9.4

9.4
.
4

>flush with tactical depth

Looks good to me

So much tactical depth they had to list it twice.

why did they write tactical depth

Giving a fuck about IGN
They went full retarded YEARS ago

Those asses are at least 9.4/10, let me tell ya

AHAHAHAHAHAHAHA SHIT GAME CONFIRMED

Damn this game must be tactically deep

buzzword quota

>9.4
LMAO can't even top one man game
at least it's better than battleborn

>some furry's sexual fantasy's gets a 10/10 from IGN
Well that tells a lot about the kinds of fetishes these guys partake in

Fucking rekt
Overshills on suicide watch

Will Overeatcah get more awards than TW3?

How deep are the tactics in this game?

Isn't it just pvp with payload and shit? If you use that term on both, battleborn would be more "tactically deep."

Stay mad

>MP Only
>Getting more than one award

>Kallie Plagge
As to be expected, tumblr creation for tumblr, the intended audience after all, tumblr is basically the synonymous with female.

it's a 7/10 and everyone knows it

fuck blizzard

This review is right you know. We praise Diablo but shit on this but all that changes is perspective.

Really makes you think

No Steam.
No buy.
And nothing of value was lost.

Borderlands 2 was great you neanderthal.

Why is "tactical depth" repeated twice?

as deep as tracer's womb

paid review

activision paid for that score, just like cod.

overwatch is a good game though.

tactical depth in the maps and tactical depth in the team
its retarded but makes sense

>that last comment

Literally why not 10.0? Petition when?

>Being unable to get the game on release day cause some shipping error
>All my steam friends are playing it right now

Never felt so excluded in my life

WELP, TIME TO GO HOME

Its not on steam, dumbfuck

>tactical depth

there is 0 depth in overwatch, don't kid yourself

user is it fun being this mentally challenged?

>tactical depth
>tactical depth twice

I know we throw this word around a lot but this is an actual Valvedrone.

technically any decision at all is "tactical", no matter how pointless

left! right! tactics!

blizzshill pls go

>sparse modes
>9.4

>All my steam friends are playing it right now
you tell me.

>excellent map design

Sup Forums literally on suicide watch. Admit it, Overwatch is great.

I don't trust IGN.

>IGN
>meaningful
wew

That's because they are meaningful and you fags are too arrogant to accept the truth.

Never ever PC-cocks!

wew

Wow, this totally does not stink ofbribed reviewer musk.

>bursting with character
subjective
>versatile skill
objectively wrong
>excellent map design
objectively wrong. In what world is generic plaza with surrounding corridors and ledges "excellent"?
>tactical depth TWICE
Again, objectively wrong.

Also, downsides
>no content
still gets a 9.4 somehow

But Air Ride is mediocre.

I sound paranoid saying this, but i believe there's some sort of anti-Kirby conspiracy at IGN.

None of his games has received a good score. Ever.

Epic comeback.

They gave this fucking game a 10 after it was already a meme.

I'm sure in time people will wonder what the fuck IGN was thinking like Gamespot's review of Chrono Cross.

We need to make a petition!

>excellent map design

HAHAHA THE MAPS ARE LITERALLY TRASH

IGN IS KNOWN FOR PAID REVIEWS

well, i kinda harassed the reviewer on twitter for a while after almost 10 years of that review. does that count?

@mattcasa

it's great, but it isn't worth full price or even the $40 pricetag.

it's a MP game only and plenty MP only games that've come before it and were equally fun got shit on for not having a SP.

I'm enjoying overwatch well enough but the maps are really bad. Theres no real way to get around that.

Maybe it's because none of the Kirby games IGN reviewed are good

WE.
WON.

But they reviewed them all!

and?

>not - absolutely shit art that will draw away most people

I tried this game but damn it's fucking ugly

...

It's a fun game. I like it. That's what I'll say about it.
Scores like these are always so fucking stupid, especially when they get into the 100's (And yes, this is is the 100's, because the faggots use x.y)
Just say if the game is good or bad, fucking hell.

>amazing
>not a-mei-zing

blizz should have put an extra 10k into it

It's also not that fun, which is kind of the point of videogames. Undertale's a 6/10 at best, and that's being extremely generous.

I had typed out a long legit response until I saw, "tactical depth" twice.. Obviously a bait pic.

>9.4
>game gets boring in less than 5 hours
Bravo blizz

I can just watch it on youtube for free instead of paying to watch it on ps4.

Trusting IGN

Teh game might even be good but lets face it IGN doesnt give good reviews anymore, the review is shallow as hell.

Alos they gave 7.5 to this absolutely umplayable piece of shit.

>Excelent map design
>Tactical depth listed twice

I enjoy Overwatch for what it is, it's a fun and simple shooter that fills that urge if you have it but let's not pretend it's more than that. There is verey little lactial depth to the game, it's as casual as it comes.

>I only play at the casual level

it looks like 7.0 garbage but it's better than mkx apparently

It's really not as in-depth as you wish it was.

Oh for sure, MKX is garbage

>Really makes you think
That you're an idiot, yes.

>No Steam.
>No buy.
Never realized shitbirds like you actually exist. How depressing.

And adds the lowest of the low shit tier Gearbox writing and "humor".

Borderlands 1 was fine as an FPS Diablo, minus a few issues. BL2 was a meme ridden agenda pushing mess.

But Diablo had satisfying combat. Borderlands's gunplay is awful.

I actually find that score to be rather accurate, just for different reasons.