BLUNDER.
BLUNDER
Nice photoshop
BAIT
Fake and also
>buying Uplay games on steam
Ishygddt
why would you do this
why resort to fake facts instead of constructively giving your opin you know what never mind
>Expecting serious posts on Sup Forums
It's the shit posting board, everyone shits on everything or shills everything to trigger someone else
if you want a real discussion
Still outsold Nioh three times over
Yeah, I got my key on gmg for ~44 bucks. Oh noes, I can't review it on Steam.
I like the game but Orochi piss me off and every 4v4 having at least 2 makes it hard to come off my tilt.
I don't care about reviews just any Uplay game on steam just requires Uplay and steam open at the same time and is pointless
I hate 4v4 because no honor fags fighting 3 on 1
1v1 and 2v2 against non salty fags is fun usually 1v1 the same guy for like 10 games if he's not a prick
>playing uplay games at all
This.
I thought you fucks knew better.
99%of the shit they put out is awful but they do make a good game here and there, ie chaos theory, far cry 3
>far cry 3
Bought Siege and i regret it.
Very fun game but dealing with Uplay issues and just the online service in general is not worth it.
It's like they want their games to flop
Seriously? The steam version launches Uplay?
>60€
I could buy a Korean girl for that price
Yeah. Trackmania, The Crew, and For Honor do this. What's worse is some games if you buy them on Steam and try to run them from Uplay, it will boot up Steam and then try to run it from Uplay again which can lead to errors and shit.
...
Game has 100ms minimum latency, in an ideal situation (
and yet here you are on Sup Forums anyway
>no tits
>no ass
>ugly fake face
yawn
1. DFC is the patyrician choice
2. only niggers care about ass
3. I didn't say a high quality one
well yes because I'm a cheap motherfucker
>i-it's bait you guys!
>our new game For Honor™® performs quite well!
Yeah okay ubishill
>Likes 1(one) Ubisoft game
Shill
and who dares to pretend ubishit doesn't actively shill there?
Im trying to get my digital refunded on xbox one, anyone know how to do this?
too cheap to lose your virginity?
where do you think you are, Reddit MacRedditson ?
The open beta must have shown everybody the lack of mechanical depth For Honor has to offer in its core aspect, the combat while also having very little content. Micro transactions in a 70$ game, a dumb moba game mode and P2P connections...
Hilarious that people bought this, I can only laugh in the face of such utter stupidity. There are the ones who realize who stupid they are and those who happily eat feces, both are hilarious.
Hard kek
>blunder after blunder
>increasingly worse quality in games
>having to churn out FotM games
And yet people will still defend ubisoft.
...
>/vg/ if you want a real discussion
...
underrated
>/vg/ if you want real discussion
epic bait
>99% of Ubisoft is shit but X is actually good!
Every fucking Ubisoft thread, you could at least try.
>Let's make a game with realistic medieval combat!
>Oh I have an idea! Let's put a shitton of UI overlay on fucking everything, that'll go well with the medieval setting!
>Let's make a game set in the medieval era!
> Let's add niggers and female warriors, that'll go well with the setting!
no one is doing that in this thread
People actually buy and refund a game just to shitpost. Amazing
Where exacly is said that the game is set to be realistic?
i feel like refunding but don't down what to replace it with. what do you guys think refund or keep
>2017 playing a ubi game
>Medieval era was white :DDDD
I hate that meme
you didn't complain when mountain blade did it
>2017
>Implying anyone gives a fuck about what you think before playing a game
Everyone is so salty, grow up and learn to take a loss!
>doesn't appreciate Chaos Theory
Fucking nu-Sup Forums, this is getting out of control.
In the fucking description.
Everyone starts white unless you change their skin colour, and you can change the gender of 90% of the characters
WE
believable=/=realistic
>user doesn't understand words, the post
There's nothing believable about a tribe of nigger samurais or a woman swinging a sword bigger than her around.
exactly, all you cucks can do is spam memes when confronted with any argument
I don't believe women can fight on par with men. So it's not even believable.
Black people didn't exist until the 1800's fyi
>believable
>autistic beliefs
not the same thing user, not everyone is afraid of women
and yet Sup Forums praises mount and blade
k
I actually own the physical version that doesn't require Uplay, we were discussing Uplay if you aren't aware yet.
Come back during the non-yuro hours.
> Having a sense of reality is autistic.
K.
If they were a bunch of savages swinging a bone I wouldn't take offence.
You are a blunder
what's wrong with mount and blade in that regard?
Explain yourself
What's there to explain? Americans invented black people to do their work for them so they didn't have to
Said the retard.
blacks and women everywhere in a setting based on medieval europe
But that's the thing, a woman on a battlefield is nothing to be afraid of.
So how is the singleplayer campaign in this game?
This. You're all retards if you even have this installed
Wait, samurais are black?
He said just before she cut his head off.
>blacks
there's not a single black npc i can think of
>women
and of the hundreds of female npcs in game, about 3 or 4 participate in combat, 2 or 3 of those are at the player's discretion, the other is a queen.
>I don't like it so neither should you: the post
It's a tutorial/prequel to the multiplayer with some cool events and bosses.
kinda short (2 hours?) but really fun
You can defend this garbage game but the fact that you have female knights is retarded. Women can't even compete with men in soccer but this is supposed to be believable?
>2 hours campaign
lmfao
what happened to games? every single one is fucking dog shit nowadays
You're free to love ubisoft games I'm just pointing out that you're an imbecile if you do. Uplay is objectively terrible
one of the companions is black
>and of the hundreds of female npcs in game, about 3 or 4 participate in combat
out of the hundreds of npcs in game only a handful participate in combat
and that's only if you ignore peasants
...
>prequel to the multiplayer
How does that even work? I thought the multiplayer was just constant battles with no story or anything.
>getting this mad because we can have female characters
wew lad, really makes you think about what kind of people post in Sup Forums
What is it about this game that triggers shitposters so hard?
>short
>shit
If you think both are the same you're a fucking retard
>Viking Age.
>Medieval.
>Existing with dudes that wore full jousting plate.
Born retarded.
underage detected
>but the fact that you have female knights is retarded. Women can't even compete with men in soccer but this is supposed to be believable?
you could say the same thing about manlet knights and yet we know that many knights were manlets
most games aren't believable or realistic you autist
played the beta for 14 hours, enjoyed it, preordered, game comes out, I'm the only one who bought it, not fun without friend / friends, back to bf1
?
You can't change your height in the game.
So, yes, it's believable that there aren't manlet knights in the game.
Long story short at the start of the campaign theres a truce between the three kingdoms at the end of the campaign a psycho bitch manages to manipulate events in order to start an endless war aka the multiplayer component
But this one claims to be.
>Enjoying short games is the same as being underage
wew
Main villain, Apollyon, gets defeated by the emperors champion, Orochi, in the end. However, the Knights, Vikings, and Samurai are already completely fucked because of Apollyon's shit. Vikings chimp out and start another war in the endless cycle. Multiplayer is just fighting that war created by Apollyon.
He didn't said in game you autist