So I've recently started my playthrough of The Witcher 3. I'm currently level 12 and my main quest as at the point where I'm talking to a bunch of woman in Novigrad to find Dandelion. I'm doing a bunch of sidequests though and I'm at the point where I'm one shotting almost every human. Am I playing the game wrong? Should I focus on the main quest first and then focus on the side quests? I have the tendency to completely finish an area before I move on.
The Witcher 3
Other urls found in this thread:
kotaku.com.au
twitter.com
Raise difficulty fag
All that does is add HP I heard. And I'm wondering how other people play this game? Is there a certain route of doing things?
the main quest is shit
>Start Witcher 3
>Sword on back
>Uninstall
How hard is it you fucking euro shits?
You have a few options, raise difficulty and trigger the option in the gameplay menu to upscale lower level enemies to your level
Do the lowest leveled quest you can, if you're interested in it. Raise the difficulty if you need to, try to not abuse of some of the signs, dress aesteticly instead of only looking at stats, etc.
There are tons ow ways to make the game harder
Think the option is called "upscale enemies"
It doesn't tamper with higher level enemies but it upscales lower level enemies to your level.
If you feel it's still too easy get a mod or something to raise difficulty
>Should I focus on the main quest first and then focus on the side quests
Definitely no. If you finish a side quest a couple levels beneath yours you get 1 XP and jackshit rewards. Just raise difficulty and alternate between main quests and side quests. The side quests are surprisingly interesting in this game, you'd miss out if you ignored them completely.
Why are you so triggered ? That's how you'd wear it if you had to avoid slowing you movements by removing some weight from your waist.
The dev even animated Geralt pushing the hilt up to remove or put in his swords.
Didn't know I could upscale lower level enemies, that's pretty cool. I guess that should resolve most of my issues.
When I read that upscaling doesn't affect rewards for killing mobs I instantly dropped it. I don't want to be stuck for 15 minutes killing 100 wolves while passing through a low-level area just to get to a questmark.
Actually if you looked at the animations his sword clips through the scabbard every time he pulls it out or puts it away so don't pretend like you were paying attention to details when you missed something so fucking glaring.
There is now fucking way you can draw a sword of that length from the back, even a shorter sword would be somewhat uncomfortable.
raisng hp is a pretty goold solution to "one shotting almost every human".
however, no, it does not do just that
Put it on death march you nigger
And how about you play the game however you want to instead of asking this retarded board?
>things have too little hp!
>>add to their hp
>more bitching
nigger
theres always some nerd (you) playing pretend on the internet
>muh sword knowledge!!
>thats now how they did it i know!
kill yourself
>not playing on deathmarch
>asking Sup Forumsirgins to tell you how to play
kys
Nice rebuttal. But I'm not even talking exclusively about swords, I'm talking about physics. Even the game acknowledges that it's not possible because it can't complete the animation without clipping, which makes it even more confusing why they didn't put the sword at his hip or something since they were obviously going for a believable world in many other ways. But if you've got some evidence that it is physically possible then go ahead and show me.
>sperging out over clipping in a slav game
weew
its to show that they dont want to harm anyone because everyone is afraid of witchers
I know its stupid but thats how it is in the books
You're supposed to play the game on easy.
kotaku.com.au
Interesting.
Technically it's possible if you pull out the sword a little bit and then grab the blade with your glove and pull it out all the way. They didn't do it because the animation would take forever and be annoying everytime. Witchers canonically carry their swords on their backs and people in-world often comment on it so it wouldn't make sense for him to have it by his hip.
>linking kotaku
iirc thats how you sheath the sword in witcher 1
he grabs the blade and let it slide in
You cant carry two swords at your sides, therefore you carry them on your back. Due to superhuman speed and agility witcher can draw them easily.
Fun fact: now even arrows were carried on back. Medieval pictures depict arrows with arrows at their side.