Why do white conservatives aka the people who never gave a shit about blacks, hate abortion when its mostly black babies getting aborted? Seems counter productive to their cause.
Why do white conservatives aka the people who never gave a shit about blacks...
Connor Hernandez
Other urls found in this thread:
youtube.com
researchgate.net
jhered.oxfordjournals.org
tau.ac.il
nature.com
rspb.royalsocietypublishing.org
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
onlinelibrary.wiley.com
onlinelibrary.wiley.com
digitalcommons.unl.edu
journals.plos.org
jstor.org
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
citeseerx.ist.psu.edu
sociology.as.nyu.edu
collegium.hrvatsko-antropolosko-drustvo.hr
onlinelibrary.wiley.com
lesacreduprintemps19.files.wordpress.com
onlinelibrary.wiley.com
bio.miami.edu
pnas.org
science.sciencemag.org
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
mbe.oxfordjournals.org
researchgate.net
uff.br
eebweb.arizona.edu
jstor.org
bearproject.info
eebweb.arizona.edu
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
researchgate.net
researchgate.net
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
mbe.library.arizona.edu
onlinelibrary.wiley.com
research.amnh.org
jhered.oxfordjournals.org
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
sciencedirect.com
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
people.virginia.edu
isites.harvard.edu
webspace.pugetsound.edu
atavisionary.com
sciencedirect.com
sciencedirect.com
sciencedirect.com
twitter.com
Gabriel Richardson
I don't. Abortion is the only thing keeping the inner city population from exploding.
Leo Edwards
Why do Democrats, who pretend to give a shit about blacks, love abortion and black genocide advocates like Margarete Sanger, who was one of Clinton's heroes?
Connor Turner
Most white conservatives(hicks) are as poor as blacks living in the hood. Wveb though they are two sides of the same coin, poor whites like to maintain the narrative they are superior to poor blacks.
The idea of blacks aborting out the undesirables that make them the permanent underclass scares poor whites. If the majority of blacks move to middle class, that means poor whites are on the bottom of the totem pole. If there are no black bodies committing crimes to feed the prison industrial complex, law enforcement will turn their eyes to the hicks committing crimes.
Julian Price
Abortion should just matter to the person doing the choice, doing anything to prevent the person choosing is fucking unnecessary.
Asher Richardson
>Implying Democrats ever cared about blacks
Michael Foster
The redefining of humanity and murder via Marxist moral subjectivity.
Zachary Wright
its a moral issue. not a fan of killing babies. people are aborting instead of using contraceptives in many cases which isn't a healthy approach. its because theyre too lazy to take care of themselves. and its not just blacks doing it even though they might be the majority. most conservatives want people to have some personal responsibility and accountability. there is the awkward issue of rape induced pregnancy but i think you will find most people sympathetic to morningafter pills under certain circumstances instead of abortion in later term.
people need to start making better life choices and i bet they would be more apt to wrap it if there was no abortion option. we shouldn't be using abortion as a crutch to mitigate the issues of a sex-crazy society. sex is being sold everywhere and advertised to everyone ad nauseum fueling the fire.
abortion isnt a solution. its an immoral bandaid.
Daniel Wright
Because cuckservatives are retarded
Jack Long
Poor whites are superior to poor blacks, you utter retard. There is a SAT score table floating around that proves that whites from households under 20k /yr income still score higher than blacks from households with over 100k / yr income. Take your race-denying betrayal back to plebbit and and Rabbipedia
Jeremiah Jackson
Yeah I’m sure that table is 100% legit, not biased, and doesn’t have extenuating factors like sample size obscuring the numbers.
Dylan Taylor
>t.poor hick
Jeremiah Garcia
you mean this one?
Nathaniel Ward
>Why do white conservatives aka the people who never gave a shit about blacks
this tired old meme
KYS shill faggot
Jordan Flores
It was white liberals who freed the slaves while white conservatives opposed them. It was white liberals who championed Civil Rights while white conservatives opposed it.
Cooper Gonzalez
civil rights were a disaster for blacks. actually even being freed was probably a mistake
Easton Morgan
Desegregation + welfare actually fucked up their families.
The same thing happened after apartheid in South Africa, crime skyrocketed.
Segregation and homogeneity + traditionalism is what kept the nigs more obedient.
Kevin Collins
here's anudda (pic related)
typical leftist just disregards facts, statistics, sources, and evidence that doesn't agree with his brainwashed worldview. how about presenting some data of your own, sweetie. if not then shut up, adults are talking.
the poor hicks perform better than rich niggers
Jaxon Ramirez
>civil rights were a disaster for blacks
>Desegregation + welfare actually fucked up their families.
these are correct
Ryder Hernandez
Why do blacks who never give a shit about whites give a fuck about gun violence when it's mostly white kids getting killed? Seems counter productive if they're wanting to be the majority.
Carter Williams
>give a fuck about gun violence when it's mostly white kids getting killed?
oh sweetie...
Leo Rivera
>Lol I can post Sup Forums infographs! I’m so smart! Facts! Xd kek
Jordan Morris
notice how the leftist is completely unable to handle sourced facts and statistics but rather resorts to babyshit-tier logical fallacies and emotional non-arguments.
Brandon Hughes
do you have any stats or arguments to contribute to the discussion or are you just going to continue doing this?
Aaron Powell
>Leftist!
This seems to be a common occurrence for you when you argue with so called leftists. Have you ever considered nobody wants to debate your autism? It’s easy to post a biased infograph. How about using actual arguments?
David Brown
A lot of us support building clinics in inner cities. Nogs abort their spawn and white women won't go anywhere near them
Landon Martin
Do you have anything that isn’t an info graph you found on an Alt Right site? I’m not going to argue with you anyway but you’re doing a poor job.
Jackson Turner
I have no problem with black abortion.
Anyone who does probably hates white people.
Thomas Hernandez
the sources of the original studies are given. feel free to read through it and point out the bias. simply because the studies were posted to a site you don't like doesn't invalidate them, sweetheart.
Wyatt Robinson
You didn’t answer my question sweetie.
Carson Johnson
... so if i were to post a study on rayleigh scattering and how it causes the sky to look blue it would be invalid simply because i posted it here? please think before you post
Nathaniel Davis
you didn't point out the bias. you are simply using a variation of the genetic fallacy even though pol is not the source of this data. are you going to read through the studies and point out the biases which you so adamantly claim are there?
Charles Hall
>Do you have anything that isn’t an info graph you found on an Alt Right site?
...and, anyway, to answer your question: yes. I made a bunch of these infographs myself from my own research. Pic related and the following link is one such example:
Now, can we please move on to where you qualify your criticisms of bias?
Elijah Ross
I know this may be hard for children to understand but in academia, you have to fork your arguments and cite sources to back them up instead of just copying and pasting sources and calling it a day. If you yourself can’t prove your position correct then I have no reason to debate you.
Also
>Genetic fallacy
Lol. Who taught you that phrase, son?
Landon Gonzalez
>That pic
Biology is hard huh?
Jace Moore
You are not adressing anything of substance, and that was the most clear cut case of genetic fallacy I have seen on this site."it's made by a rightwing person therefor the infograph is invalid"
Tell me where that isn't what you you did
Benjamin White
Still not seeing an argument
Luis Davis
i see you are just attempting to derail the thread into nonsensical non-arguments. this is a typical tactic you guys use to attempt to stop people from posting sourced facts and statistics. additionally, you are obviously incapable of presenting any sources, facts, or statistics to support your own claim. thus, i am ignoring you and am going to continue dropping my own sourced facts and statistics. feel free to continue to criticize with obvious and elementary logical fallacies. you're helping my cause more than you think because you're showing the lurkers and newfags how stupid you leftists really are
he's just trying to derail the thread. ignore him.
Julian James
fact: niggers cannot blame socioeconomic status for crime
Aiden Bailey
I argued that you were being fallacious in your arguments. Looks like I won. Bye
Nicholas Powell
fact: black males aged 16-35 constitute about 5-6% of the US population but commit over half of all violent crime
Noah Cooper
>More infographs
Kek. Yes keep indulging in your autism. I’ll keep laughing.
Jackson Roberts
Because it’s not about race, it’s about not killing babies you dumbass
Eli Thomas
So no argument huh
Charles Bennett
fact: when the south african niggers drive the white farmers out they will be unable to keep the farms going, themselves, and will starve.
Jayden Sullivan
we don't want to have niggers in our cosmetics
Thomas Lee
Giving a shit about blacks would mean supporting abortion. No one wants another unwanted inner city child to grow up in an underprivileged household, whether you’re “liberal” or “conservative”.
He’ll likely cause trouble and be a taxpayer burden...there’s literally no reason to oppose abortion up to 2nd trimester
Anthony Edwards
fact: niggers pay almost no taxes yet enjoy all the benefits of
Dominic Kelly
>the democrats are the REAL racists!
Lincoln Martin
fact: anywhere niggers live turns into an abject shithole
Adam Torres
These women actually look like real human beings, some compassion and humor in their eyes.
Adrian Brooks
>the democrats are the REAL racists!
this is true
Ethan Hughes
Were the only ones who care about blacks. You think the democrats care about you? Why? Because they give you free money and use you as political pawns to push their agenda through? Democrats want to keep blacks poor and stupid, because as soon as they’re not they vote R. And you’re stupid enough to let them keep doing it.
Caleb Cooper
Abortion was invented because the US couldn't send the blackies back to Africa. That's why Planned Parenthood gets so much money - to keep them from overrunning the country.
Jeremiah Jones
Still not seeing an argument. Sad!
Jace Nguyen
fact: when blacks commit mass shootings the media ignores it. remember this one? didn't think so.
Jeremiah Rogers
Sup Forums doesn't, and that's the only thing that matters. Sup Forums is always right. Everyone else is usually wrong.
Connor Myers
fact: the most powerful predictor of crime in an area is percentage of niggers--not poverty, not social status, not education. niggers.
Hunter Hernandez
fact: sheboons are so disgusting that literally 0 white men bother to rape them
Leo Morgan
>why are you against murder?
Jose Bennett
All low IQ people need to be gassed.
I don't care if they are black or white.
Just because blacks tend to be dumber on average doesn't mean that we should do nothing about the low IQ white problem. Low IQ white propagation is a a bigger problem than miscegenation. Low IQ is the dominant gene. Once it's introduced, you can't go back.
The Eugenicists of the 20th century were speaking of not just limiting miscegenation, which wasn't even a statistical issue back then, but limiting breeding within the white race to prevent the spread of existing inferior traits.
Colton Anderson
"Not an argument" is not an argument.
James Wood
Brody Roberts
fact: IQ is largely genetic
Ayden Scott
>instead of just copying and pasting sources and calling it a day.
That's actually exactly what 90 % of papers are, and what they're expected to be. You don't need to prove anything, if someone else has already proven it. In fact, it'd be frowned upon to do so. You are to cite them and give them credit for it. We build upon what others have already built. Nobody starts from scratch.
Adrian Reyes
>Biology is hard huh?
(1997) Barbujani et. al., find a human genetic distance of ,155. There are no recognized subspecies.
jhered.oxfordjournals.org
(2001) Kim et. al., find an Asian dog genetic distance of ,154. There are eleven recognized subspecies.
tau.ac.il
(1994) Roy et. al., find a North American coyote genetic distance of ,107. There are nineteen recognized subspecies.
nature.com
(2002) Schwartz et. al., find a Canadian lynx genetic distance of ,033. There are three recognized subspecies.
rspb.royalsocietypublishing.org
(2014) Jackson et. al., find a humpback whale genetic distance of ,12. There are three recognized subspecies.
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
(2008) Lorenzen, Arctander & Siegismund find a plains zebra genetic distance of ,11. There are five recognized subspecies.
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
(2003) Pierpaoli et. al., find a European wildcat genetic distance of ,11. There are three recognized subspecies and five biogeographic groups according to (Mattucci et. al., 2016).
onlinelibrary.wiley.com
(2007) Lorenzen et. al., find a Kob antelope genetic distance of ,11. There are two to three recognized subspecies.
onlinelibrary.wiley.com
(2003) Jordana et. al., find a south European beef cattle genetic distance of ,068. There are eighteen recognized subspecies.
digitalcommons.unl.edu
James Butler
(2004) Williams et. al., find a red winged blackbird genetic distance of ,01. There are twenty-two recognized subspecies.
journals.plos.org
jstor.org
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
citeseerx.ist.psu.edu
sociology.as.nyu.edu
collegium.hrvatsko-antropolosko-drustvo.hr
onlinelibrary.wiley.com
onlinelibrary.wiley.com
bio.miami.edu
pnas.org
science.sciencemag.org
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
digitalcommons.unl.edu
tau.ac.il
(1997) Wise et. al., show that the genetic variability within humans is 0,776. There are zero recognized human subspecies.
Christian Richardson
(1997) Wise et. al., find a chimpanzee genetic variability of ,63. There are four recognized subspecies.
(2001) Uphyrkina et. al., find a leopard genetic variability of ,58. There are thirteen recognized subspecies.
(2001) Eizirik et. al., find a jaguar genetic variability of ,739. There are nine recognized subspecies.
eebweb.arizona.edu
(2000) Culver et. al., find a puma genetic variability of ,52. There are six recognized subspecies.
nature.com
(2002) Schwartz et. al., find a Canadian lynx genetic variability of ,66. There are three recognized subspecies.
jstor.org
(1998) Paetkau et. al., find a North American brown bear genetic variability of ,5275. There are nineteen recognized subspecies.
bearproject.info
(2000) Waits et. al., find a Scandinavian brown bear genetic variability of ,687. There are nineteen recognized subspecies.
eebweb.arizona.edu
(1996) Garcia-Moreno et. al., find a coyote genetic variability of ,629. There are nineteen recognized subspecies. They further find a Gray wolf genetic variability of ,574. There are thirty-seven recognized subspecies.
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
(2001) Girman et. al., find an African wild dog genetic variability of ,643. There are five recognized subspecies.
Wyatt Fisher
(2001) Kyle & Strobeck find a North American wolverine genetic variability of ,55. There are two to three recognized subspecies.
(2001) Walker et. al., find a Scandinavian wolverine genetic variability of ,325. There are three recognized subspecies.
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
(2000) Polziehn et. al., find an elk genetic variability of ,395. There are seven to eight recognized subspecies.
mbe.library.arizona.edu
(1995) Forbes et. al., find a bighorn sheep genetic variability of ,6235. There are three recognized subspecies.
onlinelibrary.wiley.com
(2000) Reinartz et. al., find a bonobo genetic variability of ,535. There is one subspecies.
research.amnh.org
(1999) Paetkau et. al., find a polar bear genetic variability of ,68. There is one subspecies.
jhered.oxfordjournals.org
(1999) Wilton, Steward & Zafiris find an Australian dingo genetic variability of ,445. There is one recognized subspecies.
eebweb.arizona.edu
(1996) Garcia-Moreno et. al., find a domesticated dog genetic variability of ,5085. There is one recognized subspecies, and there are many breeds.
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Isaac Johnson
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
sciencedirect.com
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
people.virginia.edu
(2000) Turkheimer presents his Three Laws of Behavioral Genetics and explains their meaning.
Turkheimer begins by stating, "The nature-nurture debate is over. The bottom line is that everything is heritable, an outcome that has taken all sides of the naturenurture debate by surprise. Irving Gottesman and I have suggested that the universal influence of genes on behavior be enshrined as the first law of behavior genetics (Turkheimer & Gottesman, 1991), and at the risk of naming laws that I can take no credit for discovering, it is worth stating the nearly unanimous results of behavior genetics in a more formal manner."
The Three Laws are as follows:
? First Law. All human behavioral traits are heritable.
? Second Law. The effect of being raised in the same family is smaller than the effect of genes.
? Third Law. A substantial portion of the variation in complex human behavioral traits is not accounted for by the effects of genes or families.
In short: no one is born tabula rasa.
isites.harvard.edu
(2005) Philippe Rushton and Arthur Jensen (author of, "The g Factor") conclude that IQ is the greatest indicator of future success in Western societies when inter-generational income dependence is accounted for.
They also found that IQ is at least 50% heritable and likely nearer to 80% heritable. To draw comparison, height is 70-90% heritable.
During their analysis they concluded that Whites have a minimum of 75% IQ heritability.
webspace.pugetsound.edu
Evan Martin
You're doing the shills work for him, if you just spam stuff nobody is going to read.
Isaac Johnson
>That autist got baited into spamming a bunch of infographs nobody will read
Precious time that could have been spent getting laid or something. This is why you’re losing the culture war.
Jeremiah Allen
(2004) Plomin & Spinath discuss intelligence in the wider context of genetics, genes, and genomics.
Their discussion is multi-faceted; their analysis illustrates proof of the genetic heritability of intelligence, the immense weakness of environmental explanations for intelligence, changes in heritability during development, a multivariate analysis of IQ and various testing metrics, gene expression profiling, and genomics.
This is an excellent compilatory piece.
sciencedirect.com
(2009) Rushton & Jensen refute erroneous claims made about the nature of the Flynn Effect and its relationship with the Black-White IQ gap.
In their conclusions they state, "We conclude that predictions about the Black–White IQ gap narrowing as a result of the secular rise are unsupported. The (mostly heritable) cause of the one is not the (mostly environmental) cause of the other. The Flynn Effect (the secular rise in IQ) is not a Jensen Effect (because it does not occur on g)."
sciencedirect.com
(2001) Rushton & Rushton show evidence for racial-group differences in the form of brain size and structure, IQ, and musculoskeletal trait variation.
Their analysis shows significant variation in both the structure and sizes of the brains of Negroids, Caucasoids, and East-Asians. In addition to this, they have found differences in the skull shapes and structures of the races, alongside differences in average height and weight and all parts of the bone and muscle structures from the neck to the feet.
sciencedirect.com
(2007) Shatz analyzes the relationship between IQ and fertility.
Thomas Young
christcucks are retarded
Evan Lopez
They find that IQ is negatively associated with total fertility rate, birth rate, and population growth rate. This means that higher IQ populations are less fertile than lower IQ populations.
sciencedirect.com
(2013) Michael Woodley, Jan Nijenhuis, and Raegan Murphy conclude that Western IQs have declined by an average of 1,6 points per decade since the Victorian Era.
Higher IQ people are more productive, healthier, and are more creative. The reduction in IQs across the West has been met with a marked decrease in average productivity and general health despite vast increases in average wealth, nutrition and access to healthcare.
The cumulative reduction in IQ is between 12,45 and 13,35 points or roughly one standard deviation on a normal IQ bell curve. This represents an eight-fold reduction in the number of geniuses and a counter to the Flynn Effect.
The resultant decrease in IQ is attributed to dysgenics in the form of outbreeding and negative mate selection within populations. The importation of migrants of different races and ethnicities preempts the outbreeding and subsequent loss in IQ. This effect has sped up as migration has increased.
Mason Jenkins
being principled means following those principles consistently even when it is inconvenient to your interests.
Abortion is killing innocent human beings.
Joshua Butler
>You're doing the shills work for him
I disagree. As I said before, he is only hurting his own cause by trying to use elementary fallacies and deflection here as I believe the lurkers and newfags can see through it. I want him and others like him to continue with their shilling. One reason people come here is because this information is banned on most other websites and it gets their thinkers thinking.
Bentley Wood
>Abortion is killing innocent human beings.
agreed except for then you're aborting niggers. i have already thoroughly demonstrated that niggers are not human
Caleb Rogers
im actually reading some of it. funny how real people click links. try it sometime instead of adding absolutely nothing of value.
keep it up
Nolan Russell
Literally apples and oranges.
Murder is illegal extrajudicial killing of a private citizen by another private citizen, usually committed because of high criminality and low IQ.
State sanctioned prevention or euthanasia of undesirables is an entirely different issue. It clearly is not murder.
Are we clear?
Levi Scott
Why should we care about murder since they commit the most?
Xavier Hall
>They find that IQ is negatively associated with total fertility rate, birth rate, and population growth rate. This means that higher IQ populations are less fertile than lower IQ populations.
It's not really the IQ that is the problem. It's education. A smart woman is capable of going to a university, and so she will. She will study until she is a doctor of whatever at 25, and then she will work for a couple of years. And the first time she's even starting to think about relationships and babies is when she's thirty.
Of course, she can't take just any man, since she's a highly qualified professional. She should be extremely attractive, since she has studied all her life and she's super smart. But for some reason all she attracts is slobs and failures. Where have all the good men gone?
The problem is not that smart people don't breed. The problem is that we expect smart women to have careers. If women weren't in the workplace, I guarantee that the smartest people would breed more successfully than stupid people.
Joshua Barnes
>keep it up
i know in my heart that for every one lurker that posts like you there are 1,000 more silently reading
Jason Hall
very interesting points here thank you for bringing them up
Andrew Wright
And you'd be absolutely wrong. Practically nobody reads spam. If you give a good reason, many will open a single link. Even that guy, who is trying to virtue signal on an anonymous forum won't be reading more than one. And even then he will only glance through it.
Jack Peterson
Because we're humans.
Justin Campbell
then --> when*
Angel Edwards
i lurk almost every day, but i travel all day so WiFi is iffy for phone posting. screenshots and infographs are good because i can save them for later review.
sometimes i see new ones and that makes it worthwhile.
Ethan Harris
>And you'd be absolutely wrong. Practically nobody reads spam
i saved the links because i read them. not everyone is intellectually lazy. we'll have to agree to disagree on this point, friend. i will dump that list of sources whenever someone challenges my previous picture and source about how niggers are genetically distant enough to be described as a separate subspecies
Jason Adams
>everything that challenges my world view is biased or data poisoned
fuck off you quintessential leftist, sources are almost always included in pol infographics
Owen Watson
if infographics in a pol thread are where you're gonna draw the line then maybe you ought to look for another forum?
Owen Thomas
Because the conservative movement is reactionary, and have been loosing the culture war for more than a 100 years at this point.
Gabriel Roberts
stop replying to shills. he stopped posting after people started ignoring him.
Zachary Clark
>not everyone is intellectually lazy.
I disagree. Not only is everyone intellectually lazy, but everyone is thoroughly lazy in all aspects. If an organism doesn't have a good reason to expend energy, it probably won't. And thinking is hard work. Anyone who works doing mental work knows that people do it only a few hours a day, even if they stay eight hours at the work place.
Laziness is precisely why infographics and memes are so popular. They are readily available and easy to digest. No need to spend any energy to learn or 'learn'. I'm sure there are some legitimate autists, who actually would read the stuff you spam, but those people are probably already redpilled and know the stuff. Then, you'd be preaching to the choir even in the best case.
Brandon Nelson
>there are some legitimate autists, who actually would read the stuff you spam
all it takes is that 1-2% to digest and make more infographs and spread the word, brother.
either way, i will continue spamming. i acknowledge your viewpoint, and i even say that it is thought-out and useful. you do you and i'll do me, brother
Ian Perry
The video title is better than the thread itself
Hunter Morris
even if the intent is the same, it needs to be distributed in different forms. there is no propaganda that works on everyone the same way.
i recommend reading the essay "from the Ivory tower to the privy wall" by George Rockwell for an informative breakdown of this subject.
Nicholas Gonzalez
>that filename
The absolute mad man really went innawoods.
Blake Murphy
>i recommend reading the essay "from the Ivory tower to the privy wall" by George Rockwell for an informative breakdown of this subject.
i don't have time now but this one is added to the list and i will read it when i get the time. thanks, mate.
John Cox
BECAUSE IT IS KIKES PUSHING THIS