You are all fucking retarded

theregister.co.uk/2018/03/24/security_roundup/

>Guccifer 2.0, turned out, surprise, surprise, to be a Russian intelligence officer, according to a well-source report.

Attached: pepe.png (657x527, 13K)

Other urls found in this thread:

russiamil.wordpress.com/2016/05/10/
youtube.com/watch?
home.treasury.gov/news/press-releases/sm0312
consortiumnews.com/2017/07/24/intel-
archive.is/SIU8D
archive.is/pSjhU
translate.google.com/translate?sl=auto&tl=en&js=y&prev=_t&hl=en&ie=UTF-8&u=https://zachestnyibiznes.ru/company/ul/1037734010555_7734115960_VOENNAYa-AKADEMIYa-MINISTERSTVA-OBORONY-ROSSIYSKOY-FEDERACII&edit-text=&act=url
twitter.com/AnonBabble

>according to a well-source report
the only retard is you, SWEEETY

prove it wrong

it's me..

>here is one of the two russian officials rumored to be pointed toward for acting as the persona known a Guccifer 2.0

Sergei Afanasyev is a senior official at one of Russian's top spy agencies, the Main Intelligence Directorate (GRU).
Russian news agency TASS previously named him as a deputy chief of the Main Intelligence Directorate of the General Staff of the Russian Armed Forces.
GRU, where Afanasyev reportedly works, is one of two Kremlin spy agencies that allegedly sent hackers into the Democratic National Committee's network ahead of the 2016 presidential election.
While Afanasyev is relatively unknown outside of Russia, he apparently attended Russian peace talks for the syrian civil war Astana, Kazakhstan, in February.
It is believed to be his last public appearance, and he spoke via video call.

you are probably reading this for the first time unless you kept a close eye on the diplomats sactioned recently.
>no pictures of 'guccifer' have been shown by the media so far

Attached: guccifer2.0_1.jpg (1366x768, 137K)

here's a clip from: The MCIS 2016 panel on Color Revolutions
>russiamil.wordpress.com/2016/05/10/

from [3:20] onwards
youtube.com/watch?
v=0RM45IKLgZ0&feature=youtu.be

Attached: 4625642.jpg (765x569, 108K)

>prove something wrong that didn’t prove anything from the outset.
You can’t devide zero from zero.

>memeflagstein poster
>(((UK))) media
Gas yourself

Who?

thank you for content friends

This bullshit again? Their source is a fucking anonymous blog. Kys shill

>Russia leaked information
>this means the information was false
Nigger, can you even into logic?

Based undercover Russian poster

transfer rates on the files forensically prove it couldn't have been an external transfer over internet lines. The transfer rates for the files could only possibly be explained by an on location download to a usb drive, disk, or other storage device. Anyone saying that the files were stolen in any way other than an in-person, on-site, local download with the leaker being physically present at the location cannot explain away the transfer rates. Good luck boy-o's.

you are making some sense

home.treasury.gov/news/press-releases/sm0312

the recently sanctioned list here.
ive no idea why you guys cannot pick appart whats here to see why these guys are sanctioned, be it a particular reason that could help relating to someone from the other side. but you fucking cry like you want spoonfed information from god himself when nobody knows who the guy was, inb4 it was
>dnc
>crowdstrike
no proof or reason to call seth rich out as the source on yourself, right? unless they blame these guys, will they aknowledge seth now as the leaker and how did he leak to russian officials?

Attached: 567865.jpg (448x438, 36K)

Who cares when it was really Seth Rich and Guccifer didn't do shit but fake some documents.

he used sources according to text messages we saw. parrots autisticly keep saying that but it doesn't even apply to this

does pompeo even consider this to be a valid theory?

That was done by Bill Binney (He built the predecessor to PRISM, Thin-thread(It encrypted all US comms)) and a variety of other current/ex NSA employees. They know their shit.

Wow didn't see that one coming

>I am a former NSA Exec & didn’t sign this VIPS memo due to significant analytic, sourcing, data, date & tech issues

consortiumnews.com/2017/07/24/intel-
vets-challenge-russia-hack-evidence/

Attached: 443443.jpg (725x577, 119K)

full cap
archive.is/SIU8D

Attached: 64326435.jpg (793x2969, 540K)

imagine being this fucking dense

>professional entities would have access to that kind of bandwidth.
>Even if they didn't, there's no evidence the transfer was done at the point the files were supposed to have been sent over the internet. Rather, perhaps it happened when the hacker moved the information from one computer to another within the DNC network or from one computer to another in the hacker's own network after the theft -- both of which are common techniques.
-cybersecurity researcher Robert Graham
archive.is/pSjhU

> Grigory Molchanov the second person rumoured to be sanctioned over guccifer 2.0
translate.google.com/translate?sl=auto&tl=en&js=y&prev=_t&hl=en&ie=UTF-8&u=https://zachestnyibiznes.ru/company/ul/1037734010555_7734115960_VOENNAYa-AKADEMIYa-MINISTERSTVA-OBORONY-ROSSIYSKOY-FEDERACII&edit-text=&act=url

Attached: 684864864.jpg (449x287, 36K)