Jesus Was a ‘Drag King’ with ‘Queer Desires’ - Holy Cross Theology Professor

Is it true Sup Forums?

Attached: christ.png (656x906, 585K)

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=571vnkdrWC0
youtube.com/watch?v=dW0N0w3Pllc
youtube.com/watch?v=vsg0sCvbw4E
myredditvideos.com/
twitter.com/AnonBabble

>In a remarkable re-reading of the Bible, Professor Liew has argued that Jesus is not only “king of Israel” and “king of the Jews,” but “also a drag king,” as presented in the New Testament Gospel of John.

>Saint John’s constant references to Jesus wanting water, giving water, and leaking water “speak to Jesus’ gender indeterminacy and hence his cross-dressing and other queer desires,” Liew contends.

... This is why we pass around flyers saying Allah is a gay God.

>Reading everything through the lens of gender, Professor Liew finds sex in the most unlikely places in the life of Jesus. The episode of Jesus washing the apostles’ feet at the Last Supper, for example, is “suggestive,” like “a literary striptease,” and “even seductive,” because it “shows and withholds at the same time,” he claims.

>Liew’s sexualization of the sacred Christian texts goes beyond the reinterpretation of actions and extends to gender identity as well. For instance, Liew stated that in his Gospel, Saint John makes very clear that Jesus is a Jew but he is less clear about “whether Jesus is a biological male.”

>In passages that would be considered blasphemous to devout Christians, Liew eroticizes Jesus’ relationship to his disciples and even to God the Father, proposing that “Jesus himself needs others to cum with the Father.”

Damn, I drink water, I must be gay too

>This eroticization can be found in Liew’s interpretation of Christ’s passion and crucifixion as well, which Christians solemnly commemorate during Holy Week.

>“What I am suggesting is that, when Jesus’ body is being penetrated, his thoughts are on his Father. He is, in other words, imagining his passion experience as a (masochistic?) sexual relation with his own Father,” Liew has written.

degeneracy down vote it
youtube.com/watch?v=571vnkdrWC0
youtube.com/watch?v=dW0N0w3Pllc

>theology program aat jesuit run college
well there's your answer

He'll find out soon enough

>jesuit
Yes its true, jesuits are the devils pawns.

No no no that's different the professor said so!

>What makes the heterodox perspectives of Professor Liew all the more scandalous at this Jesuit institution is that they are not reserved for some obscure graduate seminar, but are offered to undergraduates. In his prestigious role as chair of New Testament, Professor Liew often teaches “New Testament,” the College’s primary New Testament class.

>Moreover, the “position and prestige which accompany an endowed chair in Religious Studies testify to the esteem in which his work is held by the College’s administration and academic community,” Ms. Reilly observes. “He continues to be held up as an example and a bold successor to the learned and discerning tradition of our Catholic and Jesuit College of the Holy Cross.”

>Professor Liew was appointed to the endowed Chair of New Testament Studies, a distinguished professorship associated with the Religious Studies department, in 2013, having taught previously at the Pacific School of Theology and Chicago Theological Seminary.

>The College of the Holy Cross, founded in 1843 and located in Worcester, Massachusetts, proclaims that its “Jesuit, Catholic identity has remained a constant” throughout its history, “informing and influencing everything we do.”

The Fenwick Review, which ran Ms. Reilly’s article, is billed as “The Independent Journal of Opinion at the College of the Holy Cross,” and “strives to promote intellectual freedom and progress on campus,” according to its mission statement.

What the fuck is wrong with these people?

The Jesuit Professor Tat-Siong Benny Liew

Attached: tat-siong-benny-liew.jpg (500x500, 98K)

>“Jesus himself needs others to cum with the Father.”

Who hired this person?

Bring back heretic burnings pls

We are almost at the end so it seems. Can't be long now till God ends it all

big G doesnt have a gender, or a sex, or a tailbone, He isnt human at all

Jesus was a human guy at the time, so thats what it is

And catholic pagans have the gall to call Bible believing Christians heretics...

I will pray that this professor learns the learns the virtue of humility.

More speech from this Professor:
youtube.com/watch?v=vsg0sCvbw4E

Attached: pepe-christian.jpg (1024x682, 175K)