Why are arabs so bad in warfare?

Why are arabs so bad in warfare?

Why do arab soldiers always lose?

Attached: ARABSOLDIERS.jpg (650x366, 53K)

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=cZk4Yu42g0I
meforum.org/articles/other/why-arabs-lose-wars
youtu.be/cZk4Yu42g0I
youtube.com/watch?v=Wcze7EGorOk
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

Low IQ

Islam stunted their technological growth, thus giving foreign powers the military advantage for the foreseeable future.

Good video on the subject:

youtube.com/watch?v=cZk4Yu42g0I

Attached: hqdefault.jpg (480x360, 29K)

Certainly not a lack of bravery. That whole areas seems like such a clusterfuck.

meforum.org/articles/other/why-arabs-lose-wars

Like Jews, Arabs are inbred on an immense scale.

completely and utterly different to arabs faggot read

We're even better at warfare than fucking your girlfriends while you're at work

Attached: 4L_8x2dkl2r.png (604x416, 234K)

They competed pretty well with Europe for a long time. Then guns happened.

Arabs are proficient at kicking the dog while it’s down:
Women
Fags
Bestiality
Child wives

They do not have a history of conquering hardship like the glorious white man, they have a history of oppression and slavery, far worse than anything the whites have ever done and for much longer. They are savage, but they are basic. This is why their IQ is so low and why they lose every fair fight. Weak.

Bravery wins fights, not wars. Besides I don't know if bravery is the right word because I've never seen an arab fight anyone 1v1.

Self before family. Family before clan. Clan before tribe. Tribe before nation.
So they are not motivated to fight beyond local militia.
Plus the low IQ part also.

Bad/rushed training
Low moral
Middle East is a nightmare, when it comes to environment

Is it true they believe Allah guides their bullets?

why do you fucking idiots spout meaningless bullshit all day

>In contrast to the usual manner of European warfare which he terms "face to face," Keegan depicts the early Arab armies in the Islamic era as masters of evasion, delay, and indirection.12 Examining Arab warfare in this century leads to the conclusion that Arabs remain more successful in insurgent, or political warfare13—what T. E. Lawrence termed "winning wars without battles."

>Training tends to be unimaginative, cut and dried, and not challenging. Because the Arab educational system is predicated on rote memorization, officers have a phenomenal ability to commit vast amounts of knowledge to memory. The learning system tends to consist of on-high lectures, with students taking voluminous notes and being examined on what they were told. (It also has interesting implications for foreign instructors; for example, his credibility is diminished if he must resort to a book.) The emphasis on memorization has a price, and that is in diminished ability to reason or engage in analysis based upon general principles. Thinking outside the box is not encouraged; doing so in public can damage a career. Instructors are not challenged and neither, in the end, are students.

>Arab junior officers are well trained on the technical aspects of their weapons and tactical know-how, but not in leadership, a subject given little attention. For example, as General Sa'd ash-Shazli, the Egyptian chief of staff, noted in his assessment of the army he inherited prior to the 1973 war, they were not trained to seize the initiative or volunteer original concepts or new ideas.20 Indeed, leadership may be the greatest weakness of Arab training systems. This problem results from two main factors: a highly accentuated class system bordering on a caste system, and lack of a non-commissioned-officer development program.

also tribalism vs state identity

Arabs arent very motivated when they are fighting for some corrupt local government. But when fighting for Islam, they can be very motivated.

for ISIS, alnusra and other american sponsored terrorists, yes, it is true

Dictatorships have to neuter their militaries to avoid coups

Because none of them trust each other. Military commanders are not given very much information or authority by their superiors, and information is rarely communicated between commanders. Meanwhile everyone in their armies are corrupt, which in a military force is terrible because it gets in the way of them following orders.

It might be changing now though. Continuous war is forcing these armies to adapt.

Is that a Sam joke or what?

finally a post that wasn't brainless

Isnt that also a general asian education problem?

This never happen. They fight for the bounty, the rape and the freedom to play with civilians.

Dictators are afraid of being overthrown by their own military. That's why they keep it weak on purpose.
That comes at the cost of sucking at warfare. It's enough to keep the populace under control but not enough to win wars.

watch this: youtu.be/cZk4Yu42g0I

> Keegan depicts the early Arab armies in the Islamic era as masters of evasion, delay, and indirection.1
taqiyya warfare

Cause they're so ready to die for Allah!
In war you're not suppose to be ready to die, you're suppose to be ready to FUCKING WIN!

see

read it and come to you own conclusions it was a good article. in mentioning china, culturally province matters but they don't identify as anything other than chinese.

Get out of my country you reject, also don't pretend like you're not a virgin.

FPBP

You could say that, but you can also see that Asian armies have been very effective because of high morale and dedication coming usually from an ideology motivating them towards self-sacrifice, which can help them take the initiative.

In both Afghanistan, Iraq, and Syria the most effective armies until they were worn down or beaten by Western intervention were those who were dominated by an ideology - the hardcore Islamist groups. The Taliban didn't rule Afghanistan unopposed, they just had very inefficient opposition.

Thanks mate, same to you.

>Why are arabs so bad in warfare?

Just one of many questions

youtube.com/watch?v=Wcze7EGorOk

This. Imagine America lasts another 200 years and our divisions increase. They'll fight like hell for their village, but then if they win, and another clan in the same village pisses them off, they start all over again with their neighbors.

When did that every happen. The only time they set foot on Europe was in Iberia over a millenium ago, once they went deeper into heartland Europe (South-France) they got their asses handed to them.

no gengis khan happened

No decent woman ever would be in a relationship with an arab. You are universally despised, cockroach.
even niggers are cucking you lmao, they fuck your sisters.
only white trash low iq beta women are engaged with sandniggers

This. You could arm a bunch of baboons and they wouldn't be good at fighting either. War is unironically a white man's sport.

>then guns happened
The Arabs and Ottomans both had guns, and Oman was inflicting defeats on the Portugese while the Ottomans dominated the Balkans barely over a hundred years ago. If you want to say that the north Africans are Arabs then the hundreds of thousands of Europeans they were enslaving were showing pretty solidly that they weren't being so soundly beaten.

Did you learn history from video games?

First, Tours is in Northern France. Second, it depends what you consider to be Europe.

>low iq low iq low iq hurr
if you have no fucking idea what you're talking about don't post.

the election killed this board. i'm sick of reading americans repeat themselves over and over again, same words same posts every fucking day.

Attached: 1515859585061.jpg (645x729, 81K)

The average IQ for arabs is around 85 to 90. Same as Mexicans. They're fucking retarted.

I've wondered this too
Why are arabs so bad at warfare? Even if they had the same gear as the Americans they'd still be absolutely shit at war
Why is this?

Poor mid level officers, lack of flexibility, lack of innovation.

>Why are arabs so bad at warfare
Arab dictators practice nepotism when selecting their military commanders because of an insurrection fear.

And the US army is 60% Mexicans and negroids? What is your point?

All Arabs are inbred. The enemy simply raises a banner displaying a nude image of their sand nigger mother or aunt (both) and they fall into the fetal position and start beating off until they die.

60%

>Islam stunted their technological growth
no, it was literally mongol invaders. look up the sack of baghdad

youtu.be/cZk4Yu42g0I

Very insightful and enjoyable look into this phenomena.

You know now that you mention it neither have I. Hmm.

Poor leadership and teamwork on all levels, their military is all show and no force aka they don't know how to utilize their equipment, and their low IQ is the leading factor swirling this whole pot.

Attached: 1499043322732.jpg (657x710, 139K)

They were shit at war before Islam.

they just need competent leadership. look what iran managed to do with a poor arab milita

Attached: bintjbeil.png (313x936, 104K)

This

>Islam is limited to the middle east
Retard

thread is about arabs, friendo.

Arab militaries are still structured like they were in the Middle Ages. Arab’s fight like its 1200 AD. This alone is almost the sole reason Arab armies are shit.

Accurate
They don’t promote based on merit

Nepotism + little squad level autonomy + genetic history of tribal skirmishing

Zealous perhaps?

Oy where is your breething licence mate ?

Attached: 1521991955700.jpg (375x500, 41K)

This.

>9/11/2001
>US still at war to this day with goat herders
>Arabs always lose

Righto.

No social cohesion, no unit cohesion. They are all liars and thieves to anyone outside their own families and frequently treat family members poorly. They just don't trust or care for each other. corruption also means they are usually led by imbeciles and not qualified officers.

Top-down feudal hierarchy based on fear, not courage

Alot of retards in this thread, just a reminder than arab armies defeated numerically superior byzantine armies and numerically superior sassanid armies after mohammeds death.

usa lost to arabs in iraq since 2003
israel lost to arabs in lebanon in 2006

t. 2015 "old fag"

Did they always have a low IQ or is that recent? Cause i see arabic race have accomplished a lot in the past (persian empire, mesopotamia, ottoman empire, sumer, egypt)

inbreeding
hard to recover from islam

As a result from thousands of years of systemic inbreeding.

Also: meforum.org/articles/other/why-arabs-lose-wars

Attached: I9H4LNC_d(2).jpg (640x368, 29K)

watching this video made me realise china would be crushed in a war with the US.

All the problems of the arabs, the chinese have too

Levantine aren't Arab. We peninsular arab would never lose a war. Look at the area of our Umyyad caliphate.

So? The iq of the leader is all that matters. Niggers are obviously #1 in all around athletics. Mexicans are short but strong, smaller targets and have dog like obedience to whoever keeps them fed.

So yeah go ahead and either take on the 6'2 silverback gorilla who can run for miles, the 5'7 220 lb beaner that can work for days without fatigue, lead them with the charisma and the honor of the white man and give him technology developed by the Asians and Indians and fuel it with the oil we plundered from all the other fairy fuck countries and THEN tell me that your cock squad of soyboys could even stand in the shadow of the American Eagle

>arabs so bad in warfare
>posts Iranian soldiers
Retard.

Also pic related. Modern jewery is hardly warfare.

Attached: 45e78fff66aa33303a3fac6f58c74971.jpg (400x273, 28K)

The West lost to Turkey in Gallipoli despite outnumbering them as well.

This whole nonsense that Arabs lose wars is because of Israel and the Six Day War, which IMO they didn't really lose for three reasons:

1. Lack of unity
Only Egypt and Syria actually fought in this war the rest of the Arab countries didn't want to put resources into this war

2. US involvment
Egypt especially did not want to fight a war with the US, the US was not only supplying Israel with training and weapons but also there has been numerous claims by Egyptian soldiers themselves that US soldiers were involved in this war.

3. Samson Option
Even if Egypt was able to win the war it would probably get nuked, when this was found out it wasn't really feasible to keep pushing for the war.

In the end Egypt made huge gains they gained back the Sinai and are given billions of dollars a year to just acknowledge the existence of Israel, if anything they probably won the war.

Attached: 9540-trtworld-321934-359020_0.jpg (960x540, 119K)

Trips of truth

it's complicated but at the end of the day everyone wants to be "important" thus crippling the group as a whole since everyone wants to be the "important" guy in town

arabs are basically trash no morals honor or anything remotley usefull in them

They’re too busy killing Infadel civilians to kill each other.