit this guy has either never been in a relationship or he's borderline retarded showing emotional weakness to women that would require their support is one of the biggest mistakes you can commit in a relationship. It shows women you're weak and they then store it and use it later as emotional blackmail into the trash this book goes

Attached: i heard you had a thot problem .png (1200x764, 1.14M)

>denying biology
when did i do this? before you tried to call me a communist, so i'm assuming you're just trying to strawman me to bait me. i'm saying that women are self-serving baby makers with disgusting nature. why am i not allowed to hate that? because muh biology i have to love it and grovel at their fucking feet?

quote by you in your first post:
>If you hate women, it's probably because you don't understand them.

what don't i understand? you're the one who basically called them fucking cheerleaders who give "emotional support" lmao. also you think being chad will help? they will leave chad for super-chad. i've seen it happen. the hypergamy ride never ends my dude. as long as they can trade up, they will. even you, the ultra-chad white knight will get cucked so long as she has access to being with somebody better than you. and there are people better than you and i, my friend.

>The best men always won out
actually, no. back in the peak days of good ol' tradition, men had to earn the respect and approval of a womans father to marry her. not her. she had no choice. this eliminated womens hypergamous nature and allowed "the best men" to have access to eggs. it was socially enforced for the benefit of good men. this is now gone and being "a good man" is not being selected for. back then, if it was up to the women, they would still be out fucking chad from tinder while the good guy supported her financially. it's just how they are. they want it all. it's their nature. why can't i hate it? biology is not a reason why i can't think women are disgusting things.

It's a meme. Read the first two sentences of the abstract here: ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/5364739/?reload=true
Also
>It is also noteworthy that normative data collected on more than 6,000 participants reported by Redick et al.(2012) revealed “extremely small or no gender effects”(p. 169) on such complex span tasks (including a version of the operation span task; see Table 1), which are thought to measure executive attention. Hence, this null effect of gender on executive attention, whereby the latter appears to play a significant role in predicting multitasking, may help explain the apparent lack of gender differences in multitasking in the larger literature. In fact, to this end, we cannot think of a good a priori theoretical reason to argue that men and women should differ in their baseline executive-attention ability to maintain task goals and to avoid cognitive distraction.
academia.edu/download/43874464/Gender_Invariance_in_Multitasking.pdf

I already know why I hate women. Because they're fucking emotional idiots.

The only thing I need to understand about women is they're going to crash this plane with no survivors and after they're done oh boy then we get to drag their sorry asses back to the kitchen where they belong. And this time, hopefully, we will have learned our lesson and they'll NEVER get a whiff of freedom again.

oh buddy, you misunderstand. "Femininity" is defined as the innate potential to be anything between absolute order and absolute chaos, and the ability to perpetuate and multiply itself. But it depends on the "masculine", the creative, molding force to build order out of femininity and maintain it. men use actions, women use words. men are order, reason, and aggression, women are emotion, chaos, and nurturing. If you don't get this, you're very likely retarded.

SOME MEN ARE FROM VENUS, SHITLORDS

Your "traditional" era lasted for centuries. Hypergamy has been around for as long as humanity has - hundreds of thousands of years. Nature always wins.

Second link stopped working so I'll greentext the first part:
> Mäntylä (2013) compared men and women who concurrently performed a counter-monitoring task and an n-back task and concluded that gender differences in multitasking reflect spatial ability. Here, we suggest
>(a) that there are no gender differences in a ubiquitous real-world version of multitasking (i.e., talking on a cell phone while driving),
>(b) that the data reported by Mäntylä do not, in fact, provide clear and unambiguous evidence for gender differences in multitasking, and
>(c) that individual differences in the ability to multitask are more likely associated with executive attention.

some of yall really need to stop visiting /r9k/.

>tfw no kween to nag me to perfection

Not "providing emotional support" as in crying and shit like that, but by essentially weaponizing sex to make men do great things. It's a consistent fact that the wealthiest people on Earth are married.
This is known since the Medieval Ages where men would kill eachother in order to get laid. Women are essentially a motivating force for numerous reasons.
You went on a rant about "muh Chad gets laid on a daily basis and he'l still get cucked and 90% of women fuck 1 guy", what else do you expect?
>even you, the ultra-chad white knight will get cucked so long as she has access to being with somebody better than you. and there are people better than you and i, my friend
True. I'l probably get cucked at some point -- but i'm not deluded enough to not try.
If everyone thought like you, the white race would go extinct in a year.

Attached: fn534535.png (1000x667, 508K)

Even worse, they bring /r9k/ to Sup Forums

Some of "yall" need to stop worshiping weak ass women and grow a pair of testicles. Or are you some bored housewife? In which case fuck right off your kind has never been welcome here.

fpbp

>If you want to save the West, you have to understand how women communicate
Listening to women is what ruined the West to begin with. No thanks.

That's the brilliant part of the book, through -- women whine for the sake of whining. Most of them don't actually want a solution and just want to be listened to.
Problem is, men took their whining seriously. Now, here we are.

Thanks, I was wondering where the second link went, but it took me to some unknown download. But yeah, I thought it was some kind of misled meme.

I've noticed that they'll cuck a chad if the chad himself starts getting 'weak' and losing his whole alpha being. Shit happened to my uncle who's pretty based. 20 years into marriage he started becoming too ''nice'', weak, and slightly Jeb Bush with his wife, and of course then came the pattern of her getting miserable since he was letting her walk on him. Now they're divorced. I think any genuine chad can keep his woman since he was desirable in the first place. It's just that he will need to keep her on her feet otherwise she'll lose interest. And she will challenge at times. All women do.

>Venus
>Penis
Don't, you'll give em' ideas

Read "The Manipulated Man" and "The Polygamous Sex" by Esther Vilar. Much better readings to understand those parasites.

>women criticize to show affection to someone else
Are you taking the piss? Is this book taking the piss? Someone is taking the piss.....

>when women have a problem they tend to prefer to talk about them because talking about eachother's problems is for them a sign of trust, and aren't looking for a solution and just want the person to listen
>aren't looking for a solution
so is this why women never fix things and keep on making the same mistakes over and over again? maybe they should embrace some of that toxic masculinity by:
>they isolate themselves to think about it because fulfilling problems fills them with pride
>only talk about problems with other men in order to get a solution
>get a solution
>a solution

its true. they really do just want to whine. i've gotten into quite a few fights with my wife because of this. then i see her go off and make the damn same stupid mistake again. or worse, make her problem EVEN WORSE because she refuses to figure out a solution to it. just wants to whine, whine, and whine. i get frustrated tremendously by it because if i had something that was irritating me that much, i would want to fucking fix it.

i've gotten to the point now when i just don't try to help her anymore. i actually have been starting to tune her out because its annoying hearing the same shit over and over again.

Attached: 1521755446973.jpg (1024x576, 123K)

underrated post. Notice that women throughout the world always do exactly what they are told. In the Middle East they are told to go around in sweltering heat wearing blankets. And they do. In the West they are told to act like entitled cunts. And they do.

Why the fuck would you post a pic like that around dinnertime?

fpbp

Attached: 1438989520660-0.gif (300x240, 2.87M)

What if this book is wrong? How do I know if it's right?

Personal experience here.
Do you know all the expectation you had when you started your first real relationship, all the romantic stuff, the intimacy, the "soul bonding"?
Those are male expectation.
I met many smart women a many dumb men, and I can easily prove that a conversation betwen men will always be more interesting or intellectual challeging.
>Women don't lack intelligence, they lack vis-a-vis empathy, they are unable to appreciate other's enthusiam/passion about something they are not interested into.
Wanna find a good woman? Go for the silent-kind, they are by FAR the most bearable.

Women are dumb fucking apes.
Scientists have proven the Y chromosome is from the stars.

Attached: original.jpg (400x400, 49K)

I read this and I still hate women, whats your point faggot?
>dont dismiss their feelings
fuck their feelings, they ruined the world

There is no genders, it’s 2018, you’ve offended me.

Attached: 07D6D4ED-33EB-49AB-BB6E-F177936DDA61.jpg (2048x1602, 428K)

I don't like women and it's because I know exactly what they're like.

>Do you know all the expectation you had when you started your first real relationship, all the romantic stuff, the intimacy, the "soul bonding"?
That's what I still have you soul crusher. I want a loyal wife to dedicate myself to fully, love her with all my heart, make and raise children together, being fully dedicated to our task as parents, never lose our good humour, go out together to the church, any place really, because the attraction isn't the place we go to, it's being with her. It's loving her.

Attached: 1499886884143.jpg (619x453, 47K)

If we want to save the west, knowing how women think is irrelevant because saving the west necessarily requires taking all rights away from females

Kek nice bants

I legit just had to turn my phone off (even though I need it for work) because the Mrs is trying to shit test me over txt message while I'm at fucking work.

Women are nuts, they are fuckin nuts.

Attached: 1512429401314.jpg (720x398, 74K)

>women the caretakers whom provide emotional support
False. Women are the leeches and lifesuckers who exist only to propagate the genetic line.

Wow is she trying to test you? Any thought chain behind this? If you answer you're desperate and if you don't you don't care about her?

How*

The solution to the woman problem is to not care what women think, and to think about women as seldom as possible.

You are not supposed to understand women, women are not supposed to understand men. These are the two divine kinds of human, and trying to understand them is like trying to understand God -- it's not going to happen because it is so much above you.

Fulfill your duty as a man, that's it. Thinking and complaining about women is acting like a woman.

AHAHAHA who hurt you user?

That would be turning the West into the Middle East so it would be destroying Western Enlightenment culture.

Women don't communicate /differently/. They communicate /poorly/.

They avoid anything saying or indicating anything that might possibly have a sliver of a chance of causing a conflict. They would rather lie to someone's face (non-maliciously) than say the truth which might be upsetting.

They can't just fucking rip the band-aid off and you have to process whatever they say through a dozen bullshit filters to actually get what you can approximate to have an 80% chance of being the truth.

I don't hate women for the record I just find translating how they talk into human speech to be inconvenient and unnecessary expenditure of energy and time.

Wait...did he...did he really say this?

Please respond user...

I wouldn't say the female strategy is less noble than the male one; they're just different, and often adversarial. The biological male dream is to dominate other men, take a bunch of sex slaves, and make other men work to support them. At best, men are driven to team up and create a tribe where each man is valued based on his contributions; at worst, men become violent murderous thugs. And the female contribution is ideally to be the prize and homemaker, and at its worst, is to drain resources from society and pit men against one another. The roles are different but not morally superior/inferior.

The only way I deal with shit tests is letting them know I'm perfectly content being single and I will soon be single again if I feel like I'm being shit tested. Of course you need to translate 'shit testing' into a format that can be universally understood.

Women are fucking insane, and trying to reason with them is a lost cause.

My wife, love her to fucking death, is as crazy as the rest of them but still more tolerable and stable than any other woman I've known. Here's a regular flow of conversation every few days:

>"LET ME TELL YOU ABOUT THIS PROBLEM I'VE GOT"
>listen
>offer practical solutions
>nothing gets done
>3 days later
>"LET'S TALK ABOUT THAT PROBLEM AGAIN AND YOU CAN OFFER ME SOLUTIONS THAT I WON'T BOTHER DOING BECAUSE IF I SOLVED THE PROBLEM, I COULDN'T STRESS MYSELF OUT DAILY WORRYING ABOUT THIS ANY MORE, I DON'T WANT TO FIX THE ISSUE, I JUST LIKE COMPLAINING ABOUT IT BECAUSE IF I COMPLAIN AND DON'T TAKE ACTION, I CAN STILL BITCH AND PRETEND THIS IS A HUGE HURDLE I WILL STRUGGLE TO OVERCOME AND I CAN FEEL SORRY FOR MYSELF ABOUT THIS UNSOLVED PROBLEM!!!"
>fuggggg

It's gotten to where I've just started saying "I told you what you can do, either do it or stop complaining since you have the solution, you just don't want to do the work." She's not happy with that reply because she knows it's true, but so be it, I can't do the same bullshit any longer with the same 3 complaints.

Attached: 1497590515615.jpg (807x659, 42K)

The natural female sexual strategy should be considered ignoble, that is, if you happen to enjoy having a civilization.

In the state of nature, where we all live in tribes and the most advanced technology is fire, then sure the female mating strategy is understandable.

But if you want running water and skyscrapers then hypergamy simply cannot be omnipresent. Monogamy is civilization.

Patricio o'neal is the only one that really gave me answers and insight:

youtube.com/watch?v=oC_Ih47fUhM