Will it happen?

Will it happen?

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=QkpR4pZhS84
twitter.com/AnonBabble

no way

Who cares? We all already played those.

>playing the definitive worst edition of souls
I would be embarrassed.

I haven't. :(

fag

Yes. Because companies already complain about the cartridge prices, so it's only natural they'd do a whole collection on a gigantic one so they make about 50 cent after producing them.

I hope we get the option to choose which ones we get so everyone with good taste only gets Dark Souls 1 and 3.

>good taste
>Dark Souls 3

To be honest I don't think there is much crossover between the kind of people who play Souls and the kind of people who would purchase a Switch.

It's probably not worth their time

>We

stop it.

What are you smoking? Of course there is. Souls games aren't even that core anymore desu, hasn't been since demon souls.

Dudebros buy that shit.

Nope, not only is the Switch too weak for DSIII but the games aren't fit for handheld gameplay

We.

They are a partner though. So they're making at least ONE game for the Switch.

why not? i think they would be fine on a big handheld

It could, we know FromSoft is making something for the Switch. We just don't know what.

>Sup Forums as we
go with your echo chambers websites to another place

Really? Most dudebro normies I talk to wont touch the games because of their reputation.

They really are a far cry from something like TES, even if a lot of people on here would group those games together.

Are you implying it isn't? Because it's easily the highest quality game of the series (specific issues with poise and the narrative notwithstanding).

I'm the kind of person who plays these games mostly for the bosses, and once you get past the Undead Settlement pretty much every boss in DaS3 is fucking great compared to every other game in the series.

>Really? Most dudebro normies I talk to wont touch the games because of their reputation.


Nope, they buy that shit. It's gone mainstream.

You better hope not, From can't optimize for shit, they'll probably run 8fps on Switch

>literally hasn't played any Souls games
The series is practically normie-core at this point, what the fuck are you doing? Would it being released on Switch really be the turning point of you playing the series?

>local co-op and PvP
Why not?

I haven't

Yes.

>Would it being released on Switch really be the turning point of you playing the series?

>PortableSouls

yes, it would be. I'd buy it again.

That's not how it works retardo.

>it gets ported, all dlc for all games included
>soapstone messages link to Miiverse
>additional Switch exclusive challenges/bosses for each game
>Nintendo themed weapons and armor
>amiibo support is an custom summon that learns and you can deck out in gear and have fight other spirits

NEVER EVER

The Switch has no power to run it

No, you're gonna get your Lost Kingdoms reboot and you're gonna like it!

If xbox360 can, the switch can too

I feel like we're talking about two separate groups of people. Of course average gamers, (like the kind that would buy a PS4 and play TLoU and Uncharted) are all over the series.

I'm talking about people even more casual than that. Like females, younger children, and people in their 30s. The audience for the Switch.

>any souls game on switch with Nintendo's crappy servers

yeah have fun getting backstabbed a million times before you even know it.

The Switch is a fucking tablet

>Like females, younger children, and people in their 30s. The audience for the Switch.


You're so out of touch if you really believe that. I work at EB and I can tell you from experience I've seen many dudebros, autists, core gamers buy the switch.

>(like the kind that would buy a PS4 and play TLoU and Uncharted) are all over the series.


Bloodborne sold like shit. PS4 owners are buying souls games, they're even more casual.

True, I will.

The 360 didn't run 3.

Yes, look this trailer, Dark Souls for Nintendo Switch:
youtube.com/watch?v=QkpR4pZhS84

>Bloodborne sold like shit
[citation needed]

I bought the entire console for the game and know multiple other people who did the same. There's no way it sold under 2 million.

You guys are gonna call me crazy but hear me out.

What if From Software made a new game for the Switch?

I hope so

I'll buy a switch the next day

That pic us the cringiest thing I've seen in a long time
>look how much I hate reddit guys, do I fit in yet?

A tablet thats as powerful as a xbone

Cancer

scifi souls on the switch. I could get down with that.

Won't happen cartridge isn't big enough for all of those games.

If Nintendo put an X2 in the Switch it could probably handle DaS3

But no, they had to cheap out

that pic have more years than you newfag

Soul Sacrifice Delta?

>Dark Souls 1996
That's literally King's Field. What kind of a faggot do you have to be to link that video

>What is optimization and compression?

Would be cool if there was some bonus bowser boss or master sword/ hylian shield items. From soft are apparently Nintendo fans but I doubt it would be able to run that well. Maybe on nintendos NEXT console when it would be an appropriate time for from soft to release a trilogy collection anyway

Luigi's mansion 2 sold over five million. A 3% attach rate is abysmal, PS4 owners are casuals who don't give a shit about Souls games.

Kings Field is a good game

forget about switch
i really really really would like a full remake of ds 1 and 2 in 3s engine

>From Software
>optimization
mmmmm funny joke

You're right, but just barely. All three Souls games combined is about 40 GB, while the maximum a Switch cartridge can hold is 32. If they wanted to do a collection like this, they'd have to either wait 1 or 2 years when better capacity inevitably becomes available, or else just package it with two cards.

Bloodborne isn't even on the top 50 best selling PS4 games of all time.

In fact, there are only 3 first party tittles that made it on that list. PS4 owners are casual trash that only buy multiplatform games.

Looooool

Ps4 is a fucking Chad box dude.

It's too 15 selling games has 3 FIFAs and 3 call of duties.

Its not Sup Forums's fault you missed the genre and platform defining series you faggoty fucks.

I've played DS 1 and DS 3, skipped 2 because you autists said it was shit. Would gladly buy the trilogy to have a portable version.

Not if you include DLCs, it's more like 50gb

Any day now right, my fellow Nintenbros?

But it isn't you fucking shill

The game was published after 2009 on a non Nintendo machine so no. Switch isn't powerful enough

Why fans think that Nintendo Switch can handle everything?

haha

I included all DaS2 DLCs (not SotFS edition) but not DaS3's since I don't have them. Don't tell me they're 5 GB a pop, I heard they're short as fuck.

switch won't be able to run dark souls 3 for sure
and there is no point to release just first 2 in 2017

>skipped 2 because you autists said it was shit.

>Listening to Sup Forums.

But it is tho

Post specs please.

Yes it is. There will be some possible minor downgrades for DaS3, but it's perfectly capable. See the Digital Foundry Lego City Undercover comparison. I don't give a shit about that game, but I was surprised to see how it ran on the Switch.

Then again, this is From Software. Optimization isn't their best skill.

Would the online features of a dark souls game negatively switch's battery life in handheld mode?

>Yes it is
No it isn't

It ISN'T you fucking shill. You pee poo 2 toy tablet has only 0.39 teraflops while xbone has 1.3 teraflops

It is though, it would obviously need be downgraded a bit though. But it can run it.

Lego city is pii u game you moron, darks souls 3 has problems on ps4

>Can run it
>need be downgraded
Then it can't fucking run it. It can run a different version but it can't run it

>pee poo
wat?
is this a new reddit thing?

........

The PS4 version is a downgrade from the PC... guess the PS4 can't run it either.

Actual retard logic.

it's more like x360
maybe slightly better

>Muh teraflops!

>Pretending like you even know what the fuck that means

Your previous toy of shilling drone, which now you are throwing under the bus after shitch release

You're moving goal posts at that point. Switch is running the PS4 versions for both lego city undercover and snake pass, like straight ports. But there are some minor changes made.

The Switch doesn't support Miiverse, though.

This is like saying ps4/xbone can't run dark souls because its not the pc version. What a fucking tard.

B-but everything is wrong and nintendo is the best!!!!!11

>maybe slightly better


Stop with the disinfo. The Switch is stronger than a 360.

THIS NUMBER IS BIGGER SO IT CANT HAVE A GAME!!!1!1

Correct the PS4 version cannot run the PC version

They are different versions

>Running lego city
not exactly a testament to hardware
>But there are some changes
because the switch can't handle too many particle effects because it's under powered shit

No it's correct different versions exist for a reason. PC is far more capable and has much more ability than PS4 XBONE

>can't even do a proper rebuttal.

embarrassing.

They will probably make it compatible in the future with splatoon 2. They also made the 3DS compatible.

>>Running lego city
>not exactly a testament to hardware
>>But there are some changes
>because the switch can't handle too many particle effects because it's under powered shit


The point is that it's not running a port of the wiiu version but a port of the ps4 version. it's not underpowered when you take that into consideration.

>It's not under powered
>Needs to be downgraded

That's like saying there's no difference between console and PC versions

a better question is why would FROM go to the trouble to get all 3 games running on Switch and then just abandon work on it? I mean portable Dark Souls would be huge