Your dream game is being siphoned out of your head with a special technology and being developed with an infinite...

your dream game is being siphoned out of your head with a special technology and being developed with an infinite budget just for you

the only caveat is you must pick one of these game devs to lead the project

Molyneux.

I choose...Based Todd!

Sean pls make an MMO

I feel like, if given enough time, Moleyneux would actually develop a really fucking awesome game.

His problems were budget constraints and deadlines. With none of those issues, Peter could actually create the GOTYAY and all of those "YOU COULD DO ANYTHING" memes would have actually been true

>me: hey sean, it's so awesome that my game is coming to life
>me: i mean, i always wanted to be able to do this feature
>me: it's going to be so awesome right?
>sean: heh, yeah
>sean: the only thing is the game is going to be so massive that you will probably never get to do that thing that should be easy to do no matter how big the game is
Man, can wait for my dream game to be released.

I kinda feel bad for Molyneux. He only exaggerated stuff for one game, and that was only really because he was super ambitious about it, and didn't really think about his budgetary and technological limits. He stopped after Fable 1, so he hasn't been constantly exaggerating shit like Todd, and I'm pretty sure neither Todd nor Molyneux have outright lied about a feature thise close to release like Sean seem to have.

...

Where mgsv kojimbo

And it would have been released in fall of 2058.

Why Todd is here? Hasn't he made 4 blockbuster games that all won consecutive GOTY awards?

Molyneux, he's not bad compared to the other 2. Also what fable is the best one?

Obviously Molyneux is the perfect choice- given enough time and money he could make all of his YOU CAN DO ANYTHING ideas come true

1>2>3

2 would have been better than 1 if there were actual boss battles and the hereos guild wasn't destroyed for no fucking reason

Given enough time and money I could do that too fuckface
Efficiency, claims, and actual result are why these people suck

implying your NEET ass could do anything

As much as awards should equal quality, they don't.
As an example, Skyrim has a fuckload of awards despite being one of the worst Elder Scrolls games, probably only better than Arena and the shitty spin-offs.

Didn't play fable 2. So, my answer would be fable lost chapters/anniversary.

Given 1000 years and a quintillion dollars I could

placing Sean in the same category as Todd and Molyneux is an atrocity.

Molyneux was responsible for many fantastic games (dungeon keeper) and Todd at least made some mediocre ones. Sean is just a barefooted liar responsible for Minecraft ultra-light in procedural space.

Todd probably has a better team and seems like he'd be down with incorporating all the fetishes this mind reader technology is telling him to put in the game.

Peter Molyneux any day

I'm sure a NEET could make a better game than Molyneux with similar time and budget.

I'll try out 1 then, I played 2 and I picked the love ending, also I don't like it when dogs die.

But they do. Just last year Witcher won goty.

Skyrim maybe inferior to it's predecessor but it was one of the best games released in 2011.

just make sure you play TLC.

but also make sure you watch some footage of the original so you can hear the original jack of blades voice.

jack of blades sounds like a fucking faggot in TLC. they changed his voice for no reason

>jack of blades sounds like a fucking faggot
>implying he is actually not

They absolutely fucking don't. You don't think the bandwagon factor and blind brand loyalty have anything to do with how those awards go down?

Dark Souls, Bastion and Catherine all came out the same year, and were all leagues ahead of Skyrim in terms of quality, but none got even close to the amount of awards Skyrim got.

>Bastion and Catherine

l o l

Oh ok, thanks user.

Sean is the least worst of them all, easily.

>porn RPG made by Molyneux
>You can do anything. Literally.
Might be cool.

Peter is a proven liar and a financially incompetent hack who drove both Bullfrog and Lionhead into the ground thanks to his terrible decisions and poor management

Sean is a literal nobody

Todd is the best option out of those three

>not posting the full image

My dream game is a better version of no man's sky with multiplayer and more shit to do on the planet's and less fucking sentinels, they just kill the feeling of being on an unexplored world

i'd fucking shoot myself in the head so that they can't ruin it

>still no kojumbo

it also makes literally no logical and logistical sense

>shoot a ship completely alone in empty space
>sentinels come out of fucking NOWHERE at WARP SPEED and INSTANTLY wreck you

doesn't need to be

le anything man without a doubt

I feel like Todd could make a good game if they stopped using that fucking dated Gamebryo engine.

Deserves to be after the MGSV fiasco

Pete actually made 1 good game, fable 1.
Todd did oblivion and I loved it, although I was quite younger at the time which was 10 years ago but still I think it's a good game for what it was.

And the middle fuck has only done NMS I think and that was garbage.

So there.
Either one of the first two.

Peter was barely responsible for the first Fable

Really?
Well then I don't know.
Pitch it to the fable 1's lionhead studio cast.
They can scrape something decent I bet.

Tod probably won't deliver on the gameplay but tes4 atmosphere was slick as fuck.

Just because what you think is better is not universally better user. Are you underage or something?

>not posting the real image

It's impossible to make this decision without first purchasing the latest releases by these developers.

It's an easy choice.
Todd lies about individual minor features or technical capabilities of the game engine, not the whole scale of the game or major features. He also doesn't lead projects based around gimmicks.
He's also a very capable and experienced project manager, so I trust him to actually get the thing done. I would just need him to completely understand what I'm going for with the project.

>a hack
>a literal nobody shitter
>a marketer
uhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh

I can't hate Todd, despite him working for the Devil.
Mr. Hines, on the other hand...

All of this.

Not an argument.

?????

Todd is a manlet. I would impose myself on him and force him to comply to all my specifications or I'll beat him up.

what's wrong with Will Wright?

It's punished Wright.

I'll pick todd as my master any day, any time, anywhere.

You're welcome.

>His problems were budget constraints and deadlines
what makes you think that? Usually it's the other way around, a team is given way too much freedom and when the limit is the sky you usually don't get anywhere. Contrast this with something like Majora's mask where they had 1 year alloacted dev time, and yet they zeroed in on an innovative mechanic they had and then just made the scope of the idea fit that time window in which they'd have to complete it.

t. butthurt pledger of the godus kickstarter and witness of its successive downfall ending in Konrad's face of disapproval and his inevitable leeching of what was left of the money to sustain himself for a few months before saying fuck it.

Toddbros are always right

...

This. OP is a faggot who can't differentiate memes from the vast difference in the final product these devs churn out

>Peter M
All of the features are scaled down in scope, but are still present.
>Sean M
One major advertised feature isn't present in the final game.
>Todd H
A series of advertised minor features are not in the released game.

Who do you choose, and what features do you want affected?

Molyneux at least seems to actually care about the game and just severely overshoots what he wants to happen.

Todd is a sack of lies but his games do have a modicum of fun.

I (almost) sort of feel bad for Sean, since he wanted to do the smart thing and scrap the game, but it was already shown off at E3 and they felt they had to push through.

AGI, INT or CHR?

>INT

Switch AGI and INT

Remember the time Molyneux accidentally posted his phone number on twitter? Remember how everyone actually wrote him positive messages?

Molyneux, he's a lying fuccboi but I like the shit he's made.

I pick the liar without shoes

Where's Chris Roberts?

Todd is the only guy there who's kinda respectable. So Todd.

About that user... There's this game called Godus you might want to know about...

Molyneux is a piece of fuck.

nah i just rather kill my self

fuck you OP and your Bullshit Contrived Scenario

Its either Sawyer or bust

yes

>portal 2
>dark souls
>bastion

He has an actual plan and is making his dream reality. He also hasn't been lying like Todd or Sean

bravo

Sean. He's like indie enough to be cool about it and he knows what to do. Todd's just going to make another abortion in gamebryo and Molyneux will take the money and run.

todd howard
>fallout 4 was a solid 9.5

>He has an actual plan and is making his dream reality.

It's too bad that his plan will take another 20 years to complete, if that.

>ashamed of words and deeds

The only right answer.

>He only exaggerated stuff for one game
>He stopped after Fable 1
You are precious, user. Don't ever let anyone tell you are not.

It would be even funnier if it were true.

I feel like Molyneux would care most about making a great game and less about hitting targets or pandering to demographics

I know

Where's Tim Schafer?

I choose Todd because I like him

Wait, since when did Peter Garrett make vidya?

Remember Milo

Peter
I feel like with infinite budget, he could do it
His problem is he always overestimates what he can do

Nice

Molydeux. His limitations have always been budget + time. With an infinite budget he'd be capable of everything.

Give Peter a decent team and an infinite budget, and I'm sure that he could create something great when given enough time.

Then again, my dream game would more or less be Morrowind 2.0, so Todd probably would be the best bet if my vision disallowed him taking the casual route.

Todd. He only over-exaggerates content that already exists. He's a marketer, plain and simple.

Molyneux and Sean are both idea guys who funnel precious money and time into trying to implement features that are far beyond their talents and then having to backpedal on it all later. They're dangerous because they actually start off believing their own lies.

Tod, for better or worse he does get a game out which has some stuff going on

Molyneux just shits a load of ideas out and then others have to pick up the pieces and make a real game out of it

Sean took 5 years to make a bog standard survival game with less features than most early access ones

He doesn't though. He spews neat concepts like the tree will grow over your life but that doesn't make a good game.

At best you'd get a very meh game with a decent amount of technology