What videogames deal with evolution?

What videogames deal with evolution?

Evolution isn't real you liberal faggot

>being a retard

Noah's Ark 3D

Only pretending to be retarded right user

>haha look at this fool reading a book of fake stories
>now read my book that explains life by using rocks, its not fake i swear

>being a retard

EVOLUTION IS SCIENTIFICALLY IMPOSSIBLE.

Evolution is a theory developed one hundred and forty years ago by Charles Darwin (N/A actually, by his grandfather in 1794 - before Charles was even born), before science had the evidence available to prove the theory false.
His famous book, On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection, has a title that is now known to be scientifically false. New species cannot evolve by natural selection. Modern scientific discoveries are proving evolution to be impossible. No new scientific discoveries have been found to support the Theory of Evolution.
Life did not start with a bolt of lightning striking a pond of water as claimed by the main stream scientists.
Kids are taught that life can evolve given enough time. This is a false statement without any scientific support.
They are taught that if given enough time, a monkey at a typewriter could punch keys at random and eventually type President's Abraham Lincoln Gettysburg Address. This is nonsense.
Time does not make impossible things possible. As an example, a computer was programmed in an attempt to arrive at the simple 26-letter alphabet. After 35,000,000,000,000 (35 trillion) attempts it has only arrived at 14 letters correctly.
What are the odds that a simple single cell organism could evolve given the complexity of more than 60,000 proteins of 100 different configurations all in the correct places? Never in eternity! Time does not make impossible things possible.

Go back to r/atheism.

>> explains life by using rocks, its not fake i swear

Can you clarify your retarded argument? I'm not familiar with this "living rocks" hypothesis

>I have no argument but I can will call you names

Pokémon

>implying you had an argument which to even refute in the first place.
>being a retard

where are you copy pasting this from?

The hypothesis is look at these rings in a rock they show how old the earth is

The idea of natural selection sounds great when considering deer. The deer that can sense danger the quickest and run the fastest are able to escape the predator on a more consistent basis. However, other examples on the "evolutionary tree" have many flaws.
One of the best examples of evolution nonsense is the thought that a wingless bird began to evolve a wing. Why this would occur is not answered by evolutionists. The wing stub did not make the bird more adaptable to his environment. The first wing stubs would be much too small for the bird to fly.
Why would a bird evolve wing stubs that are useless? This is backwards from the evolutionary theory of natural selection, which states that birds adapt and change in order to survive better in their environment. The bird with a half-size wing is placed at a disadvantage in its environment.
Why would the bird continue for millions of generations to improve a wing stub that is useless? The Theory of Evolution is based on natural selection of the most adaptable member of a species, not the weakest. A bird with a useless wing is at a severe disadvantage. This is the opposite of natural selection.
According to natural selection, the members of the bird species with the smallest useless wing would be the most adaptable and most likely to survive in the largest numbers. According to the theory of natural selection birds could never evolve to fly.

spore

THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST

>there are people who still believe that there are "people" who believe in creation """"""science""""" on Sup Forums
In before
>muh layers of irony man, it is supposed to be retarded!

Why would scientists lie?

to please satan

>I believe in science, which is just religion with big complex words to make it less magical

Birds aren't the only species that proves the theory of natural selection to be wrong. The problem can be found in all species in one way or another. Take fish for example.
We are told by evolutionists that a fish wiggled out of the sea onto dry land and became a land creature. So let's examine this idea. OK, a fish wiggles out of the sea and onto the land, but he can't breathe air. This could happen. Fish do stupid things at times.
Whales keep swimming up onto the beach where they die. Do you think the whales are trying to expedite a multi-million generation plan to grow legs? That concept is stupid, but let's get back to the fish story.
The gills of the fish are made for extracting oxygen from water, not from air. He chokes and gasps before flipping back into the safety of the water. Why would he do such a stupid thing? This wiggling and choking continues for millions of generation until the fish chokes less and less. His gills evolve into lungs so he can breathe air on dry land, but now he is at risk of drowning in the water.
One day he simply stays out on the land and never goes back into the water. Now he is a lizard, woooow.

There are a few possible solutions.
Either they are incompetent, and unknowingly lie because they aren't as smart as they claim to be, or they are indeed competent, and are plain evil.
I think its a mix of the two, incompetent "retards" as you put it, who are useful idiots, and actually evil men who brainwash our children to move away from God like they did in the USSR, for political globalist reasons.

haha what the fuck is going on in this thread you fucking halfbreed mixed race degenerate ingrates you come to Sup Forums and expect people to take your bait

>/out/

I rented that game and BOB nearly every week when I was a kid.

Lol

wait i have a solution for this

Stop taking the bait idiots

Nice counter arguments to my bird and fish arguments against the evolution THEORY.

not no man's sky

...

I ultimately bought my stores rental copy when they cleared out the SNES games.

I can't believe this thread is actually happening.

...

...

Well good night everybody I hate all of you and honestly hope all of you die and never see past 30

Yeah I'm going back to /r/atheism

Wrong

People have evolved into angels in less than one generation, just with their faith alone.

this cleanup brought to you by the janitor

...

You are trying to mock me, but its biologically impossible for humans to evolve.
The human female like other mammals has XX sex chromosomes, and the male has XY sex chromosomes.

The female egg contains the X-chromosome, and the male sperm contains either an X-chromosome for the reproduction of a female or a Y-chromosome for the reproduction of a male.
The female eggs all develop within the ovaries while she is a baby (fetus) within her mother's womb. Evolutionists claim environmental factors cause small changes in the offspring in the evolutionary chain.
However, the environmental experience of the female cannot change the chromosomes within her eggs and cannot have any effect upon her offspring. Her body cannot go into the eggs contained within her ovaries at her birth to make an intelligent genetic change.
Females cannot be a part of the evolutionary theory for these reasons.

The male sperm are created very differently from the female egg. The sperm are created in the testes of a male on a daily basis. This short time period between the creation of the sperm and conception within the female precludes any possibility that the male can be a part of the evolutionary process.
A harsh winter, or some other environmental condition does not affect the testes in any way that would alter the chromosomes in the sperm. Therefore, the male could not possibly contribute to evolutionary change caused by the environment. This fact applies to humans as well as all other mammals.
There are no ways possible whereby environmental adaptation could occur through the male part of the chromosome. Neither is there any scientific evidence that environmental experiences change the genetic code within the sperm.
Males cannot be a part of the evolutionary process for these reasons.

These scientific FACTS prove evolution of the human species caused by environmental adaptation or any other reason is impossible.

...

Is this fucking bait or are you retarded?

have you seen my baby daughter? She evolved into an angel and flew off

You can evolve (or maybe it's closer to creating a new species) new traits for your population in Aurora that lets them live on planets that would normally be inhospitable.

take a biology class lol. Scientists are not in a combined effort to 'hide' the 'truth' from you.

Where are the arguments, user? Should I wait a million years for your shitposts and insults to evolve into arguments?
I think I'd rather you design some and present them to me, that way we can be sure it will happen.

you alright

You know mutation is caused by radiation or miscopied genes right?

You do realize that sperm changes as the man does correct? That it is affected by both the mans diet, and physical and emotional health, and environment correct?

Semen created when a man was a fat depressed sack of shit is completely different from the semen a man creates when he's a fit happy and active man with a good diet.

Women can tell from look and smell.

pow youre dead

>ur retarded
>take a class lol
>you know that (unproven theory)

How about you make actual ARGUMENTS like I did, point by point, explaining why you think evolution is real?
You won't, because you can't. You are only repeating what you hear in school about evolution, but you don't know how it would work.

>
>No new scientific discoveries have been found to support the Theory of Evolution.
There's new transitional fossils being uncovered frequently that clearly show creatures changing over time.
>Life did not start with a bolt of lightning striking a pond of water as claimed by the main stream scientists.
The abiogenesis hypothesis is not the theory of evolution. You're attacking a completely different field of biology.
>Kids are taught that life can evolve given enough time. This is a false statement without any scientific support.
Nice evidence you got there.
>They are taught that if given enough time, a monkey at a typewriter could punch keys at random and eventually type Gettysburg Address. This is nonsense.
You're right. It is nonsense, and nobody but people who don't understand evolution try to set up these strawman arguments.
>Time does not make impossible things possible. As an example, a computer was programmed in an attempt to arrive at the simple 26-letter alphabet. After 35,000,000,000,000 (35 trillion) attempts it has only arrived at 14 letters correctly.
An event can be so improbable that it may never happen even within billions of years. Your underpants could theoretically dematerialize off your body and reassemble 3 feet to your left, but they probably won't.
>60,000 proteins of 100 different configurations all in the correct places? Never in eternity! Time does not make impossible things possible.
You're incorrectly presuming that the first living cells had a complex genetic code comparable to advanced multi cellular organisms. The amino acids that make up proteins aren't some magical one of a kind molecule that only exist on earth. Amino acids and many other organic compounds have been found floating all throughout deep space and on asteroids and meteors.
These arguments you posted are so asinine, but, to all you other non retarded people, there are people who really do use these stupid arguments. It's sad

...

>The simple 26-letter alphabet
>Uncommon means impossible
>Because certain changes don't seem useful to me, they must not be
>It's just a THEORY

>ITT trolls trolling trolls

Savage

You don't know science better than a scientist. You're wrong. If this actually was an issue you would see shit tons of papers. I bet you think earth is flat too

>Women can tell from look and smell.
You forgot taste.

Lots of games have fantasy settings

>Unproven theory
It's unproven that radiation causes mutation?
>Doesn't even know what a theory is
This better be fucking bait.

>this guy

A game theory?

> religion bothers me because it's oppresive to women and homosexuals
> t. numale

Congratulations on all the (you)s. Here's a free one for the road.

The stubs weren't wings to begin with.
They were arms to catch prey and they developed flaps of skin between torso and the arm to help with gliding or flapping them to help leaping.
Also, one other theory suggests that they were developed as a by-product of sexual display.
Same way as humans prefer women without beard, pre-ancestral birds preferred others of their species with larger "wings".

A GAME THEORY

LINK IS DEAD? NESS DISPROVES EVOLUTION?

...

Lol kill yourself my man. You were probably THAT kid in biology class. No wonder you're so ignorant

>I bet you think earth is flat too

Scientists thought this, your precious scientists aren't so smart

All youre saying is, "these things cant..." and you leave it at that without any explanation why they cant. Youre being an idiot? Just trolling because youre on Sup Forums, right? Its what people on Sup Forums do, i get it. Just let everyone know at the end of the day that you're just an idiot, and that its ok.

Science, dude. Dude, science.
Weed dude, dude weed.

>implying God has more than one planet to deal with

Space does sound like a neat concept, but it seems a bit too grand and complex.

MGSV. It details how humans gained the ability to speak from parasites that lodged themselves in our throats. I wish I could forget this stupid game.

...

Radiation counts on DNA mutation, which is proven to be wrong. The fact is, any attempt by the DNA to change is stopped and reversed.

>www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3433953/
>"Replication also contains built-in error checking. The frequency of errors is about 1 per 100 million bonds (1 x 10-8). Over the entire human genome, that works out to roughly 30 errors every single time the genome replicates.
BUT! There are really only around three errors per replication because of DNA repair. If a repair enzyme finds a mistake, it can fix it, and it can tell which strand is wrong because it can tell which strand is the newly synthesized strand by at the extent of cytosine methylation.
As DNAs exist in cells, many of the cytosines have a methyl group added to them by enzymes called methylases. A new DNA will have relatively few methylated cytosines because it has not been around long enough to have picked up that many methyl groups."
>"Without DNA repair there can be some major problems. Xeroderma pigmentosum is a serious ailment caused by mutations in the gene for DNA repair. People with xp develop many skin tumors and other problems because of the number of errors in their DNA."

Find a new theory.

Theory, in relation to science, explains why things happen, whereas a law does not. It's also been constantly confirmed and forged by using the scientific method

Theories are constantly revised and changed as we learn more about why things happen.

You're confusing scientific theory with something being "theoretical", or not being done/an idea.

...

A scientist came to the conclusion earth was round. Am i being baited?

>Same way as humans prefer women without beard
Talk for yourself, pleb
I like my women with a beard, with muscles, with a penis and with no tits.

They never did, philosophers agreed for centuries that the Earth was round

...

And a scientist will come to a conclusion that evolution is fake

Neither of your genetics get passed down though, so it's irrelevant.

Many already did.

And a priest will come to a conclusion that their religion is a lie.

So what are current scientists missing that you have?

>sperm banks don't exist

...

"Dude science". As opposed to what? "Dude GOD LOL" ? You're honestly retarded. Lol, i've never been dumb founded here before

bias

> ur le virgin
Woman tier argument. Numale confirmed

>lol

The fosil record proves evolution tho, we can even observe it today. Its not something that was pulled out of thin air like the idea of god

What if nu males
Are just evolving into nu females?

Actually what I was saying is that if he has a penis and the "woman" has a penis presumably because he's talking about a tranny, they can't procreate.

Only losers become atheist FACT

Not one attractive person with social skills is a atheist cause his life is going well and doesn't decounce god cause he can't get a girlfriend

Wow fucking epic my dood

I think you severely under-interpreted what he was saying

>he
Baseless assumptions

>spore
Why is this the only result for this.