Why is it so hard to convince people that there exist objective beauty standards?

Why is it so hard to convince people that there exist objective beauty standards?

Attached: 2115331.png (1257x620, 1.18M)

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=rKhlFic_A5A
stepfeed.com/dna-analysis-proves-arabs-aren-t-entirely-arab-4864
genographic.nationalgeographic.com/reference-populations-next-gen/
twitter.com/AnonBabble

The fact that (((they))) have to push "black is beautiful" narrative speaks volumes imo. If niggers were truly beautiful, they wouldn't need to push the narrative.

Attached: 1509043769594.jpg (750x550, 80K)

>Why is it so hard to convince people that regardless they should come together

oh wait - it isn't that hard (well something is hard tho ;))

Attached: 1428608950897.jpg (1803x1442, 561K)

Somebody, please, post ugly mixed race children compilations, i lost mine.

Attached: 1509785433382.jpg (500x417, 79K)

White roasties and feminists are threatened by it

Attached: 1522207098675.jpg (768x960, 133K)

good thing that nobody actually likes niggers, propaganda dont work really well.

Attached: racemixing.jpg (766x596, 210K)

People just have the ability to do mental gymnastics to deny reality. They recognize objective beauty but convince themselves that everything is beautiful.

i need toddlers compilation, saw one multiple times.

Attached: 1519496899448.jpg (474x750, 77K)

Disney

It's working dude, it's only on the internet that people talk about this stuff, race mixing is considered a virtue in the liberal West, especially in USA. They have brainwashed women with things like "once you go black you never go back" , Hollywood and porn constantly pushing interracial marriages. They want a global mixed population which is rootless so they can reconstruct their loyalties in their image, make us all beholden to the religion of consumerism. It's frightening.

Attached: 1520961033310.jpg (536x799, 68K)

It is only the retards who live in cities and voted for Hillary who get confused. Check ‘em. Just search any Hillary voter image. Confused retards.

Because kikes hate objectively beautiful things as they are so twisted. So they pushed that everyone is beautiful fat is beautiful everything’s beautiful, eye of the beholder crap.

because they are brainwashed by marxist indoctrination camps and entertainment programming

The percentage of people who fall for the race mixing propaganda here is so small it hardly exists which is why they push it so hard.

>once you go black you never go back
because no white man want you back.
Nah, you just under impression of propagand, it doesnt work irl.

Because if there are objective standards, there are things you can measure yourself against.

If you can measure yourself against it, then you may find yourself inferior or superior against it.

The normal person is risk-averse and cowardly, so its better to claim there is no game rather than risk finding out/admit you are losing it.

However, this is a fallacy. Only knowledge/truth of your circumstances will allow you to orient yourself toward some semblance of change of your circumstances, for better or worse (but over the long run better) as you remove the detritus of flaws and hammer yourself into a shape worthy or recognition. The former will allow you to feel pleasure in the short term, but you will suffer greatly in the long.

All it is is your time-preference (ant vs grasshopper). Would you rather suffer short-term instability for long-term stability or vice-versa? Many are the latter, and too-few the former.

This works for every "[x] are just as smart/beautiful/successful/capable as [y]" social meme. If they really were, you wouldn't have to keep reminding people.

Kids are really good at figuring this one out.

holy Shit that teeth gap

Attached: overstaying-visa.png (810x456, 81K)

I can't understand yellow fever stricken Westerners for the life of me, Asian girls are weird, soulless, have little to no personality. They hate their own people and worship whiteness. I duno, sure they are feminine but it feels incredibly fake. Nothing like the natural beauty of an Aryan woman.

Attached: 1520964954990.jpg (683x1024, 114K)

Propaganda is very powerful, but it cannot completely subvert the reptilian brain. We are lucky in that nature is on our side - non-whites simply are not attractive. Females are hypergamous by nature, and therefore white females are the group that racemixes the least of all. There is no upgrade for them. There isn't for white males either, but since they aren't as hypergamous they downgrade more readily unfortunately.

Well with regard to pic related, a typical person would be afraid to acknowledge the woman on right is more beautiful than woman on left because (prepare yourself for this tortured logic) they would think that others would think that they are basing their beauty standards on the most dominant trait: skin color.
This is what progressive, post-modernism has done to critical thought. This is why modern art is disgusting. This is why once wholesome and moral things, are not corrupt, perverted, and immoral.
We self-censor ourselves.

>post-modernism
without googling, and in your own words, would you mind defining what Post-modernism is?

Essentially, yes the propaganda is "working", in that a bunch of white females literally belive it's virtuous to racemix - but they are still not attracted to non-whites because they are objectively uglier than whites based on how the human eye interprets facial proportions and phenotype. If nature wasn't on our side, we would be truly fucked, but it is.

As much as you freaks try to push the idea that white women like black men, it's the least true meme on this shitty board.

Majority of white women find black men repulsive, aggressive and dangerous. The only girls who date black men are ones with daddy/childhood issues that should be avoided like the plague.

Human nature is to mate with someone your type, only proving any white woman who would date/fuck a black male has mental deficiencies up the ass.

Because most people are ugly.

Post-modern as in after the modernist movement. The modernist movement was a rejection of the past, the post-modern movement is the destruction of the past through critique and deconstruction both physical and mental

In the post modern world what "your type" constitutes has to do with mundane shit like whether you both like Nintendo and Star wars and watch the same TV series. Race has long since not been an issue. Class has been a major divider between people and their marriage choices but the leftists want to deconstruct that as well and move towards a classless society. But there is evidence that these kind of unnatrual interventions in human behavior is not much succesful since the rich continue to marry the rich and the poor marry the poor. The problem is that the overton window has shifted so much that class is literally the only thing on peopel's minds, they want to preserve their wealth instead of wanting to preserve their race and ensure a future for white children.

>deconstruction
Oh how I hate this word. Translated from psuedo-intellectual, it means, simply put, destruction. That which is beautiful, noble, and pure has no place in this cursed world, yet God keeps planting roses for the trampling.

>objective beauty standards

This is a pretty bad meme desu. Objective means that there are particular metrics that we can measure to determine some ranking or outcome. E=mc^2 is objective because it utilizes known quantities which we can experimentally falsify if it were not true. Beauty can’t ever do this if we even allow for the possibility of variation in human tastes; which we can verify by asking a random group of 100 people whether they prefer Sprite or Mtn dew Ice (ie slight variations in products for no reason other than differences in preference). Specific to beauty, fetishes are sufficient to say “beauty” is really subjective.

What you should argue is that there are nearly universal “tastes” in physical features of beauty. Hip-waist ratios and features of facial symmetry confirm these at the very least exist. As such we can work to determine which features are preferable, and humans can be rated on a scale of who is most “beautiful” to the most people. However, this would never truly express what anybody means when they say beautiful.

Stop using objective like a catch all for “differences definitely exist”. They’re not the same and it’s annoying as shit to read every faggot trying to claim they have the answers

Because beauty is mathematical, and normies don't know shit about mathematics by education's design.

Attached: 3104402.jpg (433x268, 31K)

Why don't you respond to any of the shit I've said cuck? Even the white female lefties who belive it's virtuous to racemix don't do it because they just aren't attracted to non-whites like they are to whites.

1248751
we found the formula to the perfect hairstyle

Obfuscating language doesn't make you seem intelligent, it only make you look like a prat.
Generalizing to communicate a point is perfectly acceptable.

because everything is subjective which is why i love eating my own shit because nobody can tell me its gross if i enjoy it hahahah, rick and morty!

Another example of mathematical beauty

Attached: geometry-in-nature-30301.jpg (880x876, 199K)

You can measure beauty in the sense of facial symmetry, jawline, eye to nose ratio etc.

youtube.com/watch?v=rKhlFic_A5A

European women have an extra advantage because they have visual vibrancy, colorful eyes, colorful hair, rosy cheeks etc. Same reason a picture of an island paradise with white sands and blue skies is more appealing than a muddy swamp on an overcast day. Even in the animal kingdom vibrancy is important trait for reproduction.

We live in a post-factum society.
It means that easy factis, is it in objective things like the balls you have or the behaviour or in numbers like the criminal statistics, or the productivity statistics, they doesn't count.

It count what you feel and not how it is, that is an evolution that will kill the western civilisation and the jews lead it

Not really. My gf has a Masters science degree and is a white woman dating me, a black guy who is also college educated. I agree with , relationships have more to do with class than race. Most people with normal lives and upbringings grow up in multicultural environments and don't give a singular shit about race. Really, your neurotic obsession with colour isn't as widespread as you'd like to believe, but spending 24/7 here might make you think that.

lol take it easy dude, I haven't disagreed with anything you said, apart from the degree with which the propoganda is working. I would argue that we still live in liberal age where people shy away from objective beauty standards and race mixing is OK with most people (just look at polls).

i fully agree

Attached: western vs middle eastern.png (1004x756, 951K)

order does not imply beauty

Persians and Pheonician descended peoples like Lebanese and other Levanties can be attractive, there is no doubt about that.

Again, what they say (polls) is not what they ultimately do. That's why you see rabid leftist white females scream about how virtuous it is to racemix, yet they will have a white boyfriend. In this regard they are "hypocrites", because their ideology couldn't win over their reptilian brain. Even if the concept of race is completely wiped from everybody's minds, most white females would not racemix due to their hypergamous nature.

>green eyes
>middle-eastern
lies

asian girls often do have good personalities and tend to be more traditional (if 1st or 2nd generation), but I agree, you wouldn't to spend your life with one and have kids by her

not even that rare

Attached: DY1JgGhUMAEvCTe.jpg (750x756, 53K)

Oh wow, on a New Years Eve I met a chick that looks exactly like the chick on the right, the only difference is that she has bright green eyes.

And my agrument is that class differences are the main reason why women chose to marry white (since whites tend to be upper class). Women are hypergamous, sure, but that could also mean marrying a wealthy black or Arab to improve their status, it does not necessarily imply that they would stay within their race. In an ideal ethnonationalist society, race would be the be all end all and women will be culturally inclined to put the racial aspect first and class later, and not the other way round.

you all shit-eyed worthless degenerates, havent invented anything, havent produced anything for hundred years.

Order means symmetry, and symmetry has been proven to be connected to beauty in the human brain. It's a matter of evolution, you want to mate with the most symmetrical person.

Thats because shes mostly pre-arab invasion middle eastern I think.

I know a girl who dates a black manlet. She used to hit on me a lot and joke about marrying me. But she is kind of frumpy and out of shape. Now she dates a black manlet. Most of these girls who date blacks just have low self-esteem and do it because they can't get with white guys.

why can't all nigger haters unite then we can fight among ourselves?

You are completely disregarding the looks aspect though. The most base part of their hypergamy that kicks in first is the physical attraction. Looks are far more important than money as long as the male isn't a complete bum. And even then it often wins out.

yeah we're squatting in our shit with african level aids and selling our children over mail to american pedophiles

People know...they're just in active denial thanks to various leftist brainwashing.

OH NO NO NO NO

Attached: 1519608690718.jpg (1198x1837, 733K)

lol, asian men make more on average than white men in the US and CA and white women are mostly repulsed by them.

I find white people more attractive than blacks but you could have found a better picture for the darkie

What is that ugly thing on the right?

It doesn't even have any facial hair.

yeah because arabs are so genetically different than other middle easterners amirite

That's just the difference between the average american and whites

Attached: 1521473313645.png (815x600, 171K)

BASED

Because everything dirty is black.

I live near that school.

Because average people are ugly and facing up to their own ugliness can send them into fits of mania and depression at the same time. Same deal with niggers. If niggers are real then so is white trash. People have a hard time facing up to their own inadequacies. Especially at the tale end of the third generation of easy living for many in the west, such painful truths are all but hate crimes. I don't think our white countries can make it past 2060 without a major race war. Some estimates put the race war at 2030. Time will tell. While you are waiting for more information, try spreading a little truth around. Three phrases will get you off to a great start: White Community Hater, White Self Hater, Anti White. In a sentence: White Community Hating Jews, direct White Self Haters to attack anyone who is not Anti White.

more like robert de nigro

Actually yes.
stepfeed.com/dna-analysis-proves-arabs-aren-t-entirely-arab-4864

i dont even know where this aids statistics comes from. Never encountered anyone with aids in 26 years of my life.

I'm pretty sure there are big differences between all those peoples that mixed after Islam some seem way darker.

Asians have lower sexual dimorphia than whites. Without surgery that is.

Often looks become secondary, we can see how many attractive women are marrying ugly old balding Hollywood Jews. Sure those are just gold diggers but my point is what is to stop a woman from starting a family with a person not of her race, especially if she's been brainwashed from birth that there no objective beauty?

i don't need any convincing

Attached: 8.jpg (960x720, 92K)

>Asian girls are weird, soulless, have little to no personality.
You just described 90% of all women.

>They hate their own people and worship whiteness.
>worship whiteness
It's just such a nice contrast to overweight, aggressive white roasties who hate white males with a passion and are vocal about their anti-white beliefs. I can't understand where the confusion about this would possibly exist.

did you just seriously post a stepfeed clickbait as an argument
i don't even know what to say
>big differences
depends on location
iraqis and saudis are as different as french and Germans
guess why?
geography
now if you can actually locate the middle east on a map you'd know what i mean

Russia is a shithole country and you know it.

I have seen this question posed multiple times on English language writing forums: why do so many authors describe hair and eye color?

Attached: Bong.png (1330x546, 34K)

That's fucking ugly

Because it is in their best interests to pretend otherwise. The communist/socialist/marxist soul hates success cause it make them look at how much they are not working to better themselves.

>posts some 99% plastic surgery bug person

fuck off

>muh colour
>no one cares about it

Then why are right wing ethnonationalist movements sprouting up all over the Western world in response to being inundated with mass migration? Why are white women the least likely contingent of people to racemix? Why is there such a strong push to normalize BMWF in the media and propagandize racemixing in day-to-day life? Why do whites flee when a bunch of you negros start shitting up their neighbourhoods and being funnelled into homogenous communities by the US government?

>fat is beautiful
That is being pushed by lazy fat white women primarily. They want reward without effort.

You clearly didn't read the article, they also link to National Geographic: genographic.nationalgeographic.com/reference-populations-next-gen/

CARLOS!!

Middle Easterners not too infested with DNA from the Arabian peninsula are better looking than ones who are. Europeans are descended from pre-Islamic Middle Eastern farmers. The Arabization of the Middle East really fucked up the region.

It's not, everyone know, they just lie about it.

The only truly objective beauty standard is symmetry, the rest is subjective

>only on the internet
I've seen more swastika tattoos than you. I also won't ever be jailed doing a salute. So good day, sir, take your own advice.

Attached: germanamerican.png (310x163, 3K)

>deconstruction
dismantling brick by brick

>revolution
using explosives

>objective beauty
>objective

you dont know what that means

yeah, but at least i dont need an id to buy a knife or license to watch tv.

the national geographic one is also clickbait
what is this
y-dna haplogroups of n population?
autosomal dna admixture for one person?
fuck could be mitochondrial dna too
>Europeans are descended from pre-Islamic Middle Eastern farmers
only marginally and it's not responsible for European phenotype

I have a fool-proof method to know with absolute certainty whether an asian girl is traditional or not:
If she marries a white man, she is not

wrong.

deconstruction is more like seperation, of an idea or whatever, into it's basic sub-components.

>middle eastern
She is not arab tho. Central Asia was whiter before Muzzes invaded and genocided.

Granted, there may be some mentally demented fuckwit, born in the congo jungle to inmates of an insane asylum, who finds the thing on the left more attractive. But if we took every human on the planet, and asked them to give an attraction score, I think we can say with 100% certainty that the right girl would be more attractive on average. Hence, we can say she is objectively more attractive.

yeah

Attached: varg on all civlilization.png (556x275, 108K)

Just as often you will see an anti-white male article written by an Arab or Indian woman who has a white boyfriend.